OZ>> While IANAL, my understanding of the situation is that LGPL was designed
OZ>> exactly for such a situation.
More interesting question. Let's say we have some open source non-GPL
application, which uses LGPL-library.
1. Is such application legal?
2. Can LGPL library source be distibuted together with source of the
application if it's unmodified? Same if it's amended to reach
compatibility (say, makefiles change, etc.)?
I remember that KDE had this sort of problems, but I don't remember what
was the resolution.
I tried to read LGPL and understand what it means there, but it seems to
me too much legalese, I couldn't get it right.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone +972-3-9316425 /\ JRRT LotR.
http://sharat.co.il/frodo/ whois:!SM8333
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
