On 10 Sep 02, Sundar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am curious to know a bit more about one of the points mentioned
> below. Hope this is okay.
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Amit Kucheria
> wrote:
> > * ACTION: Amit K to talk to jeremy about power domain framework: DONE
> > * Jeremy needs help,
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010, Michael Hope wrote:
> Ta. I've written down what I plan to do at:
> https://wiki.linaro.org/MichaelHope/Sandbox/HowToLicense
>
> If this is correct then I'll push it up to a top level page.
I'm not sure we want to duplicate too much of
https://wiki.linaro.org/TSC/License
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010, Michael Hope wrote:
>> Ta. I've written down what I plan to do at:
>> https://wiki.linaro.org/MichaelHope/Sandbox/HowToLicense
>>
>> If this is correct then I'll push it up to a top level page.
>
> I'm not sure we want t
Cc -dev
On 06:15 Mon 06 Sep , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've like to open the discussion about barebox
>
> What is Barebox?
>
> Barebox is a fork of U-Boot which was named before the elce 2009
> U-Boot-V2 with the target to have a modern i
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010, Loïc Minier wrote:
> I filed LP #629671 to track this after reproducing with the latest
> native toolchain which has the latest Linaro released patches.
Mariano, mind subscribing to this Launchpad bug since you're the
original reporter?
Thanks!
--
Loïc Minier
__
Hi Jean-Christophe,
Thanks for sharing your notes; we actually had a call the 26th of
August on Barebox; I don't think the notes from the call were shared,
so I'm sharing them below.
I think much more would have to be discussed, so certainly I suspect
there will be more calls. Grant
>
> == Minutes ==
>
> * Quick mention of what Linaro is for Robert
> * Grant working on defining a boot architecture
>* Telling manufacturers what firmware should be doing, where it stops
>* Not trying to cover the whole world, but more the fairly common case
>* Predictable set of i
Jean,
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Jean Pihet
> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 2:39 PM
> To: Shilimkar, Santosh
> Cc: Amit Kucheria; Kevin Hilman; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org; linux-
> o...@vger.
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Amit Kucheria
> wrote:
>> I copied the 2 patches to http://people.canonical.com/~amitk/imx5
>>
>
> OK, as far as I can make out the patch does the right thing.
>
> On Babbage 2.0 and the Pegatron lange5.1/nettop
Hey!
10 days ago, I met with John and Nicolas and with the help of Steve we
discussed how an "upstreamish" release process for u-boot-linaro and
linux-linaro would look like.
I'm sorry for sending the notes out to late, please find them below.
Thanks
== Attendees ==
Nicolas
John
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Amit Kucheria
> > wrote:
> >> I copied the 2 patches to http://people.canonical.com/~amitk/imx5
> >>
> >
> > OK, as far as I can make out the patch does the right th
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
>> > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Amit Kucheria
>> > wrote:
>> >> I copied the 2 patches to http://people.canonical.com/~amitk/imx5
>> >>
>>
Hi. I have a question about what the memory map of the TI OMAP3 (35xx)
looks like on startup, which I'm hoping somebody here can answer.
(Steve, Richard: you're on the CC: because Loic suggested that you
would be good people to ask.)
I'm currently looking at a bug in qemu:
https://bugs.launchpad.n
Hi Vishwa,
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Sripathy, Vishwanath
wrote:
> I did some profiling of assembly code on OMAP3630 board (ZOOM3). In worst
> case it takes around 3.28ms and best case around 2.93ms for mpu off mode.
Can you give a bit more details? Which measurement has been taken (ASM
on
Hi Amit,
Thanx for the generous response :)
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>
> The currently proposed bindings are documented on the DeviceTree wiki[1].
> Please understand that these are Device tree bindings, and it seems that we
Okay. This seems more like moving out the
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> If you're still accepting fixes for the 2.6.35 stable Linaro Kernel
> then I have some small profiling updates for you:
Thanks. Merged and pushed out.
Nicolas
___
linaro-dev mailing list
lina
Greetings,
Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, notes and actions from the
Linaro User Platforms Weekly Status meeting dated 9/01 held in
#linaro-meeting at 13:00 UTC.
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/UserPlatforms/WeeklyStatus/2010-09-01
Regards,
Tom (tgall_foo)
User Platforms Team
_
17 matches
Mail list logo
