On 27 July 2011 11:48, James Tunnicliffe <james.tunnicli...@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi,
> First we have duplication of hardware packs, but not the checksum > files and GPG signatures to go with them. The hardware packs are > hardware, not distribution specific, so it is difficult to justify to > have them in multiple locations. I imagine that this structure was > designed to put everything in one directory that someone may need to > get up and running with a Linaro distribution, but if they want to > check their hardware packs are signed and correctly downloaded they > still need to visit the hwpacks directory. I like having the hwpacks and image in the same directory; I previously spent a bizarre amount of time trying to find them on each release. I agree the signatures need to be with them though. > Second we are still using > http://releases.linaro.org/platform/linaro-n. I thought we had done > away with the lettered naming convention to go with the date based > ones. Yeh I think that component just needs losing out of the path. Dave _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
