On Friday, Aug 29, 2003, at 23:10 Asia/Jerusalem, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
OS-X does not have virtual desktops.
When you have virtual desktops you don't urgently need all of those
workarounds just to clear some space.
Let's see. My Mac right now has 12 virtual desktops (via a free add-on)
and my Lin
ביום ראשון 31 אוגוסט 2003, 01:22, Vasiliev Michael כתב:
> I am being informed privately by some people about certain facts I wasn't
> aware of.
>
> Nadav, I want to apologize for the terrible and painful words I said. Now I
> know that life is being harder for you than for the most and I never
> in
I am being informed privately by some people about certain facts I wasn't
aware of.
Nadav, I want to apologize for the terrible and painful words I said. Now I
know that life is being harder for you than for the most and I never intended
to make it even harder.
I also feel that I owe everyone
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003, Tzafrir Cohen wrote about "Re: end of boring discussion":
> However I have not yet seen a way to archive a Hebrew mailing list
> properly. linux-heb does not yet have a searchable archive yet. I find
> this to be a major problem for that list.
The bigger problem is that there
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003, Herouth Maoz wrote about "Re: OS-X rules, X sucks (Was:
Forthcoming "Blitz" of Announcements)":
> I never use multiple desktops and I don't understand why anyone would
> need to.
>...
> The issue is that window overlap is not solved by multiple desktops
> because in any cas
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 12:21:38AM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> However I have not yet seen a way to archive a Hebrew mailing list
> properly. linux-heb does not yet have a searchable archive yet. I find
> this to be a major problem for that list.
>
I have just tested this again: I tried to sear
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 04:59:03PM +0300, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> Nadav,
>
> I am one if the of the people who would like this mailing list a
> hebrew/english mailing list. However, there are no alternatives for every
> user yet, and by enforcing hebrew,you are enforcing some products. Which
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 12:43:50PM +0300, Oded Arbel wrote:
> The whole attitude of "We don't need to stinking GUI" is fine, as long as you
> keep it to yourself. if your objective is to make Linux the best operating
> system for your own special needs, then everything is fine - you probably
> d
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 03:48:46PM +0300, John Rabkin wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 03:00:54PM +0300, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
[ much snipped, including signature ]
>
> All your points are very true. I tend to add my personal fears to the
> equation. Thus my arguments.
>
> I'm afraid that b
Thanks for the code.
by the way what specifications were you using to write this code?
from my humble investigations there are a couple of ways to modulate and to
encode the callerid.
so it makes me wonder if any modem demodulator is compatible with every
modulation system.
and as for the modem ,
Just open a terminal to the modem port and issue ATI1 or ATI2 . depends on your
modem chipset.
on usrobotics usually its ATI7.
* - * - *
Tzahi Fadida
MSc Student
Information System Engineering Area
Faculty of Industrial Engineering & Management
Technion - Israel Institute of Technology
Techni
Alon,
yes I would like the scripts very much, thank you.
I'll go lookup what you mean by class 2.0 . but do you mean that even modems
that are declared as "voice modems" wouldn't work under vgetty ?
thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Alon Altman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "foofoo" <[EMAIL
By the way, the "syster feature" of Caller ID is "MSN" (nothing to do
with Microsoft's MSN), which is the number that was dialed (rather than
the number of the line that called us).
Many of you may ask "why the hell do we need this number? Don't we know
OUR number?!".
The obvious answer is that s
> > 2. does anybody know where can I get (buy) Linux compatible modem that
has
> > voice capabilities in Israel?
>
> That's tricky. Even hardware modems don't help you here. You'll need to
> find a CLASS-2 or CLASS-2.0 fax modem, which is quite tricky.
>
US Robotics ISA PnP Voice - I have it. I
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, foofoo wrote:
> Hey good people of Linux-il (and Linux-il-heb ;))
> two brief questions:
> 1. I was wondering if anybody has experience with capturing caller id under
> Linux
> i.e. what is the required software (vgetty?) and hardware.
Yes, I do actually. I made a small
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 09:32:09PM +0200, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> several list members to open linux-heb in a hope that people will
> use it more. I think we should check why it hasn't taken off...
Maybe because you (and everyone else, including the instigator of this
most annoying thread, one Mr.
OTOH, many people don't know enough english to post. probably a significant number of
them doesn't
post because they afraid they will look bad. also, there are some people who further
go and has
problem understanding the intricacies and multitude of terms in the english language.
I don't see why
Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Next Monday (01/09/2003), at 18:30, the Haifa Linux Club will once again
> meet to hear Oleg Goldshmidt talk about:
>
>Pseudo-, Quasi-, and Real Random Numbers
>
> You are all invited! More info on how to get to the meeting etc. at
> the
Hey good people of Linux-il (and Linux-il-heb ;))
two brief questions:
1. I was wondering if anybody has experience with capturing caller id under
Linux
i.e. what is the required software (vgetty?) and hardware.
2. does anybody know where can I get (buy) Linux compatible modem that has
voice ca
One of the problems, is that real work cannot be done yet in hebrew, because
of luck of terminology. Carmel and Ivrix are doing a great job, but still
there is a long way before us.
I do not wish to see questions like:
"איפה המאונט פוינט של הנפס בתור ברירת מחדל?" -> "where is the default mount
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003, nadav mavor wrote about " ":
> ב נדב הראל : כמו שאמרתי לך בכנס הספלר יכול להיות הטוב ביותר בעולם אבל
> כול עוד לא ישלבו אותו או ימשקו אותו בצורה תבעית
> לתוך האפלקציות הפופולריות הוא חסר ערך (שילוב לתוך מוזילה OO וכו ..) אני
Hspell is already integrated with a number of ap
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003, Oded Arbel wrote about "Re: OS-X rules, X sucks (Was:
Forthcoming "Blitz" of Announcements)":
> I have Voodoo3 card on my Duron (700MHz,256MB) which is a very good 3D card
> (for its age) and also has some 2D acceleration. moving any kind of window -
> even simple single co
maybe there is a creative solution to this. as i see it, the main issues are:
1) the mailing list has gone thru an internationalization process, and now there are
mixed
nationalities on the mailing list.
2) some people are just more comfortable with english, but they won't have any problem
getting
On Saturday 30 August 2003 17:18, nadav mavor wrote:
> אני לא תוען שצריך לכתוב רק באיברית כמו שהמתנגדים תוענים שצריך לכתוב רק
> באנגלית
> המייל ליסט צריך להיות באיברית אבל מי שלא יכול לכתוב בעיברית שיכתוב
> באנגלית פורטוגזית או שפת מאדים
> אני לא קיצוני בניגוד לשאר האנשים פה
> לגבי הIRIX זה לקח לי
Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Nadav,
I am one if the of the people who would like this mailing list a hebrew/english mailing list. However, there are no alternatives for every user yet, and by enforcing hebrew,you are enforcing some products. Which means loosing of of the biggest things available
Nadav,
I am one if the of the people who would like this mailing list a
hebrew/english mailing list. However, there are no alternatives for every
user yet, and by enforcing hebrew,you are enforcing some products. Which
means loosing of of the biggest things available as linux users: choice and
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 02:02:17PM +0200, Oleg Kobets wrote:
> Well, as it seems, iproute2 was created for policy routing, nat, QoS and
> tunnels for kernel 2.2.
> At least, that is what I have found on it's HOWTO pages.
>
At least some of it is targeted by iptables, doesn't it?
> I have fai
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 03:00:54PM +0300, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> JR>> benchmarking or window dragging the only way to measure quality
> JR>> of engineering then that makes a 3GHz machine running Windows
> JR>> 3.11 better engineered than a 333Mhz machine running Linux.
>
> Well, if the benchm
I have multiple desktops on my Linux machine and found this
feature to be much more convenient - don't have to keep
jumping from one desktop to another, can find and switch among
windows in the same desktop quickly, can overview my desktop easely,
the shrinking and the reverse operation keep the "c
nadav, i think you got what you were asking for. there are quite a few
mailing lists and forums for linux in israel. 'linux-il' is just one of
them. the reason that it has this name is historic (you may call that a
short-sighted decision - but using a different name back then, would have
been quit
סמחתי לקבל כול כך הרבה
תגובות שלו קשורות לנושא
בגדול אני נימנע מלרדת לרמה הזאת אבל הפעם אני אחרוג ממנהגי
בתור התחלה אני רוצה לציין לטובה את שחר שמש שהפתיע אותי אם התוסף למוזילה
(הוא עובד ניחמד מאוד תודה)
לגבי התגובות:
א התיעון כי יש כאלה שלא יכולים להתקין לקוח דואר שתומך באיברית הוא מגוחך
וחס
JR>> benchmarking or window dragging the only way to measure quality
JR>> of engineering then that makes a 3GHz machine running Windows
JR>> 3.11 better engineered than a 333Mhz machine running Linux.
Well, if the benchmarks would show so - yes, then the former is better
enigneered that the latter
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 12:43:50PM +0300, Oded Arbel wrote:
> On Saturday 30 August 2003 10:02, John Rabkin wrote:
> > Aaaah yes. The age old argument. I cannot understand for the life of me why
> > some people are on a crusade to bog Linux down with eye-candy. A flashy
> > interface is a sure sign
Well, as it seems, iproute2 was created for policy routing, nat, QoS and
tunnels for kernel 2.2.
At least, that is what I have found on it's HOWTO pages.
I have failed to find etables though, so I have no idea what it does.
I can make an educated guess that while IP alias scenario can be achieved
Herouth Maoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I never use multiple desktops and I don't understand why anyone would
> need to.
See below ;-)
> The key to work with multiple windows belonging to multiple
> applications is to be able to quickly switch from one to the other -
> preferably with one cl
On Saturday 30 August 2003 12:51, Herouth Maoz wrote:
> Now, for MacOS, the so-called "eye candy" that was described here was
> described a bit misleadingly. We are talking about minimized windows.
> Those minimize down to the dock. Then, when you travel over the
> minimized windows in the dock, yo
HM>> I never use multiple desktops and I don't understand why anyone would
HM>> need to. I do use multiple *monitors*, because sometimes it's very
Well, let me assure you there are some people that do understand that :)
HM>> with the nethack readme is the third one on the top row. That's
HM>> bad
HM>> go. No. What GNU/Linux (or BSD, or my mother) should learn is that to
HM>> design a good human interface, you need to research that topic and find
Actually I'm not sure that MACs "nobody needs more than one button on
mouse", "nobody wants two user menus on the screen or user menu attached
to
On Friday, Aug 29, 2003, at 23:10 Asia/Jerusalem, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
OS-X does not have virtual desktops.
When you have virtual desktops you don't urgently need all of those
workarounds just to clear some space.
I never use multiple desktops and I don't understand why anyone would
need to. I d
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 10:15:41AM +0200, Oleg Kobets wrote:
> I don't know about iproute2, never used it. But, don't you trying to
> acomplish "eth0:1" scenario ?
> If so, then you do not need anything besides ifconfig and kernel.
>
> Maybe I misunderstood you.
>
You understood me correctly.
On Saturday 30 August 2003 10:02, John Rabkin wrote:
> Aaaah yes. The age old argument. I cannot understand for the life of me why
> some people are on a crusade to bog Linux down with eye-candy. A flashy
> interface is a sure sign of a weak underlaying system. Please show me a
> single instance we
On Saturday, Aug 30, 2003, at 10:02 Asia/Jerusalem, John Rabkin wrote:
Aaaah yes. The age old argument. I cannot understand for the life of
me why some people are on a crusade to bog Linux down with eye-candy.
A flashy interface is a sure sign of a weak underlaying system. Please
show me a singl
I don't know about iproute2, never used it. But, don't you trying to
acomplish "eth0:1" scenario ?
If so, then you do not need anything besides ifconfig and kernel.
Maybe I misunderstood you.
Alon.
- Original Message -
From: "Shaul Karl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:13:03AM +0300, Oded Arbel wrote:
> On Monday 25 August 2003 10:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The things I think are the most useful in the OS-X interface are:
> >
> > 1. The ability to sort of "zoom out" where all the application windows
> > are resized to be small eno
Please comment on anything that follows.
With kernel 2.4 I should have used iproute2 in order to get more then
one IP for one physical eth device. This is known as IP aliasing.
iproute2 is not meant to work with 2.6. Instead, etables is the tool to
use.
--
Shaul Karl,shaulk @ actcom .
45 matches
Mail list logo
