Hi all,
When debugging video playback performance issue, we found that pulseaudio is
eating up 100% cpu time. Just in case someone else is having the samilar issue,
please let know.
We are using ubuntu-desktop, snapshot, found this issue at least w/ 0425 image.
Thanks
- eric
___
On Fri, 20 May 2011, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Today I was trying to see if I could get the ethernet driver to work
> with Panda, so we could try TFTP support.
>
> Most of the patches are posted at the u-boot m-l already, that consist
> of the smsc95xx driver and EHCI support for Pan
Hi John,
Today I was trying to see if I could get the ethernet driver to work
with Panda, so we could try TFTP support.
Most of the patches are posted at the u-boot m-l already, that consist
of the smsc95xx driver and EHCI support for Panda. With all these
patches, and using the x-loader provided
Added MMC SPL boot support for SMDKV310. This framework design is
based on nand_spl support.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
---
Changes for v3:
- spl file renamed to u-boot-mmc-spl.bin
- spl directory renamed to mmc_spl
- comments added in mkv310_image.c file
Makefile
SMDKV310 board is based on Samsung S5PV310 SOC. This SOC is very much
similar to S5PC210.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera
---
Changes for v2:
- Coding Style Cleanup
- Removed unwanted macros from board config file.
- Ethernet controllor configu
Hi,
This patchset adds support for a new board SMDKV310, based on S5PV310 SOC.
This SOC is very similar to S5PC210 SOC, hence we are re-using this SOC code.
Specific changes in PATCH v3 are mentioned in specific patch files.
Chander Kashyap (2):
ARMV7: Add support for Samsung SMDKV310 Board
A
Hi Amit,
Thanks very much for your reply.
2011/5/20 Amit Kucheria :
> On 11 May 19, Barry Song wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> it is easy to get toolchain/uboot/kernel/android source codes. but i
>> have been really searching all over the website but still fail to get
>> source codes of pm(expect powerdebug
Adds support for passing a device tree for booting the u8500 board.
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely
---
Completely untested. Not even compiled. Per, this should be all you
need to change in the kernel to get DT support working on the u8500.
g.
arch/arm/boot/dts/u8500-hrefv60.dts |7 +++
On 19 May 2011 23:01, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
>> Well, so bottom line of this, as far as I see it, is: Gerrit is de facto
>> tool for Android, and for Linaro Android we'd like to be sure that it
>> supports more flexible/advanced approach than
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
> Would either of you mind looking at this bug report? On the IGEP,
> when booting with DT is used, something appears to get messed up with
> initializing the clocks. In this case, the device tree isn't actually
> doing anything other than replacing ATAGs
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Paul Sokolovsky
wrote:
> Hello Linus,
[snip]
> Well, so bottom line of this, as far as I see it, is: Gerrit is de facto
> tool for Android, and for Linaro Android we'd like to be sure that it
> supports more flexible/advanced approach than which is seen typically
>
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 02:48:25PM -0300, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> > 2) too many shells started to parse shell scripts
> I can see a lot of 'sh', 'cat', 'rm', 'sleep', 'run-parts', I think
> this could all be optimized.
"run-parts" here is surprising; I'm not aware of anything that should call
th
Hello Linus,
On Wed, 18 May 2011 13:07:50 +0200
Linus Walleij wrote:
> 2011/5/16 Paul Sokolovsky :
>
> > You expressed concern that Gerrit is not too flexible for working
> > with multiple topic branches, in particular, that it enforces work
> > against single (master) branch (as far as I under
Dear Chander Kashyap,
In message <1305796982-7155-3-git-send-email-chander.kash...@linaro.org> you
wrote:
> Added MMC SPL boot support for SMDKV310. This framework design is
> based on nand_spl support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
Checkpatch says:
WARNING: line over 80 characters
#1333
Dear Angus Ainslie,
In message you wrote:
>
> > Which patchset? I see only this cover letter, but neither patch 1/2
> > nor patch 2.2 ?
>
> It looks like they ended up in a different thread.
I found them. You also had the linaro-dev list on Cc:, and the
Linaro mail server was faster, so they
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 21:00 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Chander Kashyap,
>
> In message <1305796982-7155-1-git-send-email-chander.kash...@linaro.org> you
> wrote:
> >
> > This patchset adds support for a new board SMDKV310, based on S5PV310 SOC.
> > This SOC is very similar to S5PC210 SOC,
Hi Wolfgang
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Chander Kashyap,
>
> In message <1305796982-7155-1-git-send-email-chander.kash...@linaro.org> you
> wrote:
>>
>> This patchset adds support for a new board SMDKV310, based on S5PV310 SOC.
>> This SOC is very similar to S5PC
Here's a link the works. Sorry for sending a bad link.
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/Status/2011-05-19
On 18 May 2011 17:06, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> See:
>
> https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/Status/2011-05-18
>
> Highlights:
>
> 1. Android Panda LEB GFX being debugged.
> 2. Andr
Dear Chander Kashyap,
In message <1305796982-7155-1-git-send-email-chander.kash...@linaro.org> you
wrote:
>
> This patchset adds support for a new board SMDKV310, based on S5PV310 SOC.
> This SOC is very similar to S5PC210 SOC, hence we are re-using this SOC code.
Which patchset? I see only this
On 11 May 19, Barry Song wrote:
> Hi all,
> it is easy to get toolchain/uboot/kernel/android source codes. but i
> have been really searching all over the website but still fail to get
> source codes of pm(expect powerdebug last updated 6 weeks ago),
> multimedia, graphics. so i am really difficult
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
>
>> Would either of you mind looking at this bug report? On the IGEP,
>> when booting with DT is used, something appears to get messed up with
>> initializing the clocks. In this case, the device t
On 19 May 2011 16:49, Ken Werner wrote:
> On 05/19/2011 12:40 PM, David Rusling wrote:
>>
>> Is this going to end up in a blueprint? This is the last loose end of
>> SMP / atomic memory operations work and I'd like to see it happen
>
> Hi,
>
> Yep, there is one (kind of a skeleton) in place at:
Hi Kevin and Paul,
Would either of you mind looking at this bug report? On the IGEP,
when booting with DT is used, something appears to get messed up with
initializing the clocks. In this case, the device tree isn't actually
doing anything other than replacing ATAGs for passing memory size,
comm
On 05/19/2011 12:40 PM, David Rusling wrote:
Is this going to end up in a blueprint? This is the last loose end of SMP /
atomic memory operations work and I'd like to see it happen
Hi,
Yep, there is one (kind of a skeleton) in place at:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain-misc
Hi all,
it is easy to get toolchain/uboot/kernel/android source codes. but i
have been really searching all over the website but still fail to get
source codes of pm(expect powerdebug last updated 6 weeks ago),
multimedia, graphics. so i am really difficult to find delivery of pm,
multimedia, graph
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Ilias Biris wrote:
> On 19/05/11 14:19, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>> Sure. As I understand the idea of an agile product backlog, though,
>> you don't necessarily do full investigation and planning on every
>> item in it (in the way that at the moment we do full down-
Build (LEB):
Ubuntu Desktop:
http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-ubuntu-desktop/20110519/
and our Community images:
Nano:
http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-nano/20110519/
ALIP:
http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-alip/20110519/
Developer Tools:
http
On 19/05/11 14:19, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> Sure. As I understand the idea of an agile product backlog, though,
> you don't necessarily do full investigation and planning on every
> item in it (in the way that at the moment we do full down-to-the-work-item
> blueprints for everything at the start
On 17 May 2011 15:12, Mounir Bsaibes wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> [moving planning away from six-month cycles]
> Not sure how this can be accomplished without also spreading the 6 months
> disruption to monthly disruptions.
> It is better to have a longe
Is this going to end up in a blueprint? This is the last loose end of SMP /
atomic memory operations work and I'd like to see it happen
Dave
On 18 May 2011, at 16:07, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Nicolas Pitre
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 May 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
>>
SMDKV310 board is based on Samsung S5PV310 SOC. This SOC is very much
similar to S5PC210.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera
---
Changes for v2:
- Coding Style Cleanup
- Removed unwanted macros from board config file.
- Ethernet controllor configu
Added MMC SPL boot support for SMDKV310. This framework design is
based on nand_spl support.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
---
Changes for v3:
- spl file renamed to u-boot-mmc-spl.bin
- spl directory renamed to mmc_spl
- comments added in mkv310_image.c file
Makefile
Hi,
This patchset adds support for a new board SMDKV310, based on S5PV310 SOC.
This SOC is very similar to S5PC210 SOC, hence we are re-using this SOC code.
Specific changes in PATCH v3 are mention in specific patch files.
Chander Kashyap (2):
ARMV7: Add support for Samsung SMDKV310 Board
ARM
I thought Abrek was a monkey? If we're talking Soviet space program animals
anyway. :)
Dave
On 19 May 2011, at 08:52, Zygmunt Bazyli Krynicki wrote:
>
>> Thanks for tackling this. I am positive on almost all the suggested
>> names here ...
>>
>> Does this mean that we want to rename abrek to
> Thanks for tackling this. I am positive on almost all the suggested
> names here ...
>
> Does this mean that we want to rename abrek to "lava-test-tool"? Paul,
> what does abrek stand for?
>
It's the name of certain space-faring dog.
Best regards
ZK
_
On 05/19/2011 12:05 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 05:58:22PM -0300, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:31 PM, John Rigby wrote:
Thanks to the heroic efforts of rsalveti the packaged
linux-linaro-omap kernel now greatly improved omap4 displ
On 19 May 2011, at 08:08, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
> wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Some of you know about this already as it was discussed a bit at LDS,
>> but probably not very inclusively.
>>
>> We have a slightly strange arrangement of projec
Hi
here is the status for Graphics WG for wk20.
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/Status/2011-05-18
Highlights:
- Working on 11.11 blueprint specs
- Finishing off tasks for 11.05:
# Cairo maintainer has committed the patches provided by Alexandros upstream
# Compositor
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Some of you know about this already as it was discussed a bit at LDS,
> but probably not very inclusively.
>
> We have a slightly strange arrangement of projects on Launchpad, with
> the main ones being "launch-control" a
39 matches
Mail list logo
