On 9 February 2012 03:23, Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> wrote: > > On 09.02.2012, at 02:20, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> On 9 February 2012 00:50, Fathi Boudra <fathi.bou...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> Same result. >>> >>> Debug info from gdb: >>> >>> qemu: Unsupported syscall: 26 >>> ptrace: Function not implemented. >>> No threads. >> >> This bit of the log is uninteresting, because it is mono attempting >> to automatically capture a backtrace. As Alex says, this doesn't >> work under qemu because we don't implement ptrace, but it's not >> important because it'll only happen when something has already >> failed to work. > > Yes, and the error actually looks as if something goes wrong very early. > Hence my question whether this same mono binary works on real hardware. > > Also, it's usually a good idea to narrow down your test case to something > simple and easily reproducible. Running your whole system building workflow > to narrow down what's causing this is not going to work.
The same binaries works on native builders: http://snapshots.linaro.org/build/linaro-o-ubuntu-desktop/20120209/0/build-log.txt If you take a look to the log (thanks loïc for putting on people.l.o), qemu segfault before reaching mono. I'll try to reduce the test case. _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
