On 23 June 2011 10:41, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 6/22/2011 10:12 PM, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>>
>> lock_depth field is removed from the power frequency events in the
>> new linux kernel(2.6.38 onwards). So this creates issue to retrieve
>> the lower members of the trace data. To fix this pro
lock_depth field is removed from the power frequency events in the
new linux kernel(2.6.38 onwards). So this creates issue to retrieve
the lower members of the trace data. To fix this problem 2 separate
structures are created and their use depends upon the format of the
power_frequency events. Thes
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:59:49 +0200, Zygmunt Krynicki
wrote:
> W dniu 22.06.2011 00:21, Michael Hudson-Doyle pisze:
>
> >> Fortunately django almost never runs in autocommit mode. There is an
> >> implicit transaction around the whole request. It is easy to control the
> >> transaction processing
(2011年06月22日 21:08), Eric Miao wrote:
>> Will the same time slot for Friday works for you all? Also thanks for
>> extending
>> the help.
>
> That works for me.
I'm ok with that too.. :)
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://l
W dniu 22.06.2011 00:21, Michael Hudson-Doyle pisze:
Fortunately django almost never runs in autocommit mode. There is an
implicit transaction around the whole request. It is easy to control the
transaction processing around a piece of code, see [1].
I got very confused by this, I admit. In g
Hi there,
I took a look at the AOSP libjpeg code which is included in
git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/external/jpeg
during my flight back home (which incidentally had been diverted and
landed me in Rio de Janeiro; not sure if I celebrate or cry) and noted
the following things:
Or we could just use continuous integration where there are no
freezes, just per change regression tests.
-Zach
On 15 June 2011 11:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 15 June 2011 15:40, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> if we want to guarantee
>>> that QEMU and th
Hi Thomas, Grant,
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Thomas Abraham
> wrote:
> > This patch adds the of_match_table to enable s3c2410-wdt driver
> > to be probed when watchdog device node is found in the device tree.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham
>
> Acked-by: Grant Likely
>
> You nee
> -Original Message-
> From: eric.y.m...@gmail.com [mailto:eric.y.m...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Eric
> Miao
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 2:47 PM
> To: Ashish Jangam
> Cc: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu); Steve Cozens; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org; Mark
> Brown; Dajun Chen; Prashant Deshpande
> S
I think its cool. It would be a big help.
On 22 June 2011 10:29, Joey Stanford wrote:
> Hi Gang,
>
> In the past few days I've received a few requests to allow community
> members access to our Mumble server.
>
> I don't feel comfortable adding in the large and open linaro-community
> team so I a
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:57:03 -0400, "anmar.ou...@linaro.org"
wrote:
> As long as we can a private space for the LTs, I think it is a great idea.
It looks as though mumble may support password-protecting channels,
which may be a good idea for LTs anyway?
I don't think it uses encryption or anyth
On 22 June 2011 11:29, Joey Stanford wrote:
> Hi Gang,
>
> In the past few days I've received a few requests to allow community
> members access to our Mumble server.
>
> I don't feel comfortable adding in the large and open linaro-community
> team so I am considering making a linaro-community-mum
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:04:41 +, Fathi Boudra
wrote:
> > If not, what are the blockers to doing so?
>
> Today, the builders are unstable.
They have just had new hard disk enclosures added, and should be more
stable now. Let's monitor for a few days and see if they are more
stable. On what da
Hello list,
I am not sure if android-platform@ is the right place to discuss
licensing terms in Android or not. Please ignore the post if it was
mistaken.
Recently, we at Linaro are trying to integrate gcc-linaro[1] into
Android build system as the optional toolchain optimized for latest
ARM cor
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:16:27 -0300, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> The unhandled fault shouldn't be related with the usb errors. From my
> experience with Beagle xM the USB port will trigger the reset once the
> disk is consuming more power than beagle can provide. As I know this
> is probably a powere
Hi Grant,
On 20 June 2011 22:13, Grant Likely wrote:
> Okay, this is getting ugly (not your fault, but this pattern has
> become too common. Can you craft and post a patch that adds the
> following functions to drivers/of/base.c and include/linux/of.h
>
> /* offset in cells, not bytes */
> int d
Joey,
I think this is great! We have a combination need for this:
1) Upstream project interaction where phone-type interaction is desirable.
2) The working group meeting where representatives from member
companies who are not Linaro assignees want to participate (for
replacing the old conference
Hi Gang,
In the past few days I've received a few requests to allow community
members access to our Mumble server.
I don't feel comfortable adding in the large and open linaro-community
team so I am considering making a linaro-community-mumble team to
allow for access. Right now you have to be i
Hi,
http://irclogs.linaro.org/
Logs are now kept from our public channels so that you can refer back to
previous converations and catch up on things that happened while you
were away if needed. They can also come up in google searches which can
be useful.
If you would like a channel added/rem
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Vishwanath Sripathy wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Amit Kucheria
> wrote:
> > On 11 Jun 22, Vishwanath Sripathy wrote:
> >> Hi Nicolas,
> >>
> >> Can you pls pull below patch from 2.6.39 mainline kernel into 11.5
> >> Linaro kernel? This would fix some of the DVFS
It would be nice if there was some example of how this new process works
overall. The Toolchain team has been mentioned in some discussions as
following the practice with the blueprints/milestone pages and
deliverable component tarballs.
Perhaps someone from the release team could prepare a set of
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On 11 Jun 22, Vishwanath Sripathy wrote:
>> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> Can you pls pull below patch from 2.6.39 mainline kernel into 11.5
>> Linaro kernel? This would fix some of the DVFS related issues seen on
>> OMAP3.
>> Patch:
>> commit 5fd2a84ab3
> Will the same time slot for Friday works for you all? Also thanks for
> extending
> the help.
That works for me.
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Vincent Guittot
wrote:
> On 22 June 2011 12:14, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>>> +
>>> +#define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].socket_id)
>>> +#define topology_core_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].core_id)
>>> +#define topology_core_cpum
On 22 June 2011 12:14, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Some nits below.
>
> After you fix them, you can add a
> Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria
>
> On 11 Jun 20, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> The affinity between ARM processors is defined in the MPIDR register.
>> We can identify which processors are in the same c
Hi Jim,
(I'm CCing linaro-dev@ because I figure others might have similar
questions)
This is because the android patches are going to the 'Unknown'
project[1], which is ignored when generating the statistics[2]. We
currently can't automatically detect the correct project for such
patches because
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Per Forlin wrote:
> On 22 June 2011 10:53, S, Venkatraman wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Per Forlin wrote:
>>> On 22 June 2011 09:42, Venkatraman S wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
> Previously there has only been o
On 11 Jun 22, Vishwanath Sripathy wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Can you pls pull below patch from 2.6.39 mainline kernel into 11.5
> Linaro kernel? This would fix some of the DVFS related issues seen on
> OMAP3.
> Patch:
> commit 5fd2a84ab3c8b87176e25db1d98c5cc34043a669
> Author: Avinash H.M
> OMA
On 11 Jun 22, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 01:36:15PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 06/16/2011 11:54 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > On 16 June 2011 21:40, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >> The ARM ARM says these fields are IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED meaning that
> > >> different ven
From: Per Forlin
Move dmaengine dependent host->next_data variable from mmci_probe to
mmci_dma_setup. The mmci fails to compile without CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE
if using next_data in mmci_probe.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
---
drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c |5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 de
Some nits below.
After you fix them, you can add a
Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria
On 11 Jun 20, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> The affinity between ARM processors is defined in the MPIDR register.
> We can identify which processors are in the same cluster,
> and which ones have performance interdependency
On 22 June 2011 01:38, Per Forlin wrote:
> pre_req() runs dma_map_sg() and prepares the dma descriptor
> for the next mmc data transfer. post_req() runs dma_unmap_sg.
> If not calling pre_req() before mmci_request(), mmci_request()
> will prepare the cache and dma just like it did it before.
> It
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 03:27:07PM -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Thanks for reporting it. This was fallout from when IS restarted the
> machine to add more disk, and they're working on it right now. It should
> be fixed RSN.
It seems to be working again now.
Thanks!
---Dave
__
> On 22/06/11 10:43, Ilias Biris wrote:
> > On 22/06/11 09:16, Joe Yu wrote:
> >> Hi Ilias,
> >>
> >>
> > TR blueprints are generally for larger "umbrella" activities - usually
> > those get broken into the so called "engineering" (you may also see the
> > term "work") blueprints upon which the TR
On 22 June 2011 11:31, Per Forlin wrote:
> On 22 June 2011 10:51, Nickolay Nickolaev wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> this one's causing me compilation trouble troubles when CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE is
>> not defined.
>>
> I don't see this issue when I compile the kernel for a Pandaboard
> without CONFIG_DMA_ENGI
Hi Nicolas,
Can you pls pull below patch from 2.6.39 mainline kernel into 11.5
Linaro kernel? This would fix some of the DVFS related issues seen on
OMAP3.
Patch:
commit 5fd2a84ab3c8b87176e25db1d98c5cc34043a669
Author: Avinash H.M
OMAP3: set the core dpll clk rate in its set_rate function
Vi
On 22 June 2011 10:51, Nickolay Nickolaev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this one's causing me compilation trouble troubles when CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE is
> not defined.
>
I don't see this issue when I compile the kernel for a Pandaboard
without CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE being set. Could you please clarify or show
me you
a recently-released blog describing Linux debug with the DS-5 Debugger:
http://blogs.arm.com/software-enablement/486-porting-linux-made-easy-with-ds-5/
This was originally triggered by successful use of DS-5 in porting Linux to
Tuscan dual-A9 platform.
Ta
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Eric Miao wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Ashish Jangam
> wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: eric.y.m...@gmail.com [mailto:eric.y.m...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Eric
>>> Miao
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 6:55 PM
>>> To: Ashish Jangam
>>> C
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 01:36:15PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 06/16/2011 11:54 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On 16 June 2011 21:40, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> The ARM ARM says these fields are IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED meaning that
> >> different vendors may attribute different meaning to these f
On 22 June 2011 10:53, S, Venkatraman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Per Forlin wrote:
>> On 22 June 2011 09:42, Venkatraman S wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req()
to start and wait for
Quote from Linux Programmer's Manual:
"If t is non-NULL, the return value is also stored in the memory
pointed to by t."
Code Review:
https://review.source.android.com/#change,23998
From 30a19b9cdbe509d62c7d4c5df9a6daab13ff8857 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Huang
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 2
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Per Forlin wrote:
> On 22 June 2011 09:42, Venkatraman S wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
>>> Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req()
>>> to start and wait for a request. This patch adds
>>> * mmc_start_req() -
Hello,
this one's causing me compilation trouble troubles when CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE is
not defined.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
>
> @@ -2077,6 +2155,7 @@ static int __init omap_hsmmc_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
>host->mapbase = res->start;
>host->
Code Review:
https://review.source.android.com/#change,23997
From afd989ca9f3415df9807847745e854522866f66f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Huang
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:35:16 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] strftime: Use snprintf() instead of sprintf()
Change-Id: I112ac012894eddc96e5f3e77cb87
On 22 June 2011 09:42, Venkatraman S wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
>> Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req()
>> to start and wait for a request. This patch adds
>> * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting
>> If there is on ongoi
Merged in AOSP:
http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=toolchain/build.git;a=commit;h=7ee395d10100fc9ed2c03c49b949033600082a4f
On 27 May 2011 01:29, Jim Huang wrote:
> While executing target install-host-libbfd, the build system complains:
>
> make -C libbfd-binutils-2.20.1/bfd install \
> bfdlibd
On 22/06/11 10:43, Ilias Biris wrote:
> On 22/06/11 09:16, Joe Yu wrote:
>> Hi Ilias,
>>
>>
> TR blueprints are generally for larger "umbrella" activities - usually
> those get broken into the so called "engineering" (you may also see the
> term "work") blueprints upon which the TR blueprints depen
> -Original Message-
> From: eric.y.m...@gmail.com [mailto:eric.y.m...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Eric
> Miao
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 6:55 PM
> To: Ashish Jangam
> Cc: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu); eric.m...@linaro.org; Steve Cozens; linaro-
> d...@lists.linaro.org; Mark Brown; Dajun Chen; P
On 22/06/11 09:16, Joe Yu wrote:
> Hi Ilias,
>
> This is Joe Yu from ARM Shanghai. We're very interested in adding a TR
> blueprint to Linaro 12.05 for a DirectFB project targeted at optimization for
> ARM with Mali GPU and NEON. What shall we do? Shall we create a TR blueprint
> ourselves at l
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
> Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req()
> to start and wait for a request. This patch adds
> * mmc_start_req() - starts a request wihtout waiting
> If there is on ongoing request wait for completion
> of that request
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Ashish Jangam
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: eric.y.m...@gmail.com [mailto:eric.y.m...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Eric
>> Miao
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 6:55 PM
>> To: Ashish Jangam
>> Cc: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu); eric.m...@linaro.org; Steve Cozen
On 20 June 2011 23:52, Michael Hope wrote:
> Some minor nits. The names are product-version-.mm - some of the
> slides use -mm.
fixed. It should be dot.
> I see the first release as having an implicit -0 so the first respin is -1,
>not -2.
fixed.
Thanks Michael.
Cheers,
Fathi
53 matches
Mail list logo
