On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Chen Shapira wrote:
> > I think it was Gal Yahas who wrote once that "real Programers do
> > cat < /dev/audio > a.out, pick up the microphone and whistle"
>
> and we change the old saying to:
> "an infinite number of rockbands given infinite time can produce Linux"?
Well, y
> I think it was Gal Yahas who wrote once that "real Programers do
> cat < /dev/audio > a.out, pick up the microphone and whistle"
and we change the old saying to:
"an infinite number of rockbands given infinite time can produce Linux"?
--
Chen Shapira
We will honor a contract and stand by a f
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Moshe Zadka wrote:
> With cat vs. vi, and Burrows-Wheeler vs. Lempel-Ziv in there for good
> measure. And, and of course, with Zadka advocating Pytohn, 'cause that's
> what Zadkas do best. (Winnie the Pooh reference, anyone?)
ZAPTA - Zadka Advocates Python To All :-)
And Ome
Are there on the Linux all the Win/Unix equal products available, such
as BEA WebLogic Servers, Java Web Server/NetscapeEnterprise Server,
etc. If yes, have these prods. the same list of features as their Win/Unix
versions? What does not available?
Thanks.
--
Evgeny Gesin
Java 2 Certified Program
>From my experience JBuilder for WinNT is able to plug-in any
jdks up to 1.2 version and I found it as the best Java IDE.
On Linux\Unix platform there is Java version of JBuilder, which
is really slow, as you pointed out, and I prefer the old (AWT)
Java WorkShop 2.0, and avoid of either Emacs, VI
Does anyone use Linux for Java development?
Why do you find it more comfortable for that than WinNT?
Thanks.
--
Evgeny Gesin
Java 2 Certified Programmer
Amdocs, Aurec Group
Join Java Desk: http://www.egroups.com/group/java-desk
To subscribe mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Omer Mussaev wrote:
> ACK. vi vs emacs is too old to be true...
>
> However, the war is vi vs. gvim
With cat vs. vi, and Burrows-Wheeler vs. Lempel-Ziv in there for good
measure. And, and of course, with Zadka advocating Pytohn, 'cause that's
what Zadkas do best. (Winnie th
Moshe Zadka wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Ira Abramov wrote:
>
> > I'll stick to good ol' mouse-insensitive
> > terminal vim.
>
> Real men use "cat > source.c", and edit with sed/grep/awk, or use the
> interactive Python interpreter to make changes.
> Of course, they put
> "from my_editor import *
> Real men use "cat > source.c", and edit with sed/grep/awk, or use the
> interactive Python interpreter to make changes.
zcat is much faster.
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the mess
Pavel Bibergal wrote:
> people!!!
> STOP!!
> cool down..
> don't start this war vi VS. emacs again!
ACK. vi vs emacs is too old to be true...
However, the war is vi vs. gvim
--
Omer Mussaev051-308-214 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
systems programmer, Mercury Interactive/RND/Conduct/core
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Ira Abramov wrote:
> I'll stick to good ol' mouse-insensitive
> terminal vim.
Real men use "cat > source.c", and edit with sed/grep/awk, or use the
interactive Python interpreter to make changes.
Of course, they put
"from my_editor import *" in their $PYTHONSTARTUP, and use c
Ira Abramov wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Omer Mussaev wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Emacs JDE is much better if you have regressed to vi.
> > > What can be better?? :-)
> >
> > gvim.
>
> just inject me with gooey honey straight down one of my major
> arteries... gvim is for wimps, real men use the keyboar
people!!!
STOP!!
cool down..
don't start this war vi VS. emacs again!
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Omer Mussaev wrote:
> >
> > Emacs JDE is much better if you have regressed to vi.
> > What can be better?? :-)
>
> gvim.
just inject me with gooey honey straight down one of my major
arteries... gvim is for wimps, real men use the keyboard. the only thing
I use the mouse is
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > yeah, but it sucks, it's slow, it's not JDK 1.1 compatible, you can't
> > cut and paste with the X clipboard... I'm back in VI :-)
> >
>
> Emacs JDE is much better if you have regressed to vi.
> You have syntax highlighting + the annoying key seque
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ira Abramov wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Pavel Bibergal wrote:
> >
> > > If u want to use the same standart IDE for linux and windows.. u should
> > > get borlands Java Builder..
> > > It is free..
> >
> > yeah, but it sucks, it's slow, it's not JDK 1.1 compatible,
Ira Abramov wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Pavel Bibergal wrote:
>
> > If u want to use the same standart IDE for linux and windows.. u should
> > get borlands Java Builder..
> > It is free..
>
> yeah, but it sucks, it's slow, it's not JDK 1.1 compatible, you can't
> cut and paste with the X clipbo
Ira Abramov wrote:
> Hi Evgeny. you can't post to this list if you are not subscribed.
>
> > Does anyone use Linux for Java development?
> > Why do you find it more comfortable for that than WinNT?
First: cost.
Second: toolkits.
Applications developed with java tend to have relation to network
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Pavel Bibergal wrote:
> If u want to use the same standart IDE for linux and windows.. u should
> get borlands Java Builder..
> It is free..
yeah, but it sucks, it's slow, it's not JDK 1.1 compatible, you can't
cut and paste with the X clipboard... I'm back in VI :-)
--
Ir
If u want to use the same standart IDE for linux and windows.. u should
get borlands Java Builder..
It is free..
Ira Abramov wrote:
> Hi Evgeny. you can't post to this list if you are not subscribed.
>
> > Does anyone use Linux for Java development?
> > Why do you find it more comfortable for th
Hi Evgeny. you can't post to this list if you are not subscribed.
> Does anyone use Linux for Java development?
> Why do you find it more comfortable for that than WinNT?
the JDK is the JDK, the same API, JRE and tools. if you mean is Emacs
better than J++ for development, it's nothing to do wi
21 matches
Mail list logo
