Re: gcc (g++ v3.2.2) trouble

2004-03-23 Thread Mark Veltzer
= > To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command > echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Name: Mark Veltzer Title: Research and Developm

Re: Configuring GDM to limit user actions

2004-02-08 Thread Mark Veltzer
for the record - the situation in windows is a lot worse since in most windows distributions the user has installation priveleges on the machine so he can actually halt the machine (for instance by running an installation process which removes critical files) or render the machine unbootable. In

Re: Globes [online] - Open question

2003-12-08 Thread Mark Veltzer
l minds go into economics... That's why they always pick mathematicians to represent them at the Nobel prize awards...:) Cheers, Mark -- Name: Mark Veltzer Title: Research and Development, Meta Ltd. Address: Habikaa 17/3, Kiriat-Sharet, city.holon, Gush-Dan, country.israel 584

Re: WebSpider/mining software.

2003-09-06 Thread Mark Veltzer
On Saturday 06 September 2003 21:47, you wrote: > Hi, > > I am not sure I am using the correct terminology. I am looking for a > tool that can download HTML pages and content given a URL as starting > point. On MS I used teleport pro (Got a license) What tool is available > on Linux? David! On th

Re: Linus: 2.6 Beta next week?

2003-07-05 Thread Mark Veltzer
a new version of glibc if you want to use new syscalls and features. Muli ?!? Cheers, Mark -- Name: Mark Veltzer Title: Research and Development, Meta Ltd. Address: Habikaa 17/3, Kiriat-Sharet, Holon, Gush-Dan, Israel 58495 Phone: +972-03-5508163 Fax: +972-03-5508163 Email: mailto:[EMA

Re: Applying open source pressure on SCO

2003-06-19 Thread Mark Veltzer
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 05:01:41PM +0300, Arik Baratz wrote: > > But there are other implications to this form of activism. Soon some guy who doesn't > like some country will add a clause to the O/S license banning use in that > country... Not a good precedent. > The owner of a project is enti

Applying open source pressure on SCO

2003-06-19 Thread Mark Veltzer
Hello all! I wanted to see how to the following ideas will fly with the open source crowd in view of SCO latest outrageous behaviour: 0. Make clean ./configure fail on SCO systems by modifying autoconf. User could still compile but not by default (special flags to ./configure woul

Re: ANSI C

2003-03-24 Thread Mark Veltzer
ave been there would have been people who would screem bloody murder about it:) > > thanks, > Tal Achituv -- Name: Mark Veltzer Title: Research and Development, Meta Ltd. Address: Habikaa 17/3, Kiriat-Sharet, Holon, Gush-Dan, Israel 58495 Phone: +972-03-5508163 Fax: +972-03-5508163 Email: ma

Re: [OT] is Linus really a traitor?

2003-01-15 Thread Mark Veltzer
o power over his users except being a bright developer who is the right person to run the Linux kernel project. If only the world had a 100 more traitors like him!!! Cheers, Mark. -- Name: Mark Veltzer Title: Research and Development, Meta Ltd. Address: Habikaa 17/3, Kiriat-Sharet, Holon,

Photos of RMS dinner

2003-01-11 Thread Mark Veltzer
heers, Mark -- Name: Mark Veltzer Title: Research and Development, Meta Ltd. Address: Habikaa 17/3, Kiriat-Sharet, Holon, Gush-Dan, Israel 58495 Phone: +972-03-5508163 Fax: +972-03-5508163 Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.veltzer.org OpenSource: CPAN, user: VELTZER, mailto:[

Re: Big Companies' Linux support

2003-01-03 Thread Mark Veltzer
n I can get one because they are written better). In any case you can hire a kernel hacker to write a device driver for just about anything these days, or, if you have enough weight, try to convince the hardware manufacturor to write one. Cheers, Mark -- Name: Mark Veltzer Titl

Re: FreeBSD vs Linux vs Windows 2000

2002-12-14 Thread Mark Veltzer
On Saturday 14 December 2002 01:00 pm, you wrote: > Not expressing any constructive opinion, your paragraph here is just saying > that BSD guys are more professional. That depends on your definition of "professional". If professional is careful up to the point of stagnation then professional is a

Re: FreeBSD vs Linux vs Windows 2000

2002-12-14 Thread Mark Veltzer
On Saturday 14 December 2002 11:56 am, you wrote: > thought you might find this interesting : > http://people.freebsd.org/~murray/bsd_flier.html Too much in favour of BSD as compared to Linux...:). Almost all the points are history today and it only goes to show the fast rate of Linux progress...

External USB cd writers for Linux

2002-12-03 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all! Can anybody recommend any that are known to work well under Linux ? BTW: same goes for scanners:) Is the Linux hardware database up to date ? (meaning is the info there any good ?) Cheers, Mark -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: PPPoE instead of PPTP on Bezeq ADSL - howto

2002-11-23 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 24 November 2002 01:31, you wrote: > Comments welcome. Just one comment: Great stuff. Since most distros come with PPPoE and not PPTP it makes installing Bezeq ADSL a little easier for newbie Linux users. Thanks for writing the document. A

Re: ccache pitfall discovered

2002-10-29 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 29 October 2002 11:44, you wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:11:50AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > > We've had a thread recently about ccache and potential pitfalls. johnm > > on advogato has discovered one such pitfall. The details: > >

Re: Bezeq ADSL and sending faxes

2002-10-26 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 27 October 2002 01:51, you wrote: > > yeah, yeah, heard you the first time... > Sorry about the double post. Problem with my email client. > ofcourse you can use your line for faxes, it's a standard SL (albeint > DSL) and still works as POT

Bezeq ADSL and sending faxes

2002-10-26 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all! I have a standard Alcatel modem for Bezeq ADSL and I wanted to know if it can be used to send faxes in any way ? Thanks, Mark -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.o

Bezeq ADSL and sending faxes

2002-10-26 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all! I have a standard Alcatel modem for Bezeq ADSL and I wanted to know if it can be used to send faxes in any way ? Thanks, Mark -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.o

Re: RedHat pisses me up!!

2002-10-16 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 16 October 2002 14:27, you wrote: > Sorry for being rude, but ... > This is the storry > > Several weeks ago, I updated RH7.3 to 8.0 version using "update all" > option. Even though I didn't asked the installation program to remove any >

Re: System Backups

2002-10-14 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 14 October 2002 13:08, you wrote: > I think that he didn't look for backup tools, but asked what's wrong > with a dumb copy, and if a dumb copy can be used instead of tools like > Ghost and mindi/mondo. > > Since this question bothers me too

Re: System Backups

2002-10-14 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 14 October 2002 12:37, you wrote: > Hi, > > What would be the way to backup an entire system ? > > I have a server which I need too backup, a complete > backup setups, *-conf, data, everything and then to > easily rebuild the entire server b

Re: A disturbing article...

2002-10-12 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 12 October 2002 21:41, you wrote: > Hi List, > I tend to concur with Oded, > > The first problem is that Linux advocates usually do not understand just > how unusable and inappropriate Linux is for the average person, which > leads to the s

Re: Mounting few Iso's on the same point

2002-10-08 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 08 October 2002 00:13, you wrote: > On Monday 07 October 2002 16:01, Alon Barzilai wrote: > > mount -t iso9660 -o ro 1.iso /mnt/disk1 > > mount -t iso9660 -o ro 2.iso /mnt/disk1 > > This is called "union mount". Linux does not have this fea

Re: xmms rh8

2002-10-07 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 07 October 2002 19:23, you wrote: > MPEG-2 ---> maybe RealNetwork new open source technology??? who > knows? > I understood that Ogg is also video ready. It's supposed to be a sort of "Meta-Format" for binary streamed media so if

Please disregard my previous message

2002-10-04 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Linux-il and Linux-kernel as fairly close on my contacts list...:) Sorry...:( Regards, Mark -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9ng3fxlxDIcceXTgRApk1AKDV2GPyb7KnT

Re: export of sys_call_table

2002-10-04 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 05 October 2002 00:06, David S. Miller wrote: > There is simply no portable way to make changes to the system call > table, so exporting it makes zero sense. > - I don't wish to comment on the need or lack thereof of exporting the sys cal

Re: xmms rh8

2002-10-04 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 04 October 2002 14:28, you wrote: > Honestly I don't quite get it. > How can they break such a behaviour or supported feature of the system ?? > > RH at previous versions could play mp3 easily, now you can't use XMMS > ?? This makes

Re: ccache

2002-09-28 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > Corrrect - but can you think of any example where the preprocessed > source will remain exactly the same, but the code would still need to > be recompiled? It seems a contradiction. Well - when you consider that the compilation process is made up

Re: ccache

2002-09-27 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 28 September 2002 02:07, you wrote: > Basically, it competes with make for > dependency tracking. It seems to try to do it in a smart way, but > having two tools trying to outsmart each other seeds doubt in my mind. > This doubt may have n

Re: [OT] Re: linux 2.4.20-pre?-ac? kernels

2002-09-26 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 26 September 2002 22:17, you wrote: > NB: marked OT with respect to the actual topic of the thread. Not entirely > OT for the list, I suppose. > > Mark Veltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ... and I will con

Re: linux 2.4.20-pre?-ac? kernels

2002-09-26 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 26 September 2002 21:50, you wrote: > On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Mark Veltzer wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Here are my thoughts on the matter (as if anyone cares what they

Re: linux 2.4.20-pre?-ac? kernels

2002-09-26 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Here are my thoughts on the matter (as if anyone cares what they are...:): 1. No commercial company has EVER produced a portable kernel (a real portable kernel - no branches like solaris or windows on alpha). This is probably due to the patience on

Re: RH8 & Mdk9

2002-09-25 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 25 September 2002 18:01, you wrote: > Wrong in both terms: > > 1. GCC 2.96 to me seems very stable these days - and I have more then > enough compile expirience with it (I use 2.96 only up until few days ago). > It had few problems when

Re: RH8 & Mdk9

2002-09-25 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 25 September 2002 12:32, you wrote: > the statistical chance that such a case will happen, is > almost zero. So when it happens, it's exciting. The statistics become much higher when you realize that: 1. Redhat wants to change the buggy

Re: kernel 2.4.19 anyone?

2002-09-21 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 22 September 2002 01:41, you wrote: > Hi fellows.. > > I was wondering if someone could share his/her experience with vanilla > kernel 2.4.19 > > I have used so far (in the last few months at least) RedHat's 2.4.18 > kernel, but it seem my b