On 9 February 2012 03:23, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 09.02.2012, at 02:20, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
>> On 9 February 2012 00:50, Fathi Boudra wrote:
>>> Same result.
>>>
>>> Debug info from gdb:
>>>
>>> qemu: Unsupported syscall: 26
>>> ptrace: Function not implemented.
>>> No threads.
>>
>> This
On 09.02.2012, at 01:50, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On 8 February 2012 17:56, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 08.02.2012, at 16:54, Fathi Boudra wrote:
>>
>>> On 7 February 2012 00:50, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 4 February 2012 02:39, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 3 February 2012 22:19, Tom Gall
On 09.02.2012, at 02:20, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 9 February 2012 00:50, Fathi Boudra wrote:
>> Same result.
>>
>> Debug info from gdb:
>>
>> qemu: Unsupported syscall: 26
>> ptrace: Function not implemented.
>> No threads.
>
> This bit of the log is uninteresting, because it is mono attempt
On 9 February 2012 00:50, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Same result.
>
> Debug info from gdb:
>
> qemu: Unsupported syscall: 26
> ptrace: Function not implemented.
> No threads.
This bit of the log is uninteresting, because it is mono attempting
to automatically capture a backtrace. As Alex says, this do
On 8 February 2012 17:56, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 08.02.2012, at 16:54, Fathi Boudra wrote:
>
>> On 7 February 2012 00:50, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 4 February 2012 02:39, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 3 February 2012 22:19, Tom Gall wrote:
> The last time I checked into it (last nove
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> find log attached
http://people.linaro.org/~lool/linaro-dev/binary.log.gz
--
Loïc Minier
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On 08.02.2012, at 16:54, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On 7 February 2012 00:50, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 4 February 2012 02:39, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 3 February 2012 22:19, Tom Gall wrote:
The last time I checked into it (last november, early december) it was
the post install script
On 7 February 2012 00:50, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 4 February 2012 02:39, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 3 February 2012 22:19, Tom Gall wrote:
>>> The last time I checked into it (last november, early december) it was
>>> the post install scripts involving a number of different mono
>>> packages.
On 4 February 2012 02:39, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 3 February 2012 22:19, Tom Gall wrote:
>> The last time I checked into it (last november, early december) it was
>> the post install scripts involving a number of different mono
>> packages. It's really easy to replicate. As Peter kindly suggest
On 3 February 2012 22:19, Tom Gall wrote:
> The last time I checked into it (last november, early december) it was
> the post install scripts involving a number of different mono
> packages. It's really easy to replicate. As Peter kindly suggested,
> time to revisit with the new version and author
The last time I checked into it (last november, early december) it was
the post install scripts involving a number of different mono
packages. It's really easy to replicate. As Peter kindly suggested,
time to revisit with the new version and author a new bug or two
depending on how things go. Being
Hi Tom,
On 3 February 2012 17:43, Tom Gall wrote:
> Awesome!
>
> Thanks much for getting this fixed Peter. Perhaps at LC you might like
> to see another qemu issue that keeps us from being able to cross build
> the Linaro Ubuntu LEB.
Which issue is it and is it reported somewhere?
I'm trying to
On 3 February 2012 15:43, Tom Gall wrote:
> Thanks much for getting this fixed Peter. Perhaps at LC you might like
> to see another qemu issue that keeps us from being able to cross build
> the Linaro Ubuntu LEB.
Sure; or you can always reach me via the bug tracking system :-)
-- PMM
__
Awesome!
Thanks much for getting this fixed Peter. Perhaps at LC you might like
to see another qemu issue that keeps us from being able to cross build
the Linaro Ubuntu LEB.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 21 January 2012 12:04, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> $0 here is the p
On 21 January 2012 12:04, Peter Maydell wrote:
> $0 here is the process name, and Perl is trying to set it using
> prctl(PR_SET_NAME, ...). [Google says it's done that only since
> Perl 5.14.] I think you're running under QEMU at this point, and
> QEMU doesn't support PR_SET_NAME.
qemu-linaro bug
Hi Tom,
On 01/22/2012 12:51 PM, Tom Gall wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Say what version of ubuntu are you building this on?
Oneric (11.10)
> Would it be possible to get a complete log?
https://pastebin.linaro.org/387/
>
> I just installed the 3.0~a40.1-1linaro13~maverick5 version of
> live-build o
Hi Matt,
Say what version of ubuntu are you building this on? Would it be
possible to get a complete log?
I just installed the 3.0~a40.1-1linaro13~maverick5 version of
live-build out of my ppa which is referenced in the wiki page onto a
"clean" oneiric machine. The cross build completed successf
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:04:43PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>On 21 January 2012 10:08, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Matt Waddel wrote:
>>> I: create linaro user
>>> Can't set $0 with prctl(): Bad address at /usr/sbin/adduser line 86.
>>>
>>> Here is the perl cod
On 21 January 2012 10:08, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Matt Waddel wrote:
>> I: create linaro user
>> Can't set $0 with prctl(): Bad address at /usr/sbin/adduser line 86.
>>
>> Here is the perl code around line 86 in adduser:
>>
>> my %config;
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Matt Waddel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have encountered a failure running live-build that I could use
> some help debugging.
>
> Using the instructions in the LiveBuild wiki page:
>
> https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/CrossCompile/LiveBuild
>
> the procedure fa
20 matches
Mail list logo
