LAVA android tests should be working again

2012-05-23 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
As some of you know, we had a problem today which caused all android tests to fail in LAVA. This is now fixed (basically, the version of adb we had installed in the lab was too old), and if you need to you should be safe to resubmit your jobs now. Linaro insiders can see more details at https://w

Re: Panda mmc issue w/ Linus' current 3.5-rc tree

2012-05-23 Thread John Stultz
On 05/23/2012 05:05 PM, John Stultz wrote: Hey Arnd, So it looks like something has gone awry in the 3.5 pull with Panda's mmc functionality. Trying to boot the current 3.5-rc tree, the boot fails after not finding the root device. Looking at the boot log I'm seeing: omap_hsmmc: probe

Re: android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

2012-05-23 Thread John Stultz
On 05/23/2012 05:25 PM, Andy Green wrote: On 24/05/12 06:42, Somebody in the thread at some point said: Am I right in thinking the issue you're running into here is that your customer has direct expectations for the tree you're maintaining, which makes adding unexpected instability on a vanilla

Re: Lava images improvement idea

2012-05-23 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Marcin Juszkiewicz writes: > Hi > > LAVA is good for doing some tests but every time I use it I wonder why > it is so slow. So I looked more at problem. > > Job which I started is going on pandaboard for 48 minutes already. So > far it did nothing related with tests which I want to run. Instead i

Re: android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

2012-05-23 Thread Andy Green
On 24/05/12 06:42, Somebody in the thread at some point said: On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 02:21:50PM +0800, Andy Green wrote: If we KNOW that deconfiguration of CONFIG_ANDROID is equivalent to not having Androidization patched in, people will stop wanting to get rid of the patches. But since Google'

Panda mmc issue w/ Linus' current 3.5-rc tree

2012-05-23 Thread John Stultz
Hey Arnd, So it looks like something has gone awry in the 3.5 pull with Panda's mmc functionality. Trying to boot the current 3.5-rc tree, the boot fails after not finding the root device. Looking at the boot log I'm seeing: omap_hsmmc: probe of omap_hsmmc.0 failed with error -22 With

Re: android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

2012-05-23 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 02:21:50PM +0800, Andy Green wrote: > >>If we KNOW that deconfiguration of CONFIG_ANDROID is equivalent to not > >>having Androidization patched in, people will stop wanting to get rid > >>of the patches. But since Google's interest is in the case it is > >>configured, I dou

Re: [PATCH 0/2] OMAP: mailbox initial device tree support

2012-05-23 Thread Omar Ramirez Luna
Hi Tony, Benoit, On 1 May 2012 12:47, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote: > To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree. > > Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested. > > Omar Ramirez Luna (2): >  OMAP: mailbox: add device tree support >  arm/dts: OMAP2+: Add mailbox nodes > >  .../devicetree/bind

Re: clone speed on jenkins

2012-05-23 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Alexander Sack writes: > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Deepti Kalakeri > wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:17 AM, John Rigby wrote: >>> >>> I believe from experience on a local host that having a precloned tree >>> of for example current upstream linus on jenkins to use with >>> --re

Re: Lava images improvement idea

2012-05-23 Thread Alexander Sack
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Hi > > LAVA is good for doing some tests but every time I use it I wonder why > it is so slow. So I looked more at problem. > > Job which I started is going on pandaboard for 48 minutes already. So > far it did nothing related with tests

Re: [PATCH][v2] ARM: davinci: cpuidle - remove ops

2012-05-23 Thread Sekhar Nori
On 5/23/2012 12:10 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 05/22/2012 07:58 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> On 5/21/2012 3:37 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>> This patch removes the ops usage because we have the index >>> passed as parameter to the idle function and we can determine >>> if we do WFI

Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] regulator: helper routine to extract regulator_init_data

2012-05-23 Thread David Brown
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 04:47:17PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > + xyzreg: regulator@0 { > + regulator-min-microvolt = <100>; > + regulator-max-microvolt = <250>; > + regulator-always-on; > + vin-supply = <&vin>; > + }; Just noticed

Re: clone speed on jenkins

2012-05-23 Thread John Rigby
http://summit.linaro.org/lcq2-12/meeting/20856/ubuntu-leb-review-current-ci-process/ is not specific to kernel ci but seems to be the best match On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:41 AM, John Rigby wrote: > I think there is a kernel ci session. > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Alexander Sack wrote

Re: clone speed on jenkins

2012-05-23 Thread John Rigby
I think there is a kernel ci session. On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:03 PM, John Rigby wrote: >> Lets discuss this next week.  I understand your point about the squid proxy. > > Sounds good. Is there a particular session where this could fit i

Lava images improvement idea

2012-05-23 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Hi LAVA is good for doing some tests but every time I use it I wonder why it is so slow. So I looked more at problem. Job which I started is going on pandaboard for 48 minutes already. So far it did nothing related with tests which I want to run. Instead if fetched some image, booted and started

Re: clone speed on jenkins

2012-05-23 Thread Alexander Sack
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:03 PM, John Rigby wrote: > Lets discuss this next week.  I understand your point about the squid proxy. Sounds good. Is there a particular session where this could fit in? -- Alexander Sack Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams http://www.linaro.org | Open source s

Re: clone speed on jenkins

2012-05-23 Thread John Rigby
Lets discuss this next week. I understand your point about the squid proxy. On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Deepti Kalakeri > wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:17 AM, John Rigby wrote: >>> >>> I believe from experience on a loc

Re: Manufacturing tool for MX6QSabreLite

2012-05-23 Thread Guodong Xu
Hi, Torben After confirmation with Freescale, the binary format of manufacturing tool is uploaded here. I have a README file for check. Can you give it a try? http://people.linaro.org/~guodongxu/myupload/freescale_tools/ Please follow Philipp's steps. And let us know whether this fixes your p

Re: thermal issue on panda

2012-05-23 Thread Andy Green
On 23/05/12 18:00, Somebody in the thread at some point said: Hi, I have successfully tested one of the latest daily build. The thermal issue doesn't occur anymore Great - thanks a lot for the report and retest. -Andy Thanks, Vincent On 17 May 2012 08:57, Ricardo Salveti wrote: On Wed, M

Re: thermal issue on panda

2012-05-23 Thread Vincent Guittot
Hi, I have successfully tested one of the latest daily build. The thermal issue doesn't occur anymore Thanks, Vincent On 17 May 2012 08:57, Ricardo Salveti wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Andy Green wrote: >> On 16/05/12 19:49, Somebody in the thread at some point said: >>> >>> On 14

Re: Manufacturing tool for MX6QSabreLite

2012-05-23 Thread Guodong Xu
Hi, Trodden I am checking with Freescale for this. So far answer I copied below: - Note: "not available at Freesacle's external website" usually means it is still not released to public. Richard and I are still checking for that. Will update you once we got more information. Thanks. Best reg