On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> >Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> >
> >Writing (and reading) mail messages in Hebrew is one example that pops
> >to mind.
> >
> >The composer may be another.
> >
> >In the composer, you have a means to set the direction: add a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>
>Writing (and reading) mail messages in Hebrew is one example that pops
>to mind.
>
>The composer may be another.
>
>In the composer, you have a means to set the direction: add a 'dir="rtl" '
>attribute where appropriate. Mozilla does not prov
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Writing (and reading) mail messages in Hebrew is one example that pops
to mind.
The composer may be another.
In the composer, you have a means to set the direction: add a 'dir="rtl" '
attribute where appropriate. Mozilla does not provide a user friendly tool
to do that
Tsafrir Cohen wrote:
> * An HTML page does define the base direction. What if the page author
got
> it wrong?
This is not impossible, but I believe that somebody who writes Logical
Hebrew and tests the page at least once with any browser has to notice if
the page direction is screwed, so the
It sounds very strange that you didn't encounter the same behavior in
Linux.
There are regressions in bidi reordering for all platforms in mozilla
0.9.2. The
problem has already been corrected in the nightly builds.
Lina Kemmel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> - Original Messag
IK>> See this bug for more info:
IK>> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63054
Well, I guess people that want it should vote for this bug...
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than Morgul-spells
phone +972-3-9316425/\
s
> IBM Israel
> Phone: +972 2 5870999 ext. 1202Fax: +972 2 5870333
>Mobile: +972 52 554160
>
>
>
>Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/07/2001 21:54:43
>
>Please respond to Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>To: Matitiahu Allo
If there's one more thing we need to lobby, especially one related to
i18n, that's a 'Character Coding' menu in the context-menu ("the
right-click menu") of pages and frames. This is often necessary to
override a bogus encoding of a window which has no menubar (e.g. a
Javascript-generated popup) o
2 5870333
Mobile: +972 52 554160
"Oded Arbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/07/2001 02:36:07
Please respond to "Oded Arbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matitiahu Allouche/Israel/IBM@IBMIL
cc: "Linux-IL Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: m
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matitiahu Allouche/Israel/IBM@IBMIL
cc: Linux-IL Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: mozilla 0.9.2
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It did not take so long to write the code, but it took *a looonnng time*
to
> push it through the slow wheels
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about "Re: mozilla 0.9.2":
>...
> of a page, and this is the first addition that we are lobbying for (you are
> invited to add your voice on the Mozilla newsgroups).
>
> However, I don't quite understand why this featu
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It did not take much time for Tzafrir to discover one of the main missing
> features. This is due to strong opposition from the people responsible for
> UI (user interface) in the Mozilla organization, who resist almost any
> change to the UI. The o
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For those who may be interested, Netscape has published version 6.1
> (preview) of its browser, which is based on Mozilla 0.9.2. I have tested
> the Windows version, and its Hebrew support was good for all the pages I
&
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It did not take so long to write the code, but it took *a looonnng time* to
> push it through the slow wheels of the Mozilla organization, until the code
> was integrated into the regular sources and built in the regular builds
> (some of it is not ye
>> If people download the Linux version and test it, it would be interesting
>> to see some feedback.
Tried it, works. The only problem seen so far is that "nikud" is not
displayed, it produces ? signs instead, but I'm not sure if it's Mozilla
or font problem. In fact, I'm very happy that Mozilla
which is rather positive, and beneficial
in the long run.
For those who may be interested, Netscape has published version 6.1
(preview) of its browser, which is based on Mozilla 0.9.2. I have tested
the Windows version, and its Hebrew support was good for all the pages I
tested. It is also reason
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 09:58:30AM +0300, Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo wrote:
> As for Konqueror, I tried it once. It misrendered so many pages I tried
> and also didn't have sane charset handling too. And last time I tried SSL
> wasn't working either. Maybe for browsing "me and my pussy cat" ho
EL>> If asked I'm sure they would add that feature.
Yeah, somewhere in this millennium. Thanks a lot, by this time my
grandchildren will read it for me, so I would not care then.
EL>> how about instead of saying opera lacking some features get
EL>> people who would but it (yea paying it's not th
EL>> Actualy we don't owe them anything mozilla might has been a nice project
EL>> but seriously.
EL>> konqurer and opera are doing much better job
Very debatable claim.
EL>> opera might not be complitly free but it's the best linux browser I saw so
EL>> far it doesn't crash at all it's VERY fas
On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Ely Levy wrote:
>
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 08:02:05PM +0300, Ely Levy wrote:
> > > opera might not be complitly free but it's the best linux browser I saw so
> > > far it doesn't crash at all it's VERY fast and it's not over
Hi Ely, Nadav, Harel, others...
Ely, you might want to seperate the things here...
Opera is very fast, indeed. I have it here and sometimes I'm using it. Is it
good? it's good at speed and rendering, but it's bad zooming some fonts and
graphics. When I want to click zoom in, I mean zoom the te
On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 08:02:05PM +0300, Ely Levy wrote:
> > opera might not be complitly free but it's the best linux browser I saw so
> > far it doesn't crash at all it's VERY fast and it's not over massive work
>
> Ely, check out Opera's list o
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 08:02:05PM +0300, Ely Levy wrote:
> opera might not be complitly free but it's the best linux browser I saw so
> far it doesn't crash at all it's VERY fast and it's not over massive work
Ely, check out Opera's list of supported standards - it's amazing how
many things they
2001, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote about "mozilla 0.9.2":
> > Hi all
> >
> > mozilla 0.9.2 was out a couple of days ago.
> >
> > I've tried it a bit, and there seems to have greatly improved in the field
> >
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 10:36:16PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> ...
> mozilla 0.9.2 was out a couple of days ago.
> ...
> Another thing I would recommend others to try is skipstone:
> http://www.muhri.net/skipstone
>
> This is a gtk browser that uses the mozilla engine.
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote about "mozilla 0.9.2":
> Hi all
>
> mozilla 0.9.2 was out a couple of days ago.
>
> I've tried it a bit, and there seems to have greatly improved in the field
> of memory leaks. With 0.9.1 after an hour of extensive
Hi all
mozilla 0.9.2 was out a couple of days ago.
I've tried it a bit, and there seems to have greatly improved in the field
of memory leaks. With 0.9.1 after an hour of extensive browsing I could
easily get the memory usage from around 20MB to around 30MB and much more.
On this vers
27 matches
Mail list logo
