SS>> Suppose C++ has a great feature, which makes writing easily
SS>> maintainable code a brease, but is not in the "official" OO
SS>> specification. Obviously, C++ is not an OO language in that
SS>> respect, but who cares?
We can also suppose C++ hasn't some of features that are in "official" OO
n>> I wonder you didn't mention NetWorker product from Legato -
n>> www.legato.com , that has the biggest installed base Worldwide, as
n>> well as above 250 installations in Israel. The distributer of this
Was I looking very bad or Legato solutions doesn't support Linux?
At least, Networker has n
VV>> Something that is widely implemented and followed, perhaps?
You must mean Microsoft Office *ducks* *runs* *hides*
VV>> No, sadly. You?
ITYM "no, luckily". It isn't real flamewar unless it is over One True
Standard.
VV>> For some reason, I haven't saved the addresses of FUCKING
VV>> "
IA>> I was once told that in Scheme (and IANASP) an "if" statement is an
IA>> object in itself. I'll be learning scheme next year and be able to tell
Well, I don't know what for, but OK - I can imagine language where sytax
constructs are objects. Even makes me curious. Good book on Scheme,
anyone
IA>> > Given enough time and resource - definitely. Having made entire DB
IA>> > solution in pure Javascript (no, it wasn't fun), I'm firm in this.
IA>>
IA>> now THAT sounds impressive. does it parse XML too? do publish it in
IA>> OpenSource :-)
No, it didn't (though I guess I might do that too,
MZ>> Let me clarify the muddy waters: in no language I'm aware of, is "if" an
MZ>> object. In most sane languages (Scheme, Python, Smalltalk), a boolean is
MZ>> an object. In smalltalk, a boolean has a method called ifTrue which
Ahh... that's boring. Just another way to write the same.
--
[EMAI
IA>> OmerM started something...
IA>>
IA>> http://iglu.org.il:8080/Zen/SchemeBook
IA>>
No, I mean dead-tree book. The thing you can read while... let's say stuck
in traffic jam on Jabotinsky street. Something like the Camel (or maybe
the Llama) book.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall
n>> 2. Quick Link -> Compatability Guides -> Software Compatability Guide.
Well, not too obvious path... Also, word "client" hints that server on
Linux is non-existant? Then, it's not support. It's half-support. If I
have Linux server, I want to backup it on Linux, not install another NT
server.
OM>> Yes, this is new distribution of Linux.
OM>> ESR had succeded in pursuading MS that Linux is popular Intel OS. In
OM>> addition to
OM>> features listed on site, MS-Linux will feature:
You forgot about Vigor - vi with Office paperclip.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels
GSM>> > So how can I allow the remote login as root to those
GSM>> > systems anyway?
GSM>> Why? To allow remote logon of root is to ask for trouble. Why not just
GSM>> su when needed. Or if you want to "do it right" install sudo.
Install ssh. Do ssh -l root myremotehost. Be happy & secure.
--
HBH>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/1/12572.html
Quote:
>> Apparently, the fastest Internet connection you can currently find in
Israel is ISDN, "a measly 128 Kbps".
That's a lie. FR is available, and you can order FR more than 128K.
And no, Bezeq isn't to blame. Why didn't I hear a wor
BM>> Because no one can supply high speed internet now, because of legal
BM>> problems.
I don't believe if the cables have started it back in 90's the issue won't
be resolved by now. But they started it when they felt satellites gonna
eat their market and they need to stop being oligopoly and sta
MZ>> I'm happy you agree my preferences not to eat kosher should be respected.
This reminds me a history about two hilonim. One says to the second: "I go
to the restaurant N this evening" - "But this is a glatt kosher
restaurant!" - "Doesn't matter, I will eat only boiled eggs".
Sorry for the o
OD>> I'm terribly sorry I had to interfer. I do not see why the code of
OD>> behivour of religious people is less "davka" than of a secular person. I
Because you and you comerades raiser a flamewar on the list (well, it
really was a flamefest, since observant people just said one short
phrase eac
OZ>> The real issue is not Shabbat/non-Shabbat, but Yom Kippur vs. Shabbat vs.
OZ>> non-Shabbat.
Now that you said that I know at least two people that would insist on
doing it on Yom Kippur because doing it any other day hurts their
feelings...
OZ>> There is no IGLU cabal. All former cabal mem
AJ>> According to the docs, MySQL listens for outside connections.
AJ>> I'm going to use MySQL from the localhost, and I don't want it
AJ>> to bind to the eth interface. Is there a way to restrict it to
AJ>> the loopback interface?
In /etc/my.cnf:
[mysqld]
skip-networking
Prevents mysql from li
TC>> And here I see:
TC>> [Formatting error: Internal base64 decoder error]
TC>>
TC>> I'm using pine 4.21. Marc is using netscape 4.75. This is not the first
TC>> time I can' read his messages sent to this list (although sometimes I
TC>> can).
That's because all Marc's mails get out in Base64, a
MS>> Some people may say Im wrong on this, but RH is getting awfully
MS>> M$ftish. The dumb-user-approach saying "you don't really need to
That's true. You don't _need_ to know. Information hiding is good, look at
your software design guides. You still _can_ know, if you care. But
average user is
IS>> Lingua::IW::Logical. Actually more like semi-broken - in some
IS>> cases it works fine.
Actually, it worked fine in most cases, but since there's more
comprehensive implemntations, like FriBidi, I did not really find time to
fix it to be 100% good.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shal
SB>> No. slackware does not use rpm by default nor redhat scripts. slackware
SB>> uses simple .tgz packages, and simple BSD scripts. thats how linux should
SB>> be ;)
That's bull. Linux should have no packages and no scripts and no
slackware. If you need some software, you code it yourself or dow
OZ>> While IANAL, my understanding of the situation is that LGPL was designed
OZ>> exactly for such a situation.
More interesting question. Let's say we have some open source non-GPL
application, which uses LGPL-library.
1. Is such application legal?
2. Can LGPL library source be distibuted tog
OH>> That's a new M$ advertisement in german, first one against Linux.
OH>> http://www.koehntopp.de/kris/msad.jpg
Anybody cares to translate what's actually written there?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone +
NH>> P.S. Yes, voting in this egroups poll is not very convenient, and it forces
NH>> you to give out your email address. I hope that people will get past that
NH>> (egroups is a respectable company, so far, and I don't know of any evidence
NH>> of it spamming).
Well, except that they do it in
AJ>> Apparantely, the Windows and MS Office source code was stolen (I'm not
AJ>> joking here).
AJ>>
AJ>> Take a look at MSNBC:
AJ>> http://www.msnbc.com/news/481927.asp
Actually, this is very bad news. Now nothing stops Microsoft lawyers from
twarting any compatibility effort not driven by Micro
HBH>> Since most of Linux applications are open source - they cannot
HBH>> say it's stolen, cause if they'll say that - then they'll have
HBH>> to show their code and prove that it's the same...
Not at all. They will claim their IP was stolen and their code, obtained
by illegal means, was used in
SF>> According to this kind of logic, MS would actually want their code to be
SF>> stolen. Let's get serious: if an open-source code implements something
No. The loss would be much greater than the benefit. But if it's _already_
stolen anyway, why not to use it?
SF>> a copyrighted code and use i
HBH>> THERE IS a GUI for Linux to configure the firewall, but the
HBH>> bastards want a $1000 for the fucking GUI! I'm serious!
Heh. Anybody saw recently a car seller that sells you a car without a
steering wheel and then wants another $10,000 for one? And what surprises
me the most, people still
HBH>> FW-1 got some advantages and features which you cannot look.
HBH>> One of them is to work with TCP/IP's layer 7 (protocols)..
HBH>>
HBH>> So yes, they are bastards for charging a $1000 for an ugly
HBH>> motif GUI, but they do have advantages that nor IP Chains and
HBH>> not Netfilter have t
HBH>> was around 1998) - the guys from checkpoint contacted him and
HBH>> threatend him with a lawsuit...
Do they have a patent on their GUI organisation? If not, what prohibits
you from making GUI of similiar organisaion, while not infringing CP's
rights on pictures, writings, etc. stuff?
HBH>>
IK>> there in the US. I wonder if we should start a major Bugzilla issue
IK>> and make everyone vote for it, or maybe just flood Bugzilla with
IK>> bugs such as "msn.co.il displays reversed" ?
I'm ready to vote for it twice a day :) That's realy _only_ thing why I
can't say "Mozilla is an usable
NH>> So what? Unless you have a completely-proxy-firewall (block
NH>> everything and allow only application proxies), whatever packets
NH>> you let through (be they http, ftp, or icq) carry the IP address
NH>> of the machine behind the firewall. But so what? If you use
I give you address of a mac
AO>> The ICQ protocol reveals the real IP of the computer running the client,
AO>> so even if you use GNU replacements it doesn't matter.
AO>> This "feature" opens a window for "crackers" to use various firewall
AO>> penetrating/piercing techniques.
If the computer is behind the firewall, most ch
S>> using ICQ remote attacker is able to make full port scan on networks behind
S>> the firewall.
How exactly one does that? Can you elaborate?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone +972-3-9316425/\
S>> the first step is using udp sniffer.
UDP sniffer on what?
S>> after that you have tools you can find on the web to preform scans in the
S>> network of the victim.
How? Can you name one such tool?
S>> you must have direct connection to the user for that. (I think its ICQ
S>> default).
ICQ
AO>> But if icq.com(example) got my packet and know my "secret" intranet
AO>> addresses
Oh, yeah, those defined in top-secret RFC1918? 10.1.1.1? 10.10.1.1?
192.168.1.1? 172.16.1.1? Am I l33t haxx0r already?
Guess how many pings is it going to take me to know each
internet-accessible address on y
AO>> 1. the computer on 192.168.1.78(example) is up
Nice. Most computers tend to be up when people are working.
AO>> 2. It can receive connection to the ICQ port
Wrong. Firewall won't let incoming connection in. It would only allow to
receive UDP packets inside "virtual circuit" created by outg
AO>> Even if the CEO does. Seen any company that the users don't hold mp3s
AO>> on their computers? It's illegal in the US and most startups are
AO>> registered in the US.
MP3 format is illegal in US? News for me. Is WAV going to be banned too?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be couns
T>> lets say i want to connect to an irc server with a spoofed ip, can
In most cases, you can't. Most cases of "IP spoofing on IRC" is really DNS
spoofing. Real IP spoofing over TCP is pretty hard to do, and if you want
to spoof more than one packet (i.e., maintain a real session), you need to
be
SB>> Those are I-lines.. not spoofing - hybrid has option to add an
SB>> I-line for spoofing.
I don't know about I-lines, etc. but I know pretty well DNS spoofing via
cache poisoning is possible - have done that myself. If you are
interested, just search "DNS cache poisoning" - there was a lot of
AO>> 1 line more and you'll see I noted "related" packets,
That depends on how your firewall understands "related". If it understands
it as something more than current connection - install another firewall.
AO>> The target at the end of the process is slip a packet
AO>> through the gateway and i
AO>> Using copyrighted material which you do not own is illegal.
AO>> Storing mp3 SONGS that you did not buy/have the disk is
Now you seem to assume every MP3 song is illegal copyrighted
material. MPAA would laugh in joy reading this. They have enormous success
in delegitimizing innocent file fo
AB>> I can't even believe we're really discussing this lame subject
AB>> here. These lamo hacker wannabe kids questions don't belong on
AB>> this list.
You can discuss attack methods for two reasons - or you want to attack
someone, or you want to protect yourself.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/
AS>> The same copyright system that disallows you to copy ripped MP3s
AS>> disallows companies to make proprietary products out of GPLed
AS>> software. Our copyright system is just fine.
With our GPLed software the matter is pretty complicated. Generally, GPLed
software is referred to as a "free
AS>> That's a common misconception. It should have been obvious, but
AS>> somehow never is, that no amount of licensing trickery can make one
AS>> program be considered a derivative work of an unrelated program. And
See, this is an official position of RMS. I have quotes from him
personally sayin
NH>> What kind of judge is going to make a decision against a company
NH>> when in a 100,000 line code, 50 lines "somehow distantly
NH>> resemble" code from a GPLed program? If the developer only looks
NH>> at the code, that's what going to happen - he won't suddenly
NH>> have 10,000 lines identic
AS>> > ==quote==
AS>> > Richard Stallman wrote:
AS>> >
AS>> > That you don't distribute binaries does not change the fact that your
AS>> > source code is designed to include Readline in the program. You
AS>> > cannot do that, now that your license is incompatible with the GPL.
AS>> > ==end quote=
AS>> Have you actually READ the GPL? It does not define "derived work"
AS>> anywhere, leaving that to copyright law. RMS has said as much, too.
For GPL, RMS is the copyright law. Since if RMS thinks it's violating GPL,
you probably will very soon forced to GPL it or pull it, if only you don't
wan
MZ>> > For GPL, RMS is the copyright law.
MZ>>
MZ>> No it isn't. RMS has his legal counsel (a professor of law) issue his
MZ>> opinions. If you think you opinions of law are worth more, you're
MZ>> welcome to do whatever you want. I just think RMS's legal counsel
MZ>> is pretty sound. Is that a p
AS>> That is necessary for copyleft. If you could take Linux and release it
Sure. So be aware that any time you read "proprietary" in FSF texts, you
should read "non-GPL", since GPL restricts not only more strict licenses,
but also less strict. I understand why it's done, but let's be honest -
do
TC>> BTW: the source was full of files with CR chars, which annoyed cpp on many
TC>> occasions, and thus had to be removed.
TC>>
TC>> crlf from fixDos ( http://e.co.za/marius/downloads/misc/ ) proved to be
TC>> very handy for the job.
Actually, I guess perl -npi.bak -e 's/\r\n$/\n/g' would do the
OH>> Netvision customer's IPs are on some black list of dial up users, in
OH>> http://mail-abuse.org/dul .
OH>> some smtp servers use this list for protecting their users for spam.
OH>> therefore, I can't send them mail! It sucks..
The real source of suckiness here is that paranoid sysadmin which
NSRS>> 6. There is currently NO GUI for linux. Bare in mind that even on Solaris
NSRS>>the advanced GUI uses Motif and the normal GUI is absolutely SHITTY.
This what amazes me most in the thing. Being unable to port Unix GUI,
written on Motif (which is now even Open Source), for years. Shows
MZ>> On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, "Stanislav Malyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MZ>> > This what amazes me most in the thing. Being unable to port Unix GUI,
MZ>> > written on Motif (which is now even Open Source)
MZ>>
MZ>> Motif is not open source.
Ah. Open Motif is not Open Source (TM). But if you rea
AS>> > Ah. Open Motif is not Open Source (TM). But if you read explanations why
AS>> > it isn't (http://www.opennc.org/openmotif/faq.html) you see that it's
AS>> > irrelevant for Linux. So from what I gather, Open Motif on Linux meets the
AS>> > Open Source criteria.
AS>>
AS>> It doesn't, because
AS>> Marc was offering you in his mail the use of his local Debian
AS>> mirror. You don't have to use it if you don't want, but
AS>> attacking him for this mail seems to me like an inappropriate
AS>> response.
We must recognise here that Marc was playing a deal of post-spinal
aperture in his mess
EL>> which reminds me did anyone got galeon ( the gnome based
EL>> mozilla) to work better than the reqular mozilla?
I tried it, but found it's not worth the trouble. It has the same gecko
renderer from mozilla, so you earn nothing here. It's not so drastically
faster, and it lacks a lot of conve
HBH>> Unfortunately, seems the BiDi standard doesn't treat the
HBH>> "makaf" properly, and Konqueror shows exactly as Mozilla the
HBH>> Makaf problem, which gives numbers as negative, and the same
HBH>> shows with fribidi and gedit..
There's no good solution to this problem, because this is not a
SS>> Well, now you know why it is better to pick 192.168.*.* for
SS>> private networks, even if you get to type more numbers :-)
Guess which address space will the second provider take? Bingo!
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than
TC>> I'm not satisfied with this behaveiour. Can anybody think of a better
TC>> workaround? A space there is also not a good idea, because the hyphen here
TC>> is supposed to connected two words to one word.
That's like you would say "I want to use character '0' to mean both 0 and
1 and I still w
NM>> It's wrong because that's not the idea of linux, it ment to be a free
NM>> software.
Let's get it straight. Let's compare - how many hours of work did you
invest in Linux (as OS, trademark, concept, etc.) and how many SuSE people
did? After you make the balance, think again if you have any r
OH>> The wrong thing is that they are getting money for programs that
OH>> volunteers did _FOR FREE_, on their own time. instead of giving
OH>> the money for the volunteers I'm giving it to the company who
OH>> packed this and made some nice setup program ? no thanks. they
OH>> should release the
OH>> SuSE employees are programming a bunch of software. What I said is, that
OH>> there are people such as Koshelev Maxim (Downloader for X's author)
OH>> who build programs at least as big as all the suse programs (yast + some
OH>> bash scripts. It's not a 'bunch' of software imo), and get _NOTH
OH>> I heard from some people that the yast license is pretty 'sly' and some
OH>> bad things about it. I prefer GPL not because I want to see its source or
OH>> modify it (Although maybe it could be nice), but because I want to be free
OH>> to use it.
GPL has nothing to do with usage, and can not
AS>> Your opinions are yours, of course, but I think you are
AS>> misrepresenting RMS here. He has always objected to limiting the use
AS>> of software. Consider his recent review of the new APSL (Apple Public
Well, so he's a hypocrite here. Because when it is regarding his software
(specifically
EB>> Just started to write PHP and I cant find an IDE which
EB>> will give me good debugging capabilities (step, break
EB>> points ).
EB>>
EB>> Anybody can recommend one to me ?
Zend IDE, but it's not free.
There's also a free one, which claims to support debugging (nexus?), but I
don't know
OZ>> There is a separate mailing list for newbie questions, and the regular
OZ>> Linux-IL subscribers' time is too precious for clueless newbie questions.
Franskly speaking, I'm freaking stunned such a topic is discussed on the
list at such length, and with such an arguments. First, is this Linux
NSC>> On one hand you're holding the flag of open source and free
NSC>> code. And on the other hand, you're saying that uithout 300
NSC>> shekels an hour, you're not gonna get off your ass. You sound
NSC>> alot more like a Microsoft developer than a Linux developer.
That's bull. If you ask somebo
SK>> 530- It seems your IP address isn't properly registered in
SK>> 530-the DNS - You must allow reverse DNS lookups.
What I can't get in this story - what is the meaning of this restriction?
Like, what for do you need reverse DNS? What it gives to you? Just to show
that you are "security-tough
YR>> It provides a better audit trail. It is trivial to setup PTR records, and
Just how better? Why PTR (which can be easily faked) is better than
IP, which determines uniquely the offending host?
As for triviality, many things are trivial to do and yet it is not the
reason to require people to
YR>> I believe you're missing a crucial point. I believe that
YR>> wu-ftpd does not only verify that a certain IP address has a PTR
YR>> record, but it also ensures that the PTR's respective A record
YR>> is identical to the original IP address. The previous statement
So? That's why I wrote "If
AB>>This thread is a bit moot. TAU's policy stands, and that is
AB>> what we require for the free service we provide.
That's what I thought it is, right? "We do it because we can, not because
it has any reason behind it"... Well, you in are your own right, and
nobody will sue you because he's
OG>> Can anyone point me to a list of public NTP servers in Israel. A
There's ntp.ac.il, and there are ntp.tau.ac.il, ntp.technion.ac.il
and I guess more, most of them uses ntp.ac.il. I'm not sure about others,
but ntp.ac.il is public.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
AB>> timeserver.iix.net.il | ntp.iix.net.il| stratum 2 | public
AB>> ntp.ilan.net.il| ntp.ac.il | stratum 0/1 | only stratum 2
AB>> servers
Seems that ntp.ac.il still allows connection to everybody. But then it's
OA>> One more semaphore question if you please - if I create a semaphoer set,
OA>> and then leave it lying around and exit the process - will it stay in the
OA>> system when no current process uses it ?
Yes. This is one of the problems with semaphores. BTW, why not using file
locking instead of i
>> This is not a PROBLEM but a FEATURE. All Sys-V IPC (semaphores,
>> message queues, shared memory) outlive their creators.
Wrong. Shared memory can be pre-deleted, so that it is removed when last
process is detached. Just like files. Semaphores can not. In fact, there's
no good way to insure th
ML>> cares ?) each in its own VEnv on top of ME or 2000. Although the
ML>> price on macs is 70 $ for a PC DOS version, VPC for PCs will
ML>> cost... 299 $. I suppose the price tag will fall by the day.
VMWare WS costs exactly $299. Coincidence? :)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be co
gk>> not terribly good portability, according to
gk>> /usr/src/linux/Documentatino/mandatory.txt , for mandatory locks?
gk>> advisory locks can be used, but then you only have a single such lock
gk>> available per file. if you need to use several locks, you need to keep
What? You sure should use
OA>> I don't think its an option I have for the current
OA>> implementation - it's file IO, and should be much slower, right
OA>> ?
Wrong. Record locking has nothing to do with file I/O - it is done
entirely in memory.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malysh
OA>> I'll think about, but I don't think I'll change from semaphores just yet.
OA>> I don't like the idea of creating temp files for locks, and I can't lock
Actually, cleaning temp file is by far easier than cleaning semaphore.
Especially if your app can be killed any moment.
OA>> against an exi
TC>> Actually the latest news is that the newest nightly builds of mozilla
TC>> /should/ contain bidi support compiled in (haven't tried it yet. just read
TC>> a message in a newgroup).
Does this mean there's a chance 0.9.[12] will have BiDi in? Can I
already order wine and candies to celebrate?
MR>> Unfortunately their site is rendered wrong in konqueror, but I'm
MR>> not sure which side is buggy.
I fear it's Konq. I saw a number of sites rendered OK with Mozilla but bad
with Konq. Or Mozilla is very forgiving (which rises aquestion why Konq
isn't), or Konq is buggy.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTE
IK>> As to KHTML (used by Konq), it's much more forgiving than Mozilla.
IK>> Heck, it implements a 'document.all' object (for IE compatibility)!
If it implements full MSIE DOM (including all properties and methods ans
stuff) it's cool. But somehow I doubt it. But if it does not, this only
means t
OA>> True. also - a lot of scripts (which of course don't check for
OA>> browser support other then document.all vs. document.layers) use
OA>> document.all and no other IE specific extensions which isn't in
OA>> the DOM.
Well, these scripts are antic and will die out, as soon as Netscape 4 dies
o
>> I remember I saw it one, somehere... it's not a linux specific but
There's a version of MSIE for Solaris - that's what they call "MSIE for
UNIX". I have yet to see one person that saw it (MSIE for Solaris) and
doesn't think it sucks big time.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be couns
EL>> Hi, Is there any alternative program for SSH-win? and a free
EL>> program?
There's SecureCRT (not free) and there's some plugins to TeraTerm (don't
remember if it's free). I saw once a free command-line client, but not a
GUI one.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
MT>> the Windows MSIE used to suck bigtime as well. theyv'e got the corporate
MT>> funding and manpower to improve it. and they will.
I do not believe that. Solaris MSIE was "proof of concept" product. It had
played it's purpose, there's no slightest reason to spend on it any more -
it will never
EL>> Actualy we don't owe them anything mozilla might has been a nice project
EL>> but seriously.
EL>> konqurer and opera are doing much better job
Very debatable claim.
EL>> opera might not be complitly free but it's the best linux browser I saw so
EL>> far it doesn't crash at all it's VERY fas
EL>> If asked I'm sure they would add that feature.
Yeah, somewhere in this millennium. Thanks a lot, by this time my
grandchildren will read it for me, so I would not care then.
EL>> how about instead of saying opera lacking some features get
EL>> people who would but it (yea paying it's not th
>> If people download the Linux version and test it, it would be interesting
>> to see some feedback.
Tried it, works. The only problem seen so far is that "nikud" is not
displayed, it produces ? signs instead, but I'm not sure if it's Mozilla
or font problem. In fact, I'm very happy that Mozilla
IK>> See this bug for more info:
IK>> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63054
Well, I guess people that want it should vote for this bug...
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone +972-3-9316425/\
BD>>If you want to introduce Linux to the Israeli word first step is to
BD>> make it available for a sane price. Linux takes pride of it being a free
I've got my RH6 disks for some $12, IIRC. Including delivery. That was an
LSL sale, I think. Just look harder, and you find a deal - it's alway
HBH>> 1. Redhat 6.0 got this X font server (XFS) - what is it and why do I
HBH>> need it? can I use it with True Type fonts from Windows?
It is a font server. You need it if you want font server a bit more
functional and flexible than one inside XFree. There are patches that
bring TTF support to
LIL>> I addition to Yarin's mail I would like to add that ACTCOM also
LIL>> provides terminal only account without any PPP abilities aka Mail Account,
Which is, I suspect, SLIRP-able, i.e. full-capacity internet account :) At
least, if you get telnet, you get SLIRP. And since telnet/mail account
YB>> Dont forget it can be a pain to use internet access through a shell :)
YB>> at least for windows users
Once you set up dial-up/slirp script, it is not different from usual PPP
setup. I did it a number of times. Surely, ones who don't know about
dialup scripts are suffering. That's the price
Hi!
I feel it might be a FAQ question, but I didnt find any good info around.
The question is:
If I have a process locked in "device wait" (D) state, is it possible to
get rid of it? It doesn't react on signals while sleeping, it locks
resources and brings a lot of trouble. Is there a way to free
AB>>
AB>> ps -xawwl output would be much appreciated :)
0 510 4375 1 0 0724 240 c01a7b20 D ? 0:00 mt -f
/dev/nst0 rewoffl
Does it help?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone +972-3-93164
AB>> Can you reset the scsi device ? (turn it off, wait a few, turn it on).
No, it's internal tape. Turning the computer off is not an option - it's
the production server.
Theoretically, is there a way to get rid of this process or at least of
locks that it holds on device? It seems a bit silly
GY>> What kernel are you running. Older 2.2s had this problem
2.2.9
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone +972-3-9316425/\ JRRT LotR.
http://sharat.co.il/frodo/ whois:!SM8333
EB>> why don't u use an official email address??? (maybe idf.il)
Maybe there aren't one? As I heard, most army systems are not connected to
Internet, and have no official means to do it (i.e., you can sneak some
modem inside, but hide it well) and, knowing the measure of the
professionalism and s
EB>> there is an idf.il valid domain. (www.idf.il)
EB>> and you also can dig some info about, from RIPE:
EB>>
EB>> domain: idf.il
EB>> descr: IDF-Shalishut Rashit
EB>> descr: 100 Ben-Gurion St. Ramat-Gan Israel
EB>> descr: +972 3 6755145
There's also Bank Of Israel web si
1 - 100 of 429 matches
Mail list logo
