Re: [RFC 6/7] Use an external declaration in exit.c for fs_cachep

2006-11-17 Thread Oleg Verych
On 2006-11-18, Stephen Rothwell wrote: [] >> --- linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm2.orig/kernel/exit.c 2006-11-15 16:48:11.485511089 >> -0600 >> +++ linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm2/kernel/exit.c 2006-11-17 23:04:09.764530373 >> -0600 >> @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ >> #include >> #include >> >> +extern kmem_cache_t *fs_c

Re: [PATCH 18/20] x86_64: Relocatable kernel support

2006-11-17 Thread Oleg Verych
On 2006-11-17, Vivek Goyal wrote: [] > static void error(char *x) > @@ -281,57 +335,8 @@ static void error(char *x) > while(1); /* Halt */ > } Is it possible to make this optional (using "panic" reboot timeout)? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-

Re: [PATCH 20/20] x86_64: Move CPU verification code to common file

2006-11-17 Thread Oleg Verych
Hallo. On 2006-11-17, Vivek Goyal wrote: [] > +no_longmode: > + /* This isn't an x86-64 CPU so hang */ > +1: > + hlt > + jmp 1b > + > +#include "../../kernel/verify_cpu.S" > + May hang be done optional? There was a discussion about applying "panic" reboot timeout here. Is it possi

Re: [PATCH 20/20] x86_64: Move CPU verification code to common file

2006-11-17 Thread Oleg Verych
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 10:59:32PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Oleg Verych wrote: > > > >It will burn CPU, until power cycle will be done (my AMD64 laptop and > >Intel's amd64 destop PC require that). In case of reboot timeout (or > >just reboot with jump to B

reboot, not loop forever (Re: [PATCH 20/20] x86_64: Move CPU verification code to common file)

2006-11-18 Thread Oleg Verych
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 11:32:59PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Oleg Verych wrote: > >On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 10:59:32PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >>Oleg Verych wrote: > >>>It will burn CPU, until power cycle will be done (my AMD64 laptop and > >>>

Re: [PATCH] emit logging when a process receives a fatal signal

2006-11-18 Thread Oleg Verych
Nice to meet you, Miquel! On 2006-11-18, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 03:04:13AM +0100, Folkert van Heusden wrote: >>> > > > I found that sometime

Re: [PATCH] emit logging when a process receives a fatal signal

2006-11-18 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:30:02PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Nov 18 2006 02:38, Oleg Verych wrote: > >On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 03:04:13AM +0100, Folkert van Heusden wrote: > >> > > > I found that sometimes processes disappear on some heavily used > &

Re: [PATCH] emit logging when a process receives a fatal signal

2006-11-18 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 12:24:14AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Nov 18 2006 21:51, Oleg Verych wrote: > >On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:30:02PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >> >Then, who you think prints that "Killed" or "Segmentation fault" >

Re: [PATCH] Fix unprivileged user builds of initramfs

2006-11-18 Thread Oleg Verych
On 2006-11-19, Matthew Wilcox wrote: [] > Someone with more time might find a more elegant fix for either or both > of these problems. But now my qlogic adapter can find its firmware without > being turned into a module. Please check "initramfs-handle-more-than-one-source-dir-or-file-list.patch"

[e-mail problems] with infradead.org recipients

2006-11-19 Thread Oleg Verych
Hi, guys. I have problems with you. Is some special NS or route needed? I can add, no problem (ISP problems are very unlikely, but possible ;). Final-Recipient: RFC822; arjan infradead.org Action: failed Status: 4.4.7 Remote-MTA: DNS; canuck.infradead.org Last-Attempt-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:27

Re: [e-mail problems] with infradead.org recipients

2006-11-19 Thread Oleg Verych
On 2006-11-19, David Woodhouse wrote: [] > I don't see either of those connection attempts in the logs for > canuck.infradead.org. Canuck is on GMT-5, and I've looked in its logs > for a few minutes around 08:27 and around 06:49. Nothing seems to match > your sender address. Yes. I've told about D

This is [Re:] How to improve the quality of the kernel[?].

2007-06-18 Thread Oleg Verych
[Dear Debbug developers, i wish your ideas will be useful.] * From: Linus Torvalds * Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel * Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:09:37 -0700 (PDT) > > On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Martin Bligh wrote: >> >> Sorry to be a wet blanket, but I've seen those sort of things >> before, and they ju

Re: This is [Re:] How to improve the quality of the kernel[?].

2007-06-19 Thread Oleg Verych
[Dropping noise for Debbugs, because interested people may join via Gmane] On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:48:55PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 06:06:47AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > > [Dear Debbug developers, i wish your ideas will be useful.] > > > > *

Re: This is [Re:] How to improve the quality of the kernel[?].

2007-06-19 Thread Oleg Verych
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:27:15PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: > On 6/19/2007 4:05 PM, Oleg Verych wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:48:55PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >> The Debian BTS requires you to either write emails with control messages > >> or gener

Re: This is [Re:] How to improve the quality of the kernel[?].

2007-06-19 Thread Oleg Verych
Linus, On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 08:01:19AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > The goal is to get all patches for a maintained subsystem submitted to > > Linus by the maintainer. Nice quote. I'm trying to make proposition/convince Adrian, who is i

Re: This is [Re:] How to improve the quality of the kernel[?].

2007-06-19 Thread Oleg Verych
* Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:08:13 +0200 > >> Crazy development{0}. Somebody knows, that comprehensively testing >> hibernation is their thing. I don't care about it, i care about foo, bar. >> Thus i can apply for example lguest patches and implement and test new >> asm-offset replacement, *easily*.

Re: This is [Re:] How to improve the quality of the kernel[?].

2007-06-19 Thread Oleg Verych
* Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:04:58 -0700 (PDT) > > On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: >> >> I'm proposing kind of smart tracking, summarized before. I'm not an >> idealist, doing manual work. Making tools -- is what i've picked up from >> one of

Re: This is [Re:] How to improve the quality of the kernel[?].

2007-06-19 Thread Oleg Verych
* Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:50:48 +0200 > > [...] >> Current identification of problems and patch association >> have completely zero level of tracking or automation, while Bugzilla is >> believed by somebody to have positive efficiency in bug tracking. > > I, as maintainer of a small subsystem,

Re: Request for Linux Kernel Mailing List archives

2007-06-20 Thread Oleg Verych
* Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel * Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:10:53 -0700 > >> For example, if a message had: >> >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> ... and I could just generate a URL: >> >> http://linux-kernel.example.com/msgid/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > gmane can do that: > http://mid.gma

Re: Request for Linux Kernel Mailing List archives

2007-06-21 Thread Oleg Verych
* Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:21:03 +0200 > > To have Gmane (news<=>e-mail [and web]) engine[s] on the kernel.org will > be the best thing ever! Some more "Why": > > * You don't receive (or annoyingly bounce) huge traffic. > . big backlogs are handled easily in many cases, like getting > e-ma

Re: How to improve the quality of the kernel?

2007-06-22 Thread Oleg Verych
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 04:19:34PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: > Markus Rechberger wrote: > > just reading through it and cleaning up some code isn't so difficult > > and can be done by many people - > > Doing cleanups is a good way to get into the matter, to become able to > eventually fix bugs

Re: [PATCH] trivial: the memset operation on a automatic array variable should be optimized out by data initialization

2007-06-23 Thread Oleg Verych
* From: Denis Cheng * Newsgroups: linux.kernel * Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 22:15:49 -0700 (PDT) > From: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > the explicit memset call could be optimized out by data initialization, > thus all the fill working can be done by the compiler implicitly. Can be optimized an

NAK (bashizm in the /bin/sh script): [PATCH v3] doc/oops-tracing: add Code: decode info

2007-06-23 Thread Oleg Verych
* From: Randy Dunlap * Newsgroups: linux.kernel * Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:28:10 -0700 * Organization: Oracle Linux Eng. [] > --- /dev/null > +++ linux-2.6.22-rc5/scripts/decodecode > @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ > +#!/bin/sh > +# Disassemble the Code: line in Linux oopses > +# usage: decodecode < oops.file

Re: Oops in a driver while using SLUB as a SLAB allocator

2007-06-23 Thread Oleg Verych
* From: Christoph Lameter * Newsgroups: linux.kernel,linux.ports.arm.kernel * Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:15:19 -0700 (PDT) > > Here is the corresponding PA-RISC piece. Its as straightforward as > the other one since the only way to make this work properly in the past > was if the sizes passed to t

Re: Kconfig troubles when using menuconfig - Was: [patch]Re: linux-2.6.22-rc5-gf1518a0 build #300 failed in zc0301_core.c

2007-06-23 Thread Oleg Verych
* Newsgroups: linux.kernel,comp.video.video4linux,linux.usb.devel As you might know, there's no organized central traking system, thus this huge lists of MLs... > But, as always, you need someone to code it, etc. ... and no relevant one, where somebody can actually see the problem and/or to code

Re: [PATCH] trivial: the memset operation on a automatic array variable should be optimized out by data initialization

2007-06-23 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 03:13:55PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 09:59:33AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: [] > > > From: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > the explicit memset call could be optimized out by data initialization, > &g

[OT]Re: NAK (bashizm in the /bin/sh script): [PATCH v3] doc/oops-tracing: add Code: decode info

2007-06-23 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 03:26:26PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 03:17:27PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Saturday 23 June 2007 13:09, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > > On Saturday 23 of June 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > Here's a nickel. Get yourself a real shell. > > >

Re: NAK (bashizm in the /bin/sh script): [PATCH v3] doc/oops-tracing: add Code: decode info

2007-06-23 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 03:17:27PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Saturday 23 June 2007 13:09, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > On Saturday 23 of June 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > Here's a nickel. Get yourself a real shell. > > > > POSIX compilant shell isn't real shell? > > In this case it's not g

(Last oops is Tainted: P) Re: 2.6.22-rc5: pdflush oops under heavy disk load

2007-06-24 Thread Oleg Verych
* From: Andrew Morton * Newsgroups: linux.kernel * Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:23:18 -0700 > > On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 13:14:40 +0100 "Jay L. T. Cornwall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> I'm beginning to suspect the Attansic L1 Gigabit Etherner driver (marked >> as EXPERIMENTAL in 2.6.22-rc5). I can'

Re: (Last oops is Tainted: P) Re: 2.6.22-rc5: pdflush oops under heavy disk load

2007-06-24 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 11:10:09AM +0100, Jay L. T. Cornwall wrote: > Oleg Verych wrote: > > >> That sounds like a good theory: you're getting easily-hit oopses in one of > >> the kernel's most-used codepaths which hasn't chanbged much in a long &g

Re: [PATCH] trivial: the memset operation on a automatic array variable should be optimized out by data initialization

2007-06-24 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 08:58:10PM +0800, rae l wrote: > On 6/23/07, Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Why not just show actual objdump output on code (maybe with different > >oxygen atoms used in gcc), rather than *talking* about optimization and > >standards

memset() with zeroes (Re: [PATCH] trivial: the memset operation on a automatic array variable should be optimized out by data initialization)

2007-06-24 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 03:15:17PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > I think all these benefits are the gcc's __builtin_memset optimization > > > than the explicit call to memset. > > > > ... or from complex memset() implementation (some chips even didn't do > > `rep' fast enough somehow). M

Re: [patch 4/9] lguest: the asm offsets

2007-06-11 Thread Oleg Verych
* Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:09:39 +1000 > > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 22:46 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 02:51:36AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > From: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > >> > This is the structure offsets required by lg.ko's switcher.S. >> > >> > U

[patch] kbuild: remember ARCH in the object directory

2007-06-12 Thread Oleg Verych
Makefile generating. Signed-off-by: Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- -o--=O`C /. .\ #oo'L O o <___=E M^-- Just lazy typing `make ARCH=i386` every time i want to check lguest. Makefile | 17 - scripts/mkm

Re: [patch] kbuild: remember ARCH in the object directory

2007-06-12 Thread Oleg Verych
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:12:09AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: [] > I did: > > # build a linux-2.6.22-rc4-git4 kernel source tree & cd into it > # mkdir BLD > $ make ARCH=i386 O=BLD defconfig > $ make -j4 O=BLD all >BLD/bld.out 2>&1 > > and it cried to me: > > GEN /scsi/linsrc/linux-2.6.22-

[patch 03/03] kbuild, asm-values: private for lguest

2007-06-12 Thread Oleg Verych
A small example of how it can be used privately. rfc-by: Oleg Verych --- TODO: change lguest files to use it. drivers/lguest/Makefile |4 drivers/lguest/asm-values.c | 24 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+) Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/drivers

[patch 00/03] kbuild, asm-values: not only offsets, not only for $ARCH

2007-06-12 Thread Oleg Verych
Version number zer0. -- -o--=O`C #oo'L O <___=E M - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[patch 01/03] kbuild, asm-values: infrastructure

2007-06-12 Thread Oleg Verych
, MIPS testing/joining to all arch probably needed) rfc-by: Oleg Verych --- See next patches, to know how to use it include/asm-generic/asm-values.h |7 scripts/Makefile.asm | 26 ++ scripts/Makefile.build |6 scripts/mkasm

[patch 02/03] kbuild, asm-values: successor of asm-offsets

2007-06-12 Thread Oleg Verych
Some asm-offsets files define not only offsets, thus make it clear. Legacy files are supported, but may be freely changed to new scheme. rfc-by: Oleg Verych --- If somebody agrees, of course. Kbuild | 68 --- 1 file

Removing of dummy asm-offset files (Re: [patch 02/03] kbuild, asm-values: successor of asm-offsets)

2007-06-13 Thread Oleg Verych
[] > +# legacy asm-offsets support (FIXME: convert all archs and remove this) > +old = $(shell test -e $(srctree)/arch/$(ARCH)/kernel/asm-offsets.c && echo > yes) > +ifeq ($(old),yes) > +asm-values =asm-offsets > +else > +asm-values =asm-values One more test here, and files li

Re: arch/i386/boot rewrite, and all the hard-coded video cards

2007-06-13 Thread Oleg Verych
* From: "H. Peter Anvin" * Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 14:52:53 -0700 > > Linus Torvalds wrote: >> >> And yes, I'm literally talking about the *text* modes. Not all of us want >> to have fbcon built in - I prefer my text-mode lean and mean and fast as >> hell, and if I want a frame buffer, I'll take

regression tracking (Re: Linux 2.6.21)

2007-06-13 Thread Oleg Verych
* Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel * Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:50:22 -0700 (PDT) * From: Linus Torvalds > > On Sun, 29 Apr 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: >> >> Besides the primary point of bug tracking is not to be friendly >> to someone, but to (a) fix the bugs and (b) know how many bugs >> there for a g

Re: arch/i386/boot rewrite, and all the hard-coded video cards

2007-06-14 Thread Oleg Verych
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 10:11:12PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Oleg Verych wrote: > > Thus, text mode on modern hardware isn't useable that much, only with > > Terminus font it is kind of normal (kudos to Dimitar Toshkov Jekov). > > But it's only option to unfor

Re: [patch 01/03] kbuild, asm-values: infrastructure

2007-06-14 Thread Oleg Verych
enerate headers from assembles output > (hopefully better output, MIPS testing/joining to all arch > probably needed) > > rfc-by: Oleg Verych > --- So, is it another not so juicy lets-break-it-all stuff from me, or it just doesn't apply for you? I thought upd

Need opinions on asm-offsets cleanup (Re: [patch 01/03] kbuild, asm-values: infrastructure)

2007-06-14 Thread Oleg Verych
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:12:25AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 09:41:43AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > > Jun 13, 2007 at 01:36:51AM +0200, asm-values patch set: > > > * header with widely used value definitions > > > * handle all asm

Re: regression tracking (Re: Linux 2.6.21)

2007-06-14 Thread Oleg Verych
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:33:40PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: [] > [...] > > Why you didn't proposed (used) Debian's BTS as alternative to bugzilla, > [...] > > BTS has been mentioned in that thread in a few posts; mostly positively > as I recall. I know, that most developers here are not worki

Re: regression tracking (Re: Linux 2.6.21)

2007-06-14 Thread Oleg Verych
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:30:49PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 06:39:23PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: [] > > I know, that most developers here are not working/familiar with what > > Debian has as its bug shooting weapon ``The system is mainly controlled >

Re: regression tracking (Re: Linux 2.6.21)

2007-06-15 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 01:42:02AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 04:20:57PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: > > > > > > I'm seeing this long (198) thread and just have no ide

Re: regression tracking (Re: Linux 2.6.21)

2007-06-15 Thread Oleg Verych
[I've added Herbert as former kernel team member in the debian(AFAIK), sorry, if i'm wrong and you have no opinion on that, Herbert.] On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 04:55:16AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 03:32:36AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 16,

Separate arch patching (Re: [patch-mm 06/25] clockevents: Fix resume logic)

2007-06-16 Thread Oleg Verych
* From: Thomas Gleixner [] > Fixup the existing users. > > This removes the sysfs entry for the HPET, which is now controlled by > the clockevents resume code. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/time.c |2 + > arch/arm/mach-imx/time.c

Re: [PATCH] (Re: regression tracking (Re: Linux 2.6.21))

2007-06-17 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 12:22:26PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > On 17/06/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 11:41:36 +0200 Michal Piotrowski > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> +If the patch introduces a new regression and this regression was not > >fixed

Re: [PATCH] (Re: regression tracking (Re: Linux 2.6.21))

2007-06-17 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 02:13:39PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday, 17 June 2007 13:47, Oleg Verych wrote: [] > > It's OK _only_ in case of unknown, hard to find *hardware* bugs. > > > > If you think it's "a good thing" for bad, untested

Re: [PATCH] (Re: regression tracking (Re: Linux 2.6.21))

2007-06-17 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 10:44:39AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: [] > >That's wrong if developers are tending to reply only one thing -- > >git-bisect. > > > >If things are going to be that bad, then better to star

Re: [RFC][PATCH] introduce panic_gently

2007-07-06 Thread Oleg Verych
* Andi Kleen (06 Jul 2007 14:03:05 +0200) >> The 180seconds reboot timeout also doesn't make sense here. The problem >> won't go away after a reboot without user interaction. > > It will when lilo -R/grubonce were used or the NFS server fixed itself > on nfs root or ... There can be many reasons f

plain text MUAs (Re: [git pull][resend] Input updates for 2.6.22-rc7)

2007-07-06 Thread Oleg Verych
* Linus Torvalds > Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE > On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >> >> Please consider pulling from: >> >> б═ б═ б═ б═ git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dtor/input.git >> for-linus > > There's somethign wrong with your emails, and it's ve

Re: Coding style on function signatures (was: Convert tasklets to work queues )

2007-07-07 Thread Oleg Verych
>> static ssize_t >> store_fan_div (struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr, >> const char *buf, size_t count) >> {...} >> >> >> IIRC, many like the entire sig on one line, because its grep friendly. >> I personally like the above, but grep-ability is hard to argu

Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway (philosophical)

2007-07-08 Thread Oleg Verych
* Alan Stern >> Why are you guys working so hard and spending so much energy to try to >> avoid doing the right thing is beyond my understanding... >> >> > It _does_ apply to kernel threads. That's exactly why I wrote above >> > that kernel threads which try to do I/O during a suspend will nee

Off topically about Re: malicious filesystems (was Re: Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway)

2007-07-08 Thread Oleg Verych
>> > > We can just wait for all fuse requests to be serviced before >> > > proceeding further with freeze, right? >> > >> > Right. Nice way to slow down or stop the suspend with an unprivileged >> > process. Avoiding that sort of DoS is one of the design goals of >> > fuse. >> >> So you want me

Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version

2007-07-08 Thread Oleg Verych
* Rodolfo Giometti (Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:14:50 +0200) * Organization: GNU/Linux Device Drivers, Embedded Systems and Courses > +.PHONY : all depend dep > + > +all : .depend $(TARGETS) > + > +.depend depend dep : > + $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -M $(TARGETS:=.c) > .depend [] > +# -- Clean section > ---

Makefiles for GNU make (Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version)

2007-07-09 Thread Oleg Verych
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 11:16:43AM +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote: > On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 11:05:32AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > > * Rodolfo Giometti (Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:14:50 +0200) > > * Organization: GNU/Linux Device Drivers, Embedded Systems and Courses > > > >

Re: [PATCH] mkmakefile: include ARCH on O= builds

2007-07-12 Thread Oleg Verych
* Bodo Eggert "Thu, 12 Jul 2007 03:40:04 +0200 (CEST)" > If you build using O=builddir ARCH=bar, you'll currently need to supply > ARCH= on builds from the builddir, too. With this patch, the generated > Makefile will do that instead. I've sent such thing at least twice. But now i'm thinking abo

Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

2007-07-12 Thread Oleg Verych
* Linus Torvalds "Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:09:28 -0700 (PDT)" > > On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: >> >> I'm going to change topic big time because your sentence above >> perfectly applies to the O(1) scheduler too. > > I disagree to a large degree. > > We almost never have problems with cod

Re: Jiffies wraparound is not treated in the schedstats

2007-05-29 Thread Oleg Verych
On 2006-11-09, Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail > From: Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel > Subject: Re: Jiffies wraparound is not treated in the schedstats > Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 11:59:45 +0530 > Organization: IBM > Lines

Re: [KJ][PATCH 02/03]ROUND_UP|DOWN macro cleanup in arch/ia64,x86_64

2007-05-30 Thread Oleg Verych
* From: "Luck, Tony" * Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:45:49 -0700 >> So as ALIGN macro does the same work as ROUNDUP, > > Although it is mathematically the same operation, the > semantic associations of the name are important too. [] > Maybe this is because I started out in mathematics before > discove

Re: [kbuild-devel] [PATCH 08/19] scripts: Make cleanfile/cleanpatch warn about long lines

2007-06-05 Thread Oleg Verych
Hallo. On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 10:47:00PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Subject: [PATCH 08/19] scripts: Make cleanfile/cleanpatch warn about long > lines > From: H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 17:58:26 -0700 > > Make the "cleanfile" and "cleanpatch" script warn about

Re: [kbuild-devel] [PATCH 08/19] scripts: Make cleanfile/cleanpatch warn about long lines

2007-06-05 Thread Oleg Verych
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:19:59AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: [] > > So, there are some new scripts. What if my proposition will be better, > > so to speak? Any problems i'm willing to fix/enhance. > > > > Note: only one copy of the file required. Sym-linked name *diff* or > > *patch* will process

Re: [kbuild-devel] [PATCH 08/19] scripts: Make cleanfile/cleanpatch warn about long lines

2007-06-05 Thread Oleg Verych
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:19:59AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: [] > If on the other hand you are proposing a script to clean whitespace > damage in the code then git already does this nicely. I've read that too quickly, sorry. What then all that clean scripts are for? > I do not recall the actual

Re: [kbuild-devel] [PATCH 08/19] scripts: Make cleanfile/cleanpatch warn about long lines

2007-06-05 Thread Oleg Verych
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 04:12:54PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:38:34PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:19:59AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > [] > > > If on the other hand you are proposing a script to clean whitespace

Re: [kbuild-devel] [PATCH 08/19] scripts: Make cleanfile/cleanpatch warn about long lines

2007-06-05 Thread Oleg Verych
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 04:57:59PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: [] > expand | while read line > do case "$line" in >++*) echo "$line";; >$p*) [ ${#line} -gt $w79 ] && : ${long:=line} > echo "$line" | s

Another version of cleanfile/cleanpatch (Re: [PATCH 08/19] scripts: Make cleanfile/cleanpatch warn about long lines)

2007-06-06 Thread Oleg Verych
While i'm against whitespace damaged files or patches since my very first patch, and don't like brain damaged programmer's tools called text editors, i also want to encourage UNIX-way of using userspace. Of course, i might be wrong and foolish. Anyway, what i'm trying to do is not to become new ge

Re: Another version of cleanfile/cleanpatch

2007-06-06 Thread Oleg Verych
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 07:50:26PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: [] > > Many things in XXI century still can be done by tools founded 20-30 > > years ago. Why not try to? > > Because your shell script is unreadable by normal human beings[*] > while the perl script for people with a bit of perl fu can

Re: Another version of cleanfile/cleanpatch

2007-06-07 Thread Oleg Verych
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:36:33PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Jun 6 2007 21:14, Oleg Verych wrote: > >[] > >> > Many things in XXI century still can be done by tools founded 20-30 > >> > years ago. Why not try to? > >> > >> Because

Re: Another version of cleanfile/cleanpatch

2007-06-07 Thread Oleg Verych
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:19:56PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Oleg Verych wrote: > > > > Because of that, i think, following is redundant: > > > > - to check for binary files > > find . -type f | xargs cleanfile What about patches? Anyway, by agreeme

[patch] scripts: clean-whitespace.sh

2007-06-07 Thread Oleg Verych
After running this script with filename as parameter, look (with diff) for, what can be corrected. Only "*.diff" and "*.patch" files are handled as patches. Signed-off-by: Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Two clean rules added, that can change look of damaged lines.

Re: [patch] scripts: clean-whitespace.sh

2007-06-08 Thread Oleg Verych
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 04:28:49PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:44:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Then again, it's a better strategy than trying to read the code ;) > > > > Please, tell us what it does, so that we can decide whether we want it in > > Linux. >

Re: [patch] scripts: clean-whitespace.sh

2007-06-08 Thread Oleg Verych
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 09:05:54PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: [] > > > > It does better whitespace cleanup, than > > > > scripts/{cleanfile *and* cleanpatch} > > Made a short test here. > Added the following to a file: > > static sam = ""; > > clean-whitespace replaced spac

Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: Add information about trailing whitespace.

2007-06-27 Thread Oleg Verych
> Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel > Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:31:22 -0700 > > > akpm:/usr/src/25> grep -l "^+.*[]$" patches/git-*.patch > patches/git-acpi.patch > patches/git-alsa.patch > patches/git-battery.patch > patches/git-cifs.patch > patches/git-drm.patch > patches/git-gfs2-nmw.patch

Re: [PATCH -mm] scripts/decodecode: fix for /bin/sh (cc your enemies)

2007-06-28 Thread Oleg Verych
* Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:51:37 -0700 I didn't want to respond to your prev. messages, because i felt, that they will be mis-read again as my original NAK (ASCII negative acknowledgement symbol, no other "fsky" meaning inside). Also i wanted to come up with more nice tool, like colour support (l

Re: [RFC] automatic CC generation for patch submission

2007-06-29 Thread Oleg Verych
* Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 05:34:51 +0300 > > Hello, > > I'd like to present a suggestion for automatic generation of > carbon copy fields in the E-Mails of posted patches. > > Basically, instead of manually figuring out who to add to CC > when sending a patch to LKML by looking at MAINTAINERS, a >

Re: [RFC] automatic CC generation for patch submission

2007-06-30 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 06:08:54AM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote: > On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 05:01:44AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > > * Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 05:34:51 +0300 > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'd like to present a suggestion for automatic gene

Re: [RFC] automatic CC generation for patch submission

2007-06-30 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 01:26:01PM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote: [] > > As you will see, nobody cares about comprehensive > > patches/tests/bugs/testers/developers *tracking* system. > > > > And don't limit yourself to fast conclusions. Thanks. > > I am not proposing a comprehensive tracking system. I

Re: ALIGN (Re: [PATCH] Fix get_order())

2007-03-09 Thread Oleg Verych
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 08:38:27AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: > > > > Probably it can be used to get rid of gccisms and "type fluff" due to > > bitwise arithmetics in ALIGN? > > Hell no. > > The ty

Re: ALIGN (Re: [PATCH] Fix get_order())

2007-03-09 Thread Oleg Verych
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 03:15:10PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: > > > > OTOH, if i would write it this way > > > > #define BALIGN(x,bits) x) >> (bits)) + 1) << (bits)) > > But that'

Re: ALIGN

2007-03-09 Thread Oleg Verych
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 08:38:27AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: > > > > Probably it can be used to get rid of gccisms and "type fluff" due to > > bitwise arithmetics in ALIGN? > > Hell no. > > The ty

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Add ability to keep track of callers of symbol_(get|put)

2007-03-11 Thread Oleg Verych
> From: Andrew Morton > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Add ability to keep track of callers of > symbol_(get|put) > Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:09:38 -0800 > >> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 02:31:35 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> From: Trent Pieph

dlopen-like facility for conditional loading of symbols in modules (Re: Firmware for new ti_usb_3410_5052 devices)

2007-03-03 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:40:26AM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Samstag, 3. M?rz 2007 01:29 schrieb Greg KH: > > On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 01:27:07AM +0100, Oleg Verych wrote: > > > > > > If you can proof that it doesn't influence kernel's control above s

Re: dlopen-like facility for conditional loading of symbols in modules (Re: Firmware for new ti_usb_3410_5052 devices)

2007-03-04 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 06:51:51PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: [] > >It will solve problem of having multiple unneeded firmware images if > >driver handles many devices and firmware is allowed to be in the > >kernel. No need in additional secure infrastructure. > > > > This seems like a hacky way

Re: module builds need improvement / top Makefile not good enough

2007-03-04 Thread Oleg Verych
> From: "FN" > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel > Subject: module builds need improvement / top Makefile not good enough > Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:14:22 -0800 > Hello list, Hallo. > I am unhappy with the direction the 2.6 kernel builds have taken. > Very much like Micro$loth DDKs we (linux users

Discussing LKML community [OT from the Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3]

2007-03-04 Thread Oleg Verych
> From: "Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel > Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3 > Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:01:07 -0800 Michael, [] > In this instance, there didn't seem to be any harm in sending my > thoughts to LKML a

ALIGN via ilog2 without gccisms (Re: [PATCH] Fix get_order())

2007-03-07 Thread Oleg Verych
> From: David Howells > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix get_order() > Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:43:06 + > [] > Various archs (including i386, x86_64, powerpc and frv) have instructions that > can be used to calculate integer log2(N). > Probably it can be used to get ri

Re: ALIGN via ilog2 without gccisms (Re: [PATCH] Fix get_order())

2007-03-07 Thread Oleg Verych
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 08:38:27AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: > > > > Probably it can be used to get rid of gccisms and "type fluff" due to > > bitwise arithmetics in ALIGN? > > Hell no. > > The ty

trailing whitespace killing (Re: [PATCH -mm] Blackfin: blackfin i2c driver)

2007-03-07 Thread Oleg Verych
> From: Andrew Morton > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel > Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] Blackfin: blackfin i2c driver > Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 23:45:29 -0800 [] > On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:39:27 +0800 "Wu, Bryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Thanks a lot, could you please give me a script just to kill thi

Re: broken device locking, sg vs. sg_io on block devices

2007-03-31 Thread Oleg Verych
> From: Alan Cox > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel > Subject: Re: broken device locking, sg vs. sg_io on block devices > Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 01:14:52 +0100 > [] >> Again, it doesn't have to. It can pass the locking operations to the >> related block device driver. > > No it can't. The driver has n

Re: [PATCH] Fix build error due to not including

2007-03-31 Thread Oleg Verych
> From: Andrew Morton > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix build error due to not including > Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 22:01:48 -0800 > > If is a bit of a pain to maintain CONFIG_SYSFS=n. But then, it's > realtively easy to fix things when they do break, and sysfs does consum

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: fix dependency generation

2007-04-01 Thread Oleg Verych
> From: Sam Ravnborg > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel > Subject: [PATCH] kbuild: fix dependency generation > Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 12:45:51 +0200 > [] > scripts/basic/fixdep.c | 10 +++--- > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/basic/fixdep.c b/scripts/ba

2.6.17->2.6.18(and 20) K8 SMP ondemand and userspace: General protection fault (bts Bug#415239)

2007-04-01 Thread Oleg Verych
While it's only one such report so far, could you, please look at it? There is some info below, full story: <http://bugs.debian.org/415239> (from the bottom). Thanks. On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 08:36:51AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:10:42AM +0100, Ole

Re: [pp] kbuild: asm-offsets generalized

2007-04-01 Thread Oleg Verych
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 10:42:03PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 04:59:29PM +0100, Oleg Verych wrote: [] > > [patch proposition] kbuild: asm-offsets generalized [] > > * (hopefully) more readable sed scripts, > > > > * top Kbuild may be updated.

Early userspace, Linux development (Re: perhaps init/ should update the reference to "change floppy")

2007-09-08 Thread Oleg Verych
* Sat, 8 Sep 2007 08:08:06 -0400 (EDT) [] > from init/do_mounts_rd.c: > > ... [] > if (rd_prompt) > change_floppy("root floppy disk to be loaded into RAM disk"); > create_dev("/dev/root", ROOT_DEV); > create_dev("/dev/ram", MKDEV(RAMDISK_MAJOR, n)); >

Re: unfamiliar notation

2007-09-10 Thread Oleg Verych
* Sun, 09 Sep 2007 21:09:01 -0400 * Organization: Georgas Software Solutions > > I just came across a notation that I haven't seen before. It's in > scripts/mconf.c: > > str_append(&help, _(menu_get_help(menu))); > > What's the deal with the underscore and the parentheses surrounding the > ca

Re: Broken mail setup

2007-09-10 Thread Oleg Verych
* Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:39:34 +0100 * Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903 > > On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:20:42 +0300 > Sami Farin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

<    1   2   3   4   >