Hi,
Tagging bugs is not only good practice but makes tracking and sorting so much
easier. With
this in mind I came up with a list of tags that can be consulted when reporting
bugs. Please
take a look at:
http://wiki.linaro.org/Process/Bugs/Tags
Ubuntu bug tags [1] also still apply, the Li
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Jamie Bennett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tagging bugs is not only good practice but makes tracking and sorting so much
> easier. With
Maybe we could also pull out some metrics, such as numbers of bug with
each tag, and age/severity distribution etc.? Would that be ea
On 21 Sep 2010, at 14:54, Dave Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Jamie Bennett
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Tagging bugs is not only good practice but makes tracking and sorting so
>> much easier. With
>
> Maybe we could also pull out some metrics, such as numbers of bug with
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:35:52AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > I still have two questions about stuff that came up here:
> >
> > * SD/MMC performance: Is this about device access, file systems or both?
> > I think the file system level stuff is actually the more important
> > part but I
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:15:17AM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:19:49AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > o Jason Hui: iMX51 work on device trees. Need assignment.
> > Reviewed BSP review, need to send results to Loïc et al.
>
> It would be gre
On 09/21/2010 11:02 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:15:17AM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:19:49AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> o Jason Hui: iMX51 work on device trees. Need assignment.
>>> Reviewed BSP review
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> It would be great to see more MX51 things on ALKML (and devicetree
> things on devtree-discuss). Up to now I have the impression that there
> is still much work done behind closed doors, which is bad if we want to
> have better mainline support for i.M
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> It looks like https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/qemu-maemo/+bug/628471
>
> And that's currently making it impossible for me to test my changes to
> l-m-c as my board hasn't arrived, so I was wondering if there's any way
> to work around it.
Well, th
roposed package to my PPA (still in
build queue) and I'm hoping to be able to upload it to the linaro-tools
PPA once we've sorted out review/access permissions/etc (maybe
tomorrow? this week, at any rate, I hope).
If you don't want to wait for that you could try pulling the sources
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:36:01AM +0100, Ian Smith wrote:
> The burndown chart is showing that number of work items has increased,
> with a number of work items completed. This is showing that the number
> of work items to complete is slipping further behind the trend line.
This is very worrisome
Hi,
notes and actions from our Monday graphics and multimedia cross-vendor
call are available on the wiki:
+ https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/UserPlatforms/2010-09-20
Details about when and where of this meeting can be found here:
+
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics#W
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 17:03 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > qemu: hardware error: no boot device found
>
> Could you share the QEMU cmdline you're using and which version of QEMU
> you're using?
>
> This error in the case of the omap3 emulation is
On 21 Sep 2010, at 19:14, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> The key item I see as missing here is UDS scheduler work; is that being
> planned at all right now?
Its being planned but Anmar is still gathering information from Jono before a
clear picture of what needs to happen can emerge.
> Christi
m in the final stages of doing a new version of qemu-maemo with
>this fix in it... I've uploaded a proposed package to my PPA (still in
>build queue) and I'm hoping to be able to upload it to the linaro-tools
>PPA once we've sorted out review/access permissions/etc (maybe
&
On 21 September 2010 20:23, Jason Andrews wrote:
> I pulled the source from your PPA and compiled it. I booted
> linaro-m-headless-tar-20100818-0.tar.gz and
> it continues past the omap2-nand driver hang; thanks for the improvements.
>
> Since this is my first time trying linaro, I'm not sure wha
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:39:15AM -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
> Specifically, I will be adding new support for Cortex-A9 SMP, though I
> may also make a few improvements to its handling of Cortex-A8 in the
> process. If you have experience using OpenOCD in these contexts, let me
> know if you have a
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:57:35PM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:35:52AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > I still have two questions about stuff that came up here:
> > >
> > > * SD/MMC performance: Is this about device access, file systems or both?
> > >
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:57:47PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > There's was relationship between runtime UP detection and highmem
> > discussed in the meeting; the bigger point here is that we want to
> > ensure the kernel is stellar at supporting our architectural baseline:
> > platforms tha
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:53:48PM +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
> ...are available here:
> https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2010-09-20
Heya Michael,
What's the issue with the OMAP3 memory map you bring up? I bet
somebody here can help with that.
Are you sufficiently un
On 21 September 2010 21:11, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:53:48PM +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
>> ...are available here:
>> https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2010-09-20
> What's the issue with the OMAP3 memory map you bring up? I bet
> somebo
>-Original Message-
>From: Peter Maydell [mailto:peter.mayd...@linaro.org]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 2:43 PM
>To: Jason Andrews
>Cc: Loïc Minier; Guilherme Salgado; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
>Subject: Re: Error (no boot device found) running qemu image
>
>On 21 September 2010 20:
2010/9/21 Jason Andrews :
>>On 21 September 2010 20:23, Jason Andrews wrote:
>>> I pulled the source from your PPA and compiled it. I booted linaro-m-
>>>headless-tar-20100818-0.tar.gz and it continues past the omap2-nand driver
>>>hang; thanks for the
>>>improvements.
> I ran longer and got rep
On 09/21/2010 12:52 PM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
[snip]
> Welcome on. We discussed OpenOCD at the last TSC meeting we had, and
> we have discovered that we don't have a very firm grasp of the gaps in
> OpenOCD for v7 hardware at the moment. So let me ask a few basic
> questions and see if
We've got a few little helper programs that are used in the Toolchain
WG to help things run smoothly. I've done a short write up on them
here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Helpers
Ulrich, this is the build system I mentioned on the call.
Scott/James/Mounir, it's not great, but
24 matches
Mail list logo
