Hi List.
I would like to alter this function...
glissmove = {
\once \override Glissando #'(bound-details left Y) = #1.3
\once \override Glissando #'(bound-details right Y) = #1.3
}
to accept its 1.3 or whatever as an input parameter instead.
I see docs on parameterizing Scheme functions, b
prefer a
cyanide pill.
Pete
David Kastrup wrote:
PMA writes:
Hi List.
I would like to alter this function...
glissmove = {
\once \override Glissando #'(bound-details left Y) = #1.3
\once \override Glissando #'(bound-details right Y) = #1.3
}
to accept its 1.3 or wh
You're right, man: working dory-hunky!
I promise to upgrade *BTWN* projects.
Thanks again,
Pete
David Nalesnik wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 5:00 PM, PMA wrote:
David& David,
Thank you Both!
I'm using the one-param version, as in this score my X& Y offsets
David Kastrup wrote:
PMA writes:
David& David,
Thank you Both!
I'm using the one-param version, as in this score my X& Y offsets
always match.
But on exec -- uh oh -- Scheme is yelling:
:2:65: error: GUILE signaled an error for the expression
beginning here
\o
bobr...@centrum.is wrote:
An optimist believes that we are living in the best of all conceivable
worlds. A pessimist _knows_ it.
--
David Kastrup
NICE!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Peter,
An optimist believes that we are living in the best of all conceivable
worlds. A pessimist _knows_ it.
Yes! Got me wondering -- How might one fit
the realist in here (without loss of pithitude)?
I thought the same thing… What I came up with is this:
An
PMA wrote:
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Peter,
An optimist believes that we are living in the best of all conceivable
worlds. A pessimist _knows_ it.
Yes! Got me wondering -- How might one fit
the realist in here (without loss of pithitude)?
I thought the same thing… What I came up with is
I've had the same experience (short of realizing).
Pete
"Dr. med. Kai Lautenschläger" wrote:
Hello List,
I just want to let you know, that I continue to be _very_ thankful for all the
great ideas, patient explanations and profound help I draw from this list! The
amount of time most of you i
luis jure wrote:
on 2013-05-21 at 13:18 David Kastrup wrote:
It would seem that you associate the term "pitch" with physical
frequency.
no, it's not me, it's the standard meaning of the term as used in music
theory, psychoacoustics, musical acoustics, music cognition, and all the
disciplines
David Kastrup wrote:
It's not as much a matter of being correct, but rather of how this term
is employed within LilyPond and its documentation. LilyPond also uses
"event" in a meaning that contrary to common usage does not include
birthday celebrations.
"Event", of course, has been in common _
Andrew Bernard wrote:
Greetings All,
Since immutable as an adjective applied to an object in most programming
languages, and in normal English usage means unchanging over time, or unable to
be changed, how is it that the value of immutable objects can then be changed
with \override and \rever
Michael Gerdau wrote:
Anybody remembering APL ?
APL was my main lang. for decades,
as is now its superset/descendant, J.
I've got weary trying to tell anybody
why. But the curious might take a
peek at
http://www.jsoftware.com/
Pete
___
lilypond-
Trevor Daniels wrote:
... in the Learning Manual:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/learning/real-music-example
Should the LH upper 'D' not be an E-flat?
- PMA
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lis
PMA wrote:
Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
This thread makes me wonder: what's the average age of LilyPond users
and developers?
My average age is 75.
Better answer -- My age is 75. I've been using Lilypond for ca 5 years,
without an editor (other than VI), and entirely for original co
PMA wrote:
PMA wrote:
Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
This thread makes me wonder: what's the average age of LilyPond users
and developers?
My average age is 75.
Better answer -- My age is 75. I've been using Lilypond for ca 5 years,
without an editor (other than VI), and entirely fo
PMA wrote:
Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
This thread makes me wonder: what's the average age of LilyPond users
and developers?
My average age is 75.
Better answer -- My age is 75. I've been using Lilypond for ca 5 years,
without an editor (other than VI), and entirely for original
co
PMA wrote:
PMA wrote:
Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
This thread makes me wonder: what's the average age of LilyPond users
and developers?
My average age is 75.
Better answer -- My age is 75. I've been using Lilypond for ca 5 years,
without an editor (other than VI), and entirely fo
Hear, hear!
Ivan Kuznetsov wrote:
Do yourself a serious favor and learn vi
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Dear List:
First, thank you for Lilypond -- this wonderful tool -- and for
accepting my subscription.
I am placing noteheads, and using beams, in a way that has little to do
with common usage.
Lilypond has to a considerable extent "played along", as you'll see in
the attached example.
But
Fixed. For proof, see pudding attached.
(And I see this was hardly a new issue.)
Thanks Jay!
Pete
Original Message
Subject: Overlap Beams in Time?
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 14:53:49 -0400
From: PMA
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Dear List:
First, thank you for Lilypond -- this
Hi List.
Would it be feasible to prepend "[Lilypond]" to the forum's email
Subject line?
Much of my other mail arrives this way -- like that from "[Csnd]" and
"[LAU]".
Does wonders for auto-filing.
Pete
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user
An FYI (not, I hope, ugly/crappy or expecting the rest of the world to
change):
In my Debian-Linux Iceape email server I have now a filter looking
simply for
"lilypond" in any Subject, From, To, Cc. So-far, it's caught whatever
it should.
Thanks for all suggestions!
Kaz Kylheku wrote:
On
Is LilyPond 2.12.2-1 (for Debian "squeeze") likely to work on Debian
"Lenny"?
Alexander Kobel wrote:
On 2010-09-06 15:50, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
On 6 September 2010 15:29, Richie Gress
wrote:
I am trying to engrave music that has no meter; this is what I need
help doing:
I need to specify
as i see it, the bracket -- whether '[' or ']' - modifies the note on
it's left.
Marc Schonbrun wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering about why the decision was made in the input syntax parser to
view beaming groups as follows:
}
\relative {
c8 d [e f g a b c]
}
The above snippet beams from the
... so works more as a function than as a literal output graphic.
PMA wrote:
as i see it, the bracket -- whether '[' or ']' - modifies the note on
it's left.
Marc Schonbrun wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering about why the decision was made in the input syntax
parser
I can report that my filter looking for "lilypond" in Subject/From/To/Cc
catches everything I'd hoped it would -- except of course any replies
to me that haven't Cc:'d the List.
To that last, I'd welcome a solution, if there's one that won't enrage
everybody. If not, I can live with it.
Cheers,
Hi List.
I have a LilyPond score printing to 11X17 paper in landscape mode.
Most of the result -- with staves stretching fully across the page of
course -- is looking okay.
But one movement isn't. It's measures, nearly a half-page wide,
would to my eye be most readable if they were arranged in
And thank you all -- Nick, Ananth, David, Dmytro !
Clearly I've got some homework to do
Pete
ananth p wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions, David & Dmytro.
Have never worked with postscript. Will try that and pdflatex too.
Agreed, scripting will be useful for repeated jobs.
Perhaps we could
Hi List.
I have a LilyPond score in which an arpeggiated chord tends to be
preceded by
a rest. And too often, the arpeggio glyph overlaps its preceding rest.
How can I shift horizontally -- either the rest slightly leftwards, or
the arpeggio
glyph itself ever-so-slightly rightwards?
I trie
Oops, my "\tweak..." attempt did not include that initial '-'.
Original Message
Subject: Horizontal shift
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:35:24 -0400
From: PMA
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hi List.
I have a LilyPond score in which an arpeggiated chord tends to b
ects -- applying
either a positive value to Arpeggio, or a negative one to Rest.
Thanks and greetings back!
Pete
Vicente Solsona wrote:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 02:35:24 +0200, PMA
wrote:
Hi List.
I have a LilyPond score in which an arpeggiated chord tends to be
preceded by
a rest. And too
In a piano page chock full of bracket-style pedalling for chords at
widely different pitch levels, I've managed to align the horizontal
pedalling lines vertically, via a zillion little paragraphs like
\once \override Staff.PianoPedalBracket #'edge-height = #'(1 . 3.5)
sustainOn
...
sustainOff
Tr
a-Ha! pursuing -- thank you Keith!
Keith E OHara wrote:
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:51:11 -0700, wrote:
In a piano page chock full of bracket-style pedalling for chords at
widely different pitch levels, I've managed to align the horizontal
pedalling lines vertically, via a zillion little paragrap
Hi List.
Most of my current score's page numbers need
shifting a little, both vertically and horizontally.
Can "\override ... #'extra-offset = #'( ... . ...)"
or something similar be aimed at PageNumber
(instead of, say, DynamicText) to shift them?
I could, I know, force the issue, page-numbe
Thomas Morley wrote:
2014-02-05 PMA:
Hi List.
Most of my current score's page numbers need
shifting a little, both vertically and horizontally.
Can "\override ... #'extra-offset = #'( ... . ...)"
or something similar be aimed at PageNumber
(instead of, say, Dynam
Thomas Morley wrote:
how about:
...
#(define folio-offset '(
...
#(define-markup-command (place-folio layout props folio) (markup?)
...
\paper {
...
HTH,
Harm
Working beautifully ("TH"d).
Thanks Harm!
Pete
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-
enario changed since?
PMA
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi List.
I'm looking for a LilyPond way to specify note duration
in a Proportional Notation context using exactly _one_
stemless notehead type.
Perhaps the first option is a mid-level horizontal line
extending distance-X from the notehead. (The space
following would indicate silence.)
But I wa
Thomas Morley wrote:
2014-07-09 0:24 GMT+02:00 PMA:
Hi List.
I'm looking for a LilyPond way to specify note duration
in a Proportional Notation context using exactly _one_
stemless notehead type.
Perhaps the first option is a mid-level horizontal line
extending distance-X from the not
I've no idea, and don't see it as clearly a defect _of the list_.
Over the past few days I've had emails straggling in a day-
or-so late from _several_ forums.
Richard Shann wrote:
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 14:53 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Hello,
now there definitely seems to be something wrong
Simon Albrecht wrote:
Hello,
now there definitely seems to be something wrong with mail delivery on the list.
Agreed. I had reported similar trouble with other forums'
email, but now only LilyPond's hasn't returned to normal.
Pete
___
lilypond-use
I'm thinking this implies that convert-ly is best used
incrementally by LP version, with no intermediate
upgrading omitted. So, with original code at Ver 'A'
and my destination Ver 'E', then for best results I'd
install Versions B, C, D and run all four convert-ly's
(A->B; B->C; C->D; D->E)?
Is
David & Harm,
Thank you! I let my unresolved fuzziness on this issue
(and a memory of messy cumulative system upgrades)
keep me from attempting a 'convert-ly' _EVER_.
Now I stand -- well, sit -- corrected, and am ready to at
least _try_.
Pete
David Kastrup wrote:
PMA
Hi List.
My Debian version is Squeeze (oldstable),
with default LilyPond at version 2.12.3-7.
Has any of you successfully upgraded LP
to version 2.18.0-1 on that system?
Thanks,
Pete
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists
PMA wrote:
Thomas Morley wrote:
2014-07-09 0:24 GMT+02:00 PMA:
Hi List.
I'm looking for a LilyPond way to specify note duration
in a Proportional Notation context using exactly _one_
stemless notehead type.
Perhaps the first option is a mid-level horizontal line
extending distance-X fro
Mike Solomon wrote:
On Jul 24, 2014, at 9:08 PM, PMA wrote:
PMA wrote:
Thomas Morley wrote:
2014-07-09 0:24 GMT+02:00 PMA:
Hi List.
I'm looking for a LilyPond way to specify note duration
in a Proportional Notation context using exactly _one_
stemless notehead type.
Perhaps the
Hi List.
An *.ly of mine has four 1-system \score's on each page,
rather than one 4-system \score, because each system's
"Score.proportionalNotationDuration...make-moment..."
setting is different (and \score accepts only one such
setting).
Trouble is, the vertical space between \score's is too b
P.S. I should ask alternatively: Is there a way that
"proportionalNotationDuration...make-moment..."
can be reset _per system_ (assuming now a multi-
system \score)?
PMA wrote:
Hi List.
An *.ly of mine has four 1-system \score's on each page,
rather than one 4-system \scor
Abraham Lee wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
Hi Pete,
Trouble is, the vertical space between \score's is too big.
This was not so in the original version (2.12.3), but is
now after my upgrade to version 2.18.2.
Is it possible to reduce LP-1.18.2's default value
PMA wrote:
Abraham Lee wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
Hi Pete,
Trouble is, the vertical space between \score's is too big.
This was not so in the original version (2.12.3), but is
now after my upgrade to version 2.18.2.
Is it possible to reduce LP-1.1
guoguocuozuoduo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am working on a piece that uses reversed and inverted clefs which indicate
> retrograde and inversion.
> The reversed clef is placed at the end of a line to indicate retrograde; the
> inverted clef is placed before the main clef to indicate inversion.
>
>
Hi List.
I have a \cadenzaOn score with many notes, occasional rests,
and no barlines. I want beaming imposed for all consecutive
(flagged) notes, interruptible only by rests.
That was LP 2.12's default auto-beam behavior, but 2.18 in
this context (tho with "\set Staff.autoBeaming = ##t") only
Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
Hi Peter,
how about a tiny example ?
Cheers,
Pierre
Hi Pierre,
Ok, I'll whittle down a big one (to remove home-grown
non-culprit conditions you'd otherwise have to wonder
about) and send the still-botching Tiny.
All I want, really, is a command that says to the a
PMA wrote:
PMA wrote:
Abraham Lee wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
Hi Pete,
Trouble is, the vertical space between \score's is too big.
This was not so in the original version (2.12.3), but is
now after my upgrade to version 2.18.2.
Is it possible to r
Hi List.
I've downloaded an old LilyPond version (lilypond-2.10.33-1.linux-x386.sh)
to correct some details in an old .ly score that the 2.12 & 2.13.. versions
just won't stand for.
The .sh is sitting now in an isolated directory. Before executing it, I
want
to ensure that doing so won't over
Hi List.
I have a quite different problem involving Lilypond & Squeeze.
An .ly file that my lilypond version 2.13.32 processed successfully
under Lenny, it (same version) fails to process under Squeeze.
So-far there is just one message text...
error: syntax error, unexpected STRING
oh for heaven's sake -- my apologies to all, for taking your time!
pete
James Lowe wrote:
hello
\paper {
paper-width = 5.5\in
paper-height = 11\in
left-margin = 0\in
right-margin = 0\in
line-width = 4.0in
doesn't this need a slash?
4.0\in
James
_
Hi List.
If you were shopping for a fine non-feature-crazy laser or inkjet
printer to be used
*only* for private publishing of your LilyPond scores (that trusty old
dot-matrix will
handle everything else), is there a make-&-model you would especially
consider?
One constraint -- it must outp
ts on this topic.
Thanks again.
Regards,
Pete
Original Message
Subject: Favorite Lilypond-Score Printer?
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:45:02 -0400
From: PMA
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hi List.
If you were shopping for a fine non-feature-crazy laser or inkjet
printer to b
ou'll spend a LOT of time for this and
it will not be, sadly, of the same quality of a professional printer.
Well, I mean, don't hink that working with a pro will be so much money !
Best regards.
JMarc
Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit :
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Laura Conrad
wrote:
&
Dear List,
I have a single clef (treble) with key signature consisting
of one Natural (on 2nd-line G) and one Sharp (on above-
the-staff G), as follows:
\set Staff.keySignature = #`(((0 . 4) . ,NATURAL)
((1 . 4) . ,SHARP))
Unfortunately the PDF out
y that its signature is
specific, not just to pitch class, but to octave registration.
Thanks,
Pete
Original Message
Subject: For a Weird Key Signature
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:02:38 -0400
From: PMA
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Dear List,
I have a single clef (treble) with key
By gum, that solved it -- just right (even the value).
Thanks a bunch!
Original Message
Subject: Re: For a Weird Key Signature (Retry)
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 10:43:55 -0400
From: PMA
To: Trevor Daniels
Thanks for this. I'll give it a go (and post better).
Trevor Da
Hi List.
I have a 40-bar LilyPond piano score notated in
3-staff systems (to accomodate a leaping-over
left hand). Occasionally one staff in a system,
either the middle or upper, contains rests only.
I want to exclude such staves from the output,
and so have defined my \score block as follows,
harm6 wrote:
PMA-2 wrote:
Hi List.
Occasionally one staff in a system,
either the middle or upper, contains rests only.
I want to exclude such staves from the output,
and so have defined my \score block as follows,
following Notation& Snippets Ref. suggestions.
\score {
harm6 wrote:
Graham Percival-3 wrote:
umm, did you try reading the lines immediately above it?
%% Keep the old definitions in here for compatibility (they erase
%previous
%% settings to the corresponding context!).
%% For new scores, one should simply insert the \RemoveEmptyStaves
%settings
harm6 wrote:
Graham Percival-3 wrote:
umm, did you try reading the lines immediately above it?
%% Keep the old definitions in here for compatibility (they erase
%previous
%% settings to the corresponding context!).
%% For new scores, one should simply insert the \RemoveEmptyStaves
%settings
Ok, sniffing
Thanks
harm6 wrote:
PMA-2 wrote:
I've tried again with Xavier's "RemoveEmptyStaves" code,
and that in turn again with James's "Grand" substitutions.
No difference so-far at all. I reckon my best next step is
to download 2.14.2.
Each vers
harm6 wrote:
at least some of the suggestions should work!!
Make sure the lines to hide are really empty. Or, if you're using some other
context/voice (Lyrics , Dynamics etc.), try to comment these to locate the
problem. Some time ago I had a similiar one: a wrong rhythm in \new Dynamics
disturb
harm6 wrote:
at least some of the suggestions should work!!
Make sure the lines to hide are really empty. Or, if you're using some other
context/voice (Lyrics , Dynamics etc.), try to comment these to locate the
problem. Some time ago I had a similiar one: a wrong rhythm in \new Dynamics
disturb
After more docs-sniffing & experiments, I think my recent query
to Harm probably boils down to --
Given a (global) "short-indent" setting under \paper, is it possible
to "\once \override..." this value for individual score systems?
Regards,
Pete
___
harm6 wrote:
...
I'm not aware of any possibility to \once\override short-indent or to repeat
the SystemStartDelimiter in the middle of a line or something else, to do
what you intend.
But to force a brace, I created a workaround adding a brace to a barline,
with the possibility to stretch it o
PMA wrote:
...
I've always wished that publishers would format music (solo scores anyway)
according to its measure groupings -- i.e., lay it out like poetry, for the same
reason.
Well o'course they won't. But now with this generous setup of yours, I can.
I dream of making a Be
I'm confused. Please forgive a terribly naive question --
*If* my LilyPond output PDF were to match what Schott wants to see
(in other words, a correct Schott-targeted style-sheet would not have
changed it), then would Schott print my original PDF *as-is*?
Thanks,
Pete
Urs Liska wrote:
Dear F
Hi List.
This is a question about notational judgment.
I have a several-bar phrase in quick 5/8 time
(qtr. + dotted qtr., but quick enough to allow
only one felt beat per bar), and want to give
its first bar a tempo spec equivalent to
= 80
So, how shall I specify that value? I fi
#2 will probably be easiest to
interpret.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:48 PM, PMA wrote:
Hi List.
This is a question about notational judgment.
I have a several-bar phrase in quick 5/8 time
(qtr. + dotted qtr., but quick enough to allow
only one felt beat per bar), and want to give
its first
Hi List.
With many multi-bar rests, my 10-staff StaffGroup in compilation
dies of segmentation fault. With each multibar rest replaced by
however many R1's, it dies still.
So I've now replaced every R1 with "s2 r2" (which compiles fine),
hoping next to tell Lilypond to *print* that centered "r2
.0" }
\once \override Stem #'transparent = ##t
e'2
}
Thanks for listening.
Pete
PMA wrote:
Hi List.
With many multi-bar rests, my 10-staff StaffGroup in compilation
dies of segmentation fault. With each multibar rest replaced by
however many R1's, it dies still.
oh, and alto clef.
PMA wrote:
Here's my snake-oil function for the centered whole-rest.
In 4/4 & proportional notation, it's working like a charm!
REST = {
s2
\once \override NoteHead #'stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
\once \override NoteHead #'text = \markup
Xavier Scheuer wrote:
On 28 November 2011 15:56, PMA wrote:
Here's my snake-oil function for the centered whole-rest.
In 4/4& proportional notation, it's working like a charm!
REST = {
s2
\once \override NoteHead #'stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
\once \overr
Xavier Scheuer wrote:
...
REST = {
s2
\once \override NoteHead #'stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
\once \override NoteHead #'text = \markup { \musicglyph #"rests.0" }
\once \override Stem #'transparent = ##t
e'2
}
I still do not understand why you need to use such dirty hack!
If there is a
Francisco Vila wrote:
2011/11/29 PMA:
Xavier Scheuer wrote:
...
REST = {
s2
\once \override NoteHead #'stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
\once \override NoteHead #'text = \markup { \musicglyph #"rests.0" }
\once \override Stem #'transparent = ##t
e'2
}
I s
James wrote:
Hello,
On 29 November 2011 15:59, PMA wrote:
Francisco Vila wrote:
2011/11/29 PMA:
Xavier Scheuer wrote:
...
REST = {
s2
\once \override NoteHead #'stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
\once \override NoteHead #'text = \markup { \musicglyph #"rests.0" }
Carl Sorensen wrote:
...
Probably, in the learning manual, section 4.3.1 where it talks about
overriding
'stencil to #f and to 'point-stencil, we should also show an example of
setting it to text-interface::print, along with some discussion that any
grob can have its stencil set to text-interface
David Kastrup wrote:
Father Gordon Gilbert writes:
Hi all,
I have a number of pieces I entered quite a while ago (2.5.x, etc) in
absolute pitch -- being the easiest for me at the time.
But now I'd like to update them (2.15.x), and while convert-ly does a
good job of changing up the basic syn
David Kastrup wrote:
PMA writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
Father Gordon Gilbert writes:
Hi all,
I have a number of pieces I entered quite a while ago (2.5.x, etc) in
absolute pitch -- being the easiest for me at the time.
But now I'd like to update them (2.15.x), and while conve
Hi List.
I'm considering posting my scores on WIMA (now via ISMLP),
and would much appreciate comment from any of you who
have had experience in going that route.
Most especialy, I'm wondering what regrets you may have
faced after agreeing to the diluted copyright protections.
Thanks in advance
P.S. By "scores" I mean only PDFs (not also their .ly sources).
PMA wrote:
Hi List.
I'm considering posting my scores on WIMA (now via ISMLP),
and would much appreciate comment from any of you who
have had experience in going that route.
Most especialy, I'm wondering
P.S. Selling is not an issue.
PMA wrote:
Thanks for your response. But I see that we are way apart on this.
Adapting/customizing the result is exactly what I mean to prevent.
I want these products closed indeed. Naturally, unrealized scoring
improvements will remain on my head.
Francisco
Thanks for your response. But I see that we are way apart on this.
Adapting/customizing the result is exactly what I mean to prevent.
I want these products closed indeed. Naturally, unrealized scoring
improvements will remain on my head.
Francisco Vila wrote:
2012/1/16 PMA:
P.S. By "s
Oh -- all *my* compositions. Sorry, I should have thought to specify this.
Shane Brandes wrote:
Do you mean by your scores? your compositions or your typesetting of
other's compositions?
Shane
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:00 PM, PMA wrote:
P.S. Selling is not an issue.
PMA wrote:
T
Francisco Vila wrote:
2012/1/17 PMA:
Thanks for your response. But I see that we are way apart on this.
Adapting/customizing the result is exactly what I mean to prevent.
I want these products closed indeed. Naturally, unrealized scoring
improvements will remain on my head.
But nobody but
David Kastrup wrote:
PMA writes:
Oh -- all *my* compositions. Sorry, I should have thought to specify
this.
Well, you said you don't care about royalties. So apparently what you
do care about is artistic integrity. The question is how you can
achieve your goals while providing a ma
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 20:26 -0500, PMA wrote:
Hi List.
I'm considering posting my scores on WIMA (now via ISMLP),
and would much appreciate comment from any of you who
have had experience in going that route.
Make sure your midi, if any, has a copyright n
Thanks Hans. As I (don't really) understand, ISMLP requires
a contributor of copyrighted materials to agree to their being
licensed *as* public domain.
Obviously for a clear view, I've got more homework ahead
Hans Aberg wrote:
On 16 Jan 2012, at 02:26, PMA wrote:
I
Francisco Vila wrote:
2012/1/17 PMA:
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 20:26 -0500, PMA wrote:
Hi List.
I'm considering posting my scores on WIMA (now via ISMLP),
and would much appreciate comment from any of you who
have had experience in going that route.
Make
Xavier Scheuer wrote:
On 17 January 2012 21:02, PMA wrote:
Your last sentence here hits on *the* issue in my original post.
Why indeed would I...? But it seems that, to post on ISMLP/
WIMA, one *must* commit to public-domain-like status.
I wish that was true!!
As a Free Culture supporter
Jay Anderson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:54 PM, PMA wrote:
Thanks Hans. As I (don't really) understand, ISMLP requires
a contributor of copyrighted materials to agree to their being
licensed *as* public domain.
IMSLP allows submission of items in the public domain and items un
David, Hans, Chris --
These are the perspectives I need.
Thanks for your patience!
Pete
David Kastrup wrote:
PMA writes:
Jay Anderson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:54 PM, PMA wrote:
Thanks Hans. As I (don't really) understand, ISMLP requires
a contributor of copyrighted mate
PMA wrote:
David, Hans, Chris --
These are the perspectives I need.
Thanks for your patience!
Pete
...
David, Hans, Chris --
These are the perspectives I've needed.
Thanks for your patience!
Pete
Sorry, forgot to erase my top-post after copying it to the b
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
