On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 10:33 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> Oh well, this is a leftover from the days where we tried to use TSC
> despite of frequency changes. It still modifies the scale factor of the
> tsc clocksource.
>
> I agree that it can be removed as we switch off TSC anyway in that ca
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 14:30 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 22:50 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 10:43 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > Looks like this path ,
> > >
> > > arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c: time_cpufreq_notifier(); <-- takes xtime_lock
> > >
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 22:50 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 10:43 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > Looks like this path ,
> >
> > arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c: time_cpufreq_notifier(); <-- takes xtime_lock
> > mark_tsc_unstable();
> >
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 10:43 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> Looks like this path ,
>
> arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c: time_cpufreq_notifier(); <-- takes xtime_lock
>mark_tsc_unstable();
> clocksource_change_rating(&clocksource_tsc, 0);
>
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 03:19 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:03:16 -0700 Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Before this change the timekeeping code would poll the clocksource
> > list every interrupt. This changes that so the clocksource list is
> > only checked whe
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:03:16 -0700 Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Before this change the timekeeping code would poll the clocksource
> list every interrupt. This changes that so the clocksource list is
> only checked when there has been and update, and no longer checks
> in interrupt c
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 18:21 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:03:16 -0700 Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Boot tested on i386, compile tested on x86_64 .. However, I couldn't
> > find a !GENERIC_TIME that compiled without this change so it's untested..
>
> I'm sc
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:03:16 -0700 Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Boot tested on i386, compile tested on x86_64 .. However, I couldn't
> find a !GENERIC_TIME that compiled without this change so it's untested..
I'm scratching my head over this statement.
Do you mean that none of grep
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 14:36 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:25:19 -0700
> john stultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 14:03 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > Before this change the timekeeping code would poll the clocksource
> > > list every interrupt. T
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 14:29 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 14:25 -0700, john stultz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 14:03 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > Before this change the timekeeping code would poll the clocksource
> > > list every interrupt. This changes that so the c
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:25:19 -0700
john stultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 14:03 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > Before this change the timekeeping code would poll the clocksource
> > list every interrupt. This changes that so the clocksource list is
> > only checked when th
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 14:25 -0700, john stultz wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 14:03 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > Before this change the timekeeping code would poll the clocksource
> > list every interrupt. This changes that so the clocksource list is
> > only checked when there has been and upda
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 14:03 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> Before this change the timekeeping code would poll the clocksource
> list every interrupt. This changes that so the clocksource list is
> only checked when there has been and update, and no longer checks
> in interrupt context.
>
> This als
Before this change the timekeeping code would poll the clocksource
list every interrupt. This changes that so the clocksource list is
only checked when there has been and update, and no longer checks
in interrupt context.
This also has a few small space and line cleanups.
Boot tested on i386, com
14 matches
Mail list logo
