Title: RE: Question on making the partitions
> -Original Message-
> From: Ehud Karni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 6:44 PM
> To: Avrahami David
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Question on making the partitions
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAG
Title: [JOB OFFER] Linux sys. admin position
Job Description:
* Develop & support Linux (Red-Hat) infrastructure for most of Comverse application servers.
* Full time job
Job Requirements:
* Developer with at least 3 years experience as Linux s
Hi,
couldn't you get the same logging capabilities by closing outgoing SMTP
connections (using iptables) for users other than "smtp" and relaying
all applications through the local smtp daemon ?
Thanks,
Gregory.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beha
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am in an "interesting" situation. I have two accounts on the same machine.
> I would like both of them to share the same mail box (I will be able to see
> the same folders on both accounts).
>
> I tried putting the mailbox on a "shared" dir :
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Ehud Karni wrote:
> My suggestion is to have only 2 partitions: / (with /usr, /bin and any
> not changing much dirs - 7-8 GB will be more than enough for RH or FC),
> and another for mostly user dirs (/home, /tmp). I put /var in the root
> partition because although changing,
I think it's a nice idea.
Might I suggest a similar solution that seems to me more airtight.
If you already have access to the smtp machine you might consider
filtering all newly arriving mails to a temorary folder and your warning
email that you send to the client will include a confirmation hyper
Hi,
Some time ago I asked this group about an idea of mine to track smtp
activity.
The reason I want to do so is that a while ago I was suspected of
sending spam messages. Knowing that I would never do such a thing I
assumed I got infected with some kind of a worm. (I understand that
there are
Diego,
I think the best way would be to use procmail in-between, piping the
messages to Your chosen location and keeping the permissions intact.
Check "man procmailrc" and "man procmailex" for some more information.
Basicaly I'd do it this way:
PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:whatever
TARGET=/my-sha
Oron Peled wrote:
On Wednesday 09 June 2004 19:18, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Maxim Kovgan wrote:
man pthread_create
man pthread_mutex_init
Why would threads and mutexes help me at all?
They won't, wrong direction. Instead, why blocking SIGCHLD
and getting to possible critical races
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
how about replacing the signal with e.g. a pipe? i.e. fork twice, have
the first son share a pipe with the father, then fork & exec the ping,
and wait on it. Once the ping returns, write to the pipe. In the
father, select on the pipe with the timeout you want. No async events
On Wednesday 09 June 2004 19:18, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Maxim Kovgan wrote:
> >man pthread_create
> >man pthread_mutex_init
> Why would threads and mutexes help me at all?
They won't, wrong direction. Instead, why blocking SIGCHLD
and getting to possible critical races? An simpler alternative
se
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 06:52:16PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Now here's the thing. Sometimes, I can see that the ping returned fairly
> immediately, but the full timeout was spent. I suspect that, due to the
> fact pselect is not a system call in Linux, ping has indeed finished
> before t
On Thursday 10 June 2004 00:43, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am in an "interesting" situation. I have two accounts on the same
> machine. I would like both of them to share the same mail box (I will be
> able to see the same folders on both accounts).
>
> I tried putting the mailbox on a "sha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 19:31:31 +0300, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The more serious problem is that ALRM has a resolution of "seconds",
> which is not good enough.
You can use `setitimer(2)' instead. It has microseconds resolution,
but
On Wednesday 09 June 2004 21:40, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 June 2004 16:50, Amir Hardon wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm planning a DB structure for an e-commerce system, and facing some
> > question about the DB efficiency that I don't know how to approach.
> >
> > For example what will be better
Hi,
I am in an "interesting" situation. I have two accounts on the same machine.
I would like both of them to share the same mail box (I will be able to see
the same folders on both accounts).
I tried putting the mailbox on a "shared" dir : "/usr/local/mail", and set
that dir G+RW (both users
On Wednesday 09 June 2004 16:50, Amir Hardon wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm planning a DB structure for an e-commerce system, and facing some
> question about the DB efficiency that I don't know how to approach.
>
> For example what will be better, storing all items information in one table
> with one column f
hi,
i got a usb irda from office-depot.
it is a generic brand, when i plug it in i see in
/prob/bus/usb/devices:
..
P: Vendor=066f ProdID=4200 Rev= 0.08
S: Manufacturer= Sigmatel Inc
S: Product= IrDA/USB Bridge
..
notice that sigmatel is a different driver than most irda devices. its
called st
i>> Do you have an idea what can i do ?
Well, if I had this situation I probably would call the provider and say
"Guys, I pay you money and my connection is not working. Why won't you fix
it *right now* or I find somebody who would provide me with service for my
money?" If they don't fix it, I'd c
Eran,
I am using linux irda support (irda-utils + kernel modules) to operate my
SonyEricsson T68i as a GPRS modem, but I do that not through a Dongle (I
think that's how USB->IrDA thingie is generally called), but directly.
Check the kernel documentation for the supported USB->IrDA interfaces a
Look for FreeSco (www.freesco.org , I think)
It runs from a floppy disk, but it doesn't look like putting it on a
bootable flash disk will be an issue.
It will run on any box (well, maybe 486 and up...) with 2 NICs and 8
megs of memory...
Maybe an old laptop with 2 NICs (PCMCIA)? Probably a lot c
Ehud Karni wrote:
Caution: untested suggestion.
You can use alarm(2) in the child process before `exec'ing the ping.
Then it either will finish normally (exit 0) or will fail for any
reason (including SIGALRM).
No good
In this way, you can use blocking `waitpid' in the parent process.
If you try
Maxim Kovgan wrote:
man pthread_create
man pthread_mutex_init
good luck.
M.
I'm afraid you will have to be WAY more specific than this. Why would
threads and mutexes help me at all?
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd.
http://www.lingnu.com/
==
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 18:52:16 +0300, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to provide a library call that will run a ping to a server.
> The catch is that it needs to be done as a non-root user, and I would
> like to avoid any soluti
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to provide a library call that will run a ping to a server.
> The catch is that it needs to be done as a non-root user, and I would
> like to avoid any solution that involves any SUID or root running
> processes beyond what is alr
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Amir Hardon wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm planning a DB structure for an e-commerce system, and facing some question
> about the DB efficiency that I don't know how to approach.
>
> For example what will be better, storing all items information in one table
> with one column for category,
Hi all,
I'm trying to provide a library call that will run a ping to a server.
The catch is that it needs to be done as a non-root user, and I would
like to avoid any solution that involves any SUID or root running
processes beyond what is already there. That leaves me, pretty much, "ping".
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 16:37:16 +0300 , Avrahami David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm installing a customized RH linux with kickstart.
> I would like the default partitions to be defined as follows:
> / - 2GB
> /usr - 4GB
> /opt - 2GB
What about
Hello all
I have a question regarding postfix and DNS servers.
I'm running postfix, and I'm trying to get it to use a specific DNS server. Try as I
might, I can't seem to convince it to use the DNS server in /etc/resolv.conf - it goes
to the DNS installed on the machine, as tcpdump confirms.
Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
Hi All
I want to setup a Firewall, and thought of runing it from flash memory
on a small computer.
I thought of getting one of those:
http://h41100.www4.hp.com/il/eng/commercial/thinclients/entry.html
Any one have any knowlege about such solution ? are there better
ha
One possible approach:
Try both designs, fill them with lots of test data and benchmark the
performance.
Also use EXPLAIN SELECT (a MySQL command which gives you information
about how it is going to execute the actual SELECT command).
I read about this stuff in MySQL Reference Manual, published
Hi,
I'm planning a DB structure for an e-commerce system, and facing some question
about the DB efficiency that I don't know how to approach.
For example what will be better, storing all items information in one table
with one column for category, or having a separate items table for each
categ
Title: Question on making the partitions
Hi,
I'm installing a customized RH linux with kickstart.
I would like the default partitions to be defined as follows:
/ - 2GB
/usr - 4GB
/opt - 2GB
The remaining FSs should be a percent of the remaining free space (after allocat
Hi All
I want to setup a Firewall, and thought of runing
it from flash memory on a small computer.
I thought of getting one of those:
http://h41100.www4.hp.com/il/eng/commercial/thinclients/entry.html
Any one have any knowlege about such solution ? are
there better hardware or cheeper th
I am using Hot also,
The service men were fixing cables on the street. I asked them if this
could be the reason for my poor service for the last month and they
answered me no it was just a problem for today which would be fixed
shortly. (it took all day)
I couldn't connect and call hot. I got the
Alcatel allows you change the IP, though that's only crucial if you use
PPTP on
both modems.
Yes, indeed, in my connection PPTP is much less stable PPPoE: back when I used
PPTP to connect on my Alcatel I had daily disconnections. Ever since I
switched to PPPoE I have almost no disconnetions.
P.S.
What I would do:
Trying to get them to accept your Linux box is doomed to failure. I'd grab a Win box
from somewhere with some extra NICs (so they can't say it's the NIC), and make them
make it work there. They won't have excuses.
I would also try to climb high as possible in the technical suppo
Hi,
For the past few month i have problem with the cable connection to the
internet.
I'm connected using Network adapter (network card...) and on linux !!!
currently Debian, before that it was mandrake at home...
The modem of the cables is Terayon TJ7151
I have few problems with the connection:
I have the STLabs one and it works.
I didn't do much with it under linux, but I did manage to grab some
basic info from my cell. I didn't use it long enough to know if there
are any problems with it (the cell application wasn't mature enough, I'm
pretty sure it was only some command line dump ut
On Tuesday 08 June 2004 09:53, Noam Rathaus wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 June 2004 00:32, Noam L. wrote:
> > I dont think you can put two PPPoE on the same LAN.
> >
> > However, most Alcatel do use PPTP, if you can get yours to talk PPTP
> > then you can use PPPoE for the ECI and PPTP for the Alc
40 matches
Mail list logo
