On 06/14/2011 04:26 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Andy Green wrote:
On 06/09/2011 10:01 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
... and with omap4_defconfig anyway cpufreq seems at least to start up
on both CPUs on Panda now, cool.
Going to have a
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Andy Green wrote:
> On 06/09/2011 10:01 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>
> > ... and with omap4_defconfig anyway cpufreq seems at least to start up
> > on both CPUs on Panda now, cool.
> >
> > Going to have a go at omap2plus_defconfig.
>
> omap2plus_defconfig
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:18:10AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
>
> > Bisecting when CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y reproducibly identified
> > af3e4fd37a18f2e5a00175bc96061541d1364a3b as the first bad commit
> > between v2.6.39 and linux-linaro-2.6.39/master, but i
On 06/09/2011 10:26 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
[ 2.262329] Freeing init memory: 292K
init: hwclock main process (519) killed by ILL signal
SIGILL issue requires CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2 enabled to see it. Disabling
CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2 (and fixing stuff like EXT4 and DEVTMPFS being
On 06/09/2011 10:01 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
... and with omap4_defconfig anyway cpufreq seems at least to start up
on both CPUs on Panda now, cool.
Going to have a go at omap2plus_defconfig.
omap2plus_defconfig is still blowing SIGILLs where omap4_defconfig is
happy (t
On 06/09/2011 09:22 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
All those fixes plus a bunch of other fixes from mainline are now merged
in linaro-2.6.39.
I wasn't seeing it die early but that also looks like a good find.
Just a FYI a bogus line in core cpufreq driver has crept into
linu
On 06/09/2011 05:38 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/119896
I'm not entirely satisfied with the W() usage in there though, even less
so by the THUMB(nop) that are inserted here and there to provide proper
padding. As the patch
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> Bisecting when CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y reproducibly identified
> af3e4fd37a18f2e5a00175bc96061541d1364a3b as the first bad commit
> between v2.6.39 and linux-linaro-2.6.39/master, but it's obviously
> totally irrelevant and causes no code changes at all (whi
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> Bisecting when CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y reproducibly identified
> af3e4fd37a18f2e5a00175bc96061541d1364a3b as the first bad commit
> between v2.6.39 and linux-linaro-2.6.39/master, but it's obviously
> totally irrelevant and causes no code changes at all (whi
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:49:51AM +0100, Tixy wrote:
>> > No, were using two different methods to produce configs. The one I use
>> > produces a Thumb2 kernel, the one you use doesn't.
>>
>> Well, i
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:49:51AM +0100, Tixy wrote:
> > No, were using two different methods to produce configs. The one I use
> > produces a Thumb2 kernel, the one you use doesn't.
>
> Well, it seems we have a few different problems here:
>
> Certainly
On 06/07/2011 11:04 AM, John Rigby wrote:
> Can you enter a bug for this so I don't forget to make these =y if
> that is all it takes to fix this.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux-linaro/+bug/794134
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.or
Can you enter a bug for this so I don't forget to make these =y if
that is all it takes to fix this.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Andy Doan wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 10:44 AM, John Rigby wrote:
>> I intend to make this better this cycle. The various flavours will be more
>> consistent with one a
On 06/07/2011 10:44 AM, John Rigby wrote:
> I intend to make this better this cycle. The various flavours will be more
> consistent with one another and the configs will be much leaner. Also I have
> found that one can successfully boot test a kernel with only "make uImage"
> so you don't have to
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:31:51AM +0100, Andy Green wrote:
>> On 06/07/2011 10:58 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>
>> Hi -
>>
>> >>It was the output produced by running the commands listed at
>> >>https://wiki.linaro.org/Resour
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:31:51AM +0100, Andy Green wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 10:58 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>
> Hi -
>
> >>It was the output produced by running the commands listed at
> >>https://wiki.linaro.org/Resources/HowTo/KernelDeploy#From_Linaro_sources
> >>
> >>This c
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:01:48AM +0100, Andy Green wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 09:35 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>
> >>>Disabling Thumb2 fixes the problem.
> >>
> >>What did you actually disable? Presumably not CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL so
> >>the thumb support at all?
> >
> >I deselec
On 06/07/2011 10:58 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
It was the output produced by running the commands listed at
https://wiki.linaro.org/Resources/HowTo/KernelDeploy#From_Linaro_sources
This config has CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y and doesn't have an entry for
CONFIG_CPU_V6
Wel
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:49:51AM +0100, Tixy wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 10:01 +0100, Andy Green wrote:
> > On 06/07/2011 09:35 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> >
> > >>> Disabling Thumb2 fixes the problem.
> > >>
> > >> What did you actually disable? Presumably not CONFIG_TH
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 10:01 +0100, Andy Green wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 09:35 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>
> >>> Disabling Thumb2 fixes the problem.
> >>
> >> What did you actually disable? Presumably not CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL so
> >> the thumb support at all?
> >
> > I deselected
On 06/07/2011 09:35 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Disabling Thumb2 fixes the problem.
What did you actually disable? Presumably not CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL so
the thumb support at all?
I deselected CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL using menuconfig, which changed
the .config file like...
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 09:22 +0100, Andy Green wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 09:09 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>
> Hi -
>
> >>> When booted on a Beagleboard-xM, the resulting kernel appears to hang
> >>> after "Starting kernel...". I haven't investigated any further.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Tr
On 06/07/2011 09:09 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
When booted on a Beagleboard-xM, the resulting kernel appears to hang
after "Starting kernel...". I haven't investigated any further.
Try disabling CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL and rebuilding.
If this does fix the problem, this
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 17:44 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Tixy wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 01:12 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >> Time to leave 2.6.38 behind and move on! We now have a 2.6.39 based
> >> Linaro kernel which can be viewed here:
> >>
> >> http://
On 06/06/2011 05:44 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
The .config I'm using is that described on the wiki at
https://wiki.linaro.org/Resources/HowTo/KernelDeploy#From_Linaro_sources
Try disabling CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL and rebuilding.
If this does fix the problem, this suggests tha
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Tixy wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 01:12 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> Time to leave 2.6.38 behind and move on! We now have a 2.6.39 based
>> Linaro kernel which can be viewed here:
>>
>> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.39.git;a=summary
>
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 01:12 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Time to leave 2.6.38 behind and move on! We now have a 2.6.39 based
> Linaro kernel which can be viewed here:
>
> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.39.git;a=summary
>
> or cloned from either of those:
>
> git:/
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>
>> I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
>> wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
>> in or should we plan on a LT/BSP kernel for full functionality.
On 2 June 2011 21:39, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:01:01PM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>> >
>> >> I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
>> >> wonderful ar
On 2 June 2011 22:12, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>
>> On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>> >
>> >> I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
>> >> wonderful are missing. My question now is
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
> >
> >> I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
> >> wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
> >> in or should we plan
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:01:01PM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
> >
> >> I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
> >> wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
> >>
On 2 June 2011 19:01, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>>
>>> I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
>>> wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
>>> in or should we plan on
On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>
>> I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
>> wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
>> in or should we plan on a LT/BSP kernel for full functionality. I
>> pre
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 01:12 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Time to leave 2.6.38 behind and move on! We now have a 2.6.39 based
> Linaro kernel which can be viewed here:
>
> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.39.git;a=summary
>
> or cloned from either of those:
>
> git://
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
> I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
> wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
> in or should we plan on a LT/BSP kernel for full functionality. I
> presume if those patches were headed upstream they wou
I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
in or should we plan on a LT/BSP kernel for full functionality. I
presume if those patches were headed upstream they would be headed
upstream:). If not they they shou
On 06/02/2011 12:12 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> This will continue to evolve as this is just the beginning for that
> tree, so more stuff will be merged. Only smoke tested on a Dove board,
> and compile tested for OMAP so far.
>
I just tried some testing of my Overo with the omap2plus_defconfi
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> vexpress
>
>
> linux-linaro-2.6.39/master doesn't seem to work on vexpress using the
> linux-linaro-natty configuration (I get "starting the kernel", then
> nothing).
>
> Upstream v2.6.39 does appear to work fully on vexpress in both ARM and
> Th
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 01:12:29AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Time to leave 2.6.38 behind and move on! We now have a 2.6.39 based
> Linaro kernel which can be viewed here:
>
> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.39.git;a=summary
>
> or cloned from either of those:
>
>
40 matches
Mail list logo
