Hi. On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 04:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > On Thursday, 7 of July 2005 14:49, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Nigel Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 22:04, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > >> Do you implement the entire swsusp userspace interface? If not, removing > > >> it probably isn't a reasonable plan without fair warning. > > > > > > I'm not suggesting removing the sysfs interface or replacing system to > > > ram - just the suspend to disk part. > > > > Right, so you support the resume from disk trigger in sysfs and the > > /proc/acpi/sleep interface? If suspend2 is a complete dropin replacement > > then I'm much happier with the idea of dropping swsusp, but I don't want > > to have to tie suspend/resume scripts to kernel versions. > > I don't think that swsusp can be replaced with suspend2 right now. First, > swsusp works on x86-64, and the support in suspend2 is preliminary, > AFAIK. Second, the IA64 support for swsusp is in the works, and it is not > supported > by suspend2. > > Please don't plan to drop swsusp until you are able to replace it > _completely_.
Fair enough. I didn't realise Pavel had IA64 support too :> Nigel -- Evolution. Enumerate the requirements. Consider the interdependencies. Calculate the probabilities. Be amazed that people believe it happened. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
