Would it maybe make things a bit easier to leave the whole MacOS
business aside and take care of the Linux-specific stuff first? And
what actually about Windows - out of curiosity. I myself am a Linux
user (Mint), and so far Frescobaldi is still running flawlessly.
And - another question out of cu
It gets a bit more complicated now. See this bug:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278633
That bug is for freeBSD, but I expect it applies to other distros as well
(it certainly applies to gentoo, as I'm getting the exact same error). In
short, snappy (an archiver) was updated to
I cannot use Frescobaldi on Mac Sonoma (not working), so I went for Visual
Studio Code, with some lilypond plugins, and I have to say that it offers
everything I need
Robert
> El 28 abr. 2024, a les 13:57, Jean Abou Samra va
> escriure:
>
>> Is Frescobaldi the most common tool on Linux, or w
I use it on Sonoma without issues.
Med vänlig hälsning / Kind regards
Mats-Olof Liljegren
e-pro
Oskarsvägen 11B
702 14 Örebro
Tel 070 360 19 19
e-post m...@e-pro.se
web: http://e-pro.se
> 29 apr. 2024 kl. 11:40 skrev Robert Garrigos :
>
> I cannot use Frescobaldi on Mac Sonoma (not working), s
> Would it maybe make things a bit easier to leave the whole MacOS
> business aside and take care of the Linux-specific stuff first?
Linux is not really causing us any specific problems. Packaging is a lot
easier, thanks to Linux distributions and Flatpak.
The only wrinkle is the oddities on Wayl
OK, so maybe I should just move lilypond work into my LaTeX IDE for the
time being. Since my lilypond installation isn't on the system PATH, how do
I include it as part of a .tex document to get access to the lilypond-book
commands?
Cheers,
N. Andrew Walsh
er/ihn/ihm/sein | he/him/his
Berlin
On
> It gets a bit more complicated now. See this bug:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278633
>
> That bug is for freeBSD, but I expect it applies to other
> distros as well (it certainly applies to gentoo, as I'm
> getting the exact same error). In short, snappy (an archiver)
>
Hi Jean,
yeah, I just had the package-manager in gentoo downgrade to the previous
version of snappy, and then filed a bug with gentoo. It's a workaround for
now.
As another workaround, I'm trying to get my latex editor to use
lilypond-book, but since it's on a nonstandard path, I don't seem able
> yeah, I just had the package-manager in gentoo downgrade to the previous
> version of snappy, and then filed a bug with gentoo. It's a workaround for
> now.
>
> As another workaround, I'm trying to get my latex editor to use lilypond-book,
> but since it's on a nonstandard path, I don't seem ab
Hi Jean,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 1:17 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
> lilypond-book isn't called by LaTeX, it's a preprocessor that you first
> have
> to run on a .lytex file to get a .tex file, then you compile that .tex file
> with TeX.
>
> Consider lyLuaTeX, which is an alternative that runs in
Hi,
Does anyone know how to manually set the midi channel # for a staff to
something other than the default of channel 0/1? Without having to
create dummy staffs with just `s256` as the voice content preceding the
desired staff? The staff in question usually only has one voice, so I
modified
Le lundi 29 avril 2024 à 06:31 -0500, Jason Yip a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know how to manually set the midi channel # for a staff to
> something other than the default of channel 0/1? Without having to
> create dummy staffs with just `s256` as the voice content preceding the
> desired sta
On 2024-04-29 06:48, Jean Abou Samra - jean(a)abou-samra.fr wrote:
You can do \set Score.midiChannelMapping = #'voice as an alternative to that.
Also \new Voice { } should work (untested) instead of \new Voice { s256 }.
I don't think there's a better way.
Setting midiChannelMapping property did
Hi all,
> Fortunately for me, I'm using lualatex already, so that worked. I do indeed
> lose point-and-click, but it's good to know that if frescobaldi stops working
> I at least have a backup.
I’ve been considering moving fully to *lula*tex ever since Urs demonstrated his
lyluatexmp (https://
Hi Kieren,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 3:12 PM Kieren MacMillan <
kie...@kierenmacmillan.info> wrote:
>
> 1. Any thoughts about what the optimal package is?
>
I use TexStudio for all my TeX work, and it's excellent. Here:
https://texstudio.sourceforge.net
(shoutout to extremely old-skool sourceforg
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Le lundi 29 avril 2024 à 06:31 -0500, Jason Yip a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does anyone know how to manually set the midi channel # for a staff to
>> something other than the default of channel 0/1? Without having to
>> create dummy staffs with just `s256` as the voice con
Can a markup command introspect its direction ?
Is it possible to set in a markup command some conditionals (not paper
related) ?
\version "2.25.15"
#(define-markup-command (conditionalMrkp layout props)
()
(interpret-markup layout props #{
\markup {
%\if #DOWN
"↑"
Hi.
I'm currently using 2.24.2.
I'm not a guitarist, and most of the people I play with are by their
own admission rather amateur.
For most tunes that I transcribe the built-in
"predefined-guitar-fretboards.ly" and, on one occasion,
"predefined-guitar-ninth-fretboards.ly" get the job done. But o
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Kevin Cole wrote:
> "predefined-guitar-ninth-fretboards.ly" get the job done. But on a few
> occasions I've had to resort to studying some online tutorial and
> constructing the diagrams from scratch.
Not a complete solution, but my chord database at
https://files.northcoa
On 2024-04-29 7:50 am, Pierre-Luc Gauthier wrote:
Can a markup command introspect its direction ?
Is it possible to set in a markup command some conditionals (not paper
related) ?
\version "2.25.15"
#(define-markup-command (conditionalMrkp layout props)
()
(interpret-markup layout props
Yeah, it works if I just replace add-grob-definition with:
#(define (add-grob-definition grob-name grob-entry)
(set! all-grob-descriptions
(cons ((@@ (lily) completize-grob-entry)
(cons grob-name grob-entry))
all-grob-descriptions)))
That said, the snipp
> [...] the snippet is _very_ useful, and certainly much easier to use
> than the lsr snippet.
Please submit the example as a new LSR snippet.
Note that we already have a (slightly different) issue for that:
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/833
It would certainly help if you co
Hi all
Reading that last thread about Frescobaldi and its possible disappearance from
Mac is causing me to panic. Jean, I did not realize that you were the last
person to seriously work on Frescobaldi / Mac.
I use Mac exclusively, and Frescobaldi / Lilypond is very important to me.
FYI, what
With not too much work, you could get emacs to do all of that I think. But
my guess is that there's no reason to panic yet. I don't see frescobaldi
magically disappearing.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024, 10:45 PM Dirck Nagy wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Reading that last thread about Frescobaldi and its possible di
> With not too much work, you could get emacs to do all of that I
> think.
Well, it would be great if someone could convert the LilyPond mode of
Emacs so that it uses the new 'tree-sitter' interface:
https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/
(look at the 'Playground' link to get a feeling w
> FYI, what I like the most about Frescobaldi are:
>
> * Templates and wizards
> * Snippets
> * Point and Click selection
> * Syntax highlighting
>
> If Frescobaldi for Mac does indeed vanish, what are my alternatives for a
> Lilypond editor?
Syntax highlighting should be doable in Emacs, V
26 matches
Mail list logo
