On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Dave Martin <dave.mar...@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Amit Kucheria <amit.kuche...@linaro.org>
> > wrote:
> >> I copied the 2 patches to http://people.canonical.com/~amitk/imx5
> >>
> >
> > OK, as far as I can make out the patch does the right thing.
> >
> > On Babbage 2.0 and the Pegatron lange5.1/nettop platforms, your check
> > is triggered, and at least on Babbage 2.0 /proc/cpuinfo and
> > /proc/self/auxv reflect the absence of NEON correctly. (I couldn't
> > boot to an fs on the Pegatron platform --- in any case I had to bodge
> > the machine ID passed by the bootloader to persuage the kernel to
> > boot).
> >
> > On Babbage 3.0, NEON is reported as present in /proc/cpuinfo and
> > /proc/self/auxv.
> >
> > See the attached logs.
>
> Nico,
>
> I've got 2 confirmations that this works. Do you want to go ahead and
> push the patch to RMK? You can also push my patch if you need an
> example of what your patch is used for. (Please keep me in cc)
OK. Could you summarize whom those confirmations come from so to add
Tested-by tags to the patches?
Nicolas
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
