On 09/03/11 02:44, Barry Song wrote:
> Thanks. Amit.
>
> 2011/3/8 Amit Kucheria :
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Barry Song <21cn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Lee,
>>> Great! Thanks a lot. It looks like the communication between linaro
>>> and mainline is that linaro can backport some bug fixes
Add linaro-build.sh to support linaro android toolchain.
--prefix= Specify where to install (default:
/tmp/android-toolchain-eabi)
--toolchain-src=Specify Android toolchain source dir (default:
/../)
--with-gcc= Specify GCC source (support: directory, bzr, url)
--apply-gcc-pat
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Barry Song <21cn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks. Amit.
>
> 2011/3/8 Amit Kucheria :
>> Linaro doesn't want to maintain dead code that isn't going upstream.
>> It won't even do it for member companies. At most it is the incubator
>> where the code lives and gets wid
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
---
drivers/net/fec.c | 13 +
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/fec.c b/drivers/net/fec.c
index 02cdd71..fcb9768 100644
--- a/drivers/net/fec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/fec.c
@@ -45,6 +45,9 @@
#include
#include
+#incl
The id_entry will possibly be NULL, So, need check
id_entry and make sure it not NULL before using it.
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
---
drivers/net/fec.c | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/fec.c b/drivers/net/fec.c
index 2a71373..02cdd71 1
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr
---
drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 79 --
1 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
index dfcf4b1..c9483d1 100644
--- a/drivers
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
---
arch/arm/mach-mx5/Kconfig |8
arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile |1 +
arch/arm/mach-mx5/board-dt.c| 64 +++
arch/arm/mach-mx5/clock-mx51-mx53.c | 43 -
arch/arm/plat-m
From: Jason Liu
This patchset adds Freescale i.mx51 device tree support.
This is based on
git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 devicetree/test
This patch has been tested on MX51 babbage board and can
boot up succesfully to linux console with DT enabled.
Grant, I think it's almost ready for you
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
Singed-off-by: Rob Herring
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts | 110 +
1 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/babbage.dts
new file mode 100644
index 00
tl;dr version: see https://android-build.linaro.org/mockup/index, click
around. Don't expect to be able to do much unless you're in
~linaro-android-builders
Hi all,
The frontend to the build service that I've been working on for the last
couple of weeks is -- to my understanding -- now feature
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, John Stultz wrote:
> This patch set provides enough to demo how the Kconfig fragment
> based defconfigs could be used to simplify both generating and
> managing the configs used to build Linaro kernels.
This is awesome, thanks!
> 5) The igep, overo, and panda configs all us
Thanks. Amit.
2011/3/8 Amit Kucheria :
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Barry Song <21cn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Lee,
>> Great! Thanks a lot. It looks like the communication between linaro
>> and mainline is that linaro can backport some bug fixes and features
>> from mainline to linaro tree.
Once we have settled on a proper common Linaro config policy,
this should be able to go away.
CC: Jason Hui
CC: patc...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: John Stultz
---
arch/arm/configs/Kconfig.omap3 | 2299 +++-
1 files changed, 2294 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Here's the initial pass of the Linaro config policy for
Kconfig.distro
CC: Jason Hui
CC: patc...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: John Stultz
---
Kconfig.distro | 1734
1 files changed, 1734 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Kconfig.di
CC: Jason Hui
CC: patc...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: John Stultz
---
arch/arm/configs/Kconfig.vexp | 39 +++
1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/configs/Kconfig.vexp
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/Kconfig.vexp b/arch
From: Stephen Rothwell
After this change, doing a "make xxx_defconfig" will check first for
a file called arch//configs/Kconfig.xxx and use that to generate
the .config (effectively starting from an allnoconfig). If that file
doesn't exist, it will use arch//configs/xxx_defconfig as now.
CC: Gr
This patch set provides enough to demo how the Kconfig fragment
based defconfigs could be used to simplify both generating and
managing the configs used to build Linaro kernels.
This is for the kernel config managment tool and dependent bluprints:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linux-linaro/+spe
Once we have settled on a proper common Linaro config policy,
this should be able to go away.
CC: Jason Hui
CC: patc...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: John Stultz
---
arch/arm/configs/Kconfig.imx51 | 423 +++-
1 files changed, 421 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
d
Once we have settled on a proper common Linaro config policy,
this should be able to go away.
CC: Jason Hui
CC: patc...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: John Stultz
---
arch/arm/configs/Kconfig.vexp | 195 +
1 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
d
CC: Jason Hui
CC: patc...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: John Stultz
---
arch/arm/configs/Kconfig.omap3 | 141
1 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/configs/Kconfig.omap3
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/Kconfig.omap3 b
In looking at trying to replace defconfigs with kconfig fragments,
one limitation identified is that config items in choice blocks
cannot be selected by other config options.
One way to doge this would be to create non-visible meta options
that change the choice block's default, but that would req
Here is the intial Kconfig.distro fragment file
CC: Jason Hui
CC: patc...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: John Stultz
---
Kconfig.distro | 20
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Kconfig.distro
diff --git a/Kconfig.distro b/Kconfig.distro
new
CC: Jason Hui
CC: patc...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: John Stultz
---
arch/arm/configs/Kconfig.imx51 | 84
1 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/configs/Kconfig.imx51
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/Kconfig.imx51 b/
Instead of using all no as the starting point for the defconfig
use the kconfig defaults.
CC: Grant Likely
CC: Stephen Rothwell
CC: linux-kbu...@vger.kernel.org,
CC: Jason Hui
CC: patc...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: John Stultz
---
scripts/kconfig/Makefile |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertio
Sort of a hack.
With the new kconfig framents, some config items may be defined
in a different order then usual. To preserve the normal order,
re-run sildentoldconfig after running defconfig.
CC: Jason Hui
CC: patc...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: John Stultz
---
scripts/kconfig/Makefile |2 ++
Hi LAurent,
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 16:52 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Andy,
[snip]
> > > It really shouldn't be that hard to get everyone involved together and
> > > settle on a single solution (either based on an existing proposal or
> > > create a 'the best of' vendor-neutral solution).
Hi Hans,
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 18:23 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >
> > "Single" might be making the problem impossibly hard to solve well.
> > One-size-fits-all solutions have a tendency to fall short on meeting
> > someone's critical requirement. I will agree that "less than n", for
> > some
Hi Andy,
On Tuesday 08 March 2011 20:12:45 Andy Walls wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 16:52 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > > It really shouldn't be that hard to get everyone involved together
> > > > and settle on a single solution (either based on an existing
> > > > proposal
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 09:13:59 +0100
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> All these memory-related modules have the same purpose: make it possible to
> allocate/reserve large amounts of memory and share it between different
> subsystems (primarily framebuffer, GPU and V4L).
>
> It really shouldn't be that hard to
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Zygmunt Krynickiu wrote:
> I'd like to define and document the recommended best practice of packaging
> Django 1.0+ (and especially 1.3) web applications and projects for Debian. I
> started this on the Debian wiki at
> http://wiki.debian.org/DjangoPackagingDraft
On Tuesday, March 08, 2011 15:01:10 Andy Walls wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 09:13 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We had a discussion yesterday regarding ways in which linaro can assist
> > V4L2 development. One topic was that of sorting out memory providers like
> > GEM and HWMEM
W dniu 08.03.2011 18:10, Paul Wise pisze:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Zygmunt Krynickiu wrote:
I'd like to define and document the recommended best practice of packaging
Django 1.0+ (and especially 1.3) web applications and projects for Debian. I
started this on the Debian wiki at
http://w
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> $ apt-cache policy uboot-mkimage
> uboot-mkimage:
> Installed: 0.4build1
> Candidate: 0.4build1
> Version table:
> *** 0.4build1 0
> 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main amd64 Packages
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
Ok;
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 05:39:27PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > I just added this one, and it does not help. The l-m-c still fails at
> > the last step.
> > mkimage: Write error on /tmp/tmpUiR_m1/boot-disc/uImage: Success
>
> This error sounded a bit wei
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 04:59:18PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > I'm scanning all 7 cards I have with the script wait_device, each card
> > with 10 iterations of the test.
> >
> > 1) Transend 4GB SD
> > 2) SanDisk 2GB SD
> > 3) KingMax MMC Mobile 2GB
> >
>
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:44:36PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On 8 March 2011 18:52, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> >> Have a look at the /dev/sdb change in device report before and after
> >> the command you suggest ...
> >
> > Interesting :-)
> >
> > But the lin
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I just added this one, and it does not help. The l-m-c still fails at
> the last step.
> mkimage: Write error on /tmp/tmpUiR_m1/boot-disc/uImage: Success
This error sounded a bit weird; I checked the u-boot sources, and this
string is used in a bunch of
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 04:03:12PM +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> W dniu 08.03.2011 15:48, Shawn Guo pisze:
> >On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 03:16:32PM +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> >>W dniu 08.03.2011 09:51, Shawn Guo pisze:
> >>
> >>>By looking the workaround on the hacking branch, I changed the s
Hi Andy,
On Tuesday 08 March 2011 15:01:10 Andy Walls wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 09:13 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We had a discussion yesterday regarding ways in which linaro can assist
> > V4L2 development. One topic was that of sorting out memory providers like
> > GEM a
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I'm scanning all 7 cards I have with the script wait_device, each card
> with 10 iterations of the test.
>
> 1) Transend 4GB SD
> 2) SanDisk 2GB SD
> 3) KingMax MMC Mobile 2GB
>
> All above 3 cards passed the test with giving "Could list partitions
> after
Hi all,
Here's what I've cobbled together tentatively from prior threads involving
linaro-dev as well as folks from ARM, Samsung and ST-E:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/Projects/UnifiedMemoryManagement
The current goals within the graphics working group are to map the
On 8 March 2011 18:52, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> Have a look at the /dev/sdb change in device report before and after
>> the command you suggest ...
>
> Interesting :-)
>
> But the linaro-media-create "size" output is probably broken for the
> same reason: s
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 09:13 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We had a discussion yesterday regarding ways in which linaro can assist
> V4L2 development. One topic was that of sorting out memory providers like
> GEM and HWMEM.
>
> Today I learned of yet another one: UMP from ARM.
>
> http
Then this sounds to me a bit like like GEM.. (or maybe I should say DRM and
either TTM/GEM below)? If you can pass buffers back and forth between
kernel and various processes by integer id, and then optionally
read/write/mmap thru some ioctls if needed.. then the buffer sharing problem
is solved.
W dniu 08.03.2011 15:48, Shawn Guo pisze:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 03:16:32PM +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
W dniu 08.03.2011 09:51, Shawn Guo pisze:
By looking the workaround on the hacking branch, I changed the sleep(1)
to sleep(5) in /usr/share/pyshared/linaro_media_create/partitions.py,
an
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 03:16:32PM +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> W dniu 08.03.2011 09:51, Shawn Guo pisze:
>
> >By looking the workaround on the hacking branch, I changed the sleep(1)
> >to sleep(5) in /usr/share/pyshared/linaro_media_create/partitions.py,
> >and almost made it, but sadly it st
W dniu 08.03.2011 09:51, Shawn Guo pisze:
By looking the workaround on the hacking branch, I changed the sleep(1)
to sleep(5) in /usr/share/pyshared/linaro_media_create/partitions.py,
and almost made it, but sadly it still fails at the last step.
You most likely missed another sleep (there sho
Hi.
This is my first post to this mailing list, and in fact to any Debian
mailing list in general so I'd like to introduce myself first. To keep
Your interest focused on the problem I moved this to the footer of this
message. With that of the way here's the core topic:
I'd like to define and
Hi,
hwmem basically use the same concept of handle (or SecureID).
The problem with this approach is that the middleware must be aware of this
handle and must provide a way to forward it between elements/component and
upper level. Today isn't the case in GStreamer (maybe in 1.0 it will), EGL,
X ..
Thanks for interesting.
As I know, the purpose of UMP is the buffer sharing especially inter-process
.
Maybe ARM can explain it more detail.
High resolution video/image processing requires zero-copy operation.
UMP allows zero-copy operation using system unique key, named SecureID.
UMP supports m
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> That's not an option for me. Myself is on ssh terminal. I do not
> have a nice monitor for that machine :)
Ok; I could propose various network tricks such as changing the routing
table to mark your APT repo unreachable, but I guess we really have to
fi
Dear Jonghun,
It's also helpful to explain what's the original purpose of UMP (for
GPU, MALI) and what's the goal of UMP usage for multimedia stack.
Especially, what's the final goal of UMP from LSI.
Also consider the previous GPU memory management program, e.g., SGX.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
O
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:53:08AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > Yes, it is. Do we have a quick fix right now? I need it ...
>
> As a workaround, try disabling your (host's) network entirely before
> running linaro-media-create; I could run it completel
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Yes, it is. Do we have a quick fix right now? I need it ...
As a workaround, try disabling your (host's) network entirely before
running linaro-media-create; I could run it completely networkless, but
I think your proxy is confusing APT.
--
Loïc Mini
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Have a look at the /dev/sdb change in device report before and after
> the command you suggest ...
Interesting :-)
But the linaro-media-create "size" output is probably broken for the
same reason: sdb appears to be unavailable for some time after changi
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:04:08AM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> >> I'm recently trying to install alpha-3 image using l-m-c on an AMD64
> >> machine which is behind the company firewall. Though I ha
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:53:00AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > I'm recently trying to install alpha-3 image using l-m-c on an AMD64
> > machine which is behind the company firewall. Though I have apt proxy
> > set on host machine, l-m-c installing system
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:23:17AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > parted -s /dev/sdN mklabel msdos && sfdisk -L /dev/sdN
> >
> > $ sudo parted -s /dev/sdb mklabel msdos && sfdisk -L /dev/sdb
> > /dev/sdb: Permission denied
> >
> > sfdisk: cannot open
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> I'm recently trying to install alpha-3 image using l-m-c on an AMD64
>> machine which is behind the company firewall. Though I have apt proxy
>> set on host machine, l-m-c installing system (chroot env
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> Looking at the packaging branch lp:ubuntu/linaro-image-tools, I see
> there are now multiple binary packages generated from
> linaro-image-tools.
>
> The udisks dependency needs to be added somewhere -- does anyone know
> which package needs it? I'm gues
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I'm recently trying to install alpha-3 image using l-m-c on an AMD64
> machine which is behind the company firewall. Though I have apt proxy
> set on host machine, l-m-c installing system (chroot env?) does not
> know it. Can we improve the l-m-c a little
Hi all,
We had a discussion yesterday regarding ways in which linaro can assist
V4L2 development. One topic was that of sorting out memory providers like
GEM and HWMEM.
Today I learned of yet another one: UMP from ARM.
http://blogs.arm.com/multimedia/249-making-the-mali-gpu-device-driver-open-so
Looking at the packaging branch lp:ubuntu/linaro-image-tools, I see
there are now multiple binary packages generated from
linaro-image-tools.
The udisks dependency needs to be added somewhere -- does anyone know
which package needs it? I'm guessing it's either linaro-image-tools
or python-linaro-
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> mkimage: Write error on /tmp/tmpXkyS2N/boot-disc/uImage: Success
Could it be that your MMC is flaky?
--
Loïc Minier
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listi
On 8 March 2011 17:19, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I'm recently trying to install alpha-3 image using l-m-c on an AMD64
> machine which is behind the company firewall. Though I have apt proxy
> set on host machine, l-m-c installing system (chroot env?) does not
> know it. Can we improve the l-m-c a litt
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > parted -s /dev/sdN mklabel msdos && sfdisk -L /dev/sdN
>
> $ sudo parted -s /dev/sdb mklabel msdos && sfdisk -L /dev/sdb
> /dev/sdb: Permission denied
>
> sfdisk: cannot open /dev/sdb read-write
you want to sudo the sfdisk call too
--
Loïc Minier
I'm recently trying to install alpha-3 image using l-m-c on an AMD64
machine which is behind the company firewall. Though I have apt proxy
set on host machine, l-m-c installing system (chroot env?) does not
know it. Can we improve the l-m-c a little bit to copy apt proxy
setting if any on host ma
Hi all,
on March 7th MM WG has organize a v4l2 meeting to collect ideas for next
development cycle.
you can found the minutes of meeting here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Multimedia/2011-03-07-V4L2_meeting
mains outcomes:
- investigate/improve the library between v4l2 and An
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 03:10:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Hi Zygmunt,
>
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 02:19:41PM +0100, Zygmunt Bazyli Krynicki wrote:
> > This will most lokalu not help.
> > Try my hacking branch of linaro-image-tools. I had the same problem as you
> > and I added a workaround.
>
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Barry Song <21cn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Lee,
> Great! Thanks a lot. It looks like the communication between linaro
> and mainline is that linaro can backport some bug fixes and features
> from mainline to linaro tree. Linaro doesn't help to review patches
> and s
Hi Lee,
Great! Thanks a lot. It looks like the communication between linaro
and mainline is that linaro can backport some bug fixes and features
from mainline to linaro tree. Linaro doesn't help to review patches
and send to mainline.
Then I have two more questions
1. is there a detailed list of ba
71 matches
Mail list logo
