> "Michael" == Michael Hope writes:
Hi,
Michael> Linaro GCC is already available in a bunch of places including
Michael> OpenBricks, crosstool-NG, OpenEmbedded, OpenWRT, and (of
Michael> course) Ubuntu. I hope to write a short page on each so
Michael> people know where to find our toolc
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 09:07:10AM +1300, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Tom Gall wrote:
> > To quote the GCC manual:
> >
> > -Os
> > Optimize for size. -Os enables all -O2 optimizations that do not
> > typically increase code size. It also performs further optimizations
> >
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:32:29PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:01:33PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
[...]
> I have to add something here to correct the conclusion about reader's
> impact.
>
> I just got the third reader to play with, and interestingly it can get
> all of these
This patch supports cpuidle framework for samsung S5PV310. Currently,
Only one idle state is possible to use, but more idle states can
be added followed by this patch.
Signed-off-by: Jaecheol Lee
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap
---
Rebasing the patch for linaro 2.6.38 kernel. This patch adds
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
---
drivers/net/fec.c | 13 +
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/fec.c b/drivers/net/fec.c
index 02cdd71..fcb9768 100644
--- a/drivers/net/fec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/fec.c
@@ -45,6 +45,9 @@
#in
The id_entry will possibly be NULL, So, need check
id_entry and make sure it not NULL before using it.
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
---
drivers/net/fec.c | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/fec.c b/drivers/net/fec.
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr
---
drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 79 --
1 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
index dfcf4b1..c9
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
Singed-off-by: Rob Herring
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts | 122 +
1 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts
new fil
From: Jason Liu
This patchset adds Freescale i.mx51 device tree support.
This is based on
git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 devicetree/test
This patch has been tested on MX51 babbage board and can
boot up succesfully to linux console with DT enabled.
Grant, I think it's almost ready for you
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
---
arch/arm/mach-mx5/Kconfig |8
arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile |1 +
arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-dt.c| 65 +++
arch/arm/mach-mx5/clock-mx51-mx53.c | 43
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:01:33PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 04:59:18PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > I'm scanning all 7 cards I have with the script wait_device, each card
> > > with 10 iterations of the test.
> > >
> > > 1) Tra
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:38:34 +1300, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> tl;dr version: see https://android-build.linaro.org/mockup/index, click
> around. Don't expect to be able to do much unless you're in
> ~linaro-android-builders
>
> Hi all,
>
> The frontend to the build service that I've been wo
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 08:53:50PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Hello Guilherme,
>
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:53:00AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > I'm recently trying to install alpha-3 image using l-m-c on an AMD64
> > > machine which is behind the com
I've written some short instructions on using crosstool-NG to build Linaro GCC:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Using/CrosstoolNg
Could someone review these for me please?
Linaro GCC is already available in a bunch of places including
OpenBricks, crosstool-NG, OpenEmbedded, OpenW
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:36 AM, James Westby
wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:09:21 +1300, Michael Hope
> wrote:
>> > * How frequently do problems get through review that are found by the
>> > test suite?
>>
>> Ideally the test suite should have been run before the review and have
>> shown
Assembler in latest binutils needs extra option to enable smc
instructions introduced in:
ARM: omap3: Remove hand-encoded SMC instructions
Signed-off-by: John Rigby
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:09:21 +1300, Michael Hope
wrote:
> > * How frequently do problems get through review that are found by the
> > test suite?
>
> Ideally the test suite should have been run before the review and have
> shown no regressions. That's how upstream does it. GCC is
> complic
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:28 AM, James Westby
wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:56:27 +1300, Michael Hope
> wrote:
>> We currently use a feature branch / merge request / merge / test /
>> push approach in gcc-linaro. This works fine for a reasonable cost
>> but can mean that patches sit unreview
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:18 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 10:17 +0200, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:32 AM, John Stultz wrote:
>> > My solution is to have a Kconfig.distro file, which is patched
>> > with Distro specific policy config, such as which filesystem
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:56:27 +1300, Michael Hope
wrote:
> We currently use a feature branch / merge request / merge / test /
> push approach in gcc-linaro. This works fine for a reasonable cost
> but can mean that patches sit unreviewed and unmerged for up to a
> month. Ramana, Andrew, and I ha
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> We currently use a feature branch / merge request / merge / test /
> push approach in gcc-linaro. This works fine for a reasonable cost
> but can mean that patches sit unreviewed and unmerged for up to a
> month. Ramana, Andrew, and I had a t
We currently use a feature branch / merge request / merge / test /
push approach in gcc-linaro. This works fine for a reasonable cost
but can mean that patches sit unreviewed and unmerged for up to a
month. Ramana, Andrew, and I had a talk about this earlier in the
week and I've written up the id
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 09:13:59 +0100
> Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
>> All these memory-related modules have the same purpose: make it possible to
>> allocate/reserve large amounts of memory and share it between different
>> subsystems (primarily fr
Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, notes and actions from the
Linaro Developer Platforms Weekly Status meeting held on March 9th
in #linaro-meeting on irc.freenode.net at 16:00 UTC.
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Foundations/2011-03-09
Actions from the meeting where as follows:
* wook
: (20110303-20110309)
* PM: JamieBennett
* Past reports : https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/Status
* Burndown information :
http://status.linaro.org/linaro-infrastructure.html
* Stakeholder process:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/CurrentProjects
== Key
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 20:30 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > My concern is that sfdisk -l returning non-zero may not be a very good
> > indication that we should sleep. It will return non-zero on any error
> > and I expect most errors to not go away af
-20110309)
* PM: JamieBennett
* Past reports : https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/Status
== Key Points for wider discussion ==
* Framebuffer patches still need more discussion
* Team is discovering and discussing Blueprints to work on this and
next cycle. More input from other teams is
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> My concern is that sfdisk -l returning non-zero may not be a very good
> indication that we should sleep. It will return non-zero on any error
> and I expect most errors to not go away after a 30 seconds sleep, in
> which case we'd be delaying l-m-c
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 20:14 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > Do we know why this happens in some cases? It'd be better if we could
> > only sleep when we know there's a chance that the partitions may be
> > available after that.
>
> I'm not sure what
Hi All,
In the developer platforms team we're working on getting the
linaro-nano image so that it is considerably smaller. To date I've
been using the approach I outlined last fall in a previous post to
this list.
Some highlights to nano:
* The linaro-image boots just as our linaro-headless im
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> Do we know why this happens in some cases? It'd be better if we could
> only sleep when we know there's a chance that the partitions may be
> available after that.
I'm not sure what you're asking; are you asking for a test on whether
we need to s
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 09:48 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 March 2011 03:32:40 John Stultz wrote:
> > +
> > +
> > +source "Kconfig.distro"
> > +
>
> I think we want something more flexible than sourcing
> a global Kconfig.distro from the board file.
>
> First of all, we want at lea
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 09:38 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 March 2011 03:32:35 John Stultz wrote:
> > Thoughts and feedback (or alternate approaches) would be appreciated.
> >
> > thanks
> > -john
> >
> > CC: Grant Likely
> > CC: Jason Hui
> > CC: patc...@linaro.org
> > Signed-of
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 10:17 +0200, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:32 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> > My solution is to have a Kconfig.distro file, which is patched
> > with Distro specific policy config, such as which filesystems
> > should be enabled, networking policy, debug options,
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
>> The upstream master branch of U-Boot on git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git
>> has the bug too.
>
> Yes, this is where I was pasting the bogus code from; I just have no
> idea why write() would suddenly be
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 14:34 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > I just tried another SanDisk 4GB SD card (#8) borrowed from colleague.
> > With 20 iterations testing, it reports:
> >
> > Could list partitions after 0 seconds! --> 13 times
> > Could list partition
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 March 2011 03:32:35 John Stultz wrote:
>> In looking at trying to replace defconfigs with kconfig fragments,
>> one limitation identified is that config items in choice blocks
>> cannot be selected by other config options.
>>
>
Hi,
You can get all the information at
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/Meetings/2011-03-08
Thanks,
James
== Agenda ==
* Actions from last meeting
* Team Status
* AOB
== Past Action items ==
* james_w to co-ordinate deployment of salgado's patchwork tree in his ab
Hi All,
The minutes of the power management weekly call can be found at :
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Meetings/2011-03-09
Highlights: Discussion on Hotplug vs. scheduler tunable to hit retention
Regards,
Amit
___
linaro-dev
Hi,
The weekly Linaro Release Meeting will be held at 17:00 UTC tomorrow.
The agenda for the meeting can be found at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/WeeklyReleaseMeeting/2011-03-10
and previous action items were:
* Mounir to investigate the status of the Panda display problem
* Mounir to
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I just tried another SanDisk 4GB SD card (#8) borrowed from colleague.
> With 20 iterations testing, it reports:
>
> Could list partitions after 0 seconds! --> 13 times
> Could list partitions after 2 seconds! --> 5 times
> Could list partitions after 4 sec
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:01:33PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 04:59:18PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > I'm scanning all 7 cards I have with the script wait_device, each card
> > > with 10 iterations of the test.
> > >
> > > 1) Tra
Hi,
The notes and actions for this weeks Android Platform Team meeting along
with team activity reports are now available at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/Meetings/2011-03-09
= Actions Recorded =
* jserv-- to produce a Blueprint at
http://launchpad.net/linaro-android to ca
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 04:59:18PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > I'm scanning all 7 cards I have with the script wait_device, each card
> > with 10 iterations of the test.
> >
> > 1) Transend 4GB SD
> > 2) SanDisk 2GB SD
> > 3) KingMax MMC Mobile 2GB
> >
>
Hello Guilherme,
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:53:00AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > I'm recently trying to install alpha-3 image using l-m-c on an AMD64
> > machine which is behind the company firewall. Though I have apt proxy
> > set on host machine, l-m-c
Signed-off-by: Johan Mossberg
---
arch/arm/mach-ux500/Makefile |2 +-
arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500.c |1 +
arch/arm/mach-ux500/dcache.c | 266
arch/arm/mach-ux500/devices.c | 31
arch/arm/mach-ux500/
Add hardware memory driver, part 1.
The main purpose of hwmem is:
* To allocate buffers suitable for use with hardware. Currently
this means contiguous buffers.
* To synchronize the caches for the allocated buffers. This is
achieved by keeping track of when the CPU uses a buffer and when
other ha
Add hardware memory driver, part 2.
The main purpose of hwmem is:
* To allocate buffers suitable for use with hardware. Currently
this means contiguous buffers.
* To synchronize the caches for the allocated buffers. This is
achieved by keeping track of when the CPU uses a buffer and when
other ha
Hello everyone,
The following patchset implements a "hardware memory driver". The
main purpose of hwmem is:
* To allocate buffers suitable for use with hardware. Currently
this means contiguous buffers.
* To synchronize the caches for the allocated buffers. This is
achieved by keeping track of w
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Jason Hui wrote:
> I will resend the whole patchset and use Linaro copyright and sign
> off. Thanks for it.
Awesome, thanks!
(And sorry that I can't provide any technical feedback on the patches,
but it is certainly nice to see imx51 + DT booting with enough devices
in
Hi, Loic,
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Jason Hui wrote:
>> + * Copyright 2011 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
>
> Copyright 2011 Linaro Ltd.
I will resend the whole patchset and use Linaro copyright and sign
off. Thanks for it.
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> The upstream master branch of U-Boot on git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git
> has the bug too.
Yes, this is where I was pasting the bogus code from; I just have no
idea why write() would suddenly become partial ones, but I didn't check
the eglibc or linux cod
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> I just added this one, and it does not help. The l-m-c still fails at
>> the last step.
>> mkimage: Write error on /tmp/tmpUiR_m1/boot-disc/uImage: Success
>
> This error sounded a bit weird; I checked
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Jason Hui wrote:
> + * Copyright 2011 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2011 Linaro Ltd.
--
Loïc Minier
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listin
On 03/09/2011 09:04 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
I take it this magic of SMP or not is hidden in this config layering scheme
you mentioned and it isn't really using the same config for say igep0020 and
No, it is in the black depths of ARM assembly and TBH, it is voodoo to
me.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>> Since the Linaro config polciy is not unified at this point
>> (in other words, each board has totally different set of generic
>> policy options configured). I added the per target differences
>> into the board kconfig fragments.
>
> No, i
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Andy Green wrote:
> On 03/09/2011 08:51 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>
> Hi -
>
>>> Panda is OMAP4 and the other two are OMAP3 AIUI, I am aware they are all
>>> under "OMAP2+" in the kernel, but there are really significant
>>> differences
>>> fro
On 03/09/2011 08:51 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
Panda is OMAP4 and the other two are OMAP3 AIUI, I am aware they are all
under "OMAP2+" in the kernel, but there are really significant differences
from configuration point of view like SMP or not.
How is that handled with
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Andy Green wrote:
> On 03/09/2011 08:17 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>
> Hi -
>
>>> 5) The igep, overo, and panda configs all use the same omap3
>>> config according to the hwpacks. I'm not sure I believe that,
>>> but went along with it to get th
On Wednesday 09 March 2011 03:32:40 John Stultz wrote:
> +
> +
> +source "Kconfig.distro"
> +
I think we want something more flexible than sourcing
a global Kconfig.distro from the board file.
First of all, we want at least three levels, as Amit
mentioned: distro, arch, board. I can think of at l
On Wednesday 09 March 2011 03:32:35 John Stultz wrote:
> In looking at trying to replace defconfigs with kconfig fragments,
> one limitation identified is that config items in choice blocks
> cannot be selected by other config options.
>
> One way to doge this would be to create non-visible meta o
On 03/09/2011 08:17 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
5) The igep, overo, and panda configs all use the same omap3
config according to the hwpacks. I'm not sure I believe that,
but went along with it to get this out the door.
They do use the same config - or 'flavour' as the
cc'ing Ubuntu kernel team.
We use their config system today and this might be of interest to them
for the future.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:32 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> This patch set provides enough to demo how the Kconfig fragment
> based defconfigs could be used to simplify both generating and
63 matches
Mail list logo
