On Dec 22 2006 09:43, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
>that's the name as it *already* existed in kernel.h. however, since
>no one was actually using it yet, it's a piece of cake to give it a
>better name. either FIELD_SIZE or MEMBER_SIZE would work just fine.
I 'd go for MEMBER_SIZE. (Compare the pr
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 04:46:51PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 07:43:39 -0500 (EST)
> > "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > as with ARRAY_SIZE(), there are a number of places (mercifully, far
> > > fewer)
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 04:46:51PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 07:43:39 -0500 (EST)
> "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > as with ARRAY_SIZE(), there are a number of places (mercifully, far
> > fewer) that recode what could be done with the FIELD_SIZEOF() ma
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 07:43:39 -0500 (EST)
"Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as with ARRAY_SIZE(), there are a number of places (mercifully, far
> fewer) that recode what could be done with the FIELD_SIZEOF() macro in
> kernel.h.
>
Looks sane.
> include/acpi/actbl.h
as with ARRAY_SIZE(), there are a number of places (mercifully, far
fewer) that recode what could be done with the FIELD_SIZEOF() macro in
kernel.h.
i wrote a short script to handle that and this is the result (after
a minor amount of hand tweaking):
arch/m68k/kernel/signal.c
5 matches
Mail list logo
