On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:28:22PM -0400, Reiner Sailer wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2007 03:25:48 -0400
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph Fannin) wrote:
>
> > I've been getting this since 2.6.21-rc7-mm1:
> > [2.379310] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual
> > address 4400d340
> > [
> And, in this case we're in luck. It's not released in any -stable tree
> yet (it's queued for the next release). So there's plenty of time to
> fix it up before next -stable release.
>
> Something like below should fix it.
I already got a similar patch, but not tested yet.
-Andi
-
To unsubs
On Fri, 25 May 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Already uncovered and fixed a few bugs in v3.
>
> Here's v4 of the sata_mv new-EH patch.
you asked for test results with 2.6.21.3 ... that seems to boot fine,
and i've tested reading from the disks only and it seems to be working
fine. ditto for 2.6.22-
On May 25 2007 20:21, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>It's Friday evening, and the US is preparing for a long three-day weekend,
>often considered the official start of summer here.
>
>So what's a pasty white nerd to do?
Doing a commit like c420bc9f09a0926b708c3edb27eacba434a4f4ba on Makefile
line 5..
On 5/26/07, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 01:28:56AM -0400, Tej Parkash wrote:
> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.20-15-generic'
> CHK include/linux/version.h
> CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
> make[2]: *** No rule to make target
Adam Osuchowski wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
>>It would be better to account for the tag in the length check.
>>Something like
>> if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP) &&
>> skb->len > skb->dev->mtu - (IS_VLAN_IP(skb) ? VLAN_HLEN : 0) &&
>> !skb_is_gso(skb))
>>
Daniel Yeisley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anyone know if the kernel has any issues running on a platform that
> provides SMBIOS v2.5?
Should not.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo i
On Sat, 26 May 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 10:36 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -#if defined(CONFIG_FB_PS3) || defined(CONFIG_FB_PS3_MODULE)
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_FB_PS3) || defined(CONFIG_FB_PS3_MODULE) || \
> > +defined(CONFIG_PS3_FLASH_MODULE) ||
> > de
On Sat, 26 May 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 13:24 +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Fri, May 25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ps3rom.c
> >
> > > + kaddr = kmap_atomic(sgpnt->page, KM_USER0);
> >
> > linux/highmem.h is not inc
On Sat, 26 May 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 18:18 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > +static u64 ps3stor_wait_for_completion(u64 devid, u64 tag,
> > > +unsigned int timeout)
> > > +{
> > > + unsigned int retries = 0;
> > > +
Hello,
When I try software suspend on my laptop it always returns to my running
system after some time.
This is what's logged by the kernel:
swsusp: Basic memory bitmaps created
Stopping tasks ...
Stopping kernel threads timed out after 20 seconds (1 tasks refusing to
freeze):
cryptd
Restarti
Hi!
> Perhaps you have opinion of maintaining diffability with
> original LZO
> code which differs from mine. Since the code is now just
> ~500 lines it
> should be fair enough to have major overhauls for sake
> of clean
> KernelStyle(tm) code. It shouldn't be that hard to
> verify this small
Hi!
> > As for unlink... How do you deal with having that thing
> > mounted, mounting something _under_ it (so that vfsmount would be kept
> > busy) and then unlinking that sucker?
>
> Yeah, that's a good point. Current patch doesn't deal with that.
> Simplest solution could be to disallow subm
Hi!
> > > #1, This is why periodic checks are a good thing; it catches problems
> > > that could stay hidden and result in data loss sooner rather later.
> >
> > Actually, I see something funny with periodic checks here. It claims
> > 'filesystem check on next boot' for >10 boots now.
> >
> > It
On Saturday 26 May 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Friday 25 May 2007 21:40, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 20:48 schrieben Sie:
> > > On Fri, 25 May 2007 17:59:29 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > > > Perhaps someone reading this could try to reproduce that problem on
> > > > his machine
Hi.
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 11:28 +0200, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I try software suspend on my laptop it always returns to my running
> system after some time.
> This is what's logged by the kernel:
>
> swsusp: Basic memory bitmaps created
> Stopping tasks ...
> Stopping ke
I will submit this for 2.6.22-rc and 2.6.21.y if nobody objects.
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 01:05:41 +0200
From: Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ieee1394: eth1394: bring back a parent device
This adds a real parent device to eth1394's ethX device like in Linux
2.6.20 and older. However,
Swap prefetch is currently too lax in prefetching with extended idle periods
unused. Increase its aggressiveness and tunability.
Make it possible for swap_prefetch to be set to a high value ignoring load
and prefetching regardless.
Add tunables to modify the swap prefetch delay and sleep period o
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 10:46 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Most of that though is just packaging. The meat of the issue
> is how do we upgrade the bootloader data. Do the changes
> below sound like everything we need?
>
> Field name: loadflags
> Type:modify (obligatory)
>
On 25 May 2007, at 11:42, Pavel Machek wrote:
What is the performance difference between safe and unsafe version?
On 24 May 2007, at 23:26, Richard Purdie wrote:
For my minilzo kernel patch, the safe version showed a 7.2%
performance
hit.
The conclusion seemed to be that we should drop the
Hello, Neil Brown.
Please cc me on blkdev barriers and, if you haven't yet, reading
Documentation/block/barrier.txt can be helpful too.
Neil Brown wrote:
[--snip--]
> 1/ SAFE. With a SAFE device, there is no write-behind cache, or if
> there is it is non-volatile. Once a write complet
Hi Nitin,
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 18:27 +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 5/25/07, Richard Purdie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 17:15 +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> > > Richard, can you please provide perf. results for this patch also?
> > > Also, can you please mail back latest ver
On May 25 2007 10:28, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>> > snd: Unknown symbol unregister_sound_special
>> > snd: Unknown symbol register_sound_special_device
>> > snd: Unknown symbol sound_class
>>
>> Uwe, could you try to revert this patch?
>> use-menuconfig-objects-ii-sound.patch
>
>I think that patc
CONFIG_SOUND, CONFIG_SND, CONFIG_SOUND_PRIME, ...:
Change Kconfig objects from "menu, config" into "menuconfig" so
that the user can disable the whole feature without having to
enter the menu first.
CONFIG_SND_*_DRIVERS:
Make a "menuconfig" out of the Kconfig objects "menu, ..., endmenu",
so that
CONFIG_SOUND, CONFIG_SND, CONFIG_SOUND_PRIME, ...:
Change Kconfig objects from "menu, config" into "menuconfig" so
that the user can disable the whole feature without having to
enter the menu first.
CONFIG_SND_*_DRIVERS:
Make a "menuconfig" out of the Kconfig objects "menu, ..., endmenu",
so that
CONFIG_SOUND, CONFIG_SND, CONFIG_SOUND_PRIME, ...:
Change Kconfig objects from "menu, config" into "menuconfig" so
that the user can disable the whole feature without having to
enter the menu first.
CONFIG_SND_*_DRIVERS:
Make a "menuconfig" out of the Kconfig objects "menu, ..., endmenu",
so that
CONFIG_SOUND, CONFIG_SND, CONFIG_SOUND_PRIME, ...:
Change Kconfig objects from "menu, config" into "menuconfig" so
that the user can disable the whole feature without having to
enter the menu first.
CONFIG_SND_*_DRIVERS:
Make a "menuconfig" out of the Kconfig objects "menu, ..., endmenu",
so that
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 07:00 schrieben Sie:
> On Friday 25 May 2007 21:40, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 20:48 schrieben Sie:
> > > On Fri, 25 May 2007 17:59:29 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > > > Perhaps someone reading this could try to reproduce that problem on
> > > > his machine.
On May 25 2007 23:33, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
>Yeah, I'll check it again if reposted. Jan, could you split ALSA
>portins at the next time?
How much split? This time, I made four out of it.
>This will make testing and merging much
>easier for me...
>
>But, above all, I'm not convinced much by that
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 07:53:53PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>
> Herbert, is this right? If cryptd is going to be used for block devs,
> the task should probably be PF_NOFREEZE (or whatever it is today)
> instead.
Probably. However, I don't think this is responsible for the reported
problem
Hi.
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 21:08 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 07:53:53PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> >
> > Herbert, is this right? If cryptd is going to be used for block devs,
> > the task should probably be PF_NOFREEZE (or whatever it is today)
> > instead.
>
> Probab
Hi Pavel,
Just did some benchmarking; results below.
On 5/25/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is the performance difference between safe and unsafe version?
File size: 256K
- Following as tests for original test code - not any kernel port of this.
- Test with each block size
Hi Richard,
On 5/26/07, Richard Purdie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been looking at my benchmark figures and I think I've found why the
figures for my version were different to yours. Its not your code which
is at fault, its the way it was hooked into the benchmarking program.
The compiler w
Hi Bret,
On 5/25/07, Bret Towe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ 237.556167] LZO compress successful: orig_size=17448, comp_size=8183
[ 253.320760] LZO decompress successful: decomp_size=17448
2221c586e3eb869af7f4333d4f56b441b9aa8414 test-input
2e6c96b687274b629308b29835cebd3af989e0c7 output
p
On Saturday 26 May 2007 07:20, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> On May 24, 2007, at 14:58:41, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > On Fedora zcat, gzip and gunzip are all links to the same file. I
> > can imagine (although it is a bit of a stretch) allowing a set of
> > users access to gunzip but not gzip (or the
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 09:14:00PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>
> You have the cryptd Kconfig option in (at least in rc3) - presumably
> Maximillian has been too keen and turned it on before you were ready :)
> It does make sense for it to be the problem. Without PF_NOFREEZE set,
> the refrige
On Mon, May 21, 2007 17:11, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 02:52:39PM +0100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> > There was another patch that removed the __init marker to _fix_ section
>> > mismatch errors.
>> > I have lost the actual mail but I asked the submitte
Hello.
Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > exec { "/usr/bin/gunzip" } "gzip", "-9", "some/file/to.gz";
> The above Perl code executes /usr/bin/gunzip and sets argv[0] to "gzip", so
> this confirms that the value of argv[0] is arbitrary. Well great, we already
> knew.
> AppArmor does not look at argv
On Friday 25 May 2007 21:06, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> --- Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...
> > Well, my point was exactly that App Armor doesn't (as far as I know) do
> > anything to enforce the argv[0] convention,
>
> Sounds like an opportunity for improvement then.
Jeez,
Hello,
when using the prism54 driver including in the 2.6.22-rc3 kernel I get this
Oops when putting the card into monitor mode:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
01d8
printing eip:
c0500608
*pde =
Oops: 0002 [#1]
PREEMPT
Modules linked in:
On Saturday 26 May 2007, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 11:28 +0200, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > When I try software suspend on my laptop it always returns to my running
> > system after some time.
> > This is what's logged by the kernel:
> >
> > swsusp:
Hello all,
I want to know in detail about , what the events (epoll or /dev/poll or
select ) achieve in contrast to thread per client.
i can have a thread per client and use send and recv system call directly
right? Why do i go for these event mechanisms?
Please help me to understand this.
Th
Hi Arunachalam,
On Saturday 26 May 2007, Arunachalam wrote:
> I want to know in detail about , what the events (epoll or /dev/poll or
> select ) achieve in contrast to thread per client.
>
> i can have a thread per client and use send and recv system call directly
> right? Why do i go for these
Chris Newport wrote:
>
> Sorry, I did not make myself clear.
>
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 25 May 2007, Chris Newport wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Maybe we should take a hint from Solaris.
>>>
>>
>> No. Solaris is shit. They make their decisions based on "we control
>> the hardware" kind of s
Hi folks,
I was trying to get answer to my question around, but no one knows.
I do have DMA turned on, etc, yet - on extensive harddrive operations wait
time is 90+% , which means that machine is waiting, rather than doing
something meanwhile. (I guess).
Can someone describe to me , in more de
> As such, AA can detect whether you did exec("gzip") or exec("gunzip")
> and apply the policy relevant to the program. It could apply different
That's not actually useful for programs which link the same binary to
multiple names because if you don't consider argv[0] as well I can run
/usr/bin/gzi
On Fri, 25 May 2007, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> >
> > f() __attribute__((noreturn)) ;
> >
> > you get:
> >
> > warning: data definition has no type or storage class
> >
> > but gcc doesn't complain if you declare it thusly:
> >
> > __attribute__((noreturn)) f() ;
>
On Saturday 26 May 2007 14:09, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > > exec { "/usr/bin/gunzip" } "gzip", "-9", "some/file/to.gz";
> >
> > The above Perl code executes /usr/bin/gunzip and sets argv[0] to "gzip",
> > so this confirms that the value of argv[0] is arbitrary.
On May 25 2007 14:14, David Miller wrote:
>
>WHat is with multiple people asking about "!!" all of a
>sudden today?
>
>> Are all these occurrences merely the debris of
>> s/something/!notsomething/g kind of patches or is there some
>> dark, unknown C / gcc wizardry I have absolutely no clue of?
>
On Sat, 26 May 2007 15:05:38 +0200
Tommy Vercetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was trying to get answer to my question around, but no one knows.
> I do have DMA turned on, etc, yet - on extensive harddrive operations wait
> time is 90+% , which means that machine is waiting, rather than doing
* Andi Kleen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > And, in this case we're in luck. It's not released in any -stable tree
> > yet (it's queued for the next release). So there's plenty of time to
> > fix it up before next -stable release.
> >
> > Something like below should fix it.
>
> I already got
On Saturday 26 May 2007 15:34, Alan Cox wrote:
> > As such, AA can detect whether you did exec("gzip") or exec("gunzip")
> > and apply the policy relevant to the program. It could apply different
>
> That's not actually useful for programs which link the same binary to
> multiple names because if y
On Saturday 26 May 2007 15:52, Paolo Ornati wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2007 15:05:38 +0200
> It means that the disk is slow and the CPU is fast... so while the disk
> is busy seeking and reading data the CPU has nothing to do but wait for
> it.
>
> Idle == CPU has nothing to do
> Waiting == CPU has no
On Saturday 26 May 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Adam Osuchowski wrote:
> > if (((skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP) && skb->len > skb->dev->mtu) ||
> > (IS_VLAN_IP(skb) && skb->len > skb->dev->mtu - VLAN_HLEN)) &&
> > !skb_is_gso(skb))
> > return ip_fragment ...
>
>
> net/
Em Sáb, 2007-05-26 às 12:51 +0200, Jan Engelhardt escreveu:
> On May 25 2007 23:33, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >
> >Yeah, I'll check it again if reposted. Jan, could you split ALSA
> >portins at the next time?
>
> How much split? This time, I made four out of it.
>
> >This will make testing and mergi
On 26/05/2007, at 15:05, Tommy Vercetti wrote:
Hi folks,
I was trying to get answer to my question around, but no one knows.
I do have DMA turned on, etc, yet - on extensive harddrive
operations wait
time is 90+% , which means that machine is waiting, rather than doing
something meanwhile. (
Hello.
Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > Therefore, TOMOYO Linux checks the combination of filename and argv[0]
> > passed to execve().
> So you are indeed trying to control the value of argv[0]? Well, good luck
> with
> that, but it's totally insane. You are guaranteed to break some applications.
After bootup (runlevel 5) I found this in dmesg:
WARNING: at mm/slab.c:777 __find_general_cachep()
[] __kmalloc+0x40/0xc3
[] drm_rmdraw+0x126/0x24e [drm]
[] skb_dequeue+0x39/0x3f
[] drm_rmdraw+0x0/0x24e [drm]
[] drm_ioctl+0x14c/0x192 [drm]
[] do_ioctl+0x4c/0x62
[] vfs_ioctl+0x237/0x249
[]
Hi Ingo;
23 May 2007 Çar tarihinde, Ingo Molnar şunları yazmıştı:
> As usual, any sort of feedback, bugreport, fix and suggestion is more
> than welcome!
I have another kaffeine [0.8.4]/xine-lib [1.1.6] problem with CFS for you :)
Under load (compiling any Qt app. or kernel with -j1 or -j2) aud
Roland Dreier wrote:
> > I am now wondering whether the usage of MSI would help in this case and
> > that i should be using enable_msi before request_irq ?
>
> MSI interrupts are never shared. So if pci_enable_msi() succeeds, you
> can be sure that the interrupts you get with that IRQ number ar
Ingo Oeser wrote:
> On Saturday 26 May 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>>net/8021q ignores the VLAN header overhead, so we should probably do the
>>same here for consistency. Using IS_VLAN_IP (and IS_PPPOE_IP for current
>>-rc) looks fine, additionally we should probably also check for
>>skb->nfct
26 May 2007 Cts tarihinde, S.Çağlar Onur şunları yazmıştı:
> 23 May 2007 Çar tarihinde, Ingo Molnar şunları yazmıştı:
> > As usual, any sort of feedback, bugreport, fix and suggestion is more
> > than welcome!
>
> I have another kaffeine [0.8.4]/xine-lib [1.1.6] problem with CFS for you
> :)
>
> U
On 5/26/07, Tommy Vercetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was trying to get answer to my question around, but no one knows.
I do have DMA turned on, etc, yet - on extensive harddrive operations wait
You may have DMA turned on, but it may be ineffectual if you don't
have the right IDE driver handi
Hi,
wait time is 90+% , which means that machine is waiting, rather than doing
something meanwhile. (I guess).
Yes, the machine spends its time waiting for the disk to do its things
as it does not have anything else to do. Nothing to worry about. If
you want, launch some CPU bound process at t
On Saturday 26 May 2007 12:40:54 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> Yes! This sort of mistakes is completely impossible, as I use to work with
> aliases rather than IP adresses. The machine I tried to ping (i. e. my
> router) is called Jerry (as a reminiscence to Mr. "Captan Trips" from
> Grateful Dead), and th
Hi,
When trying to remove the netconsole module, I got the following kernel
output after a while (couple of minutes iirc):
[525720.117293] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
[525720.117353] [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
[525720.117439] [] show_trace+0x12/0x14
[525720.117526] [] dump_stack+0
Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
>> Ingo/Peter, any thoughts here? CFS and smpnice probably is "broken"
>> with respect to such example as above albeit for nice-based tasks.
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 10:17:42AM +1000, Peter Williams wrote:
> See above. I think that faced with cpu affinity use by the sys
in terms of driver, what do you mean ?
this is my lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82855PM Processor to I/O Controller
(rev 21)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82855PM Processor to AGP Controller (rev
21)
00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/IC
Andrew,
I am going to ignore Uwe from now on. It's simply impossible
to debug the problem the way he is responding.
Well, I'm not the first person in the Linux community adding
him to the killfile, ... .
I ask to try wireless-dev, as the driver works perfectly fine
for me there, but he refuses to
Seems to be hrtimers related - CC'ed Thomas.
Parag
Folkert van Heusden wrote:
Hi,
When trying to remove the netconsole module, I got the following kernel
output after a while (couple of minutes iirc):
[525720.117293] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
[525720.117353] [] show_trace_log_lvl+0
Am 23.05.2007 09:42 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.22-rc2/2.6.22-rc2-mm1/
This breaks network initialization on my SuSE 10.0 box once
again although I compiled with CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y.
Acquisition of the IP address via DHCP times o
On Sat, 26 May 2007 16:07:49 +0200
Tommy Vercetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyway 97% is quite high... what CPU / Hard Disk do you have?
> Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1400MHz
> TOSHIBA MK8025GAS
>
> > What kernel version?
> 2.6.21.1
> > I/O scheduler? (cat /sys/block/DEVICE/queue/sc
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 17:36 schrieben Sie:
> On Saturday 26 May 2007 12:40:54 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Yes! This sort of mistakes is completely impossible, as I use to work
> > with aliases rather than IP adresses. The machine I tried to ping (i. e.
> > my router) is called Jerry (as a reminiscence
On Sat, 26 May 2007 17:59:15 +0200 Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 23.05.2007 09:42 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.22-rc2/2.6.22-rc2-mm1/
>
> This breaks network initialization on my SuSE 10.0 box once
> again although I
On Saturday 26 May 2007 14:07:24 Indan Zupancic wrote:
>
> Did the patches reach 2.6.22-rc3 yet?
No.
>
> If they did, then the following warnings might need fixing:
There is already one patch queued for it. But actually in my experience I cannot
remember a single real bug showed by these warn
On 5/26/07, Tommy Vercetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
in terms of driver, what do you mean ?
The software driver that handles the specific chipset for that drive.
The thing that shows up when you do an lsmod, assuming you have the
driver compiled as a module.
/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads:
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 21:58 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> Is there anything I can do better to help myself figuring out this
> issue? As this is a modern laptop such things like a serial console are
> unavailable, but it would be nice to track things up over netconsole
> perhaps?
>
> I just nee
Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 09:27:12AM -0400, Mark Lord wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
And yes, it only starts to look for things when it recieves an event, it
does not "scan" sysfs at all.
Does it "look for" only that one event, or does it "scan" at that point?
udev will act on that eve
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 11:53 -0400, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> Seems to be hrtimers related - CC'ed Thomas.
I doubt that. The tick interrupt just finds out, that the machine is
stuck in rmmod.
> > Also the rmmod hangs and would not exit even with kill -9. It also
> > sucks up 100% cpu.
Can you pleas
On Sat, 26 May 2007 17:50:48 +0200 Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> I am going to ignore Uwe from now on. It's simply impossible
> to debug the problem the way he is responding.
> Well, I'm not the first person in the Linux community adding
> him to the killfile, ... .
Wel
> > Seems to be hrtimers related - CC'ed Thomas.
> I doubt that. The tick interrupt just finds out, that the machine is
> stuck in rmmod.
> > > Also the rmmod hangs and would not exit even with kill -9. It also
> > > sucks up 100% cpu.
> Can you please enable CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING ?
Luckily I alrea
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 17:50 schrieben Sie:
> Andrew,
>
> I am going to ignore Uwe from now on. It's simply impossible
> to debug the problem the way he is responding.
> Well, I'm not the first person in the Linux community adding
> him to the killfile, ... .
> I ask to try wireless-dev, as the d
Jonathan Woithe wrote:
On 21 May 2007 I wrote:
Attempting to compile a 2.6.21.1 kernel for use on a Fedora Core 6 box
results in a panic at boot because the root filesystem can't be found.
I have just compiled 2.6.22-rc2 with the configuration file given in my
previous post and the resulting
On Saturday 26 May 2007 18:13:09 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I already tried your -mm kernel, but it crashes on my machine
> > for other reasons. (Yeah, I should look into them, too :P )
>
> err, please do. Just the oops trace would be a start.
Yes, I will look into it. I think it was related to my
Hi,
> > Seems to be hrtimers related - CC'ed Thomas.
>
> I doubt that. The tick interrupt just finds out, that the machine is
> stuck in rmmod.
Can you please make netconsole unloadable via rmmod? My system seems to
hang every time I do rmmod on netconsole (rmmod using 100% cpu and not
returning
Jonathan Woithe wrote:
A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard
(DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE
CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any
problems.
Let me belatedly ask if the device shows up in
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 18:13 schrieben Sie:
> On Sat, 26 May 2007 17:50:48 +0200 Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Andrew,
> >
> > I am going to ignore Uwe from now on. It's simply impossible
> > to debug the problem the way he is responding.
> > Well, I'm not the first person in the
Dear list members,
I am posting to this list just to get additional help for the bug I
reported here:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8259
So the problem is the following:
I have a Asus P5W-DH Delux Mainboard with an onboard JMicron 20360/20363 AHCI
Controller.
As soon as I enable
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 18:21 schrieben Sie:
> On Saturday 26 May 2007 18:13:09 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > I already tried your -mm kernel, but it crashes on my machine
> > > for other reasons. (Yeah, I should look into them, too :P )
> >
> > err, please do. Just the oops trace would be a start.
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 18:17 +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> > > Seems to be hrtimers related - CC'ed Thomas.
> > I doubt that. The tick interrupt just finds out, that the machine is
> > stuck in rmmod.
> > > > Also the rmmod hangs and would not exit even with kill -9. It also
> > > > sucks up 1
Junio C Hamano wrote:
This introduces a shared header file that defines the entries
for two dma blacklists in ide-dma.c and libata-core.c to make it
easier to keep them in sync.
Why wasn't this done this way in the first place? Out of tree
development for libata or something?
--
Bill Davidsen
Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 25 2007 14:14, David Miller wrote:
>>"!!" is used in contexts where pointers might be being
>>tested as well as plain integers, the "!!" turns a pointer
>>into the equivalent integer boolean for testing.
>>
>>NULL pointers become 0
>>non-NULL poin
On Saturday 26 May 2007 18:26:06 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > I think we don't have IRQ assignment problems. Uwe simply disabled
> > b44-PCI support in his first bugreport (I guess).
>
> Yes!
>
> > So there was
> > no b44-PCI driver loaded.
>
> Well, not exactly: b44 plus ssb were in fact produced, but
Also sprach Rolf Eike Beer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sat, 26 May 2007 08:48:55
+0200):
> After bootup (runlevel 5) I found this in dmesg:
>
> WARNING: at mm/slab.c:777 __find_general_cachep()
> [] __kmalloc+0x40/0xc3
> [] drm_rmdraw+0x126/0x24e [drm]
> [] skb_dequeue+0x39/0x3f
> [] drm_rmdraw+0x0/
Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 18:13 schrieben Sie:
[...]
> > Uwe, http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/git-wireless.patch.gz is the current
> > wireless tree. That's a patch against 2.6.22-rc3. Could you please test
> > that? If that works then we know that the bug probab
> > > > Seems to be hrtimers related - CC'ed Thomas.
> > > I doubt that. The tick interrupt just finds out, that the machine is
> > > stuck in rmmod.
> > > > > Also the rmmod hangs and would not exit even with kill -9. It also
> > > > > sucks up 100% cpu.
> > > Can you please enable CONFIG_PROVE_LO
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 06:38:07PM +0200, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> Not exactly, if(foo) is the same as if( (int) foo), which is not
> guaranteed to result in non-null values for non-null pointers.
RTFStandard.
> ISO 9899/1999 says: "Any pointer may be converted to an integer type. [...]
> Th
On Saturday 26 May 2007 16:44, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > > Therefore, TOMOYO Linux checks the combination of filename and argv[0]
> > > passed to execve().
> >
> > So you are indeed trying to control the value of argv[0]? Well, good luck
> > with that, but it's
On Mon, 21 May 2007 22:06:36 -0700
Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This introduces a shared header file that defines the entries
> for two dma blacklists in ide-dma.c and libata-core.c to make it
> easier to keep them in sync.
>
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
NAK
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 18:49 +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> > > > > Seems to be hrtimers related - CC'ed Thomas.
> > > > I doubt that. The tick interrupt just finds out, that the machine is
> > > > stuck in rmmod.
> > > > > > Also the rmmod hangs and would not exit even with kill -9. It also
>
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
