On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:21:45 -0200, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> > Is there a reason why we don't simply preinstall that key in the apt
> > keyring before shipping the filesystem?
>
> It's a good question. I'm going to borrow James W.'s opinion here who
> will know of any unforseen consequen
t; make[1]: *** [deb-pkg] Error 255
> make: *** [deb-pkg] Error 2
>
> Any idea of why this could be ?
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Deepti.
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:44 AM, James Westby wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just tried .39 and there's no OMAP4,
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:47:59 +0300, Paul Sokolovsky
wrote:
> As for our mirror service, adding such support in maintainable manner
> would require its complete rewrite (which will also allow to implement
> other functionality and improvements).
Adding support for what would require a complete re
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:10:08 +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> Something I don't completely have a plan for in my head at the moment is
> connecting the dots, or preserving identity between componenets (as I
> think Zygmunt put it). We have a build, which will trigger a test run,
> which will
Hi Fathi,
Given the results of last week's weekly testing, do you think we should
now flip the switch to move to using the images built by
ubuntu-build.linaro.org (offspring.linaro.org as was)?
If not, what are the blockers to doing so?
Thanks,
James
___
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:47:04 +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> Is being able to externally specify the job/test identifier a
> requirement?
Not from the build service's point of view.
It makes it easier right now as currently there isn't somewhere for us
to store the LAVA id we would get bac
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:04:41 +, Fathi Boudra
wrote:
> > If not, what are the blockers to doing so?
>
> Today, the builders are unstable. It requires:
> 1. check the build status everyday as the notifications are broken.
Notifications are now working.
> I can live with this manual steps in
Hi,
http://irclogs.linaro.org/
Logs are now kept from our public channels so that you can refer back to
previous converations and catch up on things that happened while you
were away if needed. They can also come up in google searches which can
be useful.
If you would like a channel added/rem
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:16:27 -0300, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> The unhandled fault shouldn't be related with the usb errors. From my
> experience with Beagle xM the USB port will trigger the reset once the
> disk is consuming more power than beagle can provide. As I know this
> is probably a powere
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:04:41 +, Fathi Boudra
wrote:
> > If not, what are the blockers to doing so?
>
> Today, the builders are unstable.
They have just had new hard disk enclosures added, and should be more
stable now. Let's monitor for a few days and see if they are more
stable. On what da
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:57:03 -0400, "anmar.ou...@linaro.org"
wrote:
> As long as we can a private space for the LTs, I think it is a great idea.
It looks as though mumble may support password-protecting channels,
which may be a good idea for LTs anyway?
I don't think it uses encryption or anyth
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:28:42 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> couldn't we inject a big amount of test builds in the queue to achieve
> full utilization for 24 or 48 hours or so? of course, queuing them as
> low priority so they don't make our "real" builds the cycles. Lets see
> what james says ;).
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:25:18 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> I thought we had worked out a special way how to ensure that patches
> that go to upstream gerrit get considered? Or was that just discussion
> that we still have to finish?
No, we didn't agree to complete something like that at this tim
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:06:46 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> can we somehow smoke test the infrastructure continuously till
> tomorrow and then reassess tomorrow afternoon?
We didn't add any extra stress, but all everything has been built twice
now with no builder issues. Do we have the confidence
x27;d want to take the test change through the Gerrit lifecycle.
>
> From there I'd want to hook up auto-merging and per-change build validation.
>
> -Zach
>
> On 13 June 2011 19:34, James Westby wrote:
> > Hi Zach,
> >
> > We have a request in the queue to
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:25:59 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> hi,
>
> great news.
>
> I think we should use a different hostname for gerrit. like
> review.android.linaro.org. With that we have the option to make a dedicated
> android git host using the android.git.l.o name eventually.
I don't und
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 11:06:08 +0300, Fathi Boudra
wrote:
> Yes. 3 consecutive days without any glitches.
> +1 on my side.
Fathi,
Do you want to switch this week? (I can't tell you exactly when we can
switch as it relies on the availability of an IS sysadmin to make the
changes.)
Were you planni
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:32:59 -0400, James Westby
wrote:
> I'll write up a spec on doing the tested merge involves.
I've got the first draft of this at
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/Specs/BuildTestedMerge
Please take a look at let me know any comments that you
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 00:39:20 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> We wish to make this change to reduce the integration and testing
> burden near the release, which will make that time more stressful, and
> lead to more time being spent on development.
>
> - We'll be doing a full CI loop so integration ne
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 10:28:36 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> android.git.linaro.org would be similar to https://git.linaro.org ...
> e.g. you go there and get a gitwebview for all the android trees we
> host.
>
> you could put gerrit under android.git.linaro.org/gerrit, sure, but
> others don't do
Hi,
This sounds good to me.
I wonder if we should have the testing sandboxes use the same version of
Jenkins though? If it doesn't we could have deployment failures due to
using features from the new version.
Thanks,
James
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 16:39:26 +0300, Paul Sokolovsky
wrote:
> Hello,
>
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 22:00:24 +0300, Paul Sokolovsky
wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 15:27:01 -0400
> James Westby wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This sounds good to me.
> >
> > I wonder if we should have the testing sandboxes use the same version
> > o
Hi,
I've just made some small improvements to status.linaro.org to make it
easier to keep running.
Firstly, at the bottom of every page is now the time at which the page
was last updated. If it's more than an hour ago then the site isn't
updating.
If it's not updating then follow the "Update log
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:07:15 +0100, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> On 9 June 2011 21:57, James Westby wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:24:38 +0100, Peter Maydell
> > wrote:
> >> [ddeb packages for linaro kernels]
> > I wasn't even aware that our kernel ppa build
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:48:11 +0100, James Tunnicliffe
wrote:
> A couple more observations:
>
> First we have duplication of hardware packs, but not the checksum
> files and GPG signatures to go with them. The hardware packs are
> hardware, not distribution specific, so it is difficult to justify
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:48:06 +0100, James Tunnicliffe
wrote:
> Release is a YY.MM release and a milestone is alpha/beta/eac/release
> candidate/final. I realise that we are being far more agile than we
> were and we probably won't have anything before a release candidate.
Right, I wonder if it's
Hi,
Have you tried the omap3 hardware pack with a Linaro image? That
contains the 3.0 kernel I think, so may give a comparison point.
Thanks,
James
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:29:25 +0200, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I compiled a
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:18:09 +0200, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/28/2011 12:58 PM, James Westby wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Have you tried the omap3 hardware pack with a Linaro image? That
> > contains t
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 22:34:25 +0200, Bernhard Rosenkranzer
wrote:
> On 28 July 2011 21:37, Angus Ainslie wrote:
> > I have a android manifest that builds fine on my local build server
> > with -j4 for concurrent makes.
>
> Have you tried doing a re-download locally?
> The issue I've had that res
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:37:38 -0600, Angus Ainslie
wrote:
> I have a android manifest that builds fine on my local build server
> with -j4 for concurrent makes.
>
> The same manifest fails to build on android-build.linaro.org The log is here
>
> https://android-build.linaro.org/jenkins/job/angus
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:57:59 +0100, Paul Sokolovsky
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Following today's work session preparing to switching Gerrit, everything
> is ready for the cutover now:
>
> First build from Gerrit repositories is finished successfully:
> https://android-build.linaro.org/jenkins/job/pfalc
On Sun, 7 Aug 2011 02:25:17 +0100, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> I'm seeing the same thing:
>
> $git push linaro HEAD
> Counting objects: 5, done.
> Delta compression using up to 4 threads.
> Compressing objects: 100% (2/2), done.
> Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 454 bytes, done.
> Total 3 (delta 1), reus
Hi,
https://github.com/jenkinsci/repo-plugin
is a new plugin for Jenkins to provide a "repo" SCM provider.
This means that you can have Jenkins watch for changes via repo, and
trigger actions based on that.
I don't think this is useful to us with the things that we currently do,
but may be usef
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 22:26:15 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
wrote:
> Paul,
>
> I was wondering if we could make a small change to android-build. I
> just recently tested:
>
> https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/leb-panda/#build=166
>
> It works great and I'd like to move it to a first
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:02:02 +0530, Deepti Kalakeri
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using jenkins for continuous integration work.
> I have a requirement where I need to trigger a job as part of the post build
> step of a job.
> For example I have a job to build a source and I would like to trigger the
Thanks, this looks like great information. Deepti, does this work for
you?
Thanks,
James
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:57:56 +0530, Venkatraman S wrote:
> 1. You should check the "This build is parametrized" box for the
> downstream (Sanity testing) job. Then the parameters for these jobs
> should be
> > To your knowledge should those hwpacks work? If yes, then
> > I'll open a bug so we can track this issue.
All hwapcks should work :-)
In my opinion it's better to have a bug and close it quickly, than to
miss something.
If you get an image that doesn't boot then file the bug, don't ask
whet
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:19:59 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> What's your QEMU version (qemu-arm-static)? Old versions of QEMU have
> bugs and limitations in their emulation of ARM instructions which might
> cause weird failures such as segfaults when installing the hwpack.
It was in the posted lo
Great idea!
https://code.launchpad.net/~james-w/linaro-image-tools/increase-default-image-size/+merge/72038
Thanks,
James
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:56:35 +0200, Dirk Behme
wrote:
>
> Using linaro-media-create (version
> linaro-image-tools_0.4.8-0ubuntu1~lucid1_all) to create an image the
> d
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 10:19:35 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
> I think you missed my point, if I tagged it, you CAN check it out. So
> "reachability" is not the issue.
I think there are two things here:
The first is that repo currently only fetches branches, and not
tags. This means that simply taggi
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:44:35 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
> > The first is that repo currently only fetches branches, and not
> > tags. This means that simply tagging isn't enough to ensure that you
> > have the object in your repo.
>
> Not sure what "your repo" means but I get the message.
Yeah, so
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:50:51 -0300, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:46:55AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> > Because we push everything upstream.
>
> While I agree with that blanket statement, there's no reason we wouldn't
> provide a [potentially temporary] version of
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:10:10 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
wrote:
> There's no reason to do it now, because its solving the wrong problem.
> The problem is sha's disappear. We use sha's because the provide
> immovable references to the state of a set of git trees so that people
> can reproduce builds exact
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:38:22 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
wrote:
> > It sounds like you are advocating using a model where we use tags to
> > ensure that the referenced revisions are reachable from a head, and then
> > refer to the sha ids of the revisions in the manifest. Is that correct?
>
> Yup.
We c
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:12:30 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
wrote:
> Can we tag across all the gits in the manifest?
I think you can do anything you want with
repo forall git tag foo
However, we've already established that tags aren't currently sufficient
to keep all these refs accessible, so this seem
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:51:25 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> Anyhow, we have a few ways to solve this issue. I would say that as
> long as we reference trees whose shas are reachable from the branches
> in the remote git, then we should be fine. From a manifest
> perspective, we like to sync a tip bra
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:10:03 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> We've had two instances of this problem for all the builds we've ever
> done. One instance was trying to sync u-boot and the other was trying
> to sync the TI LT kernel. John Rigby suggested the branch approach and
> it seems to have worked,
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:54:55 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 1 September 2011 17:21, James Westby wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:10:03 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
> > wrote:
> >> We've had two instances of this problem for all the builds we've ever
> >> d
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 17:36:54 +0530, Vishal Bhoj wrote:
> I had question, Can we commit multiple projects into gerrit in a single
> commit so that review would be easy ?
pfefferz: we struggled above a bit how we can make a multi project
change show up as a single gerrit change/review?
pfefferz:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 15:46:32 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > This doesn't make much sense as
> >
> > dpkg-query -l multiarch-support
>
> That's not the package that's complaining.
But shouldn't it depend on a version of dpkg-dev that supports
multiarch?
Maybe it's that we need a multiarch-support-dev
Hi,
For your information.
Thanks,
James
--- Begin Message ---
Tomorrow, you may notice a blip in Launchpad's availability around
08.30 UTC. Believe it or not, this is good news.
As you know, we'd been rolling out database changes once a month, with
a 90 minute period where Launchpad was read-o
Hi,
This is now fixed, and the other pages will be updating over the next
hour or so.
The problem was a bug that only seems to manifest in production, so I've
rolled back for now until we can investigate and fix it.
Thanks,
James
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:59:20 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> Hi all
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:16:00 -0300, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> The main problem I see with staging is that it's simply not true in the
> common sense of the word staging -- it implies that what is in staging
> today is intended to become upstream (or "mainstream") in the future,
> whereas t
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:52:53 -0300, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:52:40AM +0530, Sudhangathan B S wrote:
> > My boot time measurement markers are:
> > Timer start is at the plug-in (i.e. at the instant when overo-fire is
> > powered)
> > Timer end is when all the ico
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:08:26 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
wrote:
> I'm writing up some notes on building Android from scratch and
> replacing the kernel in an Android build from one built locally, and I
> realized that's it a bit of a chore to extract the kernel config that
> got used. I thought, it may m
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:13:32 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
wrote:
> It just does it by name.
>
> Thinking more about this.
>
> Replacing a kernel is a pretty normal operation. I think if we just
> generated a script that had the relevant paths from the build and
> posted that on the build page then that
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:19:49 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
wrote:
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+spec/linaro-android-gen-script-to-download-and-prog-builds
>
> For making downloading a programming builds easy.
That one should be done as an addition to the existing
linaro-fetch-image t
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:02:34 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
wrote:
> On 16 September 2011 10:39, James Westby wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:19:49 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
> > wrote:
> >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+spec/linaro-android-gen-script-to-
Allow the caller to set the output directory for the deb packages
using an environment variable.
---
scripts/package/builddeb |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/package/builddeb b/scripts/package/builddeb
index ea33db3..dea0190 100644
--- a/script
Hi,
Here are two patches that are needed for the kernel CI effort. I would
appreciate reviews on my first kernel patches to be submitted, and guidance
for where to send them to get them accepted upstream.
Needed in order to run the target when cross-building.
Needed in order to stop jobs in th
Pay attention to the cross-building environment variables
used in the rest of the kernel build, so that you can
successfully make deb-pkg while cross-building.
---
scripts/package/builddeb | 80 +++---
1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
di
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 01:09:29 +0300, Amit Kucheria
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:30 AM, James Westby
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here are two patches that are needed for the kernel CI effort. I would
> > appreciate reviews on my first kernel patches to be s
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:03:08 +0300, Fathi Boudra
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a mail sent to remind you the coming release dates:
>
> * Linaro 11.09 components release is September 22nd, 2011.
> * Platform Teams: [...] linaro-image-tools [...]
Hi,
Ricardo is currently working on
https://blue
x27;t tested it, but if it works would it solve your problem?
Thanks,
James
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:30:46 -0400, James Westby
wrote:
> Allow the caller to set the output directory for the deb packages
> using an environment variable.
> ---
> scripts/package/builddeb |6 +-
Hi,
IS would like to upgrade the porter boxes from maverick to natty, which
should make them more stable.
This will require a reboot, and the upgrade may cause issues for some
tasks, so please be aware and plan accordingly.
The plan is to start with jenipapo at 1900UTC on Sept 26. The others
(gu
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:20:12 -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm setting up a new machine and I'm guessing I must have missed a
> step or a file.
>
> When I debuild -S -sa it's complaining about my secret key not being found.
>
> gpg: skipped "Tom Gall ": secret key not available
> gpg: /t
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 21:48:55 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> > 2. do we need to update
> > https://wiki.linaro.org/Process/WorkItemsHowto#Work_items_in_the_whiteboard
> > ?
>
> I think we should. BUGREPORTED seemed to fill a void as David and I
> were going through each item that the other fields did
Hi Tom,
That's a cool idea, thanks for doing it.
Thanks,
James
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:23:52 -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As part of the 11.09 cycle I've completed an extension to live-build3
> that add linaro-media-create. This means with this branch of linaro's
> live-build 3 one is
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:29:47 -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> I know this has come up before, but I'd like to raise it again: Is there any
> reason for the lack of consistency between directory layouts for:
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/
> vs.
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/
>
> Woul
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:23:12 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> 2. use directory structure matching the project group names used on
> offspring.linaro.org; e.g. natty-hwpacks, natty-images, oneiric-hwpacks,
> oneiric-Images, etc.
This would be a useful step in removing the need to request syncs from
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:27:38 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> on the same front I see we still redirect ubuntu-build to offspring ... can
> we flip that
> around? e.g. make offspring.l.o redirect to ubuntu-build?
Yes, just file an RT to request the change.
Thanks,
James
__
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 10:37:15 -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> Thanks for the update James. Say related we have the following hwpack
> directory names:
>
> efikamx-oneiric
> igep-oneiric
> imx51-oneiric
> omap3-oneiric
> omap3-x11-base-oneiric
> overo-oneiric
> pa
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:09:23 -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:35 AM, James Westby
> wrote:
>
> > Note that Paul requests keeping the suffixes, but I guess that's
> > predicated on renaming the top level.
> >
> The main reason I like havi
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 17:40:42 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> Hi all, does anyone know why all the hwpack builds have started failing?
>
> See, for example:
>
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-hwpacks/panda/20111006/0/build-log.txt
>
> ...a similar problem seems to have affected the re
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:14:35 -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> There will be a newly released version in the PPA that will contain
> the support. Until that happens bzr will the only option. However
> we're getting ahead of ourselves as the new formatted images aren't in
> production yet. This is just a he
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:55:24 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Do we really need this kind detail encoded in the the state of a WI itself?
>
> Alternatively, we could always add a comment to the white board to document
> what happened
> with POSTPONED work items.
I agree with Alexander here, I think
Hi,
That sounds good to me.
Thanks,
James
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:07:10 +0530, Deepti Kalakeri
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to upgrade Jenkins on ci.linaro.org to align with the
> jenkins and ec2 plugin version on https://android-build.linaro.org/.
> ci.linaro.org currently runs on jenkins v
Hi,
Back up now, and hopefully much happier.
Thanks,
James
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:37:40 -0500, Zach Pfeffer
wrote:
> James will send a mail when its back up.
>
> --
> Zach Pfeffer
> Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams
> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
> Follow L
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:08:19 -0400, James Westby
wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:03:16 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > Sure: with this change we can produce our images without any kernel
> > whatsoever (e.g. as those are coming from hwpacks).
>
> Ok, we're back to t
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:51:34 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:03 PM, James Westby
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:35:05 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> >> headless is already available and can already be used for testing
> >> (even if oma
ew/Hardware%20Packs/job/linaro-bsp-ux500/lastBuild/console
"The cache has no package named 'linux-image-ux500'"
> >
> > On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:36:51 -0400, James Westby
> > wrote:
> >> As for the spec itself, it's rather light on the endgame righ
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:35:05 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> headless is already available and can already be used for testing
> (even if omap3 is in there atm). The other heads are failing to build
> because we don't have hardware packs yet.
>
> Now that you say that we won't hook up hwpack-creat
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:03:16 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Sure: with this change we can produce our images without any kernel
> whatsoever (e.g. as those are coming from hwpacks).
Ok, we're back to this again. I still haven't heard any convincing
arguments for why that is a good idea. Could you
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:48:52 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > Unfortunately the names change, and I don't know how to set up a
> > "current" link. However, there are stable URLs that get you most of the
> > way there, e.g.
> >
> > http://jameswestby.net:8080/view/Hardware%20Packs/job/linaro-omap3
A further thought occurred to me the other day.
I assume that we have to put the source packages in the hwpack too, for
at least the packages with some GPL code. Given that hwpacks also serve
as a snapshot of the archive, we can't rely on a pointer to the original
archive to serve the purpose.
Kn
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 23:59:42 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:11 PM, James Westby
> wrote:
> > I assume that we have to put the source packages in the hwpack too, for
> ...
> > Knowing which packages to include source for will be tricky, so I would
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:53:57 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:03 PM, James Westby
> wrote:
> > Inclusion of dependencies isn't implemented yet, so these hwpacks aren't
> > going to be usable as snapshots we can come back to yet. If that'
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 23:11:05 -0400, James Westby
wrote:
> When we discussed it on IRC the other day I thought we had consensus
> that we should do this more automatically, including all dependencies,
> and having a way to specify one or more packages as a "baseline" that
>
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:14:04 -0700, Steve Langasek
wrote:
> Is it intended that pre-release hwpacks will be long-lived? I expected the
> same rules to apply as to pre-release images: ephemeral objects used during
> development that would be replaced at release time by images built from the
> fi
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:23:26 +1200, Michael Hope
wrote:
> We've got a few little helper programs that are used in the Toolchain
> WG to help things run smoothly. I've done a short write up on them
> here:
> https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Helpers
>
> Ulrich, this is the build s
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:49:51 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hey folks
>
> I'd like to mirror and test the latest build of
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/10.11-daily/linaro-headless/
>
> but I have two issues with this:
> * having some kind of direct link to the latest image so that I don
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 15:42:34 -0300, Guilherme Salgado
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently changed l-m-c to take an hwpack, which is installed before
> the image is built. To keep that change simple I had to unpack the
> binary tarball into a tmp directory, install the hwpack, repack the
> tarball an
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:35:54 -0400, James Westby
wrote:
> Please file the bugs against lexbuilder, and assign them to the
> linaro-infrastructure team for further investigation.
Hi,
Did you file these bugs?
Thanks,
James
___
linaro-dev m
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:26:17 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010, James Westby wrote:
> > Did you file these bugs?
>
> I wasn't quite sure where to file it, so I just filed it under bugsy
> at:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugsy/+bug/649277
> and
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:27:48 +0300, Amit Kucheria
wrote:
> And with the right packaging, upgrades to linaro-testdrive will
> continually add support for new platforms and boards.
That will require some changes to l-m-c as well, to allow us to specify
board customisations, rather than hardcoding
On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 00:03:59 +0200, Zygmunt Krynicki
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I was trying to improve my work flow and I finally used bzr-pipeline for
> change management. I have prepared a rather big pipeline with 13
> different patches that collectively add some of 0.2 features, some minor
> enh
[ Apologies to anyone receiving this again, but I have had problems with
mail delivery and wanted to make sure that everyone got this ]
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:35:54 -0300, Guilherme Salgado
wrote:
> I think we can use existing libraries (python-oauth and
> lazr.authentication) and follow the exa
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:55:51 +0200, Zygmunt Krynicki
wrote:
> If we work together we might do that. Don't worry about external
> dependencies yet. If it works we'll worry about solving that problem.
Well, we can work in parallel on that. I don't want to have code queued
up which we ask IS to dep
Hi all,
Due to an ongoing migration in the data centre any image builds that are
done from now until sometime tomorrow will not appear on
snapshots.linaro.org until tomorrow.
Reorganisation as part of the migration means that firewalls need to be
updated for the rsyncs to work, and that won't be
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:33:40 +1300, Michael Hudson
wrote:
> separate releases ppa (which might be named like the current one) that
> you upload releases to manually.
Or trigger recipe builds in to manually.
Thanks,
James
___
linaro-dev mailing list
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
