On 7 February 2012 00:50, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 4 February 2012 02:39, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 3 February 2012 22:19, Tom Gall <tom.g...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> The last time I checked into it (last november, early december) it was >>> the post install scripts involving a number of different mono >>> packages. It's really easy to replicate. As Peter kindly suggested, >>> time to revisit with the new version and author a new bug or two >>> depending on how things go. Being able to cross assemble the LEB on >>> intel would be a significant milestone! >> >> Ah, mono is a known difficult one for QEMU emulation: >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu-linaro/+bug/806873 >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/530000 >> >> I know Alexander Graf from SuSE has done some work in this >> area; I'll talk to him about whether he got mono working >> and whether those fixes are reasonably upstreamable yet. > > So the answer is that, yes, Alex has got mono working. However > not all the patches are upstream. There is at least one patch > which is a workaround for a nasty race which is (IMHO) not > upstreamable and where the correct fix for the problem involves > a fairly significant chunk of rework/refactoring. > > I think if we want to be able to run mono on Linaro QEMU this > is enough work that it needs to be specced out as a blueprint and > prioritised against other things like KVM work. (My off the cuff guess > is a couple of weeks of work.)
When generating Oneiric based image, I get the issues triggered by mono, but also some others. find log attached, using qemu-user-static 1.0.50-2012.01-0ubuntu1 (from Precise). Cheers, Fathi
<<< message/external-body; access-type=x-mutt-deleted; expiration="Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:45:08 -0800"; length=644023: Unrecognized >>>
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
