On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Arie Folger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to give debian (testing branch; I believe it's called sid) a try, but
> wonder about the following:
>
> Is is glibc 3.x based? I tried in vain to look through the package list and
> found no mention of glibc.
glibc is called libc6 (Is deb
"Nadav Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +--- Please ignore the following Crap:
I did not. ;-)
> [1] If I remember correctly, it was Rebinu Gershom around the year 1000
> who declared it forbidden to read other people's mail without permission.
> There's no need to say that on every email a
On Sun, 01 Sep 2002 19:00:49 +0300
Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>2. What measures can I take to prevent them to appear ?
> >>
> For all practical purposes, nothing. They are necessary. You can make
> sure you never close the connection first ;-). If the connection was
> closed
Quoth Arie Folger:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to give debian (testing branch; I believe it's called sid) a
sarge
> Is is glibc 3.x based? I tried in vain to look through the package list and
> found no mention of glibc.
2.2
> How do you download the whole binary tree? In RH I simply downloaded the
Hi,
I'd like to give debian (testing branch; I believe it's called sid) a try, but
wonder about the following:
Is is glibc 3.x based? I tried in vain to look through the package list and
found no mention of glibc.
How do you download the whole binary tree? In RH I simply downloaded the
iso-i
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 00:29, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Nadav Har'El wrote:
>
> >[1] If I remember correctly, it was Rebinu Gershom around the year 1000
> >who declared it forbidden to read other people's mail without permission.
> >
> >
> This argument is flawed because of a perhaps unexpected p
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 10:40:17PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > What about text messages?
>
> There is no standard for setting a text/plain message's directionality.
> I think the RFC says its to be determined from the first strong
> character or
Nadav Har'El wrote:
>[1] If I remember correctly, it was Rebinu Gershom around the year 1000
>who declared it forbidden to read other people's mail without permission.
>
>
This argument is flawed because of a perhaps unexpected point Nadav has
forgotten. While it is true that Gershom forbade r
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002, Amir Tal wrote about "Re: [OT] Looking for jobs":
> bottom line : its not clear, it makes us jumpy - loose it ! or else.. ;)
According to my personal archives (oops, I can be sued!) we already asked
Iftach a year ago (september 2001) to lose this signature on this mailing
l
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002, Guy Cohen wrote about "Re: [OT] Looking for jobs":
> I'm not a lawyer buy im wondering what is their case. Having your
> mail server auto-add a message claiming your message is the property
> of your boss, and adds a "do not touch" sign, makes it legal for them
> to sue you b
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote about "Re: [OT] Looking for jobs":
> Ely Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I find it very impolite to have this kind of e-mail sent
> > a public mailing list.
>
> While I agree in principle, it may be out of control of the sender...
I hear this f
On Sunday 01 September 2002 21:06, Guy Cohen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 08:54:51PM +0300, Ely Levy wrote:
> > Those things as a way to come back at you when ignored.
> > You don't see the problem now, sure.
> > think of it this way the company this guy works for suddenly wants to get
> > rid
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 10:48:39PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >I've coded up some simple key bindings for Mozilla to allow switching
> >the direction of the input box, just like (Left/Right)Ctrl-Shift
> >does in Windows / Qt.
> >
> >Get it from:
> >htt
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 10:40:17PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> What about text messages?
There is no standard for setting a text/plain message's directionality.
I think the RFC says its to be determined from the first strong
character or something like that. (We can actually use RLE and LRE to
Those things as a way to come back at you when ignored.
You don't see the problem now, sure.
think of it this way the company this guy works for suddenly wants to get
rid of linux-il for whatever reason, what easier way than the sue the hell
out of everyone for archiving the message?
Ely Levy
Sys
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 08:54:51PM +0300, Ely Levy wrote:
> Those things as a way to come back at you when ignored.
> You don't see the problem now, sure.
> think of it this way the company this guy works for suddenly wants to get
> rid of linux-il for whatever reason, what easier way than the sue
On Sunday 01 September 2002 18:29, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On 1 Sep 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> > Ely Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > That can make problems with things like archiving/forwarding e-mails to
> > > other people and so on.
> > >
> > > anyhow to whoever archive this list, Puti
On Sunday 01 September 2002 18:35, Guy Cohen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 06:18:49PM +0300, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> > Ely Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I find it very impolite to have this kind of e-mail sent
> > > a public mailing list.
> >
> > While I agree in principle, it may be
On Sunday 01 September 2002 18:18, you wrote:
> Ely Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I find it very impolite to have this kind of e-mail sent
> > a public mailing list.
>
> While I agree in principle, it may be out of control of the sender...
then he can get a yahoo\hotmail\ whatever account
On Sunday 01 September 2002 19:43, Iftach Hyams wrote:
> I appreciate your (and others) concern. It is true - it is a bothering
> message that our server is adding automatically. I try to insert few
> empty lines so is will be away from the eye.
> Anyhow, you can rest assure that you (not person
On Sunday 01 September 2002 19:17, Eliran wrote:
> Ely Levy wrote:
> >>This e-mail message has been sent by Elbit Systems Ltd.
> >>and is for the use of the intended recipients only.
> >>The message may contain privileged or confidential information .
> >>If you are not the intended recipient you
My mistake.
I rechecked, and "lordsoth"'s reply is the correct one. Sorry about the
unnecessary noise.
Shachar
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Actually, that is not correct
>
> Replies to the original questions and to the replies are in the body.
>
> Lord Soth wrote:
>
>> On Sunday
Actually, that is not correct
Replies to the original questions and to the replies are in the body.
Lord Soth wrote:
>On Sunday 01 September 2002 14:03, Michael Sternberg wrote:
>
>
>>Sorry if I'm starting a long thread with this letter :)
>>I digged through the Google and did not find anythi
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I don't like the idea of RLE..PDF to force paragraph direction,
>and it is WRONG,
>
Yes, it is. I think that, at this stage, people are more interested in
"WORKING" than in "RIGHT".
> the Unicode BiDi Algorithm is so that puttinjg a
>RLE at the beginning does
I appreciate your (and others) concern. It is true - it is a bothering
message that our server is adding automatically. I try to insert few
empty lines so is will be away from the eye.
Anyhow, you can rest assure that you (not personally , but as a mailing
list member) are not subject to the con
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 06:18:49PM +0300, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Ely Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I find it very impolite to have this kind of e-mail sent
> > a public mailing list.
>
> While I agree in principle, it may be out of control of the sender...
>
> > That can make problem
On 1 Sep 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Ely Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > That can make problems with things like archiving/forwarding e-mails to
> > other people and so on.
> >
> > anyhow to whoever archive this list, Puting this mail there might get you
> > sued
>
> Assuming the maili
Ely Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I find it very impolite to have this kind of e-mail sent
> a public mailing list.
While I agree in principle, it may be out of control of the sender...
> That can make problems with things like archiving/forwarding e-mails to
> other people and so on.
>
>
Ely Levy wrote:
>>This e-mail message has been sent by Elbit Systems Ltd.
>>and is for the use of the intended recipients only.
>>The message may contain privileged or confidential information .
>>If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any use,
>>distribution or copyin
Matitiahu Allouche wrote:
>For those of us looking for TTF fonts with Hebrew support and no
>dependency on license for Microsoft products, the Sun JDK has TTF fonts
>which contain glyphs for Hebrew. I have checked the fonts in JDK 1.4: it
>contains 8 fonts, all variants of the Lucida family,
Can anyone recommand of good packages?
The ones from sid are making problems
did anyone try
deb http://gluck.debian.org/~kov/debian woody gnome2?
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
=
To unsubscribe, send
> This e-mail message has been sent by Elbit Systems Ltd.
> and is for the use of the intended recipients only.
> The message may contain privileged or confidential information .
> If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any use,
> distribution or copying of this communi
>
>
>On Sunday 01 September 2002 14:03, Michael Sternberg wrote:
>
>
>>Sorry if I'm starting a long thread with this letter :)
>>I digged through the Google and did not find anything that
>>will fully answer me to the next questions:
>>
>>1. How can I reproduce situation that my code will leave
For those of us looking for TTF fonts with Hebrew support and no
dependency on license for Microsoft products, the Sun JDK has TTF fonts
which contain glyphs for Hebrew. I have checked the fonts in JDK 1.4: it
contains 8 fonts, all variants of the Lucida family, some with bold or
italic style
On Sunday 01 September 2002 14:03, Michael Sternberg wrote:
> Sorry if I'm starting a long thread with this letter :)
> I digged through the Google and did not find anything that
> will fully answer me to the next questions:
>
> 1. How can I reproduce situation that my code will leave
>sockets
Sorry if I'm starting a long thread with this letter :)
I digged through the Google and did not find anything that
will fully answer me to the next questions:
1. How can I reproduce situation that my code will leave
sockets in CLOSE_WAIT state ?
2. What measures can I take to prevent them to
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Tal Achituv wrote:
> Does anybody know of a good source for kylix components?
> in general and TCP/UDP sockets specifically...
Indy at http://www.nevrona.com/Indy/ is the best internet components
suite.
And Torry's Delphi Pages at http://www.torry.net/ is one of the best
co
On Sunday 01 September 2002 01:52, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Amir Tal wrote:
> > On Saturday 31 August 2002 16:22, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:55:39PM +0300, Amir Tal wrote:
> > > > hi,
> > > >
> > > > had this laptop running RH73 with sound working, n
On Sunday 01 September 2002 08:24, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 01:00:08AM +0300, Amir Tal wrote:
> > On Saturday 31 August 2002 16:22, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:55:39PM +0300, Amir Tal wrote:
> > > > hi,
> > > >
> > > > had this laptop running RH7
debian sid, 2.4.19, kde 3.0.3.
sould card :
00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM AC'97 Audio (rev
12)
loaded modules :
i810_audio 21480 2 (autoclean)
soundcore 3236 2 (autoclean) [i810_audio]
ac97_codec 9800 0 [i810_audio]
Gabor Szabo wrote:
>
> I am considering replacing my phone/modem connection via Barak by a
> Cable connection.
I have a Golden Channels (Arutzi Zahav) cable modem. I use Netvision as
the ISP. It works well for me.
> Recently there was a discussion on this list regarding ADSL and Linux
> suppo
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>
>
>
>>Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>What about text messages?
>>>
>>>Is it possible to force directionality by beggning a document/paragraph
>>>with RLM/LRM ? Is it wise?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Probably not work. This w
hi
q1: i have used red-carpet to download gnome2 snapshots. how do i run
them ( is there a gnome2_session ? )
q2: i have downloaded kylix2, does it only support pascal ? or also c++
? (what about kylix 3) ?
erez
=
To unsubscrib
Title: is there a date for the instaparty yet ?
I know it's supposed to be a big " hush hush" thing :) - but do those involved in the organization of the instaparty - make a declaration for the date they wish to hold it on ?
Assaf
=
Assaf Flatto
System Admin
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 10:04:08AM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:58:08AM +0300, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
>
> > I did grep *some* sources. I didn't think about useradd.
> > This is indeed the "shadow" package (useradd, vipw, ...).
> >
> > Thanks for anyone who replie
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:58:08AM +0300, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> I did grep *some* sources. I didn't think about useradd.
> This is indeed the "shadow" package (useradd, vipw, ...).
>
> Thanks for anyone who replied!
Ok, here's a way to figure out which package uses a file.
1. get syscal
46 matches
Mail list logo
