Re: [CALL FOR TESTING] Linaro 11.07 Candidate

2011-07-27 Thread Alexander Sack
Thanks james for your feedback and input. On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:48 PM, James Tunnicliffe wrote: > Hi, > > Executive summary: James opens up a can of worms and volunteers to fix it. > > I am not suggesting that we change anything for this release. I don't > mind what the directory structure

Re: [CALL FOR TESTING] Linaro 11.07 Candidate

2011-07-27 Thread Mounir Bsaibes
James, This is a good topic to tackle. I have struggled myself to generalize a script I wrote that helps with the media creation. I think we should start doing retrospectives on the monthly releases and this topic can be one of the first ones to address. Mounir On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Ja

Re: [CALL FOR TESTING] Linaro 11.07 Candidate

2011-07-27 Thread James Westby
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:48:06 +0100, James Tunnicliffe wrote: > Release is a YY.MM release and a milestone is alpha/beta/eac/release > candidate/final. I realise that we are being far more agile than we > were and we probably won't have anything before a release candidate. Right, I wonder if it's

Re: [CALL FOR TESTING] Linaro 11.07 Candidate

2011-07-27 Thread James Tunnicliffe
On 27 July 2011 15:12, James Westby wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:48:11 +0100, James Tunnicliffe > wrote: >> All OS binaries structured as: >> http://releases.linaro.org/platform/[release]/[distribution >> name]/[milestone]/ >> >> Hardware packs all in one place: >> http://releases.linaro.or

Re: [CALL FOR TESTING] Linaro 11.07 Candidate

2011-07-27 Thread James Westby
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:48:11 +0100, James Tunnicliffe wrote: > A couple more observations: > > First we have duplication of hardware packs, but not the checksum > files and GPG signatures to go with them. The hardware packs are > hardware, not distribution specific, so it is difficult to justify

Re: [CALL FOR TESTING] Linaro 11.07 Candidate

2011-07-27 Thread David Gilbert
On 27 July 2011 11:48, James Tunnicliffe wrote: > Hi, > First we have duplication of hardware packs, but not the checksum > files and GPG signatures to go with them. The hardware packs are > hardware, not distribution specific, so it is difficult to justify to > have them in multiple locations. I

Re: [CALL FOR TESTING] Linaro 11.07 Candidate

2011-07-27 Thread James Tunnicliffe
Hi, Executive summary: James opens up a can of worms and volunteers to fix it. I am not suggesting that we change anything for this release. I don't mind what the directory structure on releases.linaro.org is, as long as it is consistent. But... As someone who cares more about structure on the f

[CALL FOR TESTING] Linaro 11.07 Candidate

2011-07-26 Thread Mounir Bsaibes
Hi, In preparation for the release of Linaro 11.07 images on 2011-07-28, a suitable candidate has been selected for testing. Please help our initiative by testing the official Linaro Evaluation Build (LEB): * Android: http://releases.linaro.org/platform/linaro-n/android/latest/leb-panda/ * Ub