We've got a few little helper programs that are used in the Toolchain
WG to help things run smoothly. I've done a short write up on them
here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Helpers
Ulrich, this is the build system I mentioned on the call.
Scott/James/Mounir, it's not great, but
On 09/21/2010 12:52 PM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
[snip]
> Welcome on. We discussed OpenOCD at the last TSC meeting we had, and
> we have discovered that we don't have a very firm grasp of the gaps in
> OpenOCD for v7 hardware at the moment. So let me ask a few basic
> questions and see if
2010/9/21 Jason Andrews :
>>On 21 September 2010 20:23, Jason Andrews wrote:
>>> I pulled the source from your PPA and compiled it. I booted linaro-m-
>>>headless-tar-20100818-0.tar.gz and it continues past the omap2-nand driver
>>>hang; thanks for the
>>>improvements.
> I ran longer and got rep
>-Original Message-
>From: Peter Maydell [mailto:peter.mayd...@linaro.org]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 2:43 PM
>To: Jason Andrews
>Cc: Loïc Minier; Guilherme Salgado; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
>Subject: Re: Error (no boot device found) running qemu image
>
>On 21 September 2010 20:
On 21 September 2010 21:11, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:53:48PM +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
>> ...are available here:
>> https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2010-09-20
> What's the issue with the OMAP3 memory map you bring up? I bet
> somebo
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:53:48PM +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
> ...are available here:
> https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2010-09-20
Heya Michael,
What's the issue with the OMAP3 memory map you bring up? I bet
somebody here can help with that.
Are you sufficiently un
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:57:47PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > There's was relationship between runtime UP detection and highmem
> > discussed in the meeting; the bigger point here is that we want to
> > ensure the kernel is stellar at supporting our architectural baseline:
> > platforms tha
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:57:35PM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:35:52AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > I still have two questions about stuff that came up here:
> > >
> > > * SD/MMC performance: Is this about device access, file systems or both?
> > >
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:39:15AM -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
> Specifically, I will be adding new support for Cortex-A9 SMP, though I
> may also make a few improvements to its handling of Cortex-A8 in the
> process. If you have experience using OpenOCD in these contexts, let me
> know if you have a
On 21 September 2010 20:23, Jason Andrews wrote:
> I pulled the source from your PPA and compiled it. I booted
> linaro-m-headless-tar-20100818-0.tar.gz and
> it continues past the omap2-nand driver hang; thanks for the improvements.
>
> Since this is my first time trying linaro, I'm not sure wha
m in the final stages of doing a new version of qemu-maemo with
>this fix in it... I've uploaded a proposed package to my PPA (still in
>build queue) and I'm hoping to be able to upload it to the linaro-tools
>PPA once we've sorted out review/access permissions/etc (maybe
&
On 21 Sep 2010, at 19:14, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> The key item I see as missing here is UDS scheduler work; is that being
> planned at all right now?
Its being planned but Anmar is still gathering information from Jono before a
clear picture of what needs to happen can emerge.
> Christi
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 17:03 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > qemu: hardware error: no boot device found
>
> Could you share the QEMU cmdline you're using and which version of QEMU
> you're using?
>
> This error in the case of the omap3 emulation is
Hi,
notes and actions from our Monday graphics and multimedia cross-vendor
call are available on the wiki:
+ https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/UserPlatforms/2010-09-20
Details about when and where of this meeting can be found here:
+
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics#W
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:36:01AM +0100, Ian Smith wrote:
> The burndown chart is showing that number of work items has increased,
> with a number of work items completed. This is showing that the number
> of work items to complete is slipping further behind the trend line.
This is very worrisome
roposed package to my PPA (still in
build queue) and I'm hoping to be able to upload it to the linaro-tools
PPA once we've sorted out review/access permissions/etc (maybe
tomorrow? this week, at any rate, I hope).
If you don't want to wait for that you could try pulling the sources
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> It looks like https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/qemu-maemo/+bug/628471
>
> And that's currently making it impossible for me to test my changes to
> l-m-c as my board hasn't arrived, so I was wondering if there's any way
> to work around it.
Well, th
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> It would be great to see more MX51 things on ALKML (and devicetree
> things on devtree-discuss). Up to now I have the impression that there
> is still much work done behind closed doors, which is bad if we want to
> have better mainline support for i.M
On 09/21/2010 11:02 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:15:17AM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:19:49AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> o Jason Hui: iMX51 work on device trees. Need assignment.
>>> Reviewed BSP review
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:15:17AM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:19:49AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > o Jason Hui: iMX51 work on device trees. Need assignment.
> > Reviewed BSP review, need to send results to Loïc et al.
>
> It would be gre
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:35:52AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > I still have two questions about stuff that came up here:
> >
> > * SD/MMC performance: Is this about device access, file systems or both?
> > I think the file system level stuff is actually the more important
> > part but I
On 21 Sep 2010, at 14:54, Dave Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Jamie Bennett
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Tagging bugs is not only good practice but makes tracking and sorting so
>> much easier. With
>
> Maybe we could also pull out some metrics, such as numbers of bug with
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Jamie Bennett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tagging bugs is not only good practice but makes tracking and sorting so much
> easier. With
Maybe we could also pull out some metrics, such as numbers of bug with
each tag, and age/severity distribution etc.? Would that be ea
Hi,
Tagging bugs is not only good practice but makes tracking and sorting so much
easier. With
this in mind I came up with a list of tags that can be consulted when reporting
bugs. Please
take a look at:
http://wiki.linaro.org/Process/Bugs/Tags
Ubuntu bug tags [1] also still apply, the Li
24 matches
Mail list logo
