Hi all,

in some of the blueprints I am following, I have noticed that many work
items updates (e.g. to DONE/POSTPONED/BLOCKED) are not accompanied by
any additional information.  Of course, not all work items need
more information, but some are meaningless to an external viewer
without it.

This is a general observation across Linaro and I am as guilty as any.
As an example, consider the following (semi-fictional) work item
updates:

+ Add Qt tracing support for pixmaps: POSTPONED
+ Create a bazaar branch for libX: DONE
+ Select and port an application to GLES2: DONE
+ Test that the application functions correctly on ARM: BLOCKED

These updates raise many questions:
 * Why was Qt tracing for pixmaps postponed?
 * What is the exact location of the published branch?
 * Which application was selected for porting?
 * Where can I find the ported code for the application?
 * Why is the application test blocked?

Such information is usually placed at the top of the whiteboard, like
this (at least this is how I am doing it):

[alf May 8]: Postponed work on Qt pixmap tracing because it turned
out we can trace Qt/Webkit without it, so it is not considered critical anymore.
[alf May 10]: Uploaded branch to lp:libX
[alf May 10]: Selected application Y for porting to GLES2
[alf May 12]: Finished porting Y to GLES2 and uploaded it to
http://git.linaro.org/...
[alf May 13]: Blocked on testing the ported application Y because of an
issue (LP: #666666) with the 3D drivers for chipset Z.

In conclusion, I would like to encourage more verbosity in our updates,
so that others can easily follow and appreciate all the great work that
we are doing.

Thanks,
Alexandros

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to