On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:05:23PM +0200, Thomas Schlichter wrote: > Yes, the only real differences are the two points mentioned in my first > mail... I only wanted to help you fixing these.
Thanks for pointing them out. I have fixed it in the experimental version that I have now. > Well, that seems to be fine. If you want somebody to have a look over your > final patch, feel free to mail me... sure! > I should have defined PMTMR_TICKS_PER_JIFFY like you assigned > pm_ticks_per_jiffy (why did you use a static and constant variable and not a > macro?): I actually started with using the calibrated value of PMTMR_TICKS_PER_JIFFY rather than compile time constant (as found in verify_pmtmr), but later dropped the idea since I didnt get good results with it. After that didnt revert back pm_ticks_per_jiffy to be a macro. But good point, will include this in the next patch that I am trying out. Will post it if I happen to have success :) -- Thanks and Regards, Srivatsa Vaddagiri, Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Labs, Bangalore, INDIA - 560017 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
