On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 14:30 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 22:50 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 10:43 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > Looks like this path ,
> > >
> > > arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c: time_cpufreq_notifier(); <-- takes xtime_lock
> > > mark_tsc_unstable();
> > > clocksource_change_rating(&clocksource_tsc,
> > > 0);
> > > timekeeping_change_clocksource(); <-- takes
> > > xtime_lock
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm not sure why the time_cpufreq_notifier is taking the xtime_lock tho .
> >
> > Simply because it fiddles with variables which are relevant for
> > timekeeping.
>
> loops_per_jiffy perhaps?
Oh well, this is a leftover from the days where we tried to use TSC
despite of frequency changes. It still modifies the scale factor of the
tsc clocksource.
I agree that it can be removed as we switch off TSC anyway in that case.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
