-beat bar) in the relevant
voice. Can't work out how to do that one.
Best regards,
Peter
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
www.ptoye.com
-
Sunday, October 20, 2013, 6:42:22 PM, you wrote:
I'm using the same as Mark but with back slash.
c \[ a b e d \]
It's actua
Kieren,
I was in the process of preparing one!
\version "2.16.2"
\language "english"
sopranoVoice = \relative c'' {
\key c \major
\numericTimeSignature
\time 3/2
{ \[ d2 ef \] \[ f | g \] \[ f1 \]}
}
\score {
\new Staff { \sopranoVoice }
}
The last ligature isn&#x
I found it necessary to replace
(ly:stencil-aligned-to (grob-interpret-markup grob $text) X
CENTER))
by
(ly:stencil-aligned-to (grob-interpret-markup grob text) X
CENTER))
Using 2.17.26
regards
Peter Gentry
reports the
error 62097
The music file Hairpintest.ly c:\Users\Peter\LilyPool\Examples\Hairpintest.ly
\version "2.17.26"
\include "HairpinText.ly"
hairpinMolto =
\hairpinWithCenteredText \markup { \italic molto }
hairpinMore =
\hairpinWithCenteredText \markup { \larger m
I should have mentioned that if the scheme code is included explicitly before
the music code then it compiles correctly in
Frecobaldi.
>-Original Message-
>From: Peter Gentry [mailto:peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk]
>Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 2:53 PM
>To: 'lily
The problem was caused by the filename Hairpintext.ly works HairpinText.ly does
not. It appears to be converted inside Frescobaldi
to Hairpin Text.ly and the program loops as it cannot find this file.
regards
Peter Gentry
___
lilypond-user mailing
he slash!??
Personally I think using grace notes gives the performer a certain
amount of freedom, so I don't see the need for really sharp definitions.
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
There is always more than one way to skin the cat I use something like
The file mozza4.eps is a graphic use a batch file
for %%F in (*.png) do sam2p.exe %%F %%~nF.eps
for %%F in (*.jpg) do sam2p.exe %%F %%~nF.eps
To convert to eps
I forget where I found sam2p.exe but it should be in the Lilyp
happens.
Best regards,
Peter
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
www.ptoye.com
-
Sunday, October 20, 2013, 7:32:59 PM, you wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> All three print fine here (2.17).
> Maybe try this with 2.16 (which I don't have):
> \version "2.16.2&
Kieren,
To continue...
My tiny examples print OK in 2.17. But my original file doesn't. So it needs
more exploration, which I don't have time for at the moment. WIll try later.
Best regards,
Peter
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
www.ptoye.com
-
Sunday, October 2
'''8[ r] |
}
{
\override Beam.positions = #'(0 . 0)
a8[ r] e8[ r] a,8[ r] a'''8[ r] |
}
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
e from the installation
files takes precedence.
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/including-lilypond-files
I run into the later issue earlier this week...
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lis
On 11/01/2013 08:52 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Only by analogy. LilyPond is not at fault for _this_ one.
Ok, I see. Always fun with a little game! :-)
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman
On 11/01/2013 09:01 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
On 11/01/2013 08:52 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Only by analogy. LilyPond is not at fault for _this_ one.
Ok, I see. Always fun with a little game! :-)
I guess it must be related to the creation of the postscript...(?)
Best
Peter
On 11/01/2013 09:32 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
No, the PostScript is still fine. But when you ask Ghostscript to
convert it to anything else, it has its own idea what to convert.
Ok!
At first I thought it was an easter egg, but so close to Halloween it
must be a bug!
Best
Peter
As the proposal is already made we just have to wait and see what happens.
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
lpful for the
community if we found ways to deal with questions posted outside of this
list!?
If everybody waits and sees, I am not afraid for this list...
Yes, you are right! It would of course take an effort for those who
would like to see a LilyPond Stack Exchange page!
Best
d stuff to the mailing list, or to
direct users to the list, this is fully OK.
Yes, I meant any solution rather than ignoring those questions...
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
://post.gmane.org/post.php?group=gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
/2
\[ c1 \] \[ f2~ | f \] \[ c' b \] |
\[ c2 b \] \[ a~ | a\] \[ g1 \]
}
>>
>>
}
Best regards,
Peter
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
www.ptoye.com
-
Thursday, October 31, 2013, 11:21:10 AM, you wrote:
Kieren,
To continue...
My tiny examples print OK in 2
u could make an image of the result you're after I think it
would be helpful (due to memory limitations: make sure the image file is
relatively small or post a link).
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://l
f
}
}
\score {
<<
\new ref \refUp
\new Staff <<
\new Voice {\voiceOne \voicei }
\new Voice {\voiceTwo \voiceii }
>>
\new ref \refDwn
>>
}
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
a scan. Hope it's readable.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B627QNBiKcXpZWd0WjJvZUFhNUk/edit?usp=sharing
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 11/08/2013 08:03 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Hi Peter!
Thanks a lot for the scan. I would say that even though she doesn't
condemns
her example a), she still considers b) as bad and c) as the best
compromise.
My corrections above are all similar to her example c)
I interpret h
On 11/08/2013 08:46 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Hi Peter,
I will ask him about this, and I will also check some other scores of mine
to see if I find these kind of beams.
And if it would not be asking you too much, do you know if Gould says
something on her book about the distance between
of the score?
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
As may be implied I would prefer the second alternative. But as before
I'll accept the policy agreed upon here!
I would also like to say that I otherwise support Janeks view that we
should have our own Stack Exchange site in the future but the time has
not come for this just ye
on fontsize or anything.
On 11/09/2013 03:52 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Thanks for this one more scan, Peter.
So have a look on how that compares to LilyPond:
spacing.ly <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n153581/spacing.ly>
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/
On 11/09/2013 05:09 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
But that is exactly what I did, I turned the staff 90 degrees to create that
ruler.
Yes, I thought so too (good job interpreting Gould just from the
image!). But it wasn't completely clear and I wanted to clarify anyway!
Best
On 11/10/2013 01:39 AM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
And Peter, if I may bother you a bit more, could you also have a look on this
message I posted some days ago if you have the time?
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Bar-numbers-position-td153274.html
It also concerns notation standards
ld be very glad to hear what you [Peter] and Ms. Gould think about
it (I really need to buy this book as soon as possible!).
There's no scan this time. What she writes is this:
Place bar numbers at the beginning of each system, ideally above the
clef of the top stave.
Naturally she wouldn
On 11/11/2013 09:28 AM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
What she writes is this:
Place bar numbers at the beginning of each system, ideally above the
clef of the top stave.
The above quote is from p. 484 by the way...
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user
= ##f
cis'' }
Here the accidental could be mistakenly taken for a part of the key
signature if it's too close. (The example appears fine to me when I
compile it, but I would like to mention it anyway.)
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user
Score), then I would
have easier to work with the latest version!?
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
ink it would be interesting. I seemed to me that the
confusion I mentioned as a possible problem was quite far-fetched in the
actual result. (I can post the scan from Gould on this if you like!?)
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-use
On 11/11/2013 05:35 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Peter Bjuhr writes:
I would like to volunteer for this, because it sounds important. But I
only have Finale 2011. I used to upgrade to every other Finale
version. But after I moved to LilyPond I have had no plans of
upgrading!
Sounds like "
thers upon the children unto the third and fourth/generation/of them
that hate me
Ah, thanks! You should expand this into The Ten Commandments of
LilyPond! :-)
(Hope no one takes offense by this and by my failure to recognize the
reference!)
nd here when the risk
is apparent it is 1.5. If this is the case and not just random
coincidence I would completely drop this from the list of potential
problems. What do you think Gilberto?
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-us
On 11/11/2013 05:52 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Peter Bjuhr writes:
Sounds like "for I the LilyPond thy typesetter am a jealous typesetter,
visiting the misalignment of the glyphs upon the page unto the third and
fourth printing".
Sorry David, I don't get this!???
Or like "
encouragement than an actual
suggestion!
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
in
her promise that musicians will give a better performance, we still have
a lot of decisions to make that Gould doesn't settle for us because it
isn't her job. But every publishing house can have their own standards
and set of rules expanding on the common standard fo
On 11/11/2013 07:21 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Peter Bjuhr wrote
Based on these two examples, it would indeed seem that LilyPond is
intelligent enough to adjust for this potential problem; in the first
example where there were no risk of mistakenly take the accidental for a
part of the key
culties in
using lilypond and that they prefer with a gui.
All the best
Stefan
Hi Thomas,
the way to go would be MusicXML export.
While this wish has popped up every now and then for years, Peter
Bjuhr has just started to give it an actual try. We don't know how far
this will get, but it wil
On 11/13/2013 12:00 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
On 11/12/2013 09:40 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
the way to go would be MusicXML export.
While this wish has popped up every now and then for years, Peter
Bjuhr has just started to give it an actual try. We don't know how
far this will get, but it wi
not, any ideas as to where to start with such a function? I suppose
I just need to get the positions of the two noteheads and draw a thick
line in between.
Have you seen this?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-10/msg00555.html
Best
Peter
t;Format were used).
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
uld still be a workaround instead of a real
fix.
Agreed, as also Urs pointed out.
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
ecial case, but
all alignments would work with this.
It keeps me wondering, though, why it does not work on a MultiMeasureRest.
Is that intentional?
--
Peter Crighton | Musician & Music Engraver based in Mainz/Wiesbaden, Germany
http://www.petercrighton.de
__
Maybe
there's something you find interesting and consider motivating individual
contributors ...
Regarding donations to the Frescobaldi project and also to LilyPond
maybe this site could be interesting: https://www.gittip.com/
Best
Peter
ld
be invaluable to the beginner.
These should be as free as possible of "tweaks" as these will confuse and
de-motivate the uninitiated.
As much as is possible instructions should be intuitive - you cannot really say
that for most Lily tweaks though.
regards
Peter Gentry
___
esible.
These are not meant to be critical comments just the observations of a convert
with modest skills.
regards
Peter Gentry
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:30:19 +0100
>From: Janek Warcho?
>
>I'm very sorry that i don't have time to look closely at LaLily, but
>from what i see, it's very interesting and a move in the right
>direction. Probably OrchestralLily
>(http://kainhofer.com/orchestrallily/Motivation.html#Motivation)
ttract some new
people both to LilyPond itself and to its funding. (But it seems that
it's more convenient to withdraw the money if you have an US bank account.)
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Actually I always thought WordStar was better than WordPerfect and still yearn
for Dos and Basic. Progress is a wonderful thing,
things just get more complex
regards
Peter Gentry
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https
manually remove the second line? I need this in a
songbook I’m working on right now (close to the deadline) and only want to
unfold my percent repeats if nothing else is possible.
It does work correctly with both \repeat volta & \repeat unfold, by the way.
--
Peter Crighton | Musician &
me like being a bug.
--
Peter Crighton | Musician & Music Engraver based in Mainz/Wiesbaden, Germany
http://www.petercrighton.de
2013/11/28 Kieren MacMillan
> Hi Peter,
>
> > why is it not possible to horizontal align markups attached to a
> MultiMeasureRest in the posi
Good question. I think I may have just mixed those two up …
--
Peter Crighton | Musician & Music Engraver based in Mainz/Wiesbaden, Germany
http://www.petercrighton.de
2013/12/18 David Kastrup
> Peter Crighton writes:
>
> > Hello List,
> >
> > why is it not
.18.0"
\relative {\time 4/4 d' e f g}
% gives VERY strange musicxml export result. Try it: export as
musicxml, % import the result, and you will see what I mean
Yes, the export is behind on this and some other 2.18 syntax (e g
\tuplet). I'll try to update this soon!
Best
Peter
ike to express that all usage report and feedback is inspiring
for further development, thanks!
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
w Staff \with { printPartCombineTexts = ##f }
{ \partcombine \vOne \vTwo }
}
But this solution isn't available if more than two voices are used!?
My main question is what are your experiences in handling these kind of
musical structures? But really any thoughts on this are welcome!
Be
I don't think this is recommendable as a general principle. But If you
have an existing score and no convenient method of generating the empty
global variable, this is still much simpler than putting the information
in all the parts.
Best
Peter
___
On 01/15/2014 04:54 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Peter Bjuhr writes:
I've started using global variables more recently but can highly
recommend it!
Just don't let any programmers hear that.
David, I'm sorry; I must again ask you what you mean? Is this a joke I'm
missi
On 01/15/2014 05:15 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
On 01/15/2014 04:54 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>Peter Bjuhr writes:
>>
>>>
>>>I've started using global variables more recently but can highly
>>>recommend it!
>>Just don't let any programme
iculations in
succession, for example:
b4 -> -.
The order doesn't seem to matter!
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
be a good starting point!?
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/what-goes-into-the-midi-output_003f
Take also a closer look at The Articulate script mentioned...
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http
anything. Also, you do not have to
add chord brackets.
Maybe this could be updated?
--
Peter Crighton | Musician & Music Engraver based in Mainz/Wiesbaden, Germany
http://www.petercrighton.de
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
h
it
using your method in addition; but any other thoughts are very welcome!
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 01/16/2014 11:14 AM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
In my present case I must import the music via musicxml2ly because
it's a piece I wrote previously in Finale (which I'm now going to
finish and engrave in LilyPond).
Maybe I should clarify for those not familiar with the output of
musicx
%%%
Actually, every modification to 'Voice 'Stem in the add-grace-property works
fine, except for 'details. Am I doing something wrong here? And in case this
is relevant, I am running Windows 8 64bit.
I get "Exited with exit status 1.&
On 01/16/2014 12:30 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Peter Bjuhr wrote
>I get "Exited with exit status 1." (Ubuntu 13.10).
>Could you point me to a reference how to use this?
I don't think I understand what you meant.
I meant only that if you where using any referen
> Arpeggio travels to the left and dot disappears with \harmonic (2 items).
Thank you both kindly for your answers, very useful!
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
t;} eisis cis ges c) ais4
bis cisis
\key d \major
eis ges ces
}
_
From: David Nalesnik [mailto:david.nales...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 6:43 PM
To: Peter Gentry
Cc: lilypond-user
Subject: Re: Modified enharmonic.ly (from snippets)
Hi Peter,
yPond.
>-Original Message-
>From: Kieren MacMillan [mailto:kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 6:41 PM
>To: Peter Gentry
>Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List
>Subject: Re: Modified enharmonic.ly (from snippets)
>
>Hi Peter,
>
>>
ld need to be refined.
>-Original Message-
>From: Kieren MacMillan [mailto:kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 2:31 PM
>To: Peter Gentry
>Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List; David Nalesnik
>Subject: Re: Modified enharmonic.ly (from snippets)
>
>Hi P
Oops
The algorithm for pitch change does not give correct results for all keys. A
correction is in work!
regards
Peter Gentry
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Dear People,
Don't know if this exists, could not find it on internet, guess that if it
exists people in this group would now about it.
Would like to draw a line between the numbers of the fingeorientations, a line
from finger 1 to 1, 2 to 2, 3 to 3.
Tried to do something with \draw-line but co
Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
> Re: lilypond fingeringOrientations spanner?
>[...]
Waauw this is awesome, far beyond expectation. Thank you so much Pierre!
Humble regards, Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Marc Hohl wrote:
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general/67470
>
Thank you Marc, for other examples very useful!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
'pitch p)))
(if (ly:pitch? t)
(begin
(set! t (naturalize-pitch t 1))
(ly:music-set-property! music 'tonic t)))
music)
)
naturalizeMusic =
#(define-music-function (parser location m)
(ly:music?)
(naturalize m))
regards
Peter Gentry
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Dear all,
when writing
\new StaffGroup {
<<
\new Staff { \relative c'' { f4 d e c \bar "|."} }
\new Staff { \relative c' { c2 c4 f \bar "|." } }
>>
}
\new StaffGroup {
<<
\new Staff { \relative c' { f2. d4 | } }
\new Staff { \relative c' { f2 b4 g | } }
>>
}
each StaffGroup
uralize but don't modify the pitch before
write back
if (ly:pitch? t)
(begin
(set! t (naturalize-pitch t 1))
(ly:music-set-property! music 'tonic t)))
music)
)
naturalizeMusic =
#(define-music-function (parser location m)
(ly:music?)
(naturalize m))
regards
Peter Gentry
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> "Dan" == Dan van Ginhoven writes:
Dan> Hi! I'm writing lilypond score for six brass instruments from
Dan> old handwritten sheets. The tune I'm working with has the form:
Dan> {Intro 4 bars} {A repeat twice 32 bars} {B repeat twice 16 bars}
Dan> {A 32 bars} {Trio repeat twice 32 bars }
D
Festive feliciatations to Lily folk everywhere.
regards
Peter Gentry
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
itch p)))
; if lilypond tonic then call naturalize but don't modify the pitch before
write back
(if (ly:pitch? t)
(begin
(set! t (naturalize-pitch t 1 key-list))
(ly:music-set-property! music 'tonic t)))
music )
)
naturalizeMusic =
#(define-music-function (parser location m)
(
press function applied to
{ 32}
to squash it to the same length as the original semiquaver.
I have no idea where that 1*-1/32 comes from , but that's where the
`backwards in midi time' message originates, I think.
Peter C
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
and just as markup, but nothing seems to work.
This used to work, but it's possible that changes in Lily have made it
stop working.
Last time it worked, \tempo "rit" wasn't available, so the syntax was:
a^"rit."
or similar.
--
Dr Peter Chub
David
Join the club - many of us have struggled for many months to get to grips with
the structure and philosophy of Lilypond. Some of the
enlightened have often poured scorn on these attempts or became very defensive
of any suggestion that the documentation
(comprehensive as it is) does not gr
>Just let me repeat something I wrote a number of times here.
>If you manage to understand something with the help of this
>list that you think could be a not-so-uncommon issue for many
>please consider sharing your experience with a (little or big)
>tutorial, for which we have always "free sp
sts to reduce the feeling of
being lost in a sea of hieroglyphs.
>-Original Message-
>From: Kieren MacMillan [mailto:kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca]
>Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 9:40 PM
>To: Peter Gentry
>Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List
>Subject: Re: Understanding
eWithTag #'expand \music
\layout { }
}
\score {
\new StaffGroup \keepWithTag #'score
\removeWithTag #'trills \music
\midi{ }
}
For the test only one music file conatined the 'trills 'expand tags. Do I need
to separate the ke
>
>> >I have used the tags 'trills and 'expand to produce scores
>and midi.
>> >However although the tags work OK when the music files are compiled
>> >individually when using the score file below any music
>identified by
>> >'trills or 'expand is skipped. Am I missing a point here or is this
me as the bars above? Making a 4th invisible bar!?
Best wishes!
/Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hello!
Thanks Kieren! I'll look in to the snippet link you sent. It'll probably
require some understanding from my part. There's so many things with Lilypond
that's so difficult. Especially for me without any experience at all in the
type of workflow that Lilypond use.
B
ing to ask such a ”simple” question, but for me almost
everything with Lilypond is very hard to understand at this point.
Best wishes!
/Peter
Peter Danemo
+46-70-653 21 91
E-post: m...@danemo.com
Web: danemo.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lil
Hi Again Kevin!
Ok, thanks! I’ll give this a try once more.
Best wishes!
/Peter
Peter Danemo
+46-70-653 21 91
E-post: m...@danemo.com
Web: danemo.com
> 27 jan 2015 kl. 01:35 skrev Kevin Barry :
>
> Dear Peter,
>
> Yes the override /typically/ goes in with the notes, but yo
Hi Joram!
Thanks a lot! That looks both cleaner and easier, at least for me to
understand! Yes, I would love to have command like this! That would be really
nice.
Best wishes!
/Peter
Peter Danemo
+46-70-653 21 91
E-post: petedom...@gmail.com
Web: danemo.com
> 27 jan 2015 kl. 07:12 sk
ow it says ”ritardando” in both systems.
Very confusing and unnecessary. How do I get rid of the second ritardando?
All best!
/Peter
Peter Danemo
+46-70-653 21 91
E-post: petedom...@gmail.com
Web: danemo.com
> 27 jan 2015 kl. 07:12 skrev Noeck :
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> just to give
Hi Pierre!
Wow, Looks perfect! I’ll study how you did that and try to understand.
/P
Peter Danemo
+46-70-653 21 91
E-post: petedom...@gmail.com
Web: danemo.com
> 27 jan 2015 kl. 09:56 skrev Pierre Perol-Schneider
> :
>
>
___
l
turn @var{val} or"
" @code{'()} if @var{val} is not specified.")
HTH but don't ask me to explain it!
Peter G
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
901 - 1000 of 2310 matches
Mail list logo
