On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 10:32 AM Kieren MacMillan <
kie...@kierenmacmillan.info> wrote:
> Hi Knute,
>
> > I've tried using that function, but I get a warning that the warning
> wasn't found. I put this in my input file:
> > #(ly:expect-warning "calculation-in-progress")
>
> Did you try
>
> #(ly:e
Hi again,
>>> > I've tried using that function, but I get a warning that the warning
>>> > wasn't found. I put this in my input file:
>>> > #(ly:expect-warning "calculation-in-progress")
>> Did you try
>> #(ly:expect-warning "cyclic dependency")
> Hey, that worked! Thanks a lot. How strange
Thank you, everyone!
I am somewhat familiar with Scribus, never used LaTex before though, so perhaps
I'll give that a try first, with something simple.
THanks!
dirck
From: lilypond-user-bounces+dnagy=uwlax@gnu.org
on behalf of Silvain Dupertuis
Sent: Mon
Thank you all, for your reactions. Great support!!
I checked the solutions you have send. Maybe readers in future want to know my
findings for their own use.
- All of them are functional, and useful. But not the same 😉
Mark send this one: https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=346 defineTransf
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024, Sebastian Menge wrote:
> I came up with the following (hardly minimal) example. Lily gives me many
> warnings, so I wonder if I could make it better - and easier.
Here's what I get by trying to clean up your code; your code in the first
score for comparison, followed by my ve
Hi Werner,
> This is a very nice trick, thanks! Please submit it to the LSR,
> since it is an easy solution for getting a tacet-al-fine rest
> (and completely cirvumventing the real issue :-)
I always try to solve the problem I have rather than the problem(s) I don’t
have. ;)
Submitted!
Best
> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Menge writes:
Sebastian> [1 ] Hi
Sebastian> I have a (organ) piece with different "voices"(?) stacking
Sebastian> up to chords.
Sebastian> Since this is rather homophonic, I'd not use individual
Sebastian> voices - the slurs look ugly then.
I think you need to .
Hi
I have a (organ) piece with different "voices"(?) stacking up to chords.
Since this is rather homophonic, I'd not use individual voices - the slurs
look ugly then.
I came up with the following (hardly minimal) example. Lily gives me many
warnings, so I wonder if I could make it better - and e
I have the feeling I miss / don't understand something conceptually. I
would like to understand why lily refuses to engrave the slur of the
first fis.
On the question of why the first tie does not appear: there is a note
(a2) in the voice between the first and second fis1 that interrupts the
Hi Knute,
> I've tried using that function, but I get a warning that the warning wasn't
> found. I put this in my input file:
> #(ly:expect-warning "calculation-in-progress")
Did you try
#(ly:expect-warning "cyclic dependency")
??
If that doesn’t help, you’ll have to escalate it above my pay
>> This is a very nice trick, thanks! Please submit it to the LSR,
>> since it is an easy solution for getting a tacet-al-fine rest
>> (and completely cirvumventing the real issue :-)
>
> I always try to solve the problem I have rather than the problem(s)
> I don’t have. ;)
:-)
> Submitted!
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 at 21:35, Nikolai Hedler wrote:
>
>
Hello,
Use the new syntax with the \alternative block outside of the \repeat volta
block.
Kind regards,
Xavier
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 at 21:48, Nikolai Hedler wrote:
>
> The current documentation states that \alternative outside is the older
syntax; I guess I'll keep doing it that way.
Ah, my bad, I remembered the other way around.
At least the old syntax gives the expected output.
Kind regards,
Xavier
The current documentation states that \alternative outside is the older
syntax; I guess I'll keep doing it that way.
- Nikolai
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 3:42 PM Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 at 21:35, Nikolai Hedler wrote:
> >
>
>>
> Hello,
>
> Use the new syntax with the \alternat
The following behaves as expected:
\repeat volta 2 {
c1
\alternative {
{ d1 }
{ e1 }
}
}
... and produces a repeat section with alternate ending brackets; however,
if an unfold is added thus:
\repeat volta 2 {
\repeat unfold 2 { c1 }
\alternative {
{ d
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 at 21:54, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
>
> Ah, my bad, I remembered the other way around.
> At least the old syntax gives the expected output.
Sorry for the multiple messages within a short period of time.
You can have the expected output and use the new syntax if you put the
\repeat
16 matches
Mail list logo
