On Sep 1, 2011, at 5:33 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: >> The P4080 silicon device tree was using PowerPC,4080 while the other >> e500mc based SoCs used PowerPC,e500mc. Use the core name to be >> consistent going forward. > > Shouldn't we change the nodes for all e500 based device trees in one > shot, instead of just the P4080?
I changed all the e500mc class to match what is used by everyone else. The e500v1/e500v2 are use the same convention at this time so figured a separate patch can handle them. - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
