Meir Litmanovich wrote:
> XFS is logged filesystem - which means you can power-off
> the system at the middle of activity and no file-system
> damage will be caused, so - no fsck and file-system
> corruption sheet. (BTW - it still do not prevents you from damage
> to user files)
> XFS can promise
Hi,
I changed the IRQ as You said and got my sound back. Thanks.
>From: Hetz Ben Hamo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Yoav Ben-Yosef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Lost sound
>Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 22:45:34 +0200
>
>Your sound blaster is using IRQ which is being "caught" by
Hei !
Let's stop the holy war ! Both of them are better ! :-)
> It means that to SGI's mind, XFS is better than ext2fs. SGI is
> marketing XFS as fast, reliable, and scalable. Therefore SGI believes
> that ext2fs is missing one or more of these features.
Maybe. But there are few other things a
That's not exact;y this way. You just need
mysql-develpoment package - it should have
both libs and .h files.
Meir
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Avi Boots wrote:
> Hi,
>
> where can i find the file mysql.lib for c programming ?
>
> thank you,
> avi.
>
>
> ===
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Adam Morrison wrote:
> Yaron Zabary wrote:
>
> > I've been using FreeBSD for a couple of years now. IMO, its strong
> > points (compared to Linux) are:
> >
> >. Its networking code is better.
>
> This seems to be an argument flogged about greatly, but it REALLY depends
> on
Your sound blaster is using IRQ which is being "caught" by the PCI bug &
Voodoo 3 (from IRQ 9 to 11 I think)
As much as I remember (and anyone can correct me on that) the BIOS grabs
IRQ for each PCI slot.
It's not using the IRQ unless the card needs it - and if I recall
correctly, Voodoo 3000 d
Hi All,
I've installed a VOODOO3 3000 adapter only to find that the sound support
stopped working. This is a SuSE 6.1 with an old SB16 (non-PnP) card. I
checked the definitions in my conf.modules and they look OK. Any ideas what
I have to do now?
TIA
"Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo" wrote:
> YZ>> I've been using FreeBSD for a couple of years now. IMO, its strong
> YZ>> points (compared to Linux) are:
>
> I'm a bit surprised how many myphologized is a mind of an average
> advocate. What you say is "standard 'Linux sucks' advocate kit". As m
Yaron Zabary wrote:
> I've been using FreeBSD for a couple of years now. IMO, its strong
> points (compared to Linux) are:
>
> . Its networking code is better.
This seems to be an argument flogged about greatly, but it REALLY depends
on what you mean by ``better''.
Performance wise, I don't
"Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> YZ>> . The develpment cycle is slower. A stable major release every three to
>
> This is an advantage, yeah? So now development at all means a perfect
> system?
Yes, it *is* a great advantage, once we start talking serious things,
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo wrote:
> YZ>> I've been using FreeBSD for a couple of years now. IMO, its strong
> YZ>> points (compared to Linux) are:
>
> I'm a bit surprised how many myphologized is a mind of an average
> advocate. What you say is "standard 'Linux sucks' adv
YZ>> I've been using FreeBSD for a couple of years now. IMO, its strong
YZ>> points (compared to Linux) are:
I'm a bit surprised how many myphologized is a mind of an average
advocate. What you say is "standard 'Linux sucks' advocate kit". As most
"standart advocate kits", it's built on myths t
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Micha Feigin wrote:
:Yes, the debian linux distribution has that ability.
:It automaticly checks dependency's, and downloads them together with the
:needed packages, It also uninstalls, and checks dependency's during
:uninstall.
:It can also automaticly upgrade the whole syste
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Shlomo Reches wrote:
:I know one thing that is good in Free BSD.
:They have something much better than RPM.
:When you want to upgrade a certain program
:it automatically detects the depandencies and
:get from the web any other package which is
:needed. In RPM you will get a me
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
> I wonder whyNetscape didnt do it !! :-(
>
> They have swidish Netscape but Not Hebrew, thats sucks !!
>
> Maybe we all as a group can ask them to fix there Browsers.
Mayebe you could go to mozilla.org and do that yourself. The sources are
there for
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Dune wrote:
> hey list
> does any one uses Freebsd
> and can tell me The Differnce Between FreeBsd And linux
> Besides The obvius ?
I've been using FreeBSD for a couple of years now. IMO, its strong
points (compared to Linux) are:
. It is based on sources from a single so
Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
>
> I wonder whyNetscape didnt do it !! :-(
>
> They have swidish Netscape but Not Hebrew, thats sucks !!
>
> Maybe we all as a group can ask them to fix there Browsers.
Please make sure to ask for logical Hebrew support too, OK?
Tell me how it went ;-)
Gavrie.
--
Gav
I wonder whyNetscape didnt do it !! :-(
They have swidish Netscape but Not Hebrew, thats sucks !!
Maybe we all as a group can ask them to fix there Browsers.
Gavrie Philipson wrote:
> Alex Shnitman wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > So here it is. Modify the netscape= line to point to your Netscape
>
Alex Shnitman wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So here it is. Modify the netscape= line to point to your Netscape
> binary and run. Then do what it tells you. What it does is hijack the
> Turkish enconding and turn it to Hebrew. As the echoed message at the
> end of the script says, it only works if you set y
19 matches
Mail list logo
