Hi,
1. Regarding NIS vs. LDAP:
The way I see things, NIS is obsolete in 2007 (and much before) for the
following reasons: NIS is not secure: everything goes plain text over the
network; You can not prohibit "standard" users to see other users password
hash (ie. you can't make the shadow map privat
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 09:34 +0200, Jonathan Ben Avraham wrote:
> I am considering setting up a heterogenous work environment with about
> 100 high-end Linux work stations, 40 MS Windows, and 10 Mac's. The
> underlying common authentication system will likely be LDAP. Would NIS or
> Active Direc
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 10:06:55AM +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> What is the easiest way to install an Asterisk system?
Regarding asterisk packages in distributions:
Several distributions have decent packages of Asterisk. Debian ones are
rather well-maintained, though the Lenny ones are c
I haven't read the thread so far, so I apologize if it was already
mentioned, but there are live-CDs booting with Asterisk, such as
Medianix (based on Morphix):
http://trac.medianix.org
I have no experience with any of of them.
--
Eli Marmor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Netmask (El-Mar) Internet T
Speaking of LDAP management:
I have had the best experience with this tool:
http://muclm.sourceforge.net/
Highly configurable, plug-in system, user-friendly, and installation takes 5
seconds.
On Dec 25, 2007 10:35 AM, Oded Arbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 09:34 +0200, J
On Tuesday 25 December 2007, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > If I use OpenPBX.org, does this change things?
>
> I suppose you meant CallWeaver. http://callweaver.org/ (note: they don't
> use trac).
>
> OpenPBX is a free PBX program written by Voicetronix in PERL.
> Voicetronix is an interesting company (h
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 11:04 +0200, Noam Meltzer wrote:
> Speaking of LDAP management:
> I have had the best experience with this tool:
> http://muclm.sourceforge.net/
>
> Highly configurable, plug-in system, user-friendly, and installation
> takes 5 seconds.
Not as feature complete, but I use a
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 11:07:30AM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> 3. What didn't Voicetronix deserve? Someone using "OpenPBX" as the name of
> their project?
Yes. The project was renamed. But the domain openpbx.org is still in
dispute.
Anyway, I'm still waiting for CallWeaver to come up with a rel
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 11:02:35AM +0200, Eli Marmor wrote:
> I haven't read the thread so far, so I apologize if it was already
> mentioned, but there are live-CDs booting with Asterisk, such as
> Medianix (based on Morphix):
>
> http://trac.medianix.org
>
> I have no experience with any o
Hi,
We have 9 CRT screens, in working state, smallest is 17" the biggest is 19"
(about 2/3 17" 1/3rd 19").
First come first served.
Location is in Netanya in our office.
My cell for pickup is 054-4759392
All of them need to go before this Sunday afternoon.
--
Noam Rathaus
CTO
[EMAIL PROTECT
On Tuesday, 25 בDecember 2007 09:34, Jonathan Ben Avraham wrote:
> Hi Linux-IL members,
> I am considering setting up a heterogenous work environment with about
> 100 high-end Linux work stations, 40 MS Windows, and 10 Mac's. The
> underlying common authentication system will likely be LDAP. Would
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 04:43:40PM +0200, Ariel Biener wrote:
> Well, I wouldn't chose any of the above in the way it is described. I believe
> that MS AD is the best tool to use for Windows environment, LDAP is the
> best tool for a Linux environment, and NIS is the best tool in that it is alot
>
On Tuesday, 25 בDecember 2007 17:13, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
>
> However be aware that except for Windows, NFS uses *NIX user numbers
> for access control. If your user name to user number mapping is
> not consistent across all your systems you can have security
> problems.
Indeed, consistenc
Yes I found the same plugin wrapper. It helps but does not seem to work all
the time.
I was having another problem with several 32 bit programs like ooffice (with
the default install) and acroread.
When I tried to run as a user authenticated thru LDAP (or NIS) I would get:
GLib-WARNING **: g
On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 22:07 +0200, Tom Rosenfeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently started working at a new firm that is using CentOS 4.5 64
> bit on the desktop.
>
> We were having trouble with some standard programs and we just
> realized that they are related to the 64 vs. 32 bit issues.
>
> For
On Tuesday, 25 בDecember 2007, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Regarding asterisk packages in distributions:
>
> There is still no Fedora package. There is a good package at at-rpms.
> And other packages of lesser quality.
Well. Things change:
# yum list 'asterisk*'
Loading "fastestmirror" plugin
L
It's very important to use the latest version: 1.6.16.2 (some security
issues that where fixed).
I don't like the fact that they do not write the official version of
zaptel and libpri, but refer it according to the Asterisk version
itself.
My 0.0002 cents :)
Ido
On Dec 25, 2007 8:16 PM, Oron Pel
There is one thing that everyone in this discussion seem to have missed
so far, and that is that AD *is* LDAP.
Ariel Biener wrote:
Well, I wouldn't chose any of the above in the way it is described. I believe
that MS AD is the best tool to use for Windows environment, LDAP is the
best tool f
On Tuesday, 25 בDecember 2007 21:54, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> There is one thing that everyone in this discussion seem to have missed
> so far, and that is that AD *is* LDAP.
>
> Ariel Biener wrote:
> > Well, I wouldn't chose any of the above in the way it is described. I
> > believe that MS AD is
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 10:22:46PM +0200, ik wrote:
> It's very important to use the latest version: 1.6.16.2 (some security
> issues that where fixed).
1.*4*.16.2 is indeed important if you had 1.4.16 or 1.4.16.1 as it has
fixed the fix. OTOH, there's a later commit to the same spot in the SVN
wi
Hi,
just my couple of cents:
AD and Linux authentication works quite well, that means for authentication
only, you can use kerborse to authenitcate users that you have on your AD.
however, its quite important to know, that user id mapping will be done via
winbind (or maybe a mapping file), and
On Dec 25, 2007 11:13 PM, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 10:22:46PM +0200, ik wrote:
> > It's very important to use the latest version: 1.6.16.2 (some security
> > issues that where fixed).
>
> 1.*4*.16.2 is indeed important if you had 1.4.16 or 1.4.16.1 as it ha
22 matches
Mail list logo
