Hi Grant,
> adm9240 i2c still broken, spamming debug with:
> (...)
> Aug 23 18:48:40 peetoo kernel: [ 1591.151834] i2c_adapter i2c-0: Transaction
> (pre): CNT=08, CMD=2c, ADD=5a, DAT0=00, DAT1=00
> Aug 23 18:48:40 peetoo kernel: [ 1591.170515] i2c_adapter i2c-0: Transaction
> (post): CNT=08, CMD
* Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks like Gigabit Ethernet is still having some problems. This is
> with the e1000 driver. If I remove all the qdisc_restart changes it
> starts to work the warning below goes away, but it has
> smp_processor_id warnings.
btw., what does "probl
Hi
Most of the related sites has ext3 patches for 2.4
kernels but I could not found any for 2.4.1.
where can I find It?
thanks
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
-
To unsubscribe
jmerkey wrote:
It might be helpful for someone to look at these sections of code I
had to patch in 2.6.9.
I discovered a case where the kernel scheduler will pass NULL for the
array argument
when I started hitting the extreme upper range > 200MB/S combined disk
and lan
throughput. This was ru
Current IA32 CPU hotplug code doesn't allow bringing up processors that were
not present in the boot configuration.
To make existing hot plug facility more practical for physical hot plug,
possible processors should be encountered
during boot for potentual hot add/replace/remove. On ES7000, AC
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 08:29:32AM +0200, Thomas Schlichter wrote:
> I tested the attached patch during the last night and it sems to work...
A quick feedback on your patch:
A litmus test that I use is if "zero" lost ticks are being hit,
which we should not w/o a patch like dynamic tick.
I stil
is this the right way to fix the UP assumption below?
Ingo
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux/drivers/ide/pci/alim15x3.c
===
--- linux.orig/drivers/ide/pci/alim15x3.c
+++ linux/drivers/ide/pci/alim1
2005/8/30, Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 8/30/05, zhang yuanyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello, everyone!
> >
> > The "range support" may be puzzled, but I don't know how to express my
> > problem exactly because of my poor english.
> >
> > Just take an example, I may need all udp pack
* Florian Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > JACK sources already include a CHECK_PREEMPTION() macro which expands
> > to Ingo's special gettimeofday() calls. The trace is turned on and
> > then off automatically before and after the realtime critical section
> > in the process thread (see l
I've since found that in the suspend2 code, I was working around this
problem before by not calling the prepare method. I've just today
modified the Suspend code so that it calls prepare for all of the
powerdown methods and everything is working fine without reverting the
patch. I guess this is yo
Am Donnerstag, 1. September 2005 09:23 schrieb Srivatsa Vaddagiri:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 08:29:32AM +0200, Thomas Schlichter wrote:
> > I tested the attached patch during the last night and it sems to work...
>
> A quick feedback on your patch:
>
> A litmus test that I use is if "zero" lost tic
Machida, Hiroyuki wrote:
OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
"Machida, Hiroyuki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Right, it looks like TLB, which holds cache "Physical addres"
correponding to "Logical address". In this case, PID and file name
to be looked up, perform role of "Logical address".
But, there i
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 06:56:28PM -0600, jmerkey wrote:
> Bernd,
>
> Thanks for the accurate and reasonable response. I object to the use
> of the word "tainted". This implies the binary code is somehow
> infringing. I would suggest changing the word to "non-GPL" or "Vendor
> Supported" since
Hi,
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 20:13 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Current IA32 CPU hotplug code doesn't allow bringing up processors
> that were not present in the boot configuration.
> To make existing hot plug facility more practical for physical hot
> plug, possible processors should be encoun
This patch replaces manual incrementing of refcounters on dentry/mnt in
fs/dcookie.c with calls to dget()/mntget().
Noticed this when tried to change logic in dget() and it began to oops.
Signed-Off-By: Alexey Kuznetsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-Off-By: Pavel Emelianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signe
Thank you all for your quick responses!
I want to add some of my comments.
1. Kernel parameters is a great mechanism to control how the kernel
behaves without modifying any file in kernel,
putting options in a file maybe seems a good solution... but it lower
the power of the boot loader,
On Thursday 01 September 2005 08:57, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> the whole thing should be reworked, so that there is no artificial limit
> like MAX_ARG_PAGES. (it is after all just another piece of memory, in
> theory)
Yes, a sysctl would probably lead to fragmentation problems and then
people would do
Ingo Molnar wrote:
is this the right way to fix the UP assumption below?
Ingo
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux/drivers/ide/pci/alim15x3.c
> [snip]
OK. The reported boot WARNING seems to be over now. Tested on the
offended laptop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]/UP, PCI
* Rui Nuno Capela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >is this the right way to fix the UP assumption below?
> >
> > Ingo
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >Index: linux/drivers/ide/pci/alim15x3.c
> > [snip]
>
> OK. The reported boot WARNING seems to b
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 18:56 -0600, jmerkey wrote:
> Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >>I mean, nvidia people also use propietary code in the kernel (probably
> >>violating the GPL anyway) and don't do such things.
> >
> >The Linux kernel allows binary drivers, y
* Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 01 September 2005 08:57, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > the whole thing should be reworked, so that there is no artificial limit
> > like MAX_ARG_PAGES. (it is after all just another piece of memory, in
> > theory)
>
> Yes, a sysctl would probably
> Hi
>
> Most of the related sites has ext3 patches for 2.4
> kernels but I could not found any for 2.4.1.
> where can I find It?
I think you are using way too old kernel, consider an upgrade...
Arturas M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
Kirill Korotaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This patch replaces manual incrementing of refcounters on dentry/mnt in
> fs/dcookie.c with calls to dget()/mntget().
>
> ...
>
> --- linux-2.6.8.1-t032/fs/dcookies.c.dget2004-08-14 14:54:46.0
> +0400
> +++ linux-2.6.8.1-t032/fs/dcooki
Hallo Natalie,
On Wednesday 31 August 2005 14:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Current IA32 CPU hotplug code doesn't allow bringing up processors that
> were not present in the boot configuration. To make existing hot plug
> facility more practical for physical hot plug, possible processors should
>
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:03:57AM -0700, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
> Yes. ACPI spec says transitions can fail. But, it doesn't fail often in
> practise. And even if it fails, I think, we should handle it without this
> read os STATUS register.
How can we handle it, if we do not even know
Ingo Molnar wrote:
Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
OK. The reported boot WARNING seems to be over now. Tested on the
offended laptop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]/UP, PCI chipset: ALi M1533) with
2.6.13-rt3, where the suggested patch on drivers/ide/pci/alim15x3.c
seems to fix the burp. All seems to be working fin
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:48:40PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Russell: The driver is using pccard_nonstatic_ops for card window
> management, even though the driver its marked SS_STATIC_MAP (using
> mem->static_map).
This is obviously broken. Where does it fail if pccard_static_ops is us
This patch depends on the previous patches cpuset_gfp_hardwall_flag
and cpuset_mm_alloc_oom_fixes.
This patch makes use of the previously underutilized cpuset flag
'mem_exclusive' to provide what amounts to another layer of
memory placement resolution. With this patch, there are now the
following
This patch applies a few comment and code cleanups to mm/oom_kill.c
prior to applying a few small patches to improve cpuset management of
memory placement.
The comment changed in oom_kill.c was seriously misleading. The code
layout change in select_bad_process() makes room for adding another
cond
Add another GFP flag: __GFP_HARDWALL.
A subsequent "cpuset_zone_allowed" patch will use this flag to mark
GFP_USER allocations, and distinguish them from GFP_KERNEL allocations.
Allocations (such as GFP_USER) marked GFP_HARDWALL are constrainted to
the current tasks cpuset. Other allocations (su
Now the real motivation for this cpuset mem_exclusive patch series
seems trivial. This patch depends on the previous cpuset_zone_allowed
patch and its prerequisites.
This patch keeps a task in or under one mem_exclusive cpuset from
provoking an oom kill of a task under a non-overlapping mem_exclu
Hi,
> From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The following patch does not use MMX regsiters so that we don't have
> > > to worry about save/restore the FPU/MMX states.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> >
> > Performance will probably be bad on K7 Athlons - those have a microc
The following patch is proposed for inclusion in 2.6.14.
This patch extends the use of the cpuset attribute 'mem_exclusive'
to support cpuset configurations that:
1) allow GFP_KERNEL allocations to come from a potentially larger
set of memory nodes than GFP_USER allocations, and
2) can const
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Holger Kiehl wrote:
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Nick Piggin wrote:
Holger Kiehl wrote:
meminfo.dump:
MemTotal: 8124172 kB
MemFree: 23564 kB
Buffers: 7825944 kB
Cached: 19216 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
Active: 25708 kB
Hi,
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote:
> Hmm, I cannot think of more ways to specify a timeout than how
> long I want to wait (relative) or until when (absolute) and which
> is the reference clock. And they don't seem broken to me, common
> sense, in any case. Do you have any examp
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> There it is.
>
> The most painful part of 2.6.13 is likely to be the fact that we made x86
> use the generic PCI bus setup code for assigning unassigned resources.
> That uncovered rather a lot of nasty small details, but should also mean
> that a lot of laptops in parti
Hi,
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > What "more versions" are you talking about? When you convert a user time
> > to kernel time you can automatically validate it and later you can use
> > standard kernel APIs, so you don't have to add even more API bloat.
>
> What's kernel time?
On Thursday 01 September 2005 11:07, Hiro Yoshioka wrote:
> The following is the almost final version of the
> cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll() patch.
Looks good to me.
Once the filemap.c hunk is in I'll probably do something
similar for x86-64.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On 9/1/05, Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch applies a few comment and code cleanups to mm/oom_kill.c
> prior to applying a few small patches to improve cpuset management of
> memory placement.
>
> The comment changed in oom_kill.c was seriously misleading. The code
> layout ch
On Iau, 2005-09-01 at 02:33 +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > I mean, nvidia people also use propietary code in the kernel (probably
> > violating the GPL anyway) and don't do such things.
>
> The Linux kernel allows binary drivers, you just have to live
On Iau, 2005-09-01 at 08:00 +0200, Antonio Vargas wrote:
> 2. whole screen z-buffer, for depth comparison between the pixels
> generated from each window.
That one I question in part - if the rectangles are (as is typically the
case) large then the Z buffer just ups the memory accesses. I guess fo
Coywolf wrote:
> Why bother ...
The line length in characters was getting too long, the logic was
getting too convoluted, and the comment only applied to an unobvious
portion of the line.
Providing a name for the logical condition that a complicated
expression computes is one of the ways I find u
On Iau, 2005-09-01 at 09:45 +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> I believe the use of the word is quite correct.
Ditto. The term is used for all kinds of marking in software and in the
kernel case comes well after its use for things like perl unsafe
variables. It is also used for far more than just non
We should probably also not to try to boot disabled cpus in smp_boot_cpus()...
--Mika
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
On Iau, 2005-09-01 at 09:24 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> is this the right way to fix the UP assumption below?
Probably not. The ide_lock may already be held (randomly depending on
the code path) at the point we retune a drive on error. Actually you
probably crash before this anyway.
The ALi code
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:42:23AM +0200, Thomas Schlichter wrote:
> Think about two adjacent regular timer interrupts. Now consider the first one
> is handled very late (indeed even after the second interrupt already
> occoured). Then will see two "lost" ticks.
>
> Now directly the second timer
Hi, this is the latest set of gfs patches, it includes some minor munging
since the previous set. Andrew, could this be added to -mm? there's not
much in the way of pending changes.
http://redhat.com/~teigland/gfs2/20050901/gfs2-full.patch
http://redhat.com/~teigland/gfs2/20050901/broke
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 18:46 +0800, David Teigland wrote:
> Hi, this is the latest set of gfs patches, it includes some minor munging
> since the previous set. Andrew, could this be added to -mm? there's not
> much in the way of pending changes.
can you post them here instead so that they can be a
On 9/1/05, Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Coywolf wrote:
> > Why bother ...
>
> The line length in characters was getting too long, the logic was
Yeah. That long line bugged me too when I was writing my lca oom-killer patch.
> getting too convoluted, and the comment only applied to a
Hello,
This is a list of patch which simplify the file structure of
the kernel residing in /boot . The file named with a KGZ extension
( for instance /boot/linux-2.6.13.kgz ) is simply the usual ELF file
named linux-2.6.13/vmlinux tranformed to binary with objdump and
gzip'ed.
This new fi
This third part is open for debate: it is using some Gujin exported
variables to search for the root filesystem: Gujin knows from which
disk/partition it loads the KGZ kernel file - and so the real mode
kernel function can deduce where is its root if it knows the order
of the IDE interfaces an
This fourth patch is included in the subject line.
Have fun,
Etienne.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://ww
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.13/2.6.13-mm1/
- Included Alan's big tty layer buffering rewrite. This breaks the build on
lots of more obscure character device drivers. Patches welcome (please cc
Alan).
Changes since 2.6.13-rc6-mm2:
linus.patch
git-
Hi Srivatsa,
Am Donnerstag, 1. September 2005 12:28 schrieb Srivatsa Vaddagiri:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:42:23AM +0200, Thomas Schlichter wrote:
> > Think about two adjacent regular timer interrupts. Now consider the first
> > one is handled very late (indeed even after the second interrupt al
Hi,
http://195.66.192.167/linux/trailing_spaces_patch/
There are 290 patches like this:
- printk ("scsi%d : not initializing, no I/O or memory mapping known \n",
+ printk ("scsi%d : not initializing, no I/O or memory mapping known\n",
Largest ones are:
# ls -l | sort -r
total 1256
David Teigland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, this is the latest set of gfs patches, it includes some minor munging
> since the previous set. Andrew, could this be added to -mm?
Dumb question: why?
Maybe I was asleep, but I don't recall seeing much discussion or exposition
of
- Why the ker
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:07:10AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> I haven't been following linux kernel development for a while, so I'm not
> sure what the status is. I noticed that there is now crypto support in the
> kernel, including e.g. AES. I would like to use hardware acceleration
> where ava
Hi All,
The archives & FAQs on this subject stop at December 2003. Google not
much help either (prob. due to my keyword choices)
I gather the only way to do this is via the ruby patch.
(When) Will there ever be native kernel (and maybe XFree) support for
multiple independent keyboards?
The
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:05:23PM +0200, Thomas Schlichter wrote:
> Yes, the only real differences are the two points mentioned in my first
> mail... I only wanted to help you fixing these.
Thanks for pointing them out. I have fixed it in the experimental version
that I have now.
> Well, that s
Hi all :)
I don't know if this is a known issue, but usb-storage speed for
'Full speed' devices dropped from 2.6.11.12 (more than 800Kb/s) to
2.6.12 (less than 250Kb/s). The problem still exists in 2.6.13.
The lack of speed seems to affect only the OHCI driver. My test
was done over a
Hi,
I'm trying to write a host controller driver for a Arc hardware. I
need to know how nak
pid should be handled ? Hardware can automatically manage them, that means it
automatically retry the naked transaction. But since setup packet must
not be "NAKed" or hub
endpoint #1 returns nak pid when no
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 18:46 +0800, David Teigland wrote:
> Hi, this is the latest set of gfs patches, it includes some minor munging
> since the previous set. Andrew, could this be added to -mm? there's not
> much in the way of pending changes.
>
> http://redhat.com/~teiglan
Hello all,
Nice to see that this driver gets forward ported to 2.6. I originally
wrote it for pcmcia-cs, but it made its way into 2.4 after a while.
Thanks to all the people who added code and fixes.
I'm not sure how the current Linux pcmcia layer works, and I am not
involved in powerpc land anym
Le 01.09.2005 13:36, DervishD a écrit :
> I don't know if this is a known issue, but usb-storage speed for
> 'Full speed' devices dropped from 2.6.11.12 (more than 800Kb/s) to
> 2.6.12 (less than 250Kb/s). The problem still exists in 2.6.13.
>
> The lack of speed seems to affect only the O
>From: Roman Zippel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote:
>
>> Hmm, I cannot think of more ways to specify a timeout than how
>> long I want to wait (relative) or until when (absolute) and which
>> is the reference clock. And they don't seem broken to me, comm
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:00:25PM +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> There are 290 patches like this:
>
> - printk ("scsi%d : not initializing, no I/O or memory mapping known
> \n",
> + printk ("scsi%d : not initializing, no I/O or memory mapping known\n",
> Feel free to download and ap
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:28:25PM +0200, Zoltan Szecsei wrote:
> Hi All,
> The archives & FAQs on this subject stop at December 2003. Google not
> much help either (prob. due to my keyword choices)
>
> I gather the only way to do this is via the ruby patch.
>
> (When) Will there ever be native
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
That would be nice addition IMHO. It'll be more complex since it'll
involve netconsole dumping and passing the klive session to the kernel
somehow (userland would be too unreliable to push the oops to the
server). The worst part is that oops dumping m
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, DervishD wrote:
>Hi all :)
>
>I don't know if this is a known issue, but usb-storage speed for
> 'Full speed' devices dropped from 2.6.11.12 (more than 800Kb/s) to
> 2.6.12 (less than 250Kb/s). The problem still exists in 2.6.13.
>
>The lack of speed seems to affec
Meelis Roos wrote:
>
> It's OK then - I'm not using any suspend and I had a problem that my
> machine powered down instead of reboot. The patch that went into 2.6.13
> after rc7 fixed it for me. So the current tree is OK for me and if it's
> OK for you too after suspend2 changes then this case can
On 9/1/05, David Teigland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Adapt the vfs so gfs (and other cfs's) don't need to walk vma lists.
> [cf. ops_file.c:walk_vm(), gfs works fine as is, but some don't like it.]
It works fine only if you don't care about playing well with other
clustered filesystems.
Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't been following linux kernel development for a while, so I'm not
> sure what the status is. I noticed that there is now crypto support in the
> kernel, including e.g. AES. I would like to use hardware acceleration
> where available, e.g., VIA EPIA
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 22:32, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Meelis Roos wrote:
> >
> > It's OK then - I'm not using any suspend and I had a problem that my
> > machine powered down instead of reboot. The patch that went into 2.6.13
> > after rc7 fixed it for me. So the current tree is OK for me and if it'
Hi,
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote:
> >You still didn't explain what's the point in choosing different clock
> >sources for a _timeout_.
>
> The same reasons that compel to have CLOCK_REALTIME or
> CLOCK_MONOTONIC, for example. Or the need to time out on a
> high resolution clo
Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:28:25PM +0200, Zoltan Szecsei wrote:
Hi All,
The archives & FAQs on this subject stop at December 2003. Google not
much help either (prob. due to my keyword choices)
I gather the only way to do this is via the ruby patch.
(When) Will ther
* Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050901 08:22]:
> On Thu, 1 Sep 2005 02:58 am, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> > Following patches related to dynamic tick are posted in separate mails,
> > for convenience of review. The first patch probably applies w/o dynamic
> > tick consideration also.
> >
> > Pat
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 04:07:22PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
[snip]
> I tried this quickly on a loaner ThinkPad T30, and needed the following
> patch to compile. The patch does work with PIT, but with lapic the
> system does not wake to timer interrupts :(
That may be a thinkpad issue; I have to
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 03:07:20PM +0200, Zoltan Szecsei wrote:
> >>(When) Will there ever be native kernel (and maybe XFree) support for
> >>multiple independent keyboards?
> >
> >The kernel console is unlikely to ever going to have that - noone is
> >interested in changing the console subsystem
Hi,
sorry for replying in this way, but i'm not subscribed
to lkml, and please do CC me
ruby is still maintained and the list is pretty active
although that is mostly volunteer work from Aivils
it's running pretty stable on x86 and x86_64
and there are patches almost all recent 2.6 kernels (upto
> Hallo Natalie,
>
> On Wednesday 31 August 2005 14:13,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Current IA32 CPU hotplug code doesn't allow bringing up processors
> > that were not present in the boot configuration. To make
> existing hot
> > plug facility more practical for physical hot plug, possible
Here is a working swap prefetching patch for 2.6.13. I have resuscitated and
rewritten some early prefetch code Thomas Schlichter did in late 2.5 to
create a configurable kernel thread that reads in swap from ram in reverse
order it was written out. It does this once kswapd has been idle for a m
* David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050901 16:19]:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 04:07:22PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> [snip]
> > I tried this quickly on a loaner ThinkPad T30, and needed the following
> > patch to compile. The patch does work with PIT, but with lapic the
> > system does not wake
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 11:19:51AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> You still didn't explain what's the point in choosing
> different clock sources for a _timeout_.
Well, if CLOCK_REALTIME is set forward by a minute,
timers & timeout specified against that clock will expire
a minute earlier than expe
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 11:22:32AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> For a timeout? Please get real.
> If you need more precision, use a dedicated timer API, but don't make the
> general case more complex for the 99.99% of other users.
Struct timeout is just a struct timespec + a bit for absolute/rela
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:50:33AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> When you convert a user time to kernel time you can
> automatically validate
Kernel time sucks. It is just a single clock, it may not have
the attributes of the clock that the user really wished to use.
Joe
-
To unsubscribe from thi
Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
Hi,
sorry for replying in this way, but i'm not subscribed
to lkml, and please do CC me
ruby is still maintained and the list is pretty active
although that is mostly volunteer work from Aivils
Thats good. Googling for it I found too many hits, and the ones I looke
Martin J. Bligh described at OLS the "blunderbuss effect", i.e. the
inefficiency of the dentry cache shrinker at freeing whole pages, since we
could leave (worst-case) one dentry per page because it's at the end of the
LRU list.
Pinned dentries (in first place libfs ones, but he also includes d
On 9/1/05, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Iau, 2005-09-01 at 08:00 +0200, Antonio Vargas wrote:
> > 2. whole screen z-buffer, for depth comparison between the pixels
> > generated from each window.
>
> That one I question in part - if the rectangles are (as is typically the
> case) large
On Aug 31, 2005, at 7:47 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Move all files from arch/ppc64/kernel/bpa_* to arch/powerpc/
platforms/cell,
I would like to see a patch like this go into 2.6.14, for multiple
reasons:
- The marketing folks have changed the names and we are no longer
supposed
to ref
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 04:07:22PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> I tried this quickly on a loaner ThinkPad T30, and needed the following
> patch to compile. The patch does work with PIT, but with lapic the
> system does not wake to timer interrupts :(
Even I have found that enabling lapic breaks i
The lock_nolock module does no inter-node locking and allows gfs to be
used as a local file system.
Signed-off-by: Ken Preslan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/gfs2/locking/nolock/Makefile |3
fs/gfs2/locking/nolock/main.c | 267 ++
The lock_dlm module uses the DLM in linux/drivers/dlm/ for inter-node
locking.
Signed-off-by: Ken Preslan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/Makefile |3
fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/lock.c | 533 +
The lock_harness module allows a gfs file system to connect to a given
lock module.
Signed-off-by: Ken Preslan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/gfs2/locking/harness/Makefile |3
fs/gfs2/locking/harness/lm_interface.h | 286
A per-node on-disk log is used for recovery.
Signed-off-by: Ken Preslan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/gfs2/log.c | 670 +
fs/gfs2/log.h | 68 +
fs/gfs2/recovery.c | 561 +
Add gfs to the build system and gfs2.txt to Documentation.
Signed-off-by: Ken Preslan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Documentation/filesystems/gfs2.txt | 194 +
fs/Kconfig | 15 ++
fs/Makef
Code that deals with quotas.
Signed-off-by: Ken Preslan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/gfs2/lvb.c | 61 ++
fs/gfs2/lvb.h | 28 +
fs/gfs2/quota.c | 1209
fs/gfs2/quota.h | 34 +
4 fil
There are a variety of mount options, tunable parameters, internal
statistics, and methods of online file system manipulation.
Signed-off-by: Ken Preslan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/gfs2/ioctl.c | 1485 +++
Code that handles extended attributes and ACL's.
Signed-off-by: Ken Preslan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/gfs2/acl.c | 313 ++
fs/gfs2/acl.h | 37 +
fs/gfs2/eaops.c | 179 ++
fs/gfs2/eaops.h | 30 +
fs/gfs2/eattr.c | 1621
Central header files that are widely used.
Signed-off-by: Ken Preslan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/gfs2/gfs2.h | 77 +++
fs/gfs2/incore.h| 691 +++
include/linux/gfs2_ioctl.h | 30 +
include/l
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 00:18, Hans Kristian Rosbach wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 23:46 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Here is a working swap prefetching patch for 2.6.13. I have resuscitated
> > and rewritten some early prefetch code Thomas Schlichter did in late 2.5
> > to create a configurable kerne
1 - 100 of 436 matches
Mail list logo
