-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 05 October 2002 00:06, David S. Miller wrote:
> There is simply no portable way to make changes to the system call
> table, so exporting it makes zero sense.
> -

I don't wish to comment on the need or lack thereof of exporting the sys call 
table but it sounds to me that this is an area where some work would be 
beneficial.

Is it too complication to produce a portable API along the lines of:

        syscall_entry_replace(int,func_t)

Which will be implemented per architecture with the appropriate locks ?

And if locking is the problem then even a trimmed version that doesn't do 
locking and maybe could be used for other in kernel purposes in code where 
the locking is not needed ?

Just wondering,
        Mark.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9ngrUxlxDIcceXTgRAtEsAKDYLunlNd19qdQQacfA7hHpCrtSIwCgxIok
S/PV6XqX/G0J+qSNHXwL3ao=
=unBc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to