Hello!
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 12:42:02AM +0200, Marcel Selhorst wrote:
> +++ linux/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c 2005-07-07 14:56:27.0
> +
...
> + * Specifications at www.trustedcomputinggroup.org
Blanks at end of line
> +/* Infineon specific delay definitions */
> +enum in
From: Ivan Kokshaysky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 09:51:04 +0400
> Why not just implement sparc64 version of pci_update_resource elsewhere
> (perhaps a dummy one, if you don't need PCI PM), rather than force the
> rest of the world to duplicate the code?
That's fine, what would be t
On Fri, Jul 08 2005, Jon Escombe wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Jul 07 2005, Shawn Starr wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Model: HTS548080M9AT00 (Hitachi)
> >>Laptop: T42.
> >>
> >>segfault:/home/spstarr# ./a /dev/hda
> >>head parked
> >>
> >>Seems to park, heard it click :)
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Note o
Nigel Kukard wrote:
Hi Guys,
How stable is reiserfs quotas in 2.6.11.12?
It's been stable for me for months (using various 2.6.11.y kernels),
over RAID-5 even.
--Andy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 05:13:49PM +0300, Tero Roponen wrote:
> I applied your original patch (the no-op one) and the
> end=0 patch. With those applied I could boot into login
> prompt.
Puzzling. None of these patches should affect your setup.
And you still have DMA timeouts...
> Attached are lsp
On Thu, Jul 07 2005, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> Bodo Eggert wrote:
>
> >Clemens Koller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Well, sure, it's not a notebook HDD, but maybe it's possible
> >>to give headpark a more generic way to get the heads parked?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I remember my old MFM
On Fri, Jul 08 2005, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> Clemens Koller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, sure, it's not a notebook HDD, but maybe it's possible
> > to give headpark a more generic way to get the heads parked?
>
> I remember my old MFM HDD, which had a Landing Zone stored in the BIOS to
> w
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 15:58:55 +1000 David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:46:54PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > Andrew, please apply:
>
> Ahem. Or perhaps the version which builds on iSeries too.
>
> This patch removes the use of bitfield types from the ppc64 hash
* Kylene Jo Hall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> A problem was reported that the tpm driver was interfereing with
> networking on the 8139 chipset. The tpm driver was using a hard coded
> the memory address instead of the value the BIOS was putting the chip
> at. This was in the tpm_lpc_bus_init fun
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 10:33:03AM +0200, Markus Lidel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Greg KH wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 08:08:20PM +0200, Markus Lidel wrote:
> >>Greg KH wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 05:02:41PM +0200, Markus Lidel wrote:
> I know, but i hopefully also have a good reason to
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:46:54PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> Andrew, please apply:
Ahem. Or perhaps the version which builds on iSeries too.
This patch removes the use of bitfield types from the ppc64 hash table
manipulation code.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: worki
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 23:32, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > @@ -0,0 +1,817 @@
> > +struct io_info {
> > + struct bio * sys_struct;
> > + long block[PAGE_SIZE/512];
Nigel Cunningham writes:
No... it's the maximum number of blocks per page. Depending upon how
the user has set the blocksize
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 08:11:03PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> > Problem: pci_update_resource doesn't exist for sparc64.
>
> Yes, the drivers/pci/setup-res.c code isn't compiled in on
> sparc64 because it assumes a totally different model of
> PCI bus probing than we use on sparc64.
Why not j
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> why not?
> If your /etc/shadow has no selinux context you've lost already :0
No, the kernel will map it to something safe.
- James
--
James Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
th
Nigel Cunningham writes:
No... it's the maximum number of blocks per page. Depending upon how
the user has set the blocksize when they created the filesystem (in the
case of filesystems), the number of blocks we use per page might be 1,
2, 4 or 8.
Yes. Sorry about that. I don't know what I was
david mosberger wrote:
- could anyone write same barrier for intel compiler?
Tony or David, could you help me?
I think it might be best to make ia64_mca_barrier() a proper
subroutine written in assembly code. Yes, that costs some time, but
we're talking about wasting 1,000+ cycles just t
* Chuck Harding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which still exhibits the lockup of sox. I built a 2.6.12 vanilla kernel
> using the same .config as I used for 51-12 and the failure did not happen.
> just the process of booting up causes later invocations of sox to lockup
> in the D state. If I don't
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 02:39:58PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:24:43PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 01:02:38PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]$ cat /etc/shadow
> > cat: /etc/shadow: Permission denied
>
> Additionally, the apps would need to either be rewritten to create
> the files under the audited context, or policy would have to cause all
> files created by those apps to be under the audited context. Neither
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:59:28PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> read from ACPI tables, while still keeping them available.
You're only keeping some of them available, as you overwrite one such
setting. Alternatively you can increase p.state_count by one early enough.
> index = (((frequency)/
Rafael,
Thanks a lot for the quick reply and patch. I have tested the patch tonight
and things are looking good so far. For the first time since I upgraded
from my single core athlon 64 3500+ my cpu fan isn't a tornado. Also, my
CPU frequency isn't pegged at full throttle 24/7 (it's droppin
Andrew, please apply:
This patch removes the use of bitfield types from the ppc64 hash table
manipulation code.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
arch/ppc64/kernel/iSeries_htab.c | 50 +
arch/ppc64/kernel/pSeries_lpar.c | 49
arch/ppc64/mm/ha
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > The setup was a Intel board with 1 PATA/4 SATA onboard and only a CD-ROM
> > > and a external Promise PATA controller with two PATA disks.
> >
> > actual OOPS would be very useful
>
> It's difficult because I don't have serial on that machine.
Maybe w
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:16:53PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> I was getting oopses in kset_find_obj when calling device_find in
> 2.6.11.12. Noone else in the kernel uses device_find, but I couldnt'
> see anything wrong with it (mind you, I can't understand the
> kset_find_o
On 7/5/05, Hidetoshi Seto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>- could anyone write same barrier for intel compiler?
> Tony or David, could you help me?
I think it might be best to make ia64_mca_barrier() a proper
subroutine written in assembly code. Yes, that costs some time, but
we're talking
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 08:15:52PM +0300, Yura Pakhuchiy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm creadted XFS volume on 2.6.10 linux xscale/iq31244 box, then I
> copyied files on it and moved this hard drive to i686 machine. When I
> mounted it on i686, I found no files on it. I runned xfs_check, here is
> output:
Hi Greg,
I was getting oopses in kset_find_obj when calling device_find in
2.6.11.12. Noone else in the kernel uses device_find, but I couldnt'
see anything wrong with it (mind you, I can't understand the
kset_find_obj code to judge it).
Iterating manually using bus_for_each_dev
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 07:30 am, Rudo Thomas wrote:
> Hi again.
>
> > Time seems to pass very fast with this kernel.
>
> dmesg output has not revealed anything extraordinary...
>
> Am I the only one who gets this strange behaviour? Kernel's notion of
> time seems to be about 30 times faster than real t
> Some PCI devices lose all configuration (including BARs) when
> transitioning from D3hot->D0. This leaves such a device in an
> inaccessible state. The patch below causes the BARs to be restored
> when enabling such a device, so that its driver will be able to
> access it.
Hmm, I wonder if I m
From: "John W. Linville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 20:57:04 -0400
> Problem: pci_update_resource doesn't exist for sparc64.
Yes, the drivers/pci/setup-res.c code isn't compiled in on
sparc64 because it assumes a totally different model of
PCI bus probing than we use on sparc64.
O
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:53:25PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 19:24:25 +1000 David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > That's not necessarily possible. On some archs - ppc64 for one -
> > the mmu has to be set up for hugepages on a granularity greater than
> > the hu
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 03:18:33AM -0700, Prasanna S Panchamukhi wrote:
>
>This patch contains the ia64 architecture specific changes to
>prevent the possible race conditions.
>
>Signed-off-by: Prasanna S Panchamukhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>---
>
> linux-2.6.13-rc1-mm1-prasan
Bodo Eggert wrote:
Clemens Koller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, sure, it's not a notebook HDD, but maybe it's possible
to give headpark a more generic way to get the heads parked?
I remember my old MFM HDD, which had a Landing Zone stored in the BIOS to
which the park command woul
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I guess/hope dd always makes it contiguously.
No, it is creating files by appending just like any other file write. One
could think about a call to create unfragmented files however since this is
not always working best is to create those files young or
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 02:56:52PM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
>
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 10:41:08PM +0100, Nicholas Hans Simmonds wrote:
> > This is a simple attempt at providing capability support through extended
> > attributes.
> > ...
> > +#define XATTR_CAP_SET XATTR_SECURITY_P
I've been asked about this a couple times, and there's no info in
MAINTAINERS file. Add MAINTAINERS entry for audit subsystem.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -370,6 +370,10 @@ W: http://www.thekell
Some PCI devices lose all configuration (including BARs) when
transitioning from D3hot->D0. This leaves such a device in an
inaccessible state. The patch below causes the BARs to be restored
when enabling such a device, so that its driver will be able to
access it.
Signed-off-by: John W. Linvill
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 03:34:54AM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 10:46:20PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > Rather than reimplementing the internals of pci_update_resource() it
> > may be worth splitting the common stuff out so it gets fixed for both
> > pci_update_resourc
Clemens Koller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, sure, it's not a notebook HDD, but maybe it's possible
> to give headpark a more generic way to get the heads parked?
I remember my old MFM HDD, which had a Landing Zone stored in the BIOS to
which the park command would seek. Maybe you could do s
On 7/8/05, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Given this situation, is there any significant performance or
> > > > stability advantage to using a swap partition instead of a swap file?
> > >
> > > In 2.6 they have the same reliability a
Sheo Shanker Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> When the repaired machine was started, I began to notice the disturbing wide
> variation and the frequect significant slow down of the machine as exhibited
> by the factor of 2 to 2.5 increased execution time of the test program as
> descri
Jon Escombe wrote:
Jens Axboe wrote:
Note on that - if the util says it parked, you can be very sure that it
actually did as the drive actually returns that status outside of just
completing the command.
It's worth noting that you'll need the libata passthrough patch to
make this work on a
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:32:52 -0400, Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>hdparm can also use O_DIRECT for the -t timing test.
I've not been able to get dual channel I/O speed faster than single
interface speed, either as 'md' RAID0 or simultaneous reading or
writing done the other day:
Time
SafeInternetEmail Notification [reference number: j67NfHC07460]
Greetings,
This is an automatic notification generated by the Safe Internet Email system,
in response to a message which appears to have originated from your email
account. See http://safeinternetemail.com/ for details about
> * Rui Nuno Capela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> These are one of my latest consolidated results while using (my)
>> jack_test4.2 suite, against a couple of 2.6.12 kernels patched for
>> PREEMPT_RT, on my [EMAIL PROTECTED]/UP laptop.
>>
>> See anything funny?
>
> hm, you dont seem
Quoting Greg KH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 05:46:04PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > With the obvious fix, that does in fact work (patch appended).
>
> Good.
>
> > The __simple_attr_check_format problem remains however. I assume we
> > don't really want to just take
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 05:46:04PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> With the obvious fix, that does in fact work (patch appended).
Good.
> The __simple_attr_check_format problem remains however. I assume we
> don't really want to just take it out, though, like this patch does?
No we do not.
Jens Axboe wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07 2005, Shawn Starr wrote:
Model: HTS548080M9AT00 (Hitachi)
Laptop: T42.
segfault:/home/spstarr# ./a /dev/hda
head parked
Seems to park, heard it click :)
Note on that - if the util says it parked, you can be very sure that it
actually did as the drive
Hi.
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 04:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday, 7 of July 2005 14:49, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Nigel Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 22:04, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > >> Do you implement the entire swsusp userspace interface? If
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 07:16 am, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi,
> > > +struct io_info {
> > > + struct bio * sys_struct;
> > > + long block[PAGE_SIZE/512];
> >
> > Aah, but for this you should use block_size(io_info->dev) instead. No
> > need to mess with sector sizes. Why is this long by th
From: Victor Fusco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fix the sparse warning "implicit cast to nocast type"
File/Subsystem: drivers/block/as-iosched
Signed-off-by: Victor Fusco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
as-iosched.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+),
Quoting Timothy R. Chavez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Thursday 07 July 2005 16:31, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 15:48 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> >
> > > Tim's code lets you say I want change notification to this file only. The
> > > notification follows the audit format with a
From: Victor Fusco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fix the sparse warning "implicit cast to nocast type"
File/Subsystem: drivers/block/deadline-iosched
Signed-off-by: Victor Fusco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
deadline-iosched.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 i
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 23:30:34 +0200
Rudo Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi again.
>
> > Time seems to pass very fast with this kernel.
>
> dmesg output has not revealed anything extraordinary...
>
> Am I the only one who gets this strange behaviour? Kernel's notion of
> time seems to be abou
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Quoting Greg KH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > Unfortunately the simple_attr code from libfs really doesn't seem to be
> > > usable for int args.
> >
> > Why not? You want a negative number? Just cast the u64 to a signed int
> > then. Will that not w
Hello LKML,
after some corrections here is a newer patch supporting the Infineon Trusted
Platform
Module SLD 9630 (TPM 1.1b), which is embedded on Intel-mainboards or in
HP/Fujitsu-Siemens/Toshiba-Notebooks.
The module fits the interfaces created by IBM and was patched against the
latest kernel-s
From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Correct email address and a small typo.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diffstat:=
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -Naurp linux-2613-rc2/Documentation/feature-r
From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Current kernel-doc (perl) script generates this warning:
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at scripts/kernel-doc
line 1668.
so explicitly check for SRCTREE in the ENV before using it,
and then if it is set, append a '/' to the end o
From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for kernel/acct.c:
- fix typos
- add kerneldoc for non-static functions
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diffstat:=
kernel/acct.c | 43 +++
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff -
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:22:38PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 23:10:33 +0200
> Dominik Brodowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Do you use ACPI-based idling? If so, in which state is the CPU in (cat
> > /proc/acpi/processor/*/power ? I suspect that you do not use ACPI (
Note:
hdparm can also use O_DIRECT for the -t timing test.
Eg. hdparm --direct -t /dev/hda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the F
From: Christophe Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Use set_current_state() instead of direct assignment of
current->state.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
sbpcd.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:24:43PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 01:02:38PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > > This is the device (on a Vaio GR), which other info could I provide to
> > > better diagnose the problem?
>
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 11:41 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 01:53:06PM +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The followings are updated version of patches I've posted to
> > implement IOCHK interface for I/O error handling/detecting.
> >
> > The abstraction of patches h
Hi guys,
I've been swamped with work for the last few days and haven't been
able to spend the time I intended on the hdaps driver :-( I have to
dedicate a few more days to other things, but then I hope to be able
to resume work on the driver. I /will/ be looking at the patches,
comments, sugges
Hello
Nigel Kukard wrote:
Hi Guys,
How stable is reiserfs quotas in 2.6.11.12?
There were no reports about problems with this. Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
fixes something from time to time, though.
Kind Regards
Nigel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ker
From: Victor Fusco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fix the sparse warning "implicit cast to nocast type"
Signed-off-by: Victor Fusco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/block/elevator.c |2 +-
drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c | 17 ++---
include/l
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 15:48 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Tim's code lets you say I want change notification to this file only. The
> notification follows the audit format with all relavant pieces of information
> gathered at the time of the event and serialized with all other events.
well can't
From: Christophe Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Use set_current_state() instead of direct assignment of
current->state.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
i2lib.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
In
On Thursday 07 July 2005 16:31, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 15:48 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
>
> > Tim's code lets you say I want change notification to this file only. The
> > notification follows the audit format with all relavant pieces of
> > information
> > gathered at t
From: Victor Fusco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fix the sparse warning "implicit cast to nocast type"
File/Subsystem: drivers/char/n_tty.c
Signed-off-by: Victor Fusco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
n_tty.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deleti
Hi Guys,
How stable is reiserfs quotas in 2.6.11.12?
Kind Regards
Nigel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Mike Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Given this situation, is there any significant performance or
> > > stability advantage to using a swap partition instead of a swap file?
> >
> > In 2.6 they have the same reliability and they will have the same
> > performance unless the swapfile
On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 15:58:53 -0400
Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
> > Moreover, I checked on Pentium M 725 and Pentium M 715 that the lowest
> > frequency at which the CPU can be set safely is not the 600MHz given in
> > datasheets, but 400MHz instead,
From: Victor Fusco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fix the sparse warning "implicit cast to nocast type"
File/Subsystem: kernel/audit.c
Signed-off-by: Victor Fusco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
audit.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>From Dominik Brodowski on Thursday, 07 July, 2005:
>On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 03:51:17PM -0500, Joseph Pingenot wrote:
>> >Just a latest question: can be p4-clockmod used together with
>> >speedstep-centrino? If not, would it make any sense to patch
>> >speedstep-centrino to use this feature too?
>>
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 04:34:14PM -0500, Joseph Pingenot wrote:
> >From Dominik Brodowski on Thursday, 07 July, 2005:
> >On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 03:51:17PM -0500, Joseph Pingenot wrote:
> >> >Just a latest question: can be p4-clockmod used together with
> >> >speedstep-centrino? If not, would it m
On Thursday 07 July 2005 13:58, Andrew Victor wrote:
> If the AT91RM9200+Linux community had to convert all the headers, bugs
> may be introduced in the conversion process and we would have to assume
> any maintenance responsibility. What we have now may be slightly ugly,
> but it is atleast known
Here's a small patch against 2.6.13-rc2 that adds securityfs, a virtual
fs that all LSMs can use instead of creating their own. The fs should
be mounted at /sys/kernel/security, and the fs creates that mount point.
This will make the LSB people happy that we aren't creating a new
/my_lsm_fs direct
From: aLeJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Use of __set_current_state() instead of direct assigment of
current->state.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Andres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
module.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: quilt/ke
ipw2100 doesnt compile:
net/built-in.o(.text+0x921fc): In function `ieee80211_xmit':
: undefined reference to `is_broadcast_ether_addr'
jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger
Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:24:43PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 01:02:38PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > This is the device (on a Vaio GR), which other info coul
From: Jim Cromie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
items in makefile are partially tabbed into columns,
this patch finishes that indenting, minus an ifeq block,
which I think should stand out, so I left it.
Signed-of-by: Jim Cromie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Makefile | 70 +++
Hi again.
> Time seems to pass very fast with this kernel.
dmesg output has not revealed anything extraordinary...
Am I the only one who gets this strange behaviour? Kernel's notion of
time seems to be about 30 times faster than real time.
I will gladly provide any information that will help so
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 12:59:50AM -0400, Mike Waychison wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > Here's a small patch against 2.6.13-rc2 that adds securityfs, a virtual
> > fs that all LSMs can use instead of creating their own. The fs should
> > be mounted at /sys/kernel/security, and the fs creates that mou
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 01:02:38PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > This is the device (on a Vaio GR), which other info could I provide to
> > better diagnose the problem?
> >
>
> Could you please do "echo 1 > /sys/modules/i8042/parameters/debug"
You didn't enable support for your IDE chipset and so you are using
generic IDE support (which can fail quite easy if i.e. BIOS programmed
wrong settings). The easiest way is to see which driver you do need is
to enable all drivers and see which one will claim your IDE controller. :)
On 7/7/05, M
Andi Kleen wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 03:25:37AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Prasanna S Panchamukhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are possible race conditions if probes are placed on routines within the
kprobes files and routines used by the kprobes.
So... don't do that
> > The setup was a Intel board with 1 PATA/4 SATA onboard and only a CD-ROM
> > and a external Promise PATA controller with two PATA disks.
>
> actual OOPS would be very useful
It's difficult because I don't have serial on that machine.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 23:10:33 +0200
Dominik Brodowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you use ACPI-based idling? If so, in which state is the CPU in (cat
> /proc/acpi/processor/*/power ? I suspect that you do not use ACPI (else
> you wouldn't need the table-based approach) or that the ACPI-based id
On 7/7/05, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 12:09:00PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > > Yes. Except that if hwif is NULL, we'll have other oopses since we access
> > > that in other places.
> > >
> > > Why _is_ hw
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
is PCI_MSI enabled by any chance? That is known to break level-triggered
IOAPIC irqs and devices.
As a matter of fact it is... I'll turn it off now and try it out.
If the commit is still going, I'll get you
Hi.
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 23:32, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Nigel,
>
> > diff -ruNp 623-generic-block-io.patch-old/kernel/power/suspend_block_io.c
> > 623-generic-block-io.patch-new/kernel/power/suspend_block_io.c
> > --- 623-generic-block-io.patch-old/kernel/power/suspend_block_io.c
> > 197
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 12:09:00PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > Yes. Except that if hwif is NULL, we'll have other oopses since we access
> > that in other places.
> >
> > Why _is_ hwif NULL anyway? That's another, unrelated thing, and should
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:22:25PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > This hasn't been seen to save any power whatsoever that I've seen.
>
> It drops down power rating by 1500-1800mW on my Toshiba Satellite A50
> while idling at 400MHz.
Do you use ACPI-based idling? If so, in which state is the
While fixing an oops in the st driver in a dirty release path,
I encountered an oops in cdev_put for cdevs allocated using
cdev_alloc. If cdev_del is called when the cdev kobject still
has an open user, when the last cdev_put is called, the cdev_put
will call kobject_put, which will end up ultimat
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 03:51:17PM -0500, Joseph Pingenot wrote:
> >Just a latest question: can be p4-clockmod used together with
> >speedstep-centrino? If not, would it make any sense to patch
> >speedstep-centrino to use this feature too?
>
> I'm a little confused. How is this different from th
Peter Buckingham wrote:
Hetfield wrote:
i have a problem with my Asus a1000 notebook.
some buttons, like video switch, mute on/off, brightness up/down
are not detected by acpi nor keyboard driver.
you could try the acerhk driver:
http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~tauber/acerhk/
it doesn
>Just a latest question: can be p4-clockmod used together with
>speedstep-centrino? If not, would it make any sense to patch
>speedstep-centrino to use this feature too?
I'm a little confused. How is this different from the ACPI CPU throttling
states (/proc/acpi/processor/CPUn/limit to set, thr
On Thu, Jul 07 2005, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What is needed is to flesh out what the kernel interface should looke
> > like. I suggested a sysfs file for suspending and resuming access to the
> > device, if people have other ideas they should voice them
1 - 100 of 359 matches
Mail list logo
