> Check the clock-frequency of the CPM BRG node. If u-boot isn't setting the
> memory, it's probably not setting this either.
I set the CPM BRG "clock-frequency = <153609>" (value obtained from
u-boot's 'brginfo' command), set my CPU "clock-frequency =
<1>" (down from 13000) to match
Hi,
I benchmarked performance of my network, which contains ppc405EX (Kilauea
board, kernel 2.6.30 from Denx) connected with a linux desktop via gigabit
ethernet. I used the netperf tool:
netperf -t UDP_STREAM -H 192.168.1.1 -- -m 32768
So I was sending UDP packets to the desktop. The resulting
> I'll still try to figure out how to get u-boot to fill all this in.
Got it... thanks to
"http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot-us...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg05111.html";
I made sure that CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT and CONFIG_OF_BOARD_SETUP were both
present in "u-boot-2009.03/include/configs/EP88x.h". Then
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 20:50 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 10:24 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 18:34 -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > Which suggested that the problem was the new
> > > CONFIG_PPC_OF_BOOT_TRAMPOLINE
> > > symbol wasn't set, a
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:59 AM, Mark
Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:26:12PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>
>> Does your touchscreen driver use this mutex? Or was this mutex needed
>> just for the AC97 driver?
>
> It's in the register accesses so everything accessing the chip registers
> will
This patch enables the XMC (PCIe daughter card) site on the SBC310.
STG enter the description for the patch above.
Signed-off-by: Martyn Welch
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/gef_sbc310.dts | 37 ++
1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Wolfram, do you have any way to test the on the Phytec hardware? The
WM9712 on the baseboard supports a touchscreen, is it brought out to a
header?
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 05:42:21PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> From: Grant Li
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:42:06AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Wolfram, do you have any way to test the on the Phytec hardware? The
> WM9712 on the baseboard supports a touchscreen, is it brought out to a
> header?
You can probably test adequately by writing a dummy AC97 driver that
sits in a threa
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>> +
>>> + /* Force clear the data valid bit */
>>> + in_be32(&psc_dma->psc_regs->ac97_data);
>>> +
>>
>> No mutex involved here. I think this is either a separate patch or it need
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Grant Likely
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
+
+ /* Force clear the data valid bit */
+ in_be32(&psc_dma->psc_regs->ac97_data);
+
>>>
>>> No mutex in
On Jun 30, 2009, at 2:03 AM, Felix Radensky wrote:
Hi,
Is USB host functionality supported by mainline kernel on MPC8536DS ?
Are there any limitations (e.g not all host ports supported, etc.) ?
It should be. If you have any issues let us know and we can see if we
can help out.
- k
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> +
>> + /* Force clear the data valid bit */
>> + in_be32(&psc_dma->psc_regs->ac97_data);
>> +
>
> No mutex involved here. I think this is either a seperate patch or it needs at
> least to be mentioned in the patch description.
Oops,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Frank
Prepelica wrote:
>> What kernel version are you using?
>
> We are using kernel version 2.6.24. I've searched for "current speed" in
> version 2.6.28.7 and I've found that string.
>
>> Yes, you need to modify the DTB. You have a back to back MII
>> connection
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> From: Grant Likely
>
> Current implementation of spin_event_timeout can be interrupted by an
> IRQ or context switch after testing the condition, but before checking
> the timeout. This can cause the loop to report a timeout when the
> condit
/proc/cpuinfo should be showing the boards revision and the revision of the
FPGA fitted. The functions currently used to access this information as
incorrect.
Additionally the VME geographical address of the PPC9A and it's status as
system contoller are available in the board registers. Show th
Hi,
Preemption is disabled on the vast majority of powerpc
targets. Are there any known problems in this area ?
I'd like to enable CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY on
AMCC 405EX target, to increase application responsiveness.
Is it a bad idea ?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Pre
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 10:24 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 18:34 -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > Which suggested that the problem was the new CONFIG_PPC_OF_BOOT_TRAMPOLINE
> > symbol wasn't set, and once I switched that on it started working again.
>
> What defconfig are you
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 10:57 +0530, kernel mailz wrote:
> Hi Scott,
> I agree with you, kind of understand that it is required.
> But buddy unless you see some construct work or by adding the
> construct a visible difference is there, the concept is just piece of
> theory.
In this case you'd rather
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 16:57 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> kernel mailz wrote:
>
> > asm("sync");
>
> Isn't gcc free to discard this as it has no dependencies, no indicated side
> effects, and isn't required to be kept? I think this should probably be:
>
> asm volatile("sync");
It should
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 18:34 -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
>
> Which suggested that the problem was the new
> CONFIG_PPC_OF_BOOT_TRAMPOLINE
> symbol wasn't set, and once I switched that on it started working
> again.
Ah, I might have forgot to set it to default y...
> > linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
kernel mailz writes:
> Consider atomic_add and atomic_add_return in kernel code.
> I am not able to figure out why "memory" is added in latter
The "memory" indicates that gcc should not reorder accesses to memory
from one side of the asm to the other. The reason for putting it on
the atomic ops
kernel mailz wrote:
> Consider atomic_add and atomic_add_return in kernel code.
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:59 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> kernel mailz writes:
>>
>>> I tried a small example
>>>
>>> int *p = 0x1000;
>>> int a = *p;
>>> asm("sync":::"memory");
>>> a = *p;
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>>
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:26:12PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Does your touchscreen driver use this mutex? Or was this mutex needed
> just for the AC97 driver?
It's in the register accesses so everything accessing the chip registers
will use it.
___
Linu
> What kernel version are you using?
We are using kernel version 2.6.24. I've searched for "current speed" in
version 2.6.28.7 and I've found that string.
> Yes, you need to modify the DTB. You have a back to back MII
> connection, not a phy, so you do *not* want to have a PHY node in the
> dev
2009/6/30 Marco Stornelli :
> 2009/6/30 Johnny Hung :
>> Thanks for your reply. So there are no PCI device resource info in
>> flat device tree.
>> How do PCI device resources be assign in general case or is there any
>> example?
>> I am so confusing, would you please give me detailed describle?
>
Hi,
Is USB host functionality supported by mainline kernel on MPC8536DS ?
Are there any limitations (e.g not all host ports supported, etc.) ?
Thanks a lot.
Felix.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/USB-Host-support-on-MPC8536DS-tp24267110p24267110.html
Sent from the linux
26 matches
Mail list logo
