> * Rui Nuno Capela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> These are one of my latest consolidated results while using (my) >> jack_test4.2 suite, against a couple of 2.6.12 kernels patched for >> PREEMPT_RT, on my [EMAIL PROTECTED]/UP laptop. >> >> See anything funny? > > hm, you dont seem to have PREEMPT_RT enabled in your .config - it's set > to PREEMPT_DESKTOP (config-2.6.12-RT-V0.7.51-11.0). OTOH, your 49-01 > config has PREEMPT_RT enabled. So it's not an apples to apples > comparison. Just to make sure, could you check 51-11 with PREEMPT_RT > enabled too? >
Damn. You're right... grrr! I gotta spank myself later... I've been running PREEMPT_DESKTOP all along since V0.7.5x . Anyway, all that seems to show some pretty figures on the distinction between PREEMPT_DESKTOP and PREEMPT_RT performance :) > i have just done a jack_test4.1 run, and indeed larger latencies seem to > have crept in. (But i forgot to chrt the sound IRQ above the network > IRQ, so i'll retest.) > I will do my homework too ;) -- rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
