On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pi...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote: > >> I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda >> wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back >> in or should we plan on a LT/BSP kernel for full functionality. I >> presume if those patches were headed upstream they would be headed >> upstream:). If not they they should not be in linux-linaro. > > This is the strategy of this game. If it isn't going upstream you lose.
First, please don't take offense to this feedback. I know kernel banter can have a harsh undertone. I'd like to suggest this kind of feedback isn't appropriate. The issues concerning what can't be upstreamed are well known. > In practice this means that AndyDoan/Ricardo will have to do their work > again on top of this tree, and then I might merge it. I'd like to further suggest that in the interest of cooperation that we take a more constructive tone. We're all going to need to work closely to accomplish our goals of upstreaming support for these boards and unifying implementations. > Nicolas > > _______________________________________________ > linaro-kernel mailing list > linaro-ker...@lists.linaro.org > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-kernel > _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
