On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pi...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Dave Martin <dave.mar...@linaro.org> wrote: >> > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Amit Kucheria <amit.kuche...@linaro.org> >> > wrote: >> >> I copied the 2 patches to http://people.canonical.com/~amitk/imx5 >> >> >> > >> > OK, as far as I can make out the patch does the right thing. >> > >> > On Babbage 2.0 and the Pegatron lange5.1/nettop platforms, your check >> > is triggered, and at least on Babbage 2.0 /proc/cpuinfo and >> > /proc/self/auxv reflect the absence of NEON correctly. (I couldn't >> > boot to an fs on the Pegatron platform --- in any case I had to bodge >> > the machine ID passed by the bootloader to persuage the kernel to >> > boot). >> > >> > On Babbage 3.0, NEON is reported as present in /proc/cpuinfo and >> > /proc/self/auxv. >> > >> > See the attached logs. >> >> Nico, >> >> I've got 2 confirmations that this works. Do you want to go ahead and >> push the patch to RMK? You can also push my patch if you need an >> example of what your patch is used for. (Please keep me in cc) > > OK. Could you summarize whom those confirmations come from so to add > Tested-by tags to the patches?
Tested-by: Dave Martin <dave.mar...@linaro.org> Tested-by: Jason Hui <jason....@linaro.org> _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
