Thanks Eric, I'll get these into 2012.1.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Eric Miao wrote:
> The following changes since commit cba9a894fdb1cb49b60fcd1d1d6919cbd7995dd5:
>
> Prepare v2011.12 (2011-12-23 20:25:35 +0100)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
> git://git.linaro.org/bsp/frees
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> For everyone who packages kernel trees:
>
>
> I've had some questions about getting the source for linaro kernel
> packaged, and it seems that this is still not straightforward:
>
...
This seems reasonable to me. This month we are adding CI a
, Jan 13, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:52 PM, John Rigby wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
>>> For everyone who packages kernel trees:
>>>
>>>
>>> I've had some questions about getting
the panda results page it view only for me, I'm sure I must be doing
something wrong
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Just like to announce the Ubuntu LEB 12.01 RC images, and the pointers
> for people that want to check the testing progress and such (or ev
maybe this will help?
http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-1063566.html
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 12:33 AM, E V wrote:
> Sorry for the late response. Got some problems at work, and left this for
> some while. Now, I have been asigned back to it, and keeps the same.
>
> I turned off power us
Forwarding to all after I realized my answer only went to Peter:
That manifest entry points to the u-boot-tools package which is
userland package containing mkimage so not really what you want.
Your email reminds me we need to do this better like we now do for the
kernel. But that does not help y
Added u-boot-linaro to existing bug. Marked the qemu bug invalid.
Will fix soon.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 21 February 2012 20:55, John Rigby wrote:
>> Forwarding to all after I realized my answer only went to Peter:
>> That manifest entry point
Looks like initial git clones always fail. I tried a simple job that
just trys to run git and it fails.
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012, John Rigby wrote:
>> Looks like initial git clones always fail. I tried a simple job that
>> just trys to run git and it fails.
>
> Alexander noticed too; new ci.linaro.org setup was launchi
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:24:51PM -0500, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
>> == Omar Ramirez ==
>>
>> === Highlights ===
>>
>> * Working on device tree for mailbox:
>>
>> Find a kernel that works with DT for pandaboard (OMAP4):
>> - k3.4
Version 12.04 of Linaro U-Boot has been released. Details on Launchpad here:
https://launchpad.net/u-boot-linaro/trunk/12.04
And on git.linaro.org here:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=boot/u-boot-linaro-stable.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/Linaro-u-boot-2012.04
>From the release notes:
This releas
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:50 AM, John Rigby wrote:
> Version 12.04 of Linaro U-Boot has been released. Details on Launchpad here:
> https://launchpad.net/u-boot-linaro/trunk/12.04
>
Thanks to multiple people pointing out that upstream had updated to
v2012.04.01 to include some critica
Paul,
Not sure if it has anything to do with the upgrade but I am not able
to create new jobs, I tried with and without the copy existing
option.
https://pastebin.linaro.org/529/
--john
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Paul Sokolovsky
wrote:
> On Wed, 9 May 2012 12:53:15 +0300
> Paul Sokolovsk
We need an irc aggregator to flatten all the channels to one on rx and
broadcast on tx for those of use who want to live in a flat world (only
half kidding:)
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Andy Doan wrote:
> On 05/10/2012 03:57 AM, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:36 AM, A
I believe from experience on a local host that having a precloned tree
of for example current upstream linus on jenkins to use with
--reference could be a huge win. We can discuss this in the kernel-ci
session at connect.
--john
___
linaro-dev mailing
I see this pop up with hovering over some kernel ci jobs in build queue:
'All nodes of label "kernel_cloud" are offline'
Does this mean something is broken or will it recover on its own?
--john
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
h
Lets discuss this next week. I understand your point about the squid proxy.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Deepti Kalakeri
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:17 AM, John Rigby wrote:
>>>
&
I think there is a kernel ci session.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:03 PM, John Rigby wrote:
>> Lets discuss this next week. I understand your point about the squid proxy.
>
> Sounds good. Is there a particular session where
http://summit.linaro.org/lcq2-12/meeting/20856/ubuntu-leb-review-current-ci-process/
is not specific to kernel ci but seems to be the best match
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:41 AM, John Rigby wrote:
> I think there is a kernel ci session.
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Alexa
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 12:45 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>> On 06/06/2012 07:09 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>> > Are we going to start using the config fragments we created a while ago?
>> > (Or did we not reach consensus on that?)
>> I
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 08:15 -0600, John Rigby wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>
>> > Now, if the Ubuntu kernel packaging scripts could gain an option to
>> > generate
>
>
> This is done. llt-20120626.0 should be ok (build tested with CPU_IDLE
> enabled).
> BTW, compared to the previous llt-20120613.0, llt-20120626.0 has vexpress
> support, and (as a side effect of adding vexpress) gator upgraded from
> 5.10.0 to 5.10.1.
>
>
I will add an llt-vexpress-3.4 kernel
This is probably a bug in the new kernel packaging scripts. I will
check into it.
--john
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 2:30 PM, David Cullen
wrote:
> Hello, linaro-dev,
>
> I just created a TAGS file for the Linaro kernel source and I
> noticed that there is a "kernel_build" subdirectory:
>
> /hom
just remove it
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:15 AM, David Cullen
wrote:
> Hello, John,
>
> On 7/9/2012 9:20 PM, John Rigby wrote:
>> This is probably a bug in the new kernel packaging scripts. I will
>> check into it.
>
>
> Can I just remove the "kernel_build&qu
g config-3.4.0-1-linaro-lt-omap as my initial .config. A
> search for INIT_PASS_ALL_PARAMS in the Kconfig files produces no
> results:
>
> find . -name Kconfig -exec grep -H INIT_PASS_ALL_PARAMS '{}' ';'
>
> When I extract the source to a temporary di
Cullen
wrote:
> Hello, John,
>
> On 7/10/2012 12:52 PM, John Rigby wrote:
>> I thnk we need to start at the beginning. Where did you get the
>> source you are working with. In your original post I assumed that
>> this was source extracted with dpkg-source from a linaro ke
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:35 AM, David Cullen
wrote:
> Hello, John,
>
> On 7/10/2012 5:39 PM, John Rigby wrote:
>> There will shortly be a new kernel
>> linux-linaro-lt-omap-3.4_3.4.0-1.1~120710203036 in the kernel ppa:
>> https://code.launchpad.net/~linaro-maintain
Here is a summary of the updates from 2012.07.
Naming convention:
*linux-linaro-SOCNAM* use Andrey's linux-linaro branch
*linux-linaro-lt-SOCNAME* use a landing team branch
*linux-linaro-llt-SOCNAME* use Andrey's linux-linaro-tracking branch
(3.4 based)
3.5 jobs disabled because linux-lina
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 10:16 AM, John Rigby wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 14:05 -0600, John Rigby wrote:
>>> Here is a summary of the updates from 2012.07.
>>
>>> All jobs are in this view:
>&
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 14:05 -0600, John Rigby wrote:
>> Here is a summary of the updates from 2012.07.
>
>> All jobs are in this view:
>> https://ci.linaro.org/jenkins/view/New%20Ubuntu%20Packaged%20Kernels
Probably related or same issue. On the old site I was able to
download hwpacks with for example:
wget -q -k --no-cookies --header 'Cookie: redirectlicensephp=200'
http://oldsnapshots.linaro.org/precise/hwpacks/lt-snowball/latest/hwpack_linaro-lt-snowball_20120815-254_armhf_supported.tar.gz
This
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>
>> Nicolas,
>>
>> Is device tree stuff equivalent to what was in .38 going in? I'm
>> looking for the equivalent of what went into .38 in commit
>> 3fb7bd037f31
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Andy Doan wrote:
> On 06/21/2011 04:53 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:52:12PM +0530, Amit Mahajan wrote:
>>> > On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 12:14 +0530, Avik Sil wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 June 2011 12:06 PM, Amit Mahajan wrote:
> > > > Hi,
>>
Nicolas, Dave,
make omap4_defconfig
make menuconfig and turn on THUMB2_KERNEL
make
.
CC arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.o
CC arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.o
AS arch/arm/kernel/relocate_kernel.o
arch/arm/kernel/relocate_kernel.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm/kernel/relocate_kernel.
I thought this was new but it has been around for awhile. My default
config was not turning on THUMB2 kernel so I only saw it today.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:12 AM, John Rigby wrote:
> Nicolas, Dave,
>
> make omap4_defconfig
> make menuconfig and turn on THUMB2_KERNEL
> mak
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Zach Pfeffer
>> wrote:
>>> In-order to make reproducible builds we create pinned manifests with
>>> each commit explicitly listed. We also use thi
My first request would be for board level device tree support.
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
>
> Can you please enable these Kconfig options in our configs? By default
> SCHED_MC/SMT expose a /sys interface and are disabled by default (0).
>
> Possible values are:
>
> 0 - No power saving load balance (default value)
> 1 - Fill one thread/core/package first for long running threads
> 2 -
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>
>> I'm having trouble building the Thumb2 kernel on, I actually believe
>> this same code worked some time ago before a toolchain update. There
>> are actually two pro
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:03:21PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:42:39AM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
>> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 09:54:56PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> > > > AS arch/ar
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Robert Nelson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Tom Gall wrote:
>> What we want to do for the next linaro release 11.09 is have working
>> USB wifi support out of the box on beagle/beagle xm with the developer
>> image.
>>
>> Tho you won't have to twist m
Thanks Robert.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Robert Nelson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Robert Nelson
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:02 PM, John Rigby wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Robert Nelson
>>> wrote:
>>>>
Until this patchset:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/129800
mx51 and mx53 could not be compiled into kernel together so our
upstream only mx hwpack is mx51 only
We will be able to change that now with these patches.
--john
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Christian Robotto
This tree seems to be missing per board dt support so booting with a
device tree doesn't seem to work. Need something like for example
this commit that added it for panda in the 3.0 tree:
commit d24e9a194c2ed4ca56b8f4e7d96038cd3af3fda8
Author: Grant Likely
Date: Tue Jul 5 23:42:31 2011 -0600
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>
>> This tree seems to be missing per board dt support so booting with a
>> device tree doesn't seem to work. Need something like for example
>> this commit that added
support for smdkv310 board
13d38b1 arm/dt: Add Pandaboard devicetree support
I left out the tegra and irq stuff. This works for panda I have not
tested any other platforms yet.
--john
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:33 PM, John Rigby wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Nicolas Pitre
>
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Lalancette, Christopher
wrote:
> Hello John,
> I'm currently working on bringing up a new OMAP4 board that is
> similar in many respects to the pandaboard. While playing around with
> the panda, I've noticed that upstream u-boot (from denx.de) has several
> pro
With the latest 3.1.5 merge linux-linaro-3.1 fails to build on Jenkins:
https://ci.linaro.org/jenkins/view/All%20CI/job/linux-linaro-3.1_panda-omap2plus/303/
GEN .version
CHK include/generated/compile.h
UPD include/generated/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/buil
The following changes since commit 6705d62756af1ddb4f46a8601d955334ec8fc96c:
John Rigby (1):
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35.1005.10
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-meta-linaro.git master
John Rigby (1):
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35.1006.11
meta
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 09/16/2010 06:28 PM, John Rigby wrote:
>>
>> The following changes since commit
>> 692388cf33ee34b3fcd338d2c9cbcc52a08c0bfe:
>> Leann Ogasawara (1):
>> UBUNTU: Ubuntu-2.6.35-22.32
>>
&g
Tim,
This fixes the build failure in 1006.11 (bug #643462) . Verified the
build in an armel-maverick schroot.
A build on a Beagle is still running as I write this.
Thanks,
John
The following changes since commit 7c7b33cd7f78968412eedb21941134b978cea102:
John Rigby (1):
LINARO: Linaro
I believe that the libgcc.a in our toolchain contains Thumb-2 code. I
verified this by doing objdump on libgcc.a and I see combinations of
16 and 32 bit instructions. So does that mean that the toolchain is
only usable for ARM versions that support Thumb-2?
Thanks,
John
or old and new ARM chips with the same gcc. U-Boot has
its own libgcc that I can use as a work around.
John
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:44 AM, John Rigby wrote:
>> I believe that the libgcc.a in our toolchain contains Thumb-2 code.
I'm really sorry to have started this, but for completeness here is
the rest of the story. The hypothetical scenario is a developer that
maintains u-boot for multiple platforms. Using a codesourcery or eldk
(from denx.de) toolchain one can use the appropriate -march= to get
the right code from th
Sudip,
I applied these yesterday with Frederick's help. The changes are here:
git://git.linaro.org/bsp/st-ericsson/linux-2.6.34-ux500.git
The kernel source change is in the master branch. The kernel config
change is in the packaging branch.
The resulting kernel binary package is available in
ARM.
>
> This work has been submitted here:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git;a=shortlog;h=80be7a7f642719bf99fc49692fc77d6333f51a73
>
> The following changes since commit d0bbdab2bb2c55c3dc6a4b3fd2128250dff99feb:
> John Rigby (1):
> LINARO: Linar
This sounds ok to me.
Nico, let me know when this is in your stable tree.
Thanks,
John
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Can we merge the SD/MMC patches for i.MX MMC support into the linaro kernel?
> They have been reviewed extensively and look very likely to go into the n
: SAUCE: AppArmor: allow newer tools to load
policy on older kernels"
UBUNTU: SAUCE: AppArmor: allow newer tools to load policy on older kernels
UBUNTU: SAUCE: Return correct error code for mediated network connections
John Rigby (6):
LINARO: Start new release
Merge ubu
The following changes since commit b99670db3d6a43efe6d55ce92d7a227fb1ff41f7:
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35.1006.11 (2010-09-16 17:17:17 -0600)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-meta-linaro.git master
John Rigby (1):
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35.1007.12
meta
Unless I am mistaken the mmc init vs mmc rescan should not be an issue
if the default env in u-boot is correct. As background, legacy mmc
drivers need mmc init and new generic mmc drivers need mmc rescan. I
agree that this change is annoying, however the difference can be
handled in the default e
Shawn,
So does git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.35.git have
everything you want in the linaro packaged kernel? Can you tell me
what CONFIGs need to be turned on?
Thanks,
John
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Here you go. I'm using Linaro tree below.
>
> git://gi
Nicolas,
Thanks for the info. I'll wait to see more patches/testing from Shawn
before pulling.
John
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, John Rigby wrote:
>
>> Shawn,
>>
>> So does git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-
git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-linaro.git master
Felipe Contreras (1):
video: omap: vram: remove from normal memory
John Rigby (1):
Revert "OMAP: DSS2: OMAPFB: use phys_to_virt for RAM mappings"
Russell King - ARM Linux (1):
ARM: use memblock to remove memory from a
master
Felipe Contreras (1):
video: omap: vram: remove from normal memory
John Rigby (1):
Revert "OMAP: DSS2: OMAPFB: use phys_to_virt for RAM mappings"
Russell King - ARM Linux (1):
ARM: use memblock to remove memory from available memory
arch/arm
t conversion
Johannes Berg (1):
mac80211: delete work timer
John Rigby (7):
Revert "OMAP: DSS2: OMAPFB: use phys_to_virt for RAM mappings"
LINARO: Start new release
Merge remote branch 'linux-linaro-2.6.35/master' into linaro
Merge remote branch &#
The following changes since commit 8a9363c166dbe07bbb9f719a97e90d271f2789e5:
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35.1007.12 (2010-10-11 12:45:09 -0600)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-meta-linaro.git master
John Rigby (1):
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35.1008.13
meta
The following changes since commit ddc7db4d52a56f351b338fd985448e3c88714e5a:
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35-1008.14 (2010-10-20 10:24:37 -0600)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-linaro.git linaro-2.6.35-1008.15
John Rigby (2):
LINARO: start new release
Anand,
What kernel config should I use? Thanks for working on this.
John
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Gadiyar, Anand wrote:
> (+linaro-...@lists.linaro.org. Apologies for not copying the list
> earlier. I thought I had added to CC)
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:39 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> cc'ing linaro-dev
>
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Amit Arora wrote:
>> Hello John,
>>
>> We, in Power Management work group, are developing a new tool
>> (PowerDebug) which will show users/developers various Power Management
>> related in
I pulled this into packaged kernel and built it. With my existing
config with is based on the OMAP4 Ubuntu kernel it gets to here:
[0.686676] audit: initializing netlink socket (disabled)
[0.692352] type=2000 audit(1.257:1): initialized
[0.771179] VFS: Disk quotas dquot_6.5.2
[0.7
Anand,
Thanks for the info. I changed the boot script to have use ttyS2 and
now I can boot to a shell prompt on serial console.
John
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
> On 11/8/2010 11:19 PM, John Rigby wrote:
>>
>> I pulled this into packaged kernel and bui
Oliver,
On the subject of Ubuntu sauce and security patches, at each linaro
kernel release I merge in the latest Ubuntu release so I believe the
linaro packaged kernel has all these. My current plan is to continue
doing to track the Ubuntu kernel as long as the Ubuntu kernel is
supported.
On th
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Folks, I think this thread is circling a bit back to itself, perhaps
> summarizing where we stand and what problems we're trying to solve
> would help?
>
>
> * Linaro integrates its kernel tree into Ubuntu for two reasons:
> - because Lin
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 03:05:20AM -0200, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Nicolas Pitre
>> wrote:
>> >>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Oliver Grawert wrote:
>> > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
>> >> Th
Lee,
I created a page on how to package a kernel. There are some hacks
here that would not be appropriate when packaging a kernel for a real
upload but should work fine for landing team testing.
https://wiki.linaro.org/PackageYourOwnKernel
John
___
l
John Rigby (1):
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.36.1000.1
meta-source/debian/changelog |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Anand,
Thanks for the info.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
> On 23 November 2010 11:38, John Rigby wrote:
>>
>> All omap4 experts,
>>
>> I have a packaged kernel for omap3/omap4 that boots to a shell prompt
>> on a Panda and a Beagle XM
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Nicolas Pitre
wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
>
>> I just checked - the patches I posted apply cleanly against
>> linux-linaro-2.6.36. Patch 3 has some line offsets, but otherwise
>> applies cleanly. EHCI works on Panda after applying these
>> p
-linaro-natty.git mx51-only
John Rigby (1):
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.37-1000.1 mx51 only
debian.linaro/changelog| 36 +-
.../config/armel/config.flavour.linaro-omap| 571
.../config/armel/config.flavour.linaro-vexpress| 563
-natty.git master
John Rigby (1):
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.37.1000.1
meta-source/debian/changelog |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo
Avik,
Your debuild looks good. I have never seen this error.
Is there a reason you need a packaged kernel? In general dealing with
packaged kernels is more difficult than just doing a simple
crosscompile.
The instructions of PackageYourOwnKernel are for those who need a
packaged kernel for inc
The following changes since commit 61cb9ff7af265a28043724678b4d3b0482c2e525:
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35.1008.13 (2010-10-22 07:02:42 -0600)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-meta-linaro.git master
John Rigby (1):
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35.1010.14
meta
John Rigby (6):
LINARO: Start new release
LINARO: rebase on new upstreams
LINARO: remove ports cruft
LINARO: update configs
LINARO: better common package naming
LINARO: Linux-linaro-2.6.37-1001.4
.../abi/{2.6.37-1000.2 => 2.6.37-1000.3}/abiname |
The following changes since commit 935e2f757e75f23e9c1b760cd096746191383aea:
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.37.1000.1 (2010-11-26 21:20:11 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-meta-linaro-natty.git master
John Rigby (1):
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.37.1001.2
The following changes since commit a581cf741c49c220d159fac1fdbde28255c2e7e3:
Merge branch 'linaro-stable' into linaro-packaged (2011-01-03 14:41:56 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/boot/u-boot-linaro-stable.git packaged
John Rigby (2):
de
Sorry for entering late here. Here are my questions:
How does l-m-c know about the boot partition convention? Is the fact
that omap wants a dos partition with some files on it but i.MX just
needs the raw bits at a fixed location on the card embedded in l-m-c?
If a new platform pops up with a com
Joey,
I entered a bug for this against the omap3 kernel. USB mouse and
keyboard work on beagle which uses the same kernel.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-linaro-omap/+bug/706033
John
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Joey Stanford
wrote:
> fwiw, I'm using the headless image on
U-Boot got faster in the last cycle (v2010.12). Cache is now enabled
on arm and multiblock reads were added to the mmc driver.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 21 January 2011 18:42:55 David Rusling wrote:
>> Yes, but isn't initrd slow to copy from the boot medi
I have a board with a uart breakout board. The info on the label is:
HREFP_1.1_V33_OM_S10
ID0079F3 1023 243
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dave told me he got 3 u8500 boards but no UART break out board. From
> what I have heard the u8500 boards for Linaro should co
ears to be related to commit:
>
> 98be69a ARM: omap3: Remove hand-encoded SMC instructions
>
> After doing a little searching, I stumbled across something similar from
> John Rigby:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=129118316614865&w=2
>
> I "fixed" the p
Dave,
Not sure if you noticed in the IRC logs so here is what happened for
the packaged release.
Pulled latest linux-linaro-2.6.38 that has your patches.
Fixed arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile to allow smc instructions in
arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
Disabled CONFIG_BINFMT_AOUT.
The resulting k
h_strip.*pkghdr.*/echo skipping dh_strip for cross
build/' debian/rules.d/2-binary-arch.mk
Then debuild:
debuild -eCROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- -nc -ns -aarmel -b
If you have any questions please ask.
John
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:1
Nicolas,
With the patch:
ARM: 6746/1: remove the 4x expansion presumption while decompressing the kernel
I get a build error. This is when building my packaged kernel with
debuild. Notice the stat failure __after__ the "Kernel:
arch/arm/boot/Image is ready message". Then later ld fails becaus
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:18 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 10:17 +0200, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:32 AM, John Stultz wrote:
>> > My solution is to have a Kconfig.distro file, which is patched
>> > with Distro specific policy config, such as which filesystem
Assembler in latest binutils needs extra option to enable smc
instructions introduced in:
ARM: omap3: Remove hand-encoded SMC instructions
Signed-off-by: John Rigby
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach
John,
It should work with linux-linaro-2.6.38 with the correct config. Make
sure to turn off CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS_SDI as it cause a access fault. See
lp:720055.
John
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 5:51 PM, john stultz wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 18:57 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Feb 2011
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Andy Green wrote:
>> On 03/09/2011 09:04 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>
I take it this magic of SMP or not is hidden in this config layering
scheme
you mentioned and it isn't re
Nicolas,
Today hrw pointed out this patch. It seems to be the proper fix for
the panda hang.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=130021624629574&w=2
John
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/li
This patch looks pretty safe.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=130045643531514&w=3
The bug is not critical but produces a lengthy kernel warning message
that may be alarming to some users.
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> On 22 March 2011 16:56, Andy Doan wrote:
>> On 03/22/2011 08:05 AM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
>>> That's to decide whether we should count the patches that belong to a
>>> series individually or not.
>>>
>>
>> Could you generate two sets of
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
