On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Barry Song <21cn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That's important to market. In case customers of TI, Freescale, ST-E
> are also using SoC from non-member companies, since they are using
> linaro kernel and utilitis well on TI/Freescale/ST-E,
> they want to use the same l
Hi, Shawn,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:59:42PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
>> Singed-off-by: Rob Herring
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts | 122
>>
Hi Jason,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:59:42PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
> Singed-off-by: Rob Herring
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts | 122
> +
> 1 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-
Hi all,
For some reason the jenkins instance that powers the android build
system isn't auto provisioning slaves from ec2, so builds are being
queued but not executed. If you notice this happen and it's blocking
you, get an admin (asac, loic, patryk) to go to
https://android-build.linaro.org/jenk
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Guillaume Leteller
wrote:
> Hi
>
>> In the developer platforms team we're working on getting the
>> linaro-nano image so that it is considerably smaller.
>
> Brilliant!
>
>> Some highlights to nano:
>> * The linaro-image boots just as our linaro-headless image d
Hi, Arnd,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 07 March 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Monday 07 March 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile
>> > > index 0d43be9..540697e 100644
>> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-
Thanks. Amit.
2011/3/9 Lee Jones :
> On 09/03/11 02:44, Barry Song wrote:
>> Thanks. Amit.
>>
>> 2011/3/8 Amit Kucheria :
>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Barry Song <21cn...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Lee,
Great! Thanks a lot. It looks like the communication between linaro
and mainl
Just to clear up on this front regarding how the i.MX boots: there is
an internal boot ROM built into the mask of the SoC which contains
some rudimentary boot code. It can perform the following tasks:
1) boot from any SPI-based ROM
this actually includes any memory-based SD card as they are ju
John,
It should work with linux-linaro-2.6.38 with the correct config. Make
sure to turn off CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS_SDI as it cause a access fault. See
lp:720055.
John
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 5:51 PM, john stultz wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 18:57 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Feb 2011
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 18:57 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
>
> > @Nicolas,
> >
> > None of these have been queued up by the respective maintainers yet,
> > so they aren't in linux-next as of today. However I believe there are
> > no outstanding review comme
The U-Boot on gitorious is more of a nostalgia piece, we actually
abandoned the repo a long time ago.
I am recommending this, and hoping Linaro stick to it: Linaro, Ubuntu,
Debian or any concerned distribution has absolutely NO business
building or flashing U-Boot for the boards.
You do not need
From: Rob Herring
Add a make rule to compile dt blobs for ARM.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
---
arch/arm/Makefile |3 +++
arch/arm/boot/Makefile |6 ++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/Makefile b/arch/arm/Makefile
index b49dea6..566763f 100
Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, minutes and actions from the
Linaro toolchain working group weekly meetings of March 07 & March 09,
2011.
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2011-03-07
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2011-03-09
== Sum
Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, minutes, actions and IRC logs
from the
Linaro kernel working group weekly meetings of March 07, 2011.
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/KernelConsolidation/Meetings/2011-03-07
== Summary ==
* Bug reviews
* Google Summer of code
* Patches submissi
+++ Tom Gall [2011-03-09 13:15 -0600]:
> From sound - ac97, are there arm boards that use that?
Some do. I know pxa270-based boards do. I don't know about new, shiny
linaro v7-vintage stuff.
> So that said, what is the best way to proceed?
>
> 1) Is there agreement that for all the kernels we s
Hi,
This is a message sent out once per week to call on our community to
help test the Linaro evaluation builds we produce. If you have supported
hardware, as found on:
http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-hwpacks/
please help our initiative by testing:
Ubuntu Desktop:
http://snap
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 09:56:12AM +, David Gilbert wrote:
> > 1) Is there agreement that for all the kernels we supply that we
> > should change the policy for kernel configs to not default to
> > everything on?
> > (Maybe we should be using the upstream config with minimal modifications?)
>
Dnia 2011-03-10, czw o godzinie 17:43 +0100, Loïc Minier pisze:
> I think there is a way for APT to keep compressed versions of these
> files; it's the Acquire::GzipIndexes option
And all those files can be recreated by APT when needed so there is no
need to keep them in image which has to be r
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Tom Gall wrote:
> Specifically from the installed image after the hwpack deps are
> installed get rid of the following:
> rm -f ./var/lib/apt/lists/*Packages
> rm -f ./var/lib/apt/lists/*Sources
> rm -f ./var/lib/apt/lists/*Release
> rm -f ./var/lib/apt/lists/*Release.gpg
> rm
Hi
> In the developer platforms team we're working on getting the
> linaro-nano image so that it is considerably smaller.
Brilliant!
> Some highlights to nano:
>* The linaro-image boots just as our linaro-headless image did
> (upstart and friends)
>* it can be updated, or additional pkgs
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 03:14:11PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tuesday, March 08, 2011 9:14 AM Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> > We had a discussion yesterday regarding ways in which linaro can assist
> > V4L2 development. One topic was that of sorting out memory providers like
> > GEM
On 10/03/11 at 09:20am, James Westby wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 13:15:25 -0600, Tom Gall wrote:
> > 3) linaro-media-create should have some kind of option (--nano) to
> > clear out apt caches (saves ~40 meg of space)
>
> If you want this it should be an easy change to make.
If its an easy chang
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 13:15:25 -0600, Tom Gall wrote:
> 2) Linaro-media-create shouldn't install linux-firmware_1.47_all.deb ?
> Do we have any any hardware that needs it? If so could there be a
> --nano option to not install it?
This is currently in the hwpacks as linux-image-* depend on it. Howev
Hello,
On Tuesday, March 08, 2011 9:14 AM Hans Verkuil wrote:
> We had a discussion yesterday regarding ways in which linaro can assist
> V4L2 development. One topic was that of sorting out memory providers like
> GEM and HWMEM.
>
> Today I learned of yet another one: UMP from ARM.
>
> http://b
On Monday 07 March 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 07 March 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile
> > > index 0d43be9..540697e 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile
> > > @@ -18,3 +18,4
Hi,
2011/3/10 Marcin Juszkiewicz :
> = Problems =
>
> Main problem is debian/packaging/ directory in Debian version. I need
> review of [4] patch and then will report a bug against eglibc.
It probably runs fine under bash, but not under dash/sh.
> 4. http://42.pl/u/2zj4
Cheers
--
Héctor Orón
On 9 March 2011 20:56, Michael Hope wrote:
> We currently use a feature branch / merge request / merge / test /
> push approach in gcc-linaro. This works fine for a reasonable cost
> but can mean that patches sit unreviewed and unmerged for up to a
> month. Ramana, Andrew, and I had a talk about
Hi,
CCed updated Michal email address,
One note, As Michal moved to google, Marek is works on CMA. We are
also studying the hwmem and GEM.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:18 PM, wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> The following patchset implements a "hardware memory driver". The
>
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> === wait_device testing ===
> * On reader #1, consistently fails with 30 seconds timeout
> * On reader #2, very likely succeeds after 2 seconds (5 out of 6
> iterations), (fails with 30 seconds timeout on the 6th iteration)
> * On reader #3, consistently s
On 9 March 2011 15:35, Meng-Hsuan Cheng wrote:
> Add linaro-build.sh to support linaro android toolchain.
Merged (along with slight syntax tweak) in GIT:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=android/platform/build.git;a=summary
Thanks for your contribution.
Sincerely,
-jserv
Ubuntu/natty got some cross toolchain updates recently so it is
installable again. This gave me some free time to work on improvements.
And this mail is an attempt to summary it and to provide some
ideas/questions.
= Introduction =
During Emdebian sprint it was decided that my source packages wil
On 9 March 2011 19:15, Tom Gall wrote:
> Going deeper it's pretty easy to spot low hanging fruit:
> From fs - Do we need afs, jfs, code, minix, hpfs, xfs, hfs, hfsplus,
> gfs2, reiserfs... I'm thinking no.
> From drivers - net and media make about about 1/3rd of the 28 meg in
> use, I'm sure the
Dnia 2011-03-10, czw o godzinie 14:28 +1300, Michael Hope pisze:
> Linaro GCC is already available in a bunch of places including
> OpenBricks, crosstool-NG, OpenEmbedded, OpenWRT, and (of course)
> Ubuntu. I hope to write a short page on each so people know where to
> find our toolchain in the d
33 matches
Mail list logo
