On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 03:26:26PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 03:17:27PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Saturday 23 June 2007 13:09, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > > On Saturday 23 of June 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > Here's a nickel. Get yourself a real shell. > > > > > > POSIX compilant shell isn't real shell? > > > > In this case it's not good enough. We're not writing POSIX portable > > software > > here, but Linux software where /bin/sh is /bin/bash. Similar to the Linux > > kernel which is not written in portable ISO C.
I disagree. > Well, it can also be zsh or pdksh, but I suspect that the code is valid on > them too. Not for the latter: |-*- pdksh -*- flower:-$ <kernelOops.txt>/dev/null pdksh decodecode decodecode[40]: : bad substitution flower:-$ |-*- I don't want to go further with this OT, just last thing. It's GNU BaSH *BUG* (addition to being big and slow), if it can't switch off it's expressly undocumented extentions while run as `/bin/sh'. ____ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
