On 05/24/2011 12:04 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
I just noticed today an online code cycle analyzer that targets the
Cortex-A8:
http://pulsar.webshaker.net/ccc/index.php?lng=us
Does anyone know who the author of that is, and whether he'd be
interested in doing an A9 update?
Interes
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Eric Miao wrote:
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Eric Miao wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Kurt Taylor
>>> wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Eric Miao wrote:
> Hi all,
>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
clocks.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clocks.c b/clocks.c
index b556644..3a93421 100644
--- a/clocks.c
+++ b/clocks.c
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static void add_clock_details_recur(struct clock_info
*clock,
sprintf
-Wall already set most the warning flags
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
Makefile |5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 0ac486d..295b7cb 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
BINDIR=/usr/sbin
MANDIR=/usr/share/ma
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
powerdebug.c | 14 +++---
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/powerdebug.c b/powerdebug.c
index 3e0272f..dd4fe91 100644
--- a/powerdebug.c
+++ b/powerdebug.c
@@ -164,10 +164,10 @@ int keystroke_callback(bool *enter_hit, bool
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
powerdebug.c | 16
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/powerdebug.c b/powerdebug.c
index dd4fe91..5fe07de 100644
--- a/powerdebug.c
+++ b/powerdebug.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include
#include
+#include
#include "re
Due to an internal error in clocks.c I am investigating, I am
temporarly changing the test in the mainloop to have the clock
being initialized when the option is set.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
powerdebug.c | 44 +---
1 files changed, 21 insertion
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
clocks.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clocks.c b/clocks.c
index b556644..3a93421 100644
--- a/clocks.c
+++ b/clocks.c
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static void add_clock_details_recur(struct clock_info
*clock,
sprintf
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
powerdebug.c | 14 +++---
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/powerdebug.c b/powerdebug.c
index 3e0272f..dd4fe91 100644
--- a/powerdebug.c
+++ b/powerdebug.c
@@ -164,10 +164,10 @@ int keystroke_callback(bool *enter_hit, bool
-Wall already set most the warning flags
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
Makefile |5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 0ac486d..295b7cb 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
BINDIR=/usr/sbin
MANDIR=/usr/share/ma
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
powerdebug.c | 16
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/powerdebug.c b/powerdebug.c
index dd4fe91..5fe07de 100644
--- a/powerdebug.c
+++ b/powerdebug.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include
#include
+#include
#include "re
Due to an internal error in clocks.c I am investigating, I am
temporarly changing the test in the mainloop to have the clock
being initialized when the option is set.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
powerdebug.c | 44 +---
1 files changed, 21 insertion
On Mon, 23 May 2011 13:11:37 -0300, Guilherme Salgado
wrote:
> But when compressed the free space doesn't make any difference, does it?
> I've gzipped a 2GB desktop image last week and it went down to around
> 500MB IIRC.
That's a good point, I forgot that we are compressing them.
Therefore I
Hi all,
in some of the blueprints I am following, I have noticed that many work
items updates (e.g. to DONE/POSTPONED/BLOCKED) are not accompanied by
any additional information. Of course, not all work items need
more information, but some are meaningless to an external viewer
without it.
This i
On May 24, 2011, at 9:12 AM, James Westby wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2011 13:11:37 -0300, Guilherme Salgado
> wrote:
>> But when compressed the free space doesn't make any difference, does it?
>> I've gzipped a 2GB desktop image last week and it went down to around
>> 500MB IIRC.
>
> That's a g
On Tue, 24 May 2011 09:22:14 -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> So that's 5 images { nano, server, alip, LEB, developer}
> x 9 board types { beagle (C & Xm), IGEP, imx51, iMX53,
> Overo, Panda, Orion, U8500, Versatile Express}
> x1 file system type {ext4?}
>
On 24 May 2011 15:21, Alexandros Frantzis
wrote:
> in some of the blueprints I am following, I have noticed that many work
> items updates (e.g. to DONE/POSTPONED/BLOCKED) are not accompanied by
> any additional information. Of course, not all work items need
> more information, but some are mean
Basically discussing https://wiki.linaro.org/OfficeofCTO/Schedules/,
https://wiki.linaro.org/OfficeofCTO/2011-05-24, getting our act together for
the public plan review
Dave
David Rusling, CTO
http://www.linaro.org
Linaro
Lockton House
Clarendon Rd
Cambridge
CB2 8FH
_
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Ricardo Salveti
> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Eric Miao wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Eric Miao wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Kurt Taylor
wrote:
> O
On 2011-05-24 17:40, Eric Miao wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Eric Miao wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Eric Miao wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Kurt
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:04:11PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 24 May 2011 15:21, Alexandros Frantzis
> wrote:
> > in some of the blueprints I am following, I have noticed that many work
> > items updates (e.g. to DONE/POSTPONED/BLOCKED) are not accompanied by
> > any additional information.
Hi,
Linaro Developer Platform team organises every week (Wednesday 14:00 -
18:00 UTC)
an ARM porting Jam. The idea is to gather all developers together to
fix userspace
portability issues across the board. The list of bugs being worked on
is at launchpad:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?f
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 20:47 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Linaro Developer Platform team organises every week (Wednesday 14:00 -
> 18:00 UTC)
> an ARM porting Jam. The idea is to gather all developers together to
> fix userspace
> portability issues across the board. The list of bugs being w
On Tue, 24 May 2011 18:36:18 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> It really feels like it could be time to promote the work items
> to a real entity in launchpad. Has this been discussed before?
Many times.
It's not something that the Launchpad team is likely to work on at all
this year, even if there w
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Ricardo Salveti
> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Eric Miao wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Eric Miao wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Kurt Taylor
wrote:
> O
Hi,
Available at https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/2011-05-24
== Attendees ==
* Alexander Sack (asac)
* Fathi Boudra (fabo)
* Ilias Biris (ibiris)
* James Westby (james_w)
* Paul Larson (plars)
* Ricardo Salveti (rsalveti)
* Zach Pfeffer (pfefferz)
== Blueprints drafting and review ==
*
My solution to this is to file a bug and link it to the BP if it needs
more than one line of info. This seems to work because anything that
needs more than one line is probably not 2 days of work - which is
what should go in the BP (which is my understanding). The bugs get
picked up by status, so i
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Available at https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/2011-05-24
> * AGREED: share a common format for the presentation to get a
> consistent layout across the platform teams. listing TRs, sorted by
> priority.
> * ACTION: whoever finishes f
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Alexandros Frantzis
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> in some of the blueprints I am following, I have noticed that many work
> items updates (e.g. to DONE/POSTPONED/BLOCKED) are not accompanied by
> any additional information. Of course, not all work items need
> more informa
On 24 May 2011 20:31, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> My solution to this is to file a bug and link it to the BP if it needs
> more than one line of info. This seems to work because anything that
> needs more than one line is probably not 2 days of work - which is
> what should go in the BP (which is my und
+++ James Westby [2011-05-24 14:55 -0400]:
> In addition, I'm wary of adding lots of extra features to workitems, as
> I feel they tend to be symptomatic of trying to load up engineers with
> too much process. We should always be careful to balance the desire for
> more information with the overhe
W dniu 24.05.2011 20:55, James Westby pisze:
On Tue, 24 May 2011 18:36:18 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
It really feels like it could be time to promote the work items
to a real entity in launchpad. Has this been discussed before?
Many times.
It's not something that the Launchpad team is likely
On Sat, 14 May 2011 23:45:35 +0200, Jeremiah Foster
wrote:
> It certainly is technically possible. The git-http-backend file allows
> one to use http and https as transports. Whoever is the admin for the
> Linaro git repos would need to make some changes to the apache config
> files for the git r
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 09:51:04AM -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> I have only seen this with the wireless problem already noted. Can
> you see if blacklisting the wireless driver fixes the problem?
Hmmm. What wireless problem?
> echo blacklist wl12xx_sdio > /etc/modeprobe.d/blacklist-wireless.conf
>
Hi all,
The Kernel Working Group is getting ready to release the first of our new
monthly development snapshot in a few days and we would like folks
to do some quick sanity boot testing on their boards. Please
grab or update the kernel from
git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.38.git,
and
On Tue, 24 May 2011, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Michael Casadevall
> wrote:
> > On 05/19/2011 10:56 AM, David Gilbert wrote:
> >> On 19 May 2011 16:49, Ken Werner wrote:
> >>> On 05/19/2011 12:40 PM, David Rusling wrote:
>
> Is this going to end up in a blu
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 09:51:04AM -0600, John Rigby wrote:
>> I have only seen this with the wireless problem already noted. Can
>> you see if blacklisting the wireless driver fixes the problem?
>
> Hmmm. What wireless problem?
>
Hi,
This patchset adds support for a new board SMDKV310, based on S5PV310 SOC.
This SOC is very similar to S5PC210 SOC, hence we are re-using this SOC code.
Specific changes in patch versions are mentioned in specific patch files.
Chander Kashyap (2):
ARMV7: Add support for Samsung SMDKV310 Boa
SMDKV310 board is based on Samsung S5PV310 SOC. This SOC is very much
similar to S5PC210.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera
---
Changes for v2:
- Coding Style Cleanup
- Removed unwanted macros from board config file.
- Ethernet controllor configu
Added MMC SPL boot support for SMDKV310. This framework design is
based on nand_spl support.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
---
Changes for v3:
- spl file renamed to u-boot-mmc-spl.bin
- spl directory renamed to mmc_spl
- comments added in mkv310_image.c file
Changes for v
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:40:28PM -0400, James Westby wrote:
> On Sat, 14 May 2011 23:45:35 +0200, Jeremiah Foster
> wrote:
> > It certainly is technically possible. The git-http-backend file allows
> > one to use http and https as transports. Whoever is the admin for the
> > Linaro git repos wo
41 matches
Mail list logo
